共收录 19 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-23, an incorrect check in the JP2 will result in an heap buffer over-write of a single byte when specifying certain options. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-23.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
bit7z is a cross-platform C++ static library that allows the compression/extraction of archive files. Prior to version 4.0.12, a one-byte off-by-one error in SafeOutPathBuilder::restoreSymlink() allows an attacker to craft a .7z archive that, when extracted with bit7z on any non-Windows platform, creates a symlink escaping the intended output directory. Subsequent archive entries extracted through
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-47 and 7.1.2-22, an off by one in the meta encoder could result in an out of bounds read of a single byte in the meta encoder. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-47 and 7.1.2-22.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Music Player Daemon (MPD) before version 0.24.11 contains a stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the pcm_unpack_24be function in src/pcm/Pack.cxx that allows unauthenticated attackers to corrupt stack memory by triggering an off-by-one write in the PCM decoder plugin. Attackers can issue two MPD commands referencing a malicious HTTP audio source to cause the unpack loop to write 1366 entries int
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 contains an off-by-one heap-based buffer overflow in the dynamic_binary_buffer_t class (src/dynamic_binary_buffer.hpp). Five methods (append_dynamic_buffer, append_data_as_pointer, append_data_as_object_ptr, memcpy_from_ptr, memcpy_from_object_ptr) use an incorrect bounds check of the form 'if (offset + length > maximum_internal_storage_size + 1)' instead
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect fix that was applied in GHSA-5592-p365-24xh could result in a heap buffer over-write of a single byte.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An off-by-two error in lp_write() in papd in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 allows an adjacent network attacker to modify limited data or cause a minor service disruption via crafted print data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Rsync versions before 3.4.3 contain an off-by-one out-of-bounds stack write vulnerability in the establish_proxy_connection() function in socket.c that allows network attackers to corrupt stack memory by sending a malformed HTTP proxy response. Attackers can exploit this by positioning themselves between the client and proxy or controlling the proxy server to send a response line of 1023 or more b
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect check in the JP2 will result in an heap buffer over-write of a single byte when specifying certain options.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An of by one in the meta encoder could result in an out of bounds read of a single byte in the meta encoder.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Tor before 0.4.9.7 has an out-of-bounds read by one byte via a malformed BEGIN cell, aka TROVE-2026-007.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An off-by-one error (CWE-193) in the ConsumeUnit16Array and ConsumeUnit64Array functions in Velocidex Velociraptor before version 0.76.5 on Windows and Linux allows a local attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a process crash by providing a specially crafted .evtx file to the parse_evtx VQL plugin.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-7572 是一个存在于 Velocidex Velociraptor 中的 off-by-one 错误（CWE-193），影响 Windows 和 Linux 平台上的 0.76.5 之前版本。该漏洞位于 ConsumeUnit16Array 和 ConsumeUnit64Array 函数中，当 parse_evtx VQL 插件处理特制的 .evtx 文件时，会触发基于堆的缓冲区越界读取或写入，导致进程崩溃，造成拒绝服务（DoS）。攻击者利用此漏洞需要本地访问，并诱导用户或服务解析恶意 evtx 文件（用户交互）。CVSS 评分为 4.4（中危），攻击向量为本地，利用复杂度低，无需特权，但影响仅限可用性和完整性（低）。目前无证据表明已被在野利用或已加入 CISA KEV。受影响的 Velociraptor 版本需升级至 0.76.5 或更高。建议蓝队立即检查 Velociraptor 部署版本，对关键主机限制本地文件解析操作的访问，并监控异常进程崩溃。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许拥有本地访问权限的攻击者通过恶意 .evtx 文件导致 Velociraptor 进程崩溃，影响取证分析服务的可用性；尽管 CVSS 中等，但仅需用户交互即可触发，需优先打补丁。
Postfix before 3.8.16, 3.9 before 3.9.10, and 3.10 before 3.10.9 sometimes allows a buffer over-read and process crash via an enhanced status code that lacks text after the third number.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Postfix before 3.8.16, 3.9 before 3.9.10, and 3.10 before 3.10.9 sometimes allows a buffer over-read and process crash via an enhanced status code that lacks text after the third number.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
mutt before 2.3.2 sometimes truncates the hash_passwd by one byte for IMAP auth_cram MD5 digest.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Rules could be bypassed by changing the first character: `example.com` could be be bypassed by e.g. `fxample.com`. ### Details Off-by-one error in the suffixtrie implementation. ### Impact The domain filter could be bypassed. Please note that DNS filtering alone is not enough to block malicious traffic.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估