The AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.5 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reauth_for_authorize function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new administrator accounts with attacker-supplied credentials via a CSRF-ba

The AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.5 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reauth_for_authorize function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new administrator accounts with attacker-supplied credentials via a CSRF-ba

The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in multiple PHP Jabbers scripts. The lack of CSRF tokens or appropriate SameSite attributes allows an attacker to send unauthorized requests in the context of an authenticated user, leading to unauthorized administrative actions, such as creating new admin accounts. This issue was fixed in the versions specified in the affecte

Leantime 3.6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated users by excluding the Laravel VerifyCsrfToken middleware from the global middleware stack in app/Http/Kernel.php. Attackers can craft malicious pages delivered via phishing emails or malicious websites to trigger unauthorized POST, P

Leantime 3.6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated users by excluding the Laravel VerifyCsrfToken middleware from the global middleware stack in app/Http/Kernel.php. Attackers can craft malicious pages delivered via phishing emails or malicious websites to trigger unauthorized POST, P

IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Joomla Extension - balbooa.com - Various CSRF vectors in the admin interface in Gridbox < 2.20.2

Joomla Extension - rolandd.com - CSRF vectors in AJAX endpoint handlers RO CSVI < 9.11.0

The Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the (global scope, included by fvcr_admin_page_html) function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration, including API tokens, access tokens, econ

nebula-mesh is a self-hosted control plane for Slack Nebula mesh virtual private network. Prior to version 0.3.3, every /ui/* POST / PUT / PATCH / DELETE route processes the request as soon as the session cookie validates. SameSite=Lax on the session cookie prevents most cross-site form submits but does not protect: top-level form-submit navigations from third-party pages (some browsers still send

nebula-mesh is a self-hosted control plane for Slack Nebula mesh virtual private network. Prior to version 0.3.3, every /ui/* POST / PUT / PATCH / DELETE route processes the request as soon as the session cookie validates. SameSite=Lax on the session cookie prevents most cross-site form submits but does not protect: top-level form-submit navigations from third-party pages (some browsers still send

The Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete or forcibly resolve arbitrary GDPR data request records stored in the

### Impact It's possible to forge a request to delete a message. ### Patches The problem has been patched in version 2.0-rc-1 of Discussion Extension. ### Workarounds There's no easy workaround except upgrading. ### References https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/DISCUSSION-22 ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [Jira XWiki](https://

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Insert Headers and Footers Code – HT Script <= 1.1.8 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Google Review Slider <= 18.4 versions.

### Summary The Budibase AI chat-link handoff flow (`GET/POST /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff`) binds an **external chat identity** (Slack/Discord/MS Teams/Telegram) to a **Budibase user account**. The confirmation endpoint is on a **public route** (no CSRF middleware, no auth-group gate) and the only credential it checks is a `confirmationToken` that is **already rendered in plaintext i

The WPO365 | Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 43.2. This is due to the Ajax_Service::verify_ajax_request() helper gating its wp_verify_nonce() call behind the boolean option 'enable_nonce_check', which is absent from the default 'wpo365_options' array and therefore evaluates to false via get_global_boolean_var(); as a result,

Administrator routes and install/update/uninstall processing did not consistently enforce component-management and installation permissions. An unauthorized backend user or CSRF attack could install, update or remove extensions.

Administrator actions, editor popups and import/export requests lacked consistent token, item-permission and input-validation checks. Unauthorized backend users or CSRF attacks could expose, create or modify extension configuration and items.

Conditions administration did not consistently enforce tokens and component/mapped-item permissions.

Privileged Regular Labs AJAX endpoints did not consistently require valid CSRF tokens, matching component/item permissions and trusted server-generated form configuration. Authenticated lower-privileged users or CSRF attacks could invoke lookups or mutations outside their authorization.

Vulnerability in the Oracle Work in Process product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Work in Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the

Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker a

Vulnerability in the Oracle Contracts Integration product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Contracts Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker.

Vulnerability in the Oracle HRMS (Japanese) product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Oracle Payroll Japanese). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle HRMS (Japanese). Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Success

Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attac

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Program Management product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Primavera Integration). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Program Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other t

djangoSIGE through 1.10 (commit a6fe7e8) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to cancel sales or purchase orders on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting order-cancellation logic implemented inside HTTP GET method handlers in CancelarOrcamentoVendaView, CancelarPedidoVendaView, CancelarOrcamentoCompraView, and CancelarPedidoCompraView. Att

## Summary In the composable `astro/hono` pipeline, the `security.checkOrigin` protection is only installed by the `middleware()` primitive. The `actions()` and `pages()` primitives each dispatch to user code independently, so a pipeline that mounts either primitive before (or without) `middleware()` will bypass the origin check for those requests. ## Details `security.checkOrigin` (default: `t

### Impact The internal `/webpack-dev-server/open-editor` and `/webpack-dev-server/invalidate` endpoints perform state-changing actions on any `GET` request, without verifying that the request originated from the dev server's own page. Any website a developer visits while the dev server is running can trigger them cross-origin with no interaction beyond the visit. An attacker can open an arbitra

Network-AI, a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator, has a shipped, exported, documented feature called `ApprovalInbox` (`lib/approval-inbox.ts`). It is the network surface of the human-in-the-loop Approval Gate, which `ApprovalGate` uses to require explicit human approval for high-risk operations. The HTTP server it exposes has no authentication of any kind and sets `Access-Control-Allow-Or

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the `zone-include.php` script in Revive Adserver 6.0.7. Linking and unlinking banners or campaigns to zones could be triggered via crafted GET or POST requests without any verification of the CSRF token, allowing an attacker to perform these actions on behalf of an authenticated administrator.

dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, the application exposes server-side state changes through `GET` routes. Because browsers automatically send cookies on same-site top-level navigation and Rails does not app

Network-AI, a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator, has a shipped, exported, documented feature called `ApprovalInbox` (`lib/approval-inbox.ts`). It is the network surface of the human-in-the-loop Approval Gate, which `ApprovalGate` uses to require explicit human approval for high-risk operations. The HTTP server it exposes has no authentication of any kind and sets `Access-Control-Allow-Or

The MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8 does not perform a nonce check on its configuration-delete action (it verifies the manage_options capability but ignores the nonce), so an attacker can trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a crafted page that wipes the MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8's SMTP configuration and deactivates the MailerSend WordPress plugin before 1.0.8,

A weakness has been identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. Affected is an unknown function of the component OAuth Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not

A weakness has been identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. Affected is an unknown function of the component OAuth Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not

Symfony UX is a JavaScript ecosystem for Symfony. From 2.22.0 until 2.36.0 and 3.1.0, Symfony\UX\LiveComponent\EventListener\LiveComponentSubscriber::isLiveComponentRequest() gates #[LiveAction] invocations on Accept: application/vnd.live-component+html, but the Accept header is CORS-safelisted and cross-origin fetch() can set it without preflight, allowing forged cross-origin #[LiveAction] reques

The Joomla extension Events Booking prior version 5.8.0 had an frontend file upload endpoint that lacked CSRF protection.

Symfony UX is a JavaScript ecosystem for Symfony. From 2.22.0 until 2.36.0 and 3.1.0, Symfony\UX\LiveComponent\EventListener\LiveComponentSubscriber::isLiveComponentRequest() gates #[LiveAction] invocations on Accept: application/vnd.live-component+html, but the Accept header is CORS-safelisted and cross-origin fetch() can set it without preflight, allowing forged cross-origin #[LiveAction] reques

grav-plugin-login before 3.8.11 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the login.regenerate2FASecret frontend task, which regenerates and persists a new TOTP secret for the authenticated session user without any anti-CSRF nonce or Origin/Referer check. Because Grav core dispatches the task from the GET 'task:' URI parameter and the default session cookie is SameSite=Lax, an

grav-plugin-login before 3.8.11 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the login.regenerate2FASecret frontend task, which regenerates and persists a new TOTP secret for the authenticated session user without any anti-CSRF nonce or Origin/Referer check. Because Grav core dispatches the task from the GET 'task:' URI parameter and the default session cookie is SameSite=Lax, an

The Loco Translate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the execTemplate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server by supplying a php://filter stream wrapper URI as the 'template' parameter, which bypasses

The Appointment Booking Plugin WordPress plugin before 5.6.3 does not validate a CSRF nonce on several state-changing actions handled by its central request dispatcher, allowing attackers to perform privileged actions, such as overwriting the booking-form configuration or disconnecting the connected payment gateway, via Cross-Site Request Forgery against a logged-in administrator.

The Landing Page Builder – Coming Soon page, Maintenance Mode, Lead Page, WordPress Landing Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ulpb_admin_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, update, retitle, or change the post stat

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the xxl-job-admin web application v.3.0.0 that allows an attacker to perform unauthorized modifications to Glue IDE shell scripts. The affected endpoint lacks proper CSRF token validation and accepts arbitrary HTTP methods via a permissive request mapping

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.1, 10.2.5, 10.0.8, and 9.4.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.5.2605.0, 10.4.2604.7, 10.3.2512.16, 10.2.2510.18, and 10.1.2507.24, an attacker could trick a user that holds a role with the `list_deployment_server` capability into running arbitrary Search Processing Language (SPL) searches on their behalf as `splunk-system-user`, allowing for ac

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.1, 10.2.5, 10.0.8, and 9.4.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.5.2605.0, 10.4.2604.7, 10.3.2512.16, 10.2.2510.18, and 10.1.2507.24, an attacker could trick a user that holds a role with the `list_deployment_server` capability into running arbitrary Search Processing Language (SPL) searches on their behalf as `splunk-system-user`, allowing for ac

Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.36.0, Vaultwarden's SSO authorization flow did not bind the OAuth state parameter accepted by /connect/authorize to the initiating browser session, allowed attacker-controlled PKCE parameters, and left SsoAuth records intact after failed token exchange, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to induce IdP authentication and red

Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.36.0, Vaultwarden's SSO authorization flow did not bind the OAuth state parameter accepted by /connect/authorize to the initiating browser session, allowed attacker-controlled PKCE parameters, and left SsoAuth records intact after failed token exchange, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to induce IdP authentication and red

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in andreimarcu linux-server v.1.0 through v.2.3.8 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the uploadPutHandler function

Mojolicious versions from 4.59 before 9.48 for Perl expose a stable representation of the session CSRF token to a BREACH compression oracle. _csrf_token generates and caches one token per session and returns the same value on every call, and _csrf_field places that value in a hidden `csrf_token` input. When a response carrying the token also echoes attacker-controlled input and is gzip-compressed

### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains authenticated cross-site request forgery issues in its timesheet state-changing API endpoints. The application reuses the browser's existing session for `/api/*` requests, and both the `stop` and `restart` operations are exposed through `GET` and `PATCH` routes that directly modify business state. As a result, an attacker can trick a logged-in user into visiting

### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains authenticated cross-site request forgery issues in its default team creation shortcuts for projects, customers, and activities. These endpoints are exposed through `GET` routes and directly create or reuse a `Team`, add the current user as teamlead, and bind the target object to that team. As a result, an attacker can trick a logged-in user with the required per

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time collaborative markdown notes application. Prior to 1.11.0, the GitHub Gist export flow created an OAuth2  state  value but only checked that it was present rather than validating it against the value expected for the user's session. Because the state was not properly validated, an attacker could forge a callback URL containing their own valid GitHub OAuth code

Rejetto HFS 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 accepts state-changing API requests via the GET method and exempts GET requests from its anti-CSRF header check. A remote attacker can perform administrative actions including account creation and configuration changes leading to code execution - by causing a logged-in administrator's browser to navigate to a crafted URL, or without any credentials against default i

Rejetto HFS 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 accepts state-changing API requests via the GET method and exempts GET requests from its anti-CSRF header check. A remote attacker can perform administrative actions including account creation and configuration changes leading to code execution - by causing a logged-in administrator's browser to navigate to a crafted URL, or without any credentials against default i

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hamsalam ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام sync-basalam allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام: from n/a through <= 1.9.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in purethemes WorkScout-Core workscout-core allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects WorkScout-Core: from n/a through <= 1.7.08.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Ray Enterprise Translation allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Ray Enterprise Translation versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 to 4.1.4, from 11.0.0 to 11.0.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Salesforce Suite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Salesforce Suite versions: from 0.0.0 to 5.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Ray Enterprise Translation allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Ray Enterprise Translation versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.0.4, from 4.1.0 to 4.1.4, from 11.0.0 to 11.0.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Salesforce Suite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Salesforce Suite versions: from 0.0.0 to 5.1.3.

The iDirect iQ200 does not validate CSRF tokens on state-changing API endpoints after authentication. The /api/reboot endpoint accepts POST requests authenticated solely by a session cookie that lacks the SameSite attribute. A remote attacker can host a malicious web page that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, automatically submits a cross-site POST request causing an immediate devi

The GoodMeet – Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting & Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user's capability (manage

The Salon Booking System – Free Version plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 10.30.32. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the setCustomText function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP code into the web-accessible translate-constants.php file within the plugin directory,

Cotonti Siena 0.9.26 and earlier contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify administrator configuration by tricking a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged POST request to the admin.php config update handler, which never invokes the application's CSRF validation function. Attackers can disable the PFS module's file extension white

New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to 0.12.0-alpha.1, the email and WeChat account binding endpoints GET /api/oauth/email/bind and GET /api/oauth/wechat/bind used GET requests for state-changing account operations, allowing an attacker to trigger a logged-in user's browser to bind an attacker-controlled email address or OA

Cotonti Siena 0.9.26 and earlier contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify administrator configuration by tricking a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged POST request to the admin.php config update handler, which never invokes the application's CSRF validation function. Attackers can disable the PFS module's file extension white

## Details ### Sink `tools/bazar/services/CSVManager.php` line 372-399: ``` public function importEntry(array $importedEntries, string $formId): ?array { if (!$this->importdone) { // ... foreach ($importedEntries as $entry) { $entry = unserialize(base64_decode($entry)); // false]` argument; arbitrary classes are instantiated. The subsequent `array_map('strval'

Mockoon provides way to design and run mock APIs. Prior to 9.7.0, Mockoon's admin API in commons-server/src/libs/server/admin-api.ts is mounted on the same Express listener as user-defined mock routes, enabled by default in shipped runtimes, serves Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * with write methods allowed, and has no authentication. Any unauthenticated caller who can reach the mock server port can

Mockoon provides way to design and run mock APIs. Prior to 9.7.0, Mockoon's admin API in commons-server/src/libs/server/admin-api.ts is mounted on the same Express listener as user-defined mock routes, enabled by default in shipped runtimes, serves Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * with write methods allowed, and has no authentication. Any unauthenticated caller who can reach the mock server port can

The Divi Torque Lite – Divi Theme, Divi Builder & Extra Theme plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.3. This is due to the use of '__return_true' as the permission_callback for the /install_plugin and /activate_plugin REST API endpoints, which bypasses WordPress's built-in REST API nonce verification. Although the endpoint callbac

Malicious use of a stolen cookie might allow modifications to the contents of the IP phone’s webpage.

Malicious use of a stolen cookie might allow modifications to the contents of the IP phone’s webpage.

### Summary Serena's built-in web dashboard exposes an unauthenticated Flask API on a fixed, predictable port (TCP 24282, hardcoded as `0x5EDA` in `constants.py`). The server has no authentication, no CSRF protection, and no Host header validation. A DNS rebinding attack allows a malicious webpage to reach this API from any browser and write arbitrary content to the agent's persistent memory stor

## Summary Waku's RSC request dispatcher invokes server actions without validating the request's `Origin` (or `Sec-Fetch-Site`) header. A cross-origin web attacker can therefore cause a victim browser to issue an authenticated `POST` to a registered server action endpoint using a CORS-safelisted content type (`text/plain`), which does not trigger a preflight. Any state-mutating server action that

# Unauthenticated Cross-Origin Plugin Upload Leads to RCE (Joro ≤ v1.1.0) **Severity:** Critical **CVSS v3.1:** 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) **Affected versions:** Joro ≤ v1.1.0, proxy mode (default), Linux/macOS **Reporter:** cstover **Date:** 2026-05-27 --- ## Summary Joro's default proxy mode (in versions <= 1.1.0) exposes a local API on `127.0.0.1:9090` that performs no authen

A vulnerability has been found in flask-dashboard Flask-MonitoringDashboard up to 5.0.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

A vulnerability has been found in flask-dashboard Flask-MonitoringDashboard up to 5.0.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

The Smash Balloon Social Photo Feed – Easy Social Feeds Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.11.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the maybe_connection_data function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the site's Instagram and Facebook oEmbed access tokens via a forged

The Wp Js Detect plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's notification text and CSS settings (wp_non_js_notification_text and wp_non_js_notification_css), injecting arbi

### Summary In add-on mode, the ha-mcp settings UI routes are mounted both under the MCP secret path **and** at the bare root of the published port (`:9583`), so Home Assistant ingress can serve the "Open Web UI" button. The root-mounted routes perform no authentication — no secret, no `Origin` check, no CSRF token — so any client that can reach `:9583` without the MCP secret can invoke them. ##

Serena is a powerful MCP toolkit for coding that provides semantic retrieval and editing capabilities. Prior to v1.5.2, Serena's built-in web dashboard exposes an unauthenticated Flask API on a fixed, predictable port, with no authentication, no CSRF protection, and no Host header validation. A DNS rebinding attack allows a malicious webpage to reach this API from any browser and write arbitrary c

Serena is a powerful MCP toolkit for coding that provides semantic retrieval and editing capabilities. Prior to v1.5.2, Serena's built-in web dashboard exposes an unauthenticated Flask API on a fixed, predictable port, with no authentication, no CSRF protection, and no Host header validation. A DNS rebinding attack allows a malicious webpage to reach this API from any browser and write arbitrary c

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in SEIKO EPSON Web Config. If a user views a malicious page while logged into Web Config, unintended operations may be performed.

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, the GET /invitations/{uuid} endpoint can perform a state-changing password reset using an attacker-known invitation UUID, allowing an attacker who can cause a victim to visit the crafted invitation URL to reset the victim account password to a predictable value. This issue i

Leantime contains an OIDC login CSRF vulnerability in the verifyState() method that unconditionally returns true without validating state parameters. Attackers can craft malicious callback URLs with attacker-controlled authorization codes to perform session fixation, logging victims in as the attacker.

Leantime contains an OIDC login CSRF vulnerability in the verifyState() method that unconditionally returns true without validating state parameters. Attackers can craft malicious callback URLs with attacker-controlled authorization codes to perform session fixation, logging victims in as the attacker.

A weakness has been identified in imhamzaazam ecommerceFlask up to cb7d9e24c30a99379651b7493b32048126ef402b. The affected element is an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. A

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in properfraction CrawlWP SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CrawlWP SEO: from n/a through 3.0.16.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in properfraction CrawlWP SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CrawlWP SEO: from n/a through 3.0.16.

Plack::Middleware::OAuth versions through 0.10 for Perl do not support the OAuth 2.0 state parameter. RequestTokenV2 builds the provider authorization redirect without issuing a state value, and AccessTokenV2 exchanges the callback code and registers the resulting token into the session (register_session) without verifying that the callback corresponds to an authorization request this session ini

Dancer2::Plugin::Auth::OAuth::Provider versions before 0.23 for Perl do not support the OAuth 2.0 state parameter. The authentication_url method builds the provider authorization redirect without issuing a state value, and the callback method exchanges the callback code and registers the resulting token into the session without verifying that the callback corresponds to an authorization request t

Dancer2::Plugin::Auth::OAuth::Provider versions before 0.23 for Perl do not support the OAuth 2.0 state parameter. The authentication_url method builds the provider authorization redirect without issuing a state value, and the callback method exchanges the callback code and registers the resulting token into the session without verifying that the callback corresponds to an authorization request t

Plack::Middleware::OAuth versions through 0.10 for Perl do not support the OAuth 2.0 state parameter. RequestTokenV2 builds the provider authorization redirect without issuing a state value, and AccessTokenV2 exchanges the callback code and registers the resulting token into the session (register_session) without verifying that the callback corresponds to an authorization request this session ini

webpack-dev-server versions 5.2.5 and earlier expose two internal developer endpoints, /webpack-dev-server/open-editor and /webpack-dev-server/invalidate, that perform state-changing actions on any GET request without verifying that the request originated from the dev server's own page. Any website a developer visits while the dev server is running can trigger these endpoints cross-origin with no

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikBooking Hotel Booking Engine & PMS allows Path Traversal. This issue affects VikBooking Hotel Booking Engine & PMS: from n/a through 1.8.12.

The RegistrationMagic – User Registration Forms Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.9.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_request function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate the privileges of an arbitrary form submitter to administrator by creating a malic

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - RedirectManager Extension allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Mediawiki - RedirectManager Extension: from * before 1.3.3.

The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.15.3 This is due to missing nonce validation on the give_set_notification_status_handler() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable donation email notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action suc

Inappropriate implementation in SVG in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in PerformanceAPIs in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in ScriptInjections in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfer in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in NFC in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

KTM System e-BOK is vulnerable to Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in both the email-change and password-change functionalities. An attacker can craft a malicious website that, when visited by an authenticated user, automatically sends a forged POST request to the application. This allows the attacker to trigger an unauthorized email or password change on behalf of the victim without their knowle

The Plugin for Google Analytics by IO technologies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Google Analytics settings page (ga.php). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's stored Google Analytics tracking ID option (io-ga-id) via a forged r

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Squidex.io Squidex CMS v.7.21.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the IdentityServer account profile endpoint

The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in Safari 26.5.2, iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2, macOS Tahoe 26.5.2. A malicious website may exfiltrate data cross-origin.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Squidex.io Squidex CMS v.7.21.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the IdentityServer account profile endpoint

A vulnerability was found in CodeAstro Human Resource Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

The HD Quiz plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 2.2.0 to 2.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the hdq_validate_nonce function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete or modify quizzes and questions, create new quizzes, and change plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrato

HD Quiz 是 WordPress 的一个插件，用于创建和管理测验。在版本 2.2.0 到 2.2.1 中，该插件存在跨站请求伪造（CSRF）漏洞。漏洞根源在于 hdq_validate_nonce 函数缺少或错误地实现了 nonce 验证。未认证的攻击者可以通过诱使站点管理员点击恶意链接，伪造请求执行未经授权的操作，包括删除或修改测验和问题、创建新测验以及更改插件设置。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 4.3（中等），攻击向量为网络，攻击复杂度低，无需特权，但需要用户交互。虽然目前没有证据表明该漏洞已在野外被利用，也未列入已知被利用漏洞目录（KEV），但考虑到其可能导致的数据完整性问题，建议受影响用户尽快采取行动。修复方案是升级到已修复的版本（如 2.2.2 或更高版本，如果存在），或应用厂商提供的补丁。

Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.39.0, `GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff` is a public endpoint (no auth required) that performs a permanent, state-changing operation: it binds an external chat identity (Slack/Discord/MS Teams) to an authenticated Budibase user account, with no consent UI and no CSRF protection. The session token in the URL is created by the atta

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, there is a CSRF on TARGET through /users/:id via POST parameter "user[admin]". This vulnerability is fixed in 17.3.3 and 17.4.1.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Paid Memberships Pro - Add Member From Admin <= 0.7.2 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Gmail SMTP <= 1.2.3.19 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Child Theme Wizard <= 1.4 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Real Estate 7 <= 3.5.9 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce <= 6.8.0 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FunnelKit Payment Gateway for Stripe WooCommerce <= 1.14.0.3 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Eagle Booking <= 1.3.4.3 versions.

Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, organization team member management can be performed via GET requests without CSRF protection. If a victim who is an organization owner is logged in and is tricked into visiting a crafted link, an attacker-controlled user can be added to the Owners team. As a result, the attacker gains organization owner–equivalent privileges. This v

A critical vulnerability in Admin GUI in Payara Server Full 4.x, 5.x, 6.x, 7.x, 7.2026.x, 6.2025.x, 6.2024.x on All platforms that allows the attacker to leak the admin gfresttoken to an attacker-controlled host that can result in a full unauthenticated takeover of Payara admin domain. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the DownloadServlet of the Admin GUI in Payara Server allo

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Zowe zDevOps Plugin 1.1.3.50.ve350c9b_450b_1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Assembla Plugin 1.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username and password.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins EC2 Fleet Plugin 4.2.3.539.v8fedff2a_81c3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing AWS credentials stored in Jenkins.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Gitee Plugin 1288.v18b_deb_c9069b_ and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Priority Sorter Plugin 936.v2c01c6b_84449 and earlier allows attackers to overwrite the global job priority configuration.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 4331.v9d06ed4658ff and earlier allows attackers to instantiate types related to job or system configuration other than Pipeline steps through the Pipeline Snippet Generator.

The MotorDesk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the motordesk_admin_home function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings, including the search page URI and custom template directory path via a forged request

The Book a Room Event Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_form()/update_settings() functionality. The plugin's options page handler dispatches on the 'action' POST parameter and calls update_settings(), which persists plugin configuration (including

The Osiris Signature Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action

The MP Customize Login Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in all versions up to and including 1.0. This is due to a completely broken nonce validation in the enter_mpclp_login_options() function, which contains an inverted check (if wp_verify_nonce(...) { return false; }) and is missing the required action parameter for wp_verify_nonce(). As a result, the

The Bulk SEO Image plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's settings page handler BulkSeoImage(), which dispatches to launchbulk() / BulkSeoImageGo() whenever the request contains $_POST['bulkseoimage']. No wp_nonce_field() is emitted in the form and no check_admin_refe

The Blue Captcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the main admin panel (blcap_main_page) and on the Hall of Shame and Log subpages, which accept a 'blcap_action' / 'action' parameter from $_REQUEST and perform destructive operations (plugin uninstall via blcap_uninstall(),

## Summary In **Gogs 0.14.1**, organization team member management can be performed via **GET requests without CSRF protection**. If a victim who is an **organization owner** is logged in and is tricked into visiting a crafted link, an attacker-controlled user can be added to the **Owners** team. As a result, the attacker gains **organization owner–equivalent privileges**. --- ## Description W

## Title **Chat Identity Link Hijacking — Attacker Can Silently Map Their Slack/Discord Identity to Any Authenticated Budibase User's Account** ## Severity **High** — CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = **7.3** ## Affected Product - **Product:** Budibase - **Version:** 3.37.2 (introduced in this version) - **Component:** `packages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts

React Router is a router for React. From 7.12.0 until 7.15.1, certain CSRF checks in React Router v7 Framework Mode were insufficient and run on POST requests, but were bypassed on PUT/PATCH/DELETE requests. This is a low severity vulnerability because modern browser protections (CORS preflight, SameSite cookies) already block the cross-origin attack vectors that this missing CSRF check would othe

## Impact Uni-CLI versions before 0.225.2 exposed the legacy JSON-RPC-over-HTTP MCP transport on loopback without validating browser Origin headers before routing requests. A malicious web page could send a CORS simple POST request, such as text/plain, to the local /mcp endpoint and deliver a JSON-RPC body to the dispatcher. If the user had started the local MCP HTTP transport, that page could dr

## Summary `network-ai`'s `ApprovalInbox` (`lib/approval-inbox.ts`) is a shipped, exported, documented feature — *"a web-accessible approval queue with REST API … and SSE streaming"* (SECURITY.md). It is the network surface of the **human-in-the-loop Approval Gate**, which `ApprovalGate` uses to require explicit human approval for *"high-risk operations (writes, shell commands, budget spend)"* (S

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the cas-auth plugin under default configurations. This defect allows a remote attacker that manages to send a victim to a webpage controlled by them can cause the victim's browser to become authenticated as a different identity. Actions the victim takes upstream are then attributed to attackers identity. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from

The User Admin Simplifier plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the useradminsimplifier_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset and permanently delete any user's stored menu and admin-bar configuration via a forged request that

该漏洞存在于WordPress的User Admin Simplifier插件中，影响所有版本至3.0.0（含）。由于对useradminsimplifier_options_page函数缺少或错误的nonce验证，导致跨站请求伪造（CSRF）。未认证的攻击者可以通过伪造请求，诱使站点管理员执行操作（如点击链接），从而触发uas_save_admin_options()函数，重置并永久删除任意用户的菜单和后台工具栏配置，并覆盖useradminsimplifier_options数据库条目。攻击者无需认证即可发起攻击，但需要管理员交互。CVSS评分为4.3（中等），攻击复杂度低，但要求用户交互，且仅影响完整性（低），不影响机密性和可用性。建议用户升级到插件的最新版本（如果已发布修复版本），或限制未认证请求的访问，并教育管理员谨慎点击不明链接。

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal WP EasyPay allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP EasyPay: from n/a through 4.4.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal WP EasyPay allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP EasyPay: from n/a through 4.4.0.

uBB.threads is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to a lack of protective mechanisms. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user into executing unintended actions. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 7.7.5 but may also affect other versions.

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the Personal File Storage (PFS) module. In modules/pfs/inc/pfs.editfolder.php, the folder update action ('a=update') updates folder metadata (title, description, public/gallery flags) without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated user into vis

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the Personal File Storage (PFS) module. In modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main.php, the file upload action ('a=upload') processes uploaded files without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token, even though sibling actions such as 'delete' (line 272) do. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated use

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the administration rights handler. In system/admin/admin.rights.php, the rights update action ('a=update') modifies group access rights (including via cot_auth_add_group) without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated administrator into visitin

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the administration configuration handler. In system/admin/admin.config.php, the configuration update action ('a=update') processes POST data via cot_config_update_options() without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token (the 'x' parameter), unlike other admin handlers (e.g. admin.structure

The Optimole – Optimize Images | Convert WebP & AVIF | CDN & Lazy Load | Image Optimization plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the replace_file function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite existing media attachments with attacker-supplied

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Migrate Lite <= 2.7.8 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Migrate Lite <= 2.7.8 versions.

MultiJuicer is used to run separate Juice Shop instances on a central kubernetes cluster without the need for local instances. In versions 8.0.0 through 10.0.0, the team join endpoint (POST /multi-juicer/api/teams/{team}/join) accepted requests with any Content-Type, including text/plain. Because that content type does not trigger a CORS preflight, an attacker could host a cross-site HTML form tha

WordPress More Fields Plugin 2.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by disabling CSRF token validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that trick logged-in administrators into adding or deleting custom fields and boxes on the Write/Edit page via POST and GET requests to the options-general.php endpoint.

WordPress Lazy Content Slider Plugin 3.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting POST requests to the plugin settings page via lzcs_admin.php to modify plugin configuration parameters like lzcs_color and lzcs_count.

WordPress CP Polls 1.0.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious HTML pages that execute unwanted poll operations when administrators visit the page while logged in.

Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 1.0.0 to before version 2.0.14, cross-site GET request can trigger stored cron commands on a victim's agents. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.14.

MISP contains an insecure default configuration in which the Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header control is disabled. When this setting is disabled, state-changing requests such as POST, PUT, or AJAX requests are not restricted based on the browser-provided Sec-Fetch-Site header. A remote unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious web page that causes an authenticated MISP user’s browser to

MISP contains an insecure default configuration in which the Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header control is disabled. When this setting is disabled, state-changing requests such as POST, PUT, or AJAX requests are not restricted based on the browser-provided Sec-Fetch-Site header. A remote unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious web page that causes an authenticated MISP user’s browser to

Improper state verification in the OAuth implementation could allow an attacker to manipulate the authentication flow and cause a victim’s account to be linked to an attacker-controlled account. This can result in unauthorized account linking and potential account takeover.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in weDevs WooCommerce Conversion Tracking allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WooCommerce Conversion Tracking: from n/a through 2.0.10.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in YITH YITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects YITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel: from n/a through 1.16.0.

Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magepeople inc. WpEvently allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through 4.1.2.

Yoast Duplicate Post through 4.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post_dismiss_notice handler, which verifies no nonce or capability. Attackers can trick any authenticated user into sending a request that sets the duplicate_post_show_notice site option, suppressing admin notices network-wide.

Easy Twitter Feeds before 1.2.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post action handler that lacks nonce verification. Attackers can trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link that duplicates any post regardless of post type.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notification Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Notification Center 1.10.0.3291 and later

该漏洞是一个影响 Notification Center 的跨站请求伪造（CSRF）漏洞。远程攻击者可以通过诱使用户点击恶意链接或访问恶意页面，在用户不知情的情况下以用户身份执行未经授权的操作，例如更改通知设置、发送伪造请求等。具体而言，Notification Center 未对关键操作实施有效的 CSRF 令牌验证或同源策略检查，导致攻击者可以构造恶意请求并利用用户当前会话进行权限提升或身份劫持。官方已在版本 1.10.0.3291 及之后修复了此漏洞。建议用户立即升级到该版本或更高版本。由于 CSRF 攻击通常需要用户交互（如点击链接），且利用条件较高，但一旦成功可能造成用户数据泄露或账户被控制。目前没有迹象表明该漏洞已被在野利用或公开武器化（KEV 及在野利用标记均为 False）。

SemCms 5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via crafted POST request to /admin/semcms_user.php.

The WP Meta Sort Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the top-level included script in msp-options.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's msp_loop_file and msp_nav_location settings via a forged request via a forged request g

The WP Emoticon Rating plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action suc

The WpMobi plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handleSaveGeneralSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's General Settings and inject arbitrary web scripts into the administrator's browser via the unescaped app_na

The WP-Ultimate-Map plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the process_init() function hooked to admin_init, which saves plugin settings (zoom-level, focus-lat, focus-lng, sel_places, sel_routes) via update_option() based solely on the presence of a save-setting POST parameter. Additionally,

The FastPicker, an order picker and order management system (oms) for WooCommerce on steroids plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settingsPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including toggling the webh

The AJAX Report Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rc_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including link text and markup, success/failure/already-reported messages, comment threshold, cookie

The jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the jqFootnotes_options_subpanel function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings with arbitrary values that, because option values such as jqfoot_anchor_open, jqf

Every `/ui/*` POST / PUT / PATCH / DELETE route processes the request as soon as the session cookie validates. `SameSite=Lax` on the session cookie prevents most cross-site form submits but does not protect: - top-level form-submit navigations from third-party pages (some browsers still send Lax cookies on top-level POSTs) - same-registrable-domain attackers (sibling-subdomain XSS, subdomain take

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Akınsoft QR Menü allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects QR Menü: from s1.05.06 before v1.05.12.

The Frontend User Notes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the funp_ajax_modify_notes function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in user into visiting a malicious page, causing unauthorized overwriting of that victim's own note con

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the change_status function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the status of arbitrary invoices — including marking unpaid invoices as pai

该漏洞存在于WordPress的LatePoint日历预订插件（Appointments and Events）中，影响所有版本直至5.6.0（含）。问题源于change_status函数缺少或未正确实现nonce验证，导致跨站请求伪造（CSRF）攻击。未认证的攻击者可通过诱骗站点管理员点击恶意链接或访问恶意页面，伪造请求任意更改发票状态，包括将未付款发票标记为已付款。此漏洞允许攻击者绕过授权，干扰正常的支付流程。CVSS评分为4.3（中等），攻击向量为网络，无需认证，但需要用户交互（管理员点击链接）。影响仅涉及完整性（低），不涉及机密性和可用性。建议管理员立即将插件升级到最新版本（5.6.0之后），以修复nonce验证缺失的问题。由于是WordPress插件，攻击面较广，但利用条件需要管理员交互，紧急程度中等。无需限制网络暴露，但应谨慎处理未知链接。

The Frontend User Notes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the funp_ajax_modify_notes function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in user into visiting a malicious page, causing unauthorized overwriting of that victim's own note con

Inappropriate implementation in UI in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Network in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Media in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Inappropriate implementation in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

The EmergencyWP – Dead Man's switch & legacy deliverance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the form_settings_ui (settings save handler, procedural include scope) function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including the min

CVE-2026-9732 影响 WordPress 插件 EmergencyWP – Dead Man's switch & legacy deliverance（版本 ≤1.4.2），是一个跨站请求伪造（CSRF）漏洞。漏洞源于函数 form_settings_ui 中缺少或错误的 nonce 验证，导致未认证的攻击者可以伪造请求，诱使站点管理员执行点击链接等操作，从而修改插件设置。攻击者可改变最低访问角色（通过 add_cap/remove_cap 修改 WordPress 角色权限）、启用或禁用卸载时删除数据标志、调整生命周期检查时间、强制电子邮件地址、确认页面 ID 以及日期/时间格式。由于 CSRF 需要管理员交互，CVSS 评分为 4.3（中等），攻击复杂度低，无需认证，但影响仅限于完整性，不波及机密性或可用性。目前该漏洞未被列入 KEV，也无在野利用报告。建议受影响用户立即更新至最新版本（或 1.4.2 以上），或在不使用该插件时将其删除，并教育管理员警惕可疑链接。

OpenClaude is an open-source coding-agent command line interface for cloud and local model providers. Prior to version 0.5.1, the OpenClaude MCP authentication flow starts a temporary local HTTP server to handle OAuth callbacks. To prevent CSRF attacks, the server validates a state parameter against an internally stored value. However, due to a logic flaw in the order of conditionals, an attacker

NamelessMC is website software for Minecraft servers. In versions 2.2.4 and prior, the OAuth callback handling does not validate the state parameter server-side before exchanging the authorization code. This allows an attacker to capture a valid OAuth callback URL for their own account and cause a victim's browser to navigate to it, resulting in the victim's session being authenticated as the atta

The Remove NoFollow Commenter URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gmz_comment_settings_save function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's comment-display setting via a forged request via a forged request granted they can tri

The Google Plus One Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the googlePlusOneAdmin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the plusone-lang, plusone-callback, and plusone-url options stored in the data

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, tag blacklist, relevance threshold, batch size, and tagging toggles, via a

The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_init function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the tectite_forms_button option, via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick

The Remove meta boxes per user role plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'remove-meta-boxes-per-user-role' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify or reset the plugin's per-role meta box visibility settings via a forged request granted the

The BirdSeed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the birdseed_plugin_settings_page() function. The function processes the 'birdseed_token' GET parameter and saves it to the database via update_option() without verifying a nonce. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers t

ZeusCart 4.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of victims by crafting malicious requests. Attackers can deactivate customer accounts via the admin interface by tricking users into visiting attacker-controlled pages that submit requests to the regstatus endpoint with action=deny parameters.

The DeepAI endpoint 'https://api.deepai.org/change_user_email' accepts POST requests without any CSRF protection. If an attacker can trick a logged-in user into clicking a malicious link, the attacker can change the user's email address and take over their account. Fixed on 2026-05-20.

SOPlanning is vulnerable to Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in groupe_save create, modify and delete endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious website that, when visited by an authenticated user, automatically sends a forged GET or POST request to the application. This issue affects SOPlanning version 1.55 and below.

## Summary The sensitive `mode=export` action in `modules/sso/keys.php` exports a PKCS#12 bundle containing the configured private key and certificate, but the CSRF validation line is commented out. A forged cross-site POST from an administrator session can therefore trigger private key export without a valid form token. ## Vulnerable Code Links - https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/blob/v5.0.9/

## Summary `modules/sso/clients.php` validates an `adm_csrf_token` on every state-changing branch except `enable`. The `enable` case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls `$client->enable($enabled)`, and persists the new state with no token check. Because the action is reachable via plain GET parameters, a third-party page can trick an authenticated administrator into disabling (or silentl

## Summary `modules/registration.php` mode `send_login` regenerates a random password for `user_uuid_assigned`, stores its bcrypt hash in `adm_users.usr_password`, and emails the cleartext to that user. Every other state-changing mode in the same file (`assign_member`, `assign_user`, `delete_user`, `create_user`) calls `SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token'])` first; the `send_

PHP-SHOP 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to add administrative users by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting a page containing a hidden form that automatically submits POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like name, email, password, and permissions set to admin

HaPe PKH 1.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrator passwords by submitting forged requests to the user update endpoint. Attackers can craft malicious forms targeting the aksi_user.php script with parameters like id_user, password, and level to modify admin credentials without authentication.

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In 29.0 and earlier, there is a cross-site request forgery vulnerability on the 2FA toggle. plugin/LoginControl/set.json.php accepts POST type=set2FA value=false, calls LoginControl::setUser2FA(User::getId(), false) on the session-authenticated user, and returns. There is no forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest() call, no isTokenValid() check, no X-CSRF-Token/Sa

The Media Library Assistant plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.35 This is due to missing nonce verification on the bulk action handlers in the settings tab handlers. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick an administrator into performing bulk delete, edit, or purge operations on plugin settings and attachment

Vulnerability in Oracle REST Data Services (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 24.2.0-26.1.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle REST Data Services. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle REST Data Services,

Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.35.4, the buildMatcherRegex() / matches() functions in packages/backend-core/src/middleware/matchers.ts route patterns are compiled into unanchored regular expressions and tested against ctx.request.url, which includes the full query string. The CSRF middleware in the Budibase Worker uses this matching system to decide whether to skip CSRF t

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Multijob Plugin 662.vd2e0001f6b_b_d and earlier allows attackers to resume failed Multijob builds.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitHub Integration Plugin 0.7.3 and earlier allows attackers to attackers to trigger a build for a pull request.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Multijob Plugin 662.vd2e0001f6b_b_d and earlier allows attackers to resume failed Multijob builds.