#cwe-326

共收录 21 条相关安全情报。

← 返回所有主题
CVE-2026-4648

Use of an insecure cryptographic algorithm in the cashless payment system using NFC wristbands from CasfID Servicios Tecnológicos S.L.U. (version used at Resurrection Fest 2025), which employs cards based on MIFARE Classic technology (FM11RF08S). The cryptographic weakness of the authentication algorithm allows an attacker to retrieve access keys using techniques known as Backdoored Nested Attack,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49852

joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. Prior to 1.6.8, joserfc.jwt.decode accepts attacker-forged HMAC-signed tokens when the caller-supplied verification key is the empty string or None, because HMACAlgorithm.sign and HMACAlgorithm.verify in src/joserfc/_rfc7518/jws_algs.py pass the output of OctKey.get_op_key(..

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. Prior to 1.6.8, joserfc.jwt.decode accepts attacker-forged HMAC-signed tokens when the caller-supplied verification key is the empty string or None, because HMACAlgorithm.sign and HMACAlgorithm.verify in src/joserfc/_rfc7518/jws_algs.py pass the output of OctKey.get_op_key(..

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2024-23564

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Business Logic Vulnerability using which a non valid user of the application can obtain passwords from the server and redirect them to their own email address by manipulating the server's response. The application includes checks in the initial requests to verify the validity of the provided UserId, but similar validation is not applied to Email requests when sen

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-35146

HCL DFXServer is affected by an Unencrypted Communication vulnerability. The application permits users to establish connections over unencrypted channels via the HTTP protocol, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and expose sensitive data transmitted between the user and the application.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45363

ruby-jwt is a Ruby implementation of the RFC 7519 OAuth JSON Web Token standard. Prior to 2.10.3 and 3.2.0, JWT.decode(token, '', true, algorithm: 'HS256') accepts an attacker-forged token because OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', '', payload) returns a valid digest under an empty key and no empty-key precondition exists in the HMAC algorithm. The same path is reached when a keyfinder block or key_fi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
INFO EPSS 0%
ADVISORY 2026-07-14

`jwt` (Ruby gem) - empty-key HMAC bypass

推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

ruby-jwt is a Ruby implementation of the RFC 7519 OAuth JSON Web Token standard. Prior to 2.10.3 and 3.2.0, JWT.decode(token, '', true, algorithm: 'HS256') accepts an attacker-forged token because OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', '', payload) returns a valid digest under an empty key and no empty-key precondition exists in the HMAC algorithm. The same path is reached when a keyfinder block or key_fi

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-63579

Unauthorized use of Kyocera printers, allows all information stored in the Kyocera address book to be exported. The security measure that encrypts incoming data ian be bypassed with this vulnerability, allowing encrypted data to be decrypted. Passwords and other sensitive information can be obtained. This affects Kyocera Command Center RX TASKalfa 2552ci, TASKalfa 3252ci, TASKalfa 2553ci, TASKalfa

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14868

The encryption algorithm used to protect the configuration of user accounts, stored in the built-in user directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0, is not strong enough for the level of protection required. A local attacker could alter the existing configuration and ultimately gain privileged access to the PcVue application.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7830

UltraVNC through 1.8.2.2 uses inadequate cryptography in the MS-Logon II authentication scheme (rfbUltraVNC_MsLogonIIAuth). In rfb/dh.cpp the Diffie-Hellman key exchange is performed with parameters that fit in an unsigned 64-bit integer (DH_MAX_BITS controls the prime size). A 64-bit DH key can be broken by Pollard's rho algorithm in under one second on current hardware. Additionally, the private

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

CWE-326 in BOSH allows a local attacker to steal Basic-auth credentials or redirect UAA token requests via MITM. HttpRequestHelper#create_async_endpoint and #send_http_get_request_synchronous hard-code OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE, enabling an attacker to intercept traffic between bosh-monitor and the BOSH director or UAA and steal credentials. Affected versions: - BOSH: all versions prior to v282.1

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41860

CVE-2026-41860 是 BOSH 组件中的安全漏洞,源于不安全的 TLS 证书验证。在 HttpRequestHelper 类的 create_async_endpoint 和 send_http_get_request_synchronous 方法中,硬编码了 OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE 选项,导致 bosh-monitor 与 BOSH director 或 UAA 之间的通信不进行证书校验。这使得具备本地网络访问权限的攻击者能够执行中间人攻击 (MITM),拦截并窃取 Basic-auth 凭据,或重定向 UAA 令牌请求。漏洞影响所有低于 v282.1.9 的 BOSH 版本,且已在 v282.1.9 及更高版本中修复。CVSS 评分为 8.8(高),攻击向量为本地(AV:L),攻击复杂度低,需要低权限,影响范围变更,对机密性、完整性和可用性均造成高影响。目前未发现该漏洞被在野利用,也未列入已知利用漏洞列表。建议用户立即升级至 BOSH v282.1.9 或更高版本;同时应限制 bosh-monitor 的网络暴露范围,并监控异常流量,以降低被利用风险。由于漏洞允许窃取凭据,可能进一步导致横向移动和权限提升,因此应优先修复。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许本地攻击者窃取 Basic-auth 凭据或劫持 UAA 令牌,直接威胁 BOSH 管理平台的安全性。由于 CVSS 高达 8.8 且无需特殊条件即可利用,需立即升级修复。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45787

electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. Prior to 3.9.5, deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks. This vulne

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
jwt

`JWT.decode(token, '', true, algorithm: 'HS256')` accepts an attacker-forged token. `OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', '', payload)` returns a valid digest under an empty key, and no `raise InvalidKeyError if key.empty?` precondition exists in the HMAC algorithm. ``` JWT.decode(token, "", true, algorithm: 'HS256') -> JWA::Hmac.verify(verification_key: "", ...) -> OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256',

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/slack-go/slack

```go func NewSecretsVerifier(header http.Header, secret string) (SecretsVerifier, error) { hash := hmac.New(sha256.New, []byte(secret)) // raw secret, no precondition } ```

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
electerm

### Impact _Insecure sync encryption: deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks._ ### Patches - https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44523

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to 0.19.4, no minimum length or entropy is enforced on the JWT_SECRET configuration value. The application accepts any base64-decodable secret regardless of size, including secrets as short as 1 byte. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.19.4.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (10.0) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44351

fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 6.2.4, a critical authentication-bypass vulnerability in fast-jwt's async key-resolver flow allows any unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWTs that are accepted as authentic. When the application's key resolver returns an empty string (''), for example via the common keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' JWKS-style fallback, fa

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-33361

In Meari IoT SDK image handling (libmrplayer.so) as observed in CloudEdge 5.5.0 (build 220), Arenti 1.8.1 (build 220), and related white-label apps (<= 1.8.x), baby monitor ".jpgx3" files use reversible XOR over only the first 1024 bytes with a predictable key derivation model.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

#### Summary No minimum length or entropy is enforced on the `JWT_SECRET` configuration value. The application accepts any base64-decodable secret regardless of size, including secrets as short as 1 byte. HS256 secrets below 32 bytes are brute-forceable offline, allowing attackers to recover the signing key and forge valid JWTs for arbitrary users. --- #### Impact An attacker who captures a s

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (10.0) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)