#cwe-639

共收录 1244 条相关安全情报。

← 返回所有主题
CVE-2026-88065

`tts-be` is a backend for a timetable selector that aims to help students better choose their class schedules. Versions prior to 2.1.0 have a Broken Access Control vulnerability across several API endpoints (such as `/api/student/{id}/photo` and `/api/course_unit/{id}/exchange/metadata`). By chaining these unauthenticated endpoints, a remote attacker can use the backend as an open proxy to bypass

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18423

Concrete CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.2 is vulnerable to Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the Express saved search preset delete and edit dialogs . An authenticated user holding only view permission on a single Express entity could therefore permanently delete, with no undo, or rename saved search presets owned by Express entities for which they had no permission, and a renamed preset name was

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79409

An issue in Webkul Bagisto 2.4.9 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the add-to-cart API and the downloadable fulfilment components.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54050

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment (CLE). From 23.0 until 23.5 and 25.3, the DELETE /api/users/{userId}/profile/image endpoint allows an authenticated user to delete another user's profile image because ProfileController.removeProfileImage() passes the attacker-controlled userId to ProfileServiceImpl.removeProfileImage() without verifying ownership, and profileImageUploadedRepositor

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91984

Vikunja before 2.6.0 fails to validate that user-supplied project_view_id in task-position requests belongs to the task's project. Authenticated attackers can insert task position rows into arbitrary other tenant project views via POST or PUT task-position endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91933

Flowise before 3.1.4 fails to enforce workspace-level authorization checks in openai-realtime endpoints, allowing authenticated users to access tools from ChatFlows in other workspaces by supplying an unscoped chatflowid. Attackers can invoke GET and POST requests to retrieve tool definitions and execute tools from victim workspaces, triggering external side effects and accessing sensitive tool ou

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55178

GeoLens is a self-hosted geospatial data catalog with semantic search, OGC and STAC APIs, and a map builder. Prior to 1.2.3, multiple read and link endpoints authorize only the resource named in the request URL and fail to re-authorize a second caller-influenced dataset reached through a relationship, map layer, VRT source, externalId lookup, or request body. When a public map references a private

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91993

Jpom through 2.11.12 fails to validate workspace ownership when resolving repositoryId on the /build/branch-list endpoint, allowing authenticated users to access repositories from other workspaces. Attackers can submit repository identifiers from different workspaces to enumerate repository existence, determine repository type, and execute git ls-remote commands using other workspaces' stored cred

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52826

Kimai is an open-source time tracking application. Prior to 2.57.0, GET or POST requests to /en/admin/project/{id}/rate/{rate}, /en/admin/customer/{id}/rate/{rate}, and /en/admin/activity/{id}/rate/{rate} independently resolve the authorized parent identifier and the attacker-selected child rate identifier without confirming that the ProjectRate, CustomerRate, or ActivityRate belongs to that paren

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52821

Kimai is an open-source time tracking application. Prior to 2.57.0, GET or POST requests to /en/admin/activity/create/{project} and /en/admin/project/create/{customer} require only the generic create_activity or create_project capability and do not verify edit access to the supplied Project or Customer object. A user who knows a valid project.id or customer identifier can use the preset-parent cre

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52820

Kimai is an open-source time tracking application. Prior to 2.57.0, PATCH /api/timesheets/{id} and POST /api/timesheets accept a user-controlled project identifier through TimesheetApiEditForm and FormTrait, and ProjectRepository::getQueryBuilderForFormType() places that identifier in an unconditional OR branch that bypasses the team access criteria. Any authenticated user with edit_own_timesheet

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46498

Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, OAuthTokenStore reads caller-supplied token identifiers from the shared Core Token Store (CTS) without an OAuth-only namespace, and OAuthAdapter accepts a row whose BLOB claims to contain an OAuth token without binding the trusted CTS type or verifying integrity. An attacker who can place controlled JSON in CTS unde

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91846

Affected versions of MISP allow a collection element to be created from a bare UUID without consistently checking whether the acting user is allowed to access the referenced object. The commit explains that collection elements themselves only store UUIDs, while the collection view later resolves those UUIDs into their underlying objects. Before this fix, the generic add() path could therefore pe

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-89141

The AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.7.7 via the 'mediaId' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to access and retrieve the transcribed contents of

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-90858

A flaw has been found in subhajitkhan online-clinic-management-system up to e9ee77a8827a1446220fa07ee693dc4d9a29a578. Affected by this vulnerability is the function session_start of the file adminappview.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument adminmail can lead to authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product operates

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91773

Soft Serve versions 0.7.1 through 0.11.6 fail to scope Git LFS lock queries by repository, allowing authenticated users to read lock metadata from repositories they cannot access. Attackers with write access to any repository can enumerate lock IDs globally to recover locked file paths, usernames, and lock timestamps from private repositories.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-91770

IceHRM before 36.0.0 fails to validate employee ownership on seven REST sub-resource endpoints, allowing authenticated employees to read any colleague's HR records. Attackers can substitute arbitrary employee IDs in skill, education, certification, language, leave, attendance, and status endpoints to access sensitive personnel data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54258

ZoneMinder is a free, open source closed-circuit television software application. Versions prior to 1.36.39, 1.38.4, and 1.39.11 allow an authenticated low-privileged user with coarse `Events=View` and/or `Snapshots=View` permissions to directly fetch media for events belonging to monitors they are not allowed to access. The normal UI correctly hides the restricted monitor and its events, but dire

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49464

NL Portal Backend Libraries provide backend components for Dutch government portals that interact with residents, customers, suppliers, and partner organizations. The `nl.nl-portal:taak` package from version 1.5.0 through 3.0.0 fails to verify ownership when processing the `submitTaakV2` GraphQL mutation, allowing an authenticated user who knows or guesses another user’s task ID to read its form d

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81916

Concrete CMS before 9.5.3 evaluated the authorization check for an Express entry submission against the entity of the posted form rather than the entity identified by the dashboard route. As a result, a user permitted to add entries to one Express object could create entries in a different Express object outside their authorization scope, potentially polluting protected datasets, triggering workfl

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81915

Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 does not perform an object-level authorization check when a Page Type was updated. The Types::submit() dashboard controller loaded and saved the Page Type identified by a user-supplied ptID without calling canEditPageType(), so a signed-in dashboard user permitted to edit one Page Type could modify the configuration of Page Types outside their assigned authorization bounda

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62113

Contributor Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Slim SEO <= 4.10.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-89264

MoguBlog through 6.2 fails to validate the comment author identity in the POST /web/comment/add endpoint, allowing authenticated users to post comments attributed to any other user. Attackers can supply arbitrary userUid values in the request body to impersonate other accounts including administrators.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-89262

MoguBlog through 6.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the comment deletion endpoint that performs ownership checks against request-body fields instead of the authenticated principal. Attackers can delete arbitrary comments and their replies by supplying comment UIDs and author UIDs obtained from unauthenticated listing endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-89257

AVideo through 29.0 contains an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in objects/categoryDeleteAssets.json.php. The endpoint validates only the Category::canCreateCategory() capability and a CSRF nonce before passing the attacker-supplied $_REQUEST['id'] to Category::deleteAssets(), which recursively removes {systemRootPath}videos/categories/assets/{id}/. It omits the Category::use

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-89252

AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 fails to verify ownership in addLiveLink.php when updating LiveLinks, allowing authenticated users to modify other users' links. A canStream user can overwrite another user's LiveLink HLS source and metadata by supplying an existing linkId, redirecting viewers to attacker-controlled media.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82213

The Nexi XPay Build WordPress plugin from 7.6.1 to 7.6.2 does not verify that the saved payment token being requested belongs to the current user, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve other customers' stored card token references together with a valid authorisation signature.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86782

The Visualizer WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not properly authorise access to its chart-building actions, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to publish, rename, and overwrite the content of posts and pages they do not own, including other users' private drafts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82305

The YITH WooCommerce Wishlist WordPress plugin before 4.18.1 does not verify that a user is authorised to rename a given wishlist, allowing unauthenticated users to rename any wishlist on the site.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14566

The advanced-customized-prompts WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not perform any capability, ownership, or nonce check before updating WooCommerce order item metadata for a supplied order, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to tamper with the custom metadata of orders belonging to other customers.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to an authorization bypass (IDOR) because the frontend calendar lightbox endpoint (/ccm/calendar/view_event/{bID}/{occurrence_id}) does not verify that the caller is permitted to view the calendar that owns the requested event occurrence. The controller loads the occurrence directly from an attacker‑supplied, sequential identifier without confirming that

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to manipulate runtime caches and cause a denial of service due to an insecure direct object reference.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 concatenates three caller-supplied strings into a String.format path on the shared /ds-storage RWX PVC and returns the file with no project ACL — pure IDOR plus traversal. Read is constrained to files named job.log/error.log, but DataStage job logs routinely carry connection strings, {dsnextenc} ciphertexts (decryptable via d2-f023), and customer-data ro

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18121

Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to an authorization bypass (IDOR) because the frontend calendar lightbox endpoint (/ccm/calendar/view_event/{bID}/{occurrence_id}) does not verify that the caller is permitted to view the calendar that owns the requested event occurrence. The controller loads the occurrence directly from an attacker‑supplied, sequential identifier without confirming that

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81210

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 concatenates three caller-supplied strings into a String.format path on the shared /ds-storage RWX PVC and returns the file with no project ACL — pure IDOR plus traversal. Read is constrained to files named job.log/error.log, but DataStage job logs routinely carry connection strings, {dsnextenc} ciphertexts (decryptable via d2-f023), and customer-data ro

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80434

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to manipulate runtime caches and cause a denial of service due to an insecure direct object reference.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9225

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 Langflow could allow an authenticated attacker to access sensitive files belonging to other users due to improper access control in the File/Read File component. When executing flows through the /api/v1/run/advanced/{flow_id} endpoint, the application allows component inputs to reference storage paths using arbitrary user or flow identifiers without verifying

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68527

Concrete CMS versions 8.3.0 through 9.5.2 are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the Calendar event edit dialog (concrete/controllers/dialog/event/edit.php). The dialog checked permissions against the calendar identifier supplied in the request rather than the calendar owning the targeted event occurrence. A user with the "Add Event" permission on a single calendar could read and overwrite e

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Concrete CMS versions 8.3.0 through 9.5.2 are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the Calendar event edit dialog (concrete/controllers/dialog/event/edit.php). The dialog checked permissions against the calendar identifier supplied in the request rather than the calendar owning the targeted event occurrence. A user with the "Add Event" permission on a single calendar could read and overwrite e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-88877

Traefik is a HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In versions >= v3.7.0 and <= v3.7.11, the Kubernetes ingress-nginx provider mishandles Ingresses that carry both an authentication annotation and the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/from-to-www-redirect annotation. For such Ingresses the provider creates an additional 'sibling' router that matches on the host alone, carries only the RedirectRegex midd

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-88865

AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 fails to validate restream ownership in getRestream.json.php, allowing authenticated users with canStream permission to mint tokens for arbitrary restreams. Attackers can exchange the token to retrieve other users' stream keys from getLiveKey.json.php and publish to their YouTube, Twitch, or RTMP destinations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 13.4
Conf: 50%

Traefik is a HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In versions >= v3.7.0 and <= v3.7.11, the Kubernetes ingress-nginx provider mishandles Ingresses that carry both an authentication annotation and the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/from-to-www-redirect annotation. For such Ingresses the provider creates an additional 'sibling' router that matches on the host alone, carries only the RedirectRegex midd

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80354

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Apache Camel K. An authorization vulnerability in custom resource resolution allows a tenant to reference secrets by name in the operator namespace, potentially exposing secrets belonging to other tenants or operator components. This issue affects Apache Camel K: from 2.0.0 before 2.9.3, from 2.10.1 before 2.10.2. Users are

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82582

An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in SHIRASAGI through a user-controlled key, which may allow an unauthorized attacker to retrieve files from the groupware's shared file feature.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-84062

BurgerEditor 3.0.0 through 3.4.0 contains an issue with authorization bypass through user-controlled key. If this vulnerability is exploited, the content of the page may be altered by an attacker who can log in to the product may be caused.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-87997

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, POST /api/chat/completions and POST /api/v1/chat/completions in backend/open_webui/main.py copied a client-supplied folder_id into a new chat without applying the folder write-access check used by the dedicated chat routes. An authenticated user who knew a shared folder identifier could

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-87994

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 until 0.11.1, the channel branch of chat_completion in backend/open_webui/main.py checked channel write access and channel membership for a supplied message_id but did not verify that the calling user authored the targeted message. A channel member could use the chat completions endpoint to replace ano

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, POST /api/chat/completions and POST /api/v1/chat/completions in backend/open_webui/main.py copied a client-supplied folder_id into a new chat without applying the folder write-access check used by the dedicated chat routes. An authenticated user who knew a shared folder identifier could

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 until 0.11.1, the channel branch of chat_completion in backend/open_webui/main.py checked channel write access and channel membership for a supplied message_id but did not verify that the calling user authored the targeted message. A channel member could use the chat completions endpoint to replace ano

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79324

Missing authorization in the Address Delete controller in Mageplaza GDPR for Magento 2 (mageplaza/module-gdpr) through 4.2.9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to delete any customer's saved address, and to erase all stored addresses by iterating the address id, via a GET request to /customer/address/delete/id/{id}. The controller extends the legacy Action class instead of AbstractAccount, so

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69375

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86725

AVideo through c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SocialMediaPublisher plugin's add.json.php endpoint that allows authenticated users to modify other users' OAuth token records. Attackers can supply arbitrary row IDs to overwrite another user's stored access_token and refresh_token, then delete the compromised record to destroy the victim

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86720

WWBN AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 fails to validate ownership of live_restreams_id in resendRestreamer.json.php, allowing authenticated users with canStream to access other users' restream destinations. Attackers can broadcast their live stream to victim-configured restream destinations by supplying arbitrary live_restreams_id values, hijacking YouTube, Facebook,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73320

XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve private unfurl records by supplying predictable auto-increment primary key IDs to the unfurl endpoint. Attackers can enumerate or predict result IDs and query the endpoint without any session, user, or visibility checks to obtain rendered preview HTML, original U

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81802

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WpEvently <= 5.6.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 iDOR via the watchRules and issueListConfig endpoints exposed private saved searches

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 signed URL reuse allowed disclosure of restricted project icons

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 an IDOR in the user profile API disclosed private issues and starred folders across organizations

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86489

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 an IDOR in the user profile API disclosed private issues and starred folders across organizations

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86488

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 iDOR via the watchRules and issueListConfig endpoints exposed private saved searches

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86451

Affected versions of MISP allow authenticated users to retrieve object-reference records by UUID through EventGraphTool::get_reference_data() without first checking whether the requester is authorized to view the object the reference belongs to. The vulnerable code queried ObjectReference.uuid directly and returned the matching row whenever it existed. Because no parent-object ACL was applied, a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86408

Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view(). The vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as: * type * key_data * fingerprint but did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first. The upstre

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-4945

The Otter Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks, Page Builder for Gutenberg Editor & FSE plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.7 via the 'watch_checkout' function due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to pay for a lower-cost product while obtaining entitlement for a pre

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Affected versions of MISP allow authenticated users to retrieve object-reference records by UUID through EventGraphTool::get_reference_data() without first checking whether the requester is authorized to view the object the reference belongs to. The vulnerable code queried ObjectReference.uuid directly and returned the matching row whenever it existed. Because no parent-object ACL was applied, a

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view(). The vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as: * type * key_data * fingerprint but did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first. The upstre

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86277

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Syllabus-Aligned Learning Management & Examination System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file delete_exam.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The MemberDash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.5 via the 'id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the password of any WordPress user, including administrators, by supplying an arbitrary user ID during registration, and take over t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16310

CVE-2026-16310 是 WordPress 的 MemberDash 插件(版本至 1.8.5)中存在的一个不安全直接对象引用(IDOR)漏洞。该漏洞源于通过 'id' 参数对用户控制的键缺少有效性验证,导致未经认证的攻击者能够在注册过程中任意指定用户 ID,从而修改任何 WordPress 用户(包括管理员)的密码。攻击者无需登录即可利用此漏洞完全接管目标账户,并且受害者不会收到任何有关密码更改的通知。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 9.8,属于严重级别,攻击向量为网络,复杂度低,无需权限和用户交互,对机密性、完整性和可用性均有高影响。受影响版本为 MemberDash 插件所有版本(1.8.5 及更早版本)。由于该插件常用于会员制网站,此类漏洞可能导致管理员账户被接管,进而造成整个站点数据泄露或恶意篡改。根据可用元数据,目前尚未标记为已列入 KEV 或已发现在野利用,但鉴于其利用简单且影响重大,应视为紧急风险,建议立即采取缓解措施。

💡 影响/原因: 该插件漏洞允许未认证攻击者通过构造任意用户 ID 轻松重置密码并接管管理员账户,CVSS 9.8 且无需任何交互,可导致站点完全沦陷。

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 fail to properly filter private attribute-view cell values in the getAttributeViewKeys endpoint. Publish readers can retrieve hidden KeyValues payloads from rows bound to inaccessible documents, exposing private database contents without authorization.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getAttributeViewKeysByID endpoint that allows publish readers to enumerate private attribute view key definitions without verifying parent database visibility. Attackers can access the endpoint to retrieve complete key schemas including sensitive field names and relation definitions from hidden databases.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86192

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 fail to properly filter private attribute-view cell values in the getAttributeViewKeys endpoint. Publish readers can retrieve hidden KeyValues payloads from rows bound to inaccessible documents, exposing private database contents without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86191

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getAttributeViewKeysByID endpoint that allows publish readers to enumerate private attribute view key definitions without verifying parent database visibility. Attackers can access the endpoint to retrieve complete key schemas including sensitive field names and relation definitions from hidden databases.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

NetBox through 4.7.0 fails to properly scope user-private records in REST and GraphQL API endpoints for Notifications, Subscriptions, and Bookmarks. Authenticated users with view permissions can access all users' private records through unscoped querysets, disclosing which users watch or bookmark which objects.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Plane through 1.4.2 fails to validate that issues belong to the deploy board's project in the public comment endpoint. Authenticated attackers can post comments to arbitrary issues across workspaces by supplying an issue_id parameter to the public deploy-board comment endpoint.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the status edit endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to read followers-only and direct-message reviews by enumerating sequential status IDs. Attackers can access the raw content of restricted statuses through the edit view, bypassing the privacy protections documented for these message types.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the Favorite and Unfavorite views, allowing authenticated attackers to favorite or unfavorite followers-only and direct statuses they cannot access. Attackers can POST to the favorite endpoint with a status ID to create unauthorized interactions, trigger ActivityPub broadcasts, and enumerate private status IDs through response

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the edit_readthrough function that allows authenticated users to modify other users' reading records. Attackers can exploit sequential ReadThrough IDs to overwrite arbitrary users' start dates, finish dates, progress, and progress mode, affecting reading statistics and exported data.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 fail to properly filter private attribute-view cell values in the getAttributeViewKeys endpoint. Publish readers can retrieve hidden KeyValues payloads from rows bound to inaccessible documents, exposing private database contents without authorization.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

SiYuan versions before v3.8.2 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getAttributeViewKeysByID endpoint that allows publish readers to enumerate private attribute view key definitions without verifying parent database visibility. Attackers can access the endpoint to retrieve complete key schemas including sensitive field names and relation definitions from hidden databases.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86176

NetBox through 4.7.0 fails to properly scope user-private records in REST and GraphQL API endpoints for Notifications, Subscriptions, and Bookmarks. Authenticated users with view permissions can access all users' private records through unscoped querysets, disclosing which users watch or bookmark which objects.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86174

Plane through 1.4.2 fails to validate that issues belong to the deploy board's project in the public comment endpoint. Authenticated attackers can post comments to arbitrary issues across workspaces by supplying an issue_id parameter to the public deploy-board comment endpoint.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

NetBox through 4.7.0 fails to properly scope user-private records in REST and GraphQL API endpoints for Notifications, Subscriptions, and Bookmarks. Authenticated users with view permissions can access all users' private records through unscoped querysets, disclosing which users watch or bookmark which objects.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Plane through 1.4.2 fails to validate that issues belong to the deploy board's project in the public comment endpoint. Authenticated attackers can post comments to arbitrary issues across workspaces by supplying an issue_id parameter to the public deploy-board comment endpoint.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86113

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the edit_readthrough function that allows authenticated users to modify other users' reading records. Attackers can exploit sequential ReadThrough IDs to overwrite arbitrary users' start dates, finish dates, progress, and progress mode, affecting reading statistics and exported data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86112

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the Favorite and Unfavorite views, allowing authenticated attackers to favorite or unfavorite followers-only and direct statuses they cannot access. Attackers can POST to the favorite endpoint with a status ID to create unauthorized interactions, trigger ActivityPub broadcasts, and enumerate private status IDs through response

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-86111

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the status edit endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to read followers-only and direct-message reviews by enumerating sequential status IDs. Attackers can access the raw content of restricted statuses through the edit view, bypassing the privacy protections documented for these message types.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the edit_readthrough function that allows authenticated users to modify other users' reading records. Attackers can exploit sequential ReadThrough IDs to overwrite arbitrary users' start dates, finish dates, progress, and progress mode, affecting reading statistics and exported data.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the Favorite and Unfavorite views, allowing authenticated attackers to favorite or unfavorite followers-only and direct statuses they cannot access. Attackers can POST to the favorite endpoint with a status ID to create unauthorized interactions, trigger ActivityPub broadcasts, and enumerate private status IDs through response

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BookWyrm through 0.9.1 fails to validate user visibility permissions in the status edit endpoint, allowing authenticated attackers to read followers-only and direct-message reviews by enumerating sequential status IDs. Attackers can access the raw content of restricted statuses through the edit view, bypassing the privacy protections documented for these message types.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
surrealdb

An authenticated user scoped to one namespace/database could invoke a custom API (`DEFINE API`) belonging to a different namespace/database, reaching another tenant's endpoint. The route `/api/{namespace}/{database}/{endpoint}` took the namespace and database from the URL and applied them to the caller's session before the endpoint was looked up or run, without checking that the caller's authenti

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85638

A weakness has been identified in jofpin trape 2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file core/user.py. This manipulation of the argument vId/id causes authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61688

SolidInvoice is an open-source invoicing platform. Prior to version 3.0.1, an authenticated user can view the API request history of any other user's API tokens within the same company by manipulating two writable Symfony UX LiveComponent props on the `DataGrid` component. Version 3.0.1 fixes the issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SolidInvoice is an open-source invoicing platform. Prior to version 3.0.1, an authenticated user can view the API request history of any other user's API tokens within the same company by manipulating two writable Symfony UX LiveComponent props on the `DataGrid` component. Version 3.0.1 fixes the issue.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17627

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject messages into workflow history due to improper authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85693

Chatbot UI contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the retrieval endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to access private file content belonging to other users by supplying arbitrary file UUIDs. The endpoint uses a service-role Supabase client that bypasses row-level security and fails to validate file ownership, enabling attackers to retrieve indexed content chunks from victim fil

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85624

Blinko 1.8.7 contains a cross-user private note disclosure vulnerability in the noteReferenceList procedure that performs no ownership verification on supplied note identifiers. Authenticated attackers can enumerate sequential note IDs and retrieve complete content of other users' private notes including attachments and tags.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85607

Blinko 1.8.7 contains an authorization bypass (IDOR) vulnerability in multiple tRPC procedures (message.list, message.update, message.delete, message.clearAfter in server/routerTrpc/message.ts and conversation.clearMessages in server/routerTrpc/conversation.ts). Although these procedures require authentication, they query the database by caller-supplied conversation or message ID without verifying

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Blinko 1.8.7 contains a cross-user private note disclosure vulnerability in the noteReferenceList procedure that performs no ownership verification on supplied note identifiers. Authenticated attackers can enumerate sequential note IDs and retrieve complete content of other users' private notes including attachments and tags.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Blinko 1.8.7 contains an authorization bypass (IDOR) vulnerability in multiple tRPC procedures (message.list, message.update, message.delete, message.clearAfter in server/routerTrpc/message.ts and conversation.clearMessages in server/routerTrpc/conversation.ts). Although these procedures require authentication, they query the database by caller-supplied conversation or message ID without verifying

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85617

snipe-it versions before 8.6.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the bulk delete functionality that allows restricted users to soft-delete users outside their authorized scope. Attackers can include unauthorized user IDs in bulk delete requests to bypass instance-level restrictions and modify or disable accounts they should not access.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85616

Snipe-IT versions before 8.6.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in checkout-acceptance report actions when Full Multiple Company Support is enabled. Authenticated users with reports.view permission can enumerate sequential acceptance IDs and soft-delete or trigger reminder emails for acceptances belonging to other companies by exploiting a null check on the legacy users.company_id col

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85615

Openpanel before 2.3.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the report.getLayouts and report.resetLayout tRPC procedures that fail to bind dashboardId to the authorized projectId. Authenticated attackers can supply an arbitrary victim dashboardId with their own projectId to read report layouts and configurations or delete dashboard grid arrangements across tenants.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85611

OpenPanel before 2.3.0 contains a cross-tenant broken object level authorization vulnerability in the report.getLayouts and report.resetLayout tRPC procedures that fail to scope dashboard queries to the caller's project. Authenticated attackers can supply their own projectId with a victim organization's guessable dashboardId to read confidential report definitions or permanently delete dashboard l

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85594

Traefik versions from v3.7.1 fail to enforce crossProviderNamespaces restrictions on the traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.middlewares Service annotation in the Kubernetes Ingress provider. A namespace-limited tenant excluded from the allowlist can attach an operator-owned middleware to its Service, and if that middleware injects backend credentials, recover them at a controlled backend.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85579

SiYuan is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability (confirmed in v3.8.1, fixed in v3.8.2) in the reader-accessible POST /api/transactions/undoState endpoint. The endpoint returns the peekMutatedRootIDs list from the global undo-log stack for a caller-supplied root ID without applying publish-access visibility filtering. An authenticated reader who knows the root ID of a visible document

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

snipe-it versions before 8.6.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the bulk delete functionality that allows restricted users to soft-delete users outside their authorized scope. Attackers can include unauthorized user IDs in bulk delete requests to bypass instance-level restrictions and modify or disable accounts they should not access.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Snipe-IT versions before 8.6.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in checkout-acceptance report actions when Full Multiple Company Support is enabled. Authenticated users with reports.view permission can enumerate sequential acceptance IDs and soft-delete or trigger reminder emails for acceptances belonging to other companies by exploiting a null check on the legacy users.company_id col

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Traefik versions from v3.7.1 fail to enforce crossProviderNamespaces restrictions on the traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.middlewares Service annotation in the Kubernetes Ingress provider. A namespace-limited tenant excluded from the allowlist can attach an operator-owned middleware to its Service, and if that middleware injects backend credentials, recover them at a controlled backend.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

SiYuan is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability (confirmed in v3.8.1, fixed in v3.8.2) in the reader-accessible POST /api/transactions/undoState endpoint. The endpoint returns the peekMutatedRootIDs list from the global undo-log stack for a caller-supplied root ID without applying publish-access visibility filtering. An authenticated reader who knows the root ID of a visible document

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27432

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in sc Internet Vivoo WP Rentals allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Rentals: from n/a before 3.16.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79630

The WPFunnels WordPress plugin before 3.13.0 does not verify that the product requested through a checkout order bump is the product that bump's discount was configured for, allowing unauthenticated users to obtain any purchasable product at a discount intended for a different one, with the reduced price carried through to the total of the order they place.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16281

The Classified Listing WordPress plugin before 6.1.1 does not verify that the caller owns or can edit the target listing before its AI image-editing AJAX action deletes or attaches media, allowing any authenticated user, including a subscriber, to permanently delete attachments from, and attach files to, any listing owned by another user.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85381

A security vulnerability has been detected in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file App/Home/Controller/ChapterController.class.php of the component Chapter Controller. Such manipulation of the argument content leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exp

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (10.0) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85378

A vulnerability was identified in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. Affected by this issue is the function AuthController::_initialize of the file App/Admin/Controller/ChapterController.class.php of the component Chapter Controller. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is pub

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-83711

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (10.0) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69857

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel

**CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72802](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72802). ### Summary `POST /api/asset/resolveAssetPath` returns the resolved **absolute** filesystem path of an asset, unmodified. The route is `CheckAuth`-only, so it is reachable by the publish `RoleReader` token and by the anonymous account when `Publish.Auth.Enable` is `false`. An anonymous r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
apostrophe

## Summary ApostropheCMS enforces per-type authorization on pages: a page type may declare `editRole` / `publishRole` (and the core `@apostrophecms/archive-page` does), so a project can have page-type subtrees that only higher-privileged roles are allowed to create or edit within. The `move()` operation is supposed to enforce that a page may only be moved *into* a parent the actor has **create** r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85392

Peppermint through 0.5.5 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the GET /api/v1/auth/user/:id/logout endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to delete sessions for any user by supplying arbitrary user IDs. Attackers can forcibly log out any user including administrators by calling the logout handler with another user's ID, since the endpoint performs no authorization checks to veri

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85389

Worklenz before 3.0.0 fails to verify task ownership by organization when resolving task-scoped API endpoints, allowing authenticated users to access another tenant's task data. Attackers can query task endpoints with arbitrary task UUIDs to retrieve work logs, comments, attachments, and project insights belonging to other organizations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Peppermint through 0.5.5 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the GET /api/v1/auth/user/:id/logout endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to delete sessions for any user by supplying arbitrary user IDs. Attackers can forcibly log out any user including administrators by calling the logout handler with another user's ID, since the endpoint performs no authorization checks to veri

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Worklenz before 3.0.0 fails to verify task ownership by organization when resolving task-scoped API endpoints, allowing authenticated users to access another tenant's task data. Attackers can query task endpoints with arbitrary task UUIDs to retrieve work logs, comments, attachments, and project insights belonging to other organizations.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85308

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Brainstorm Force SureForms allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects SureForms: from n/a through 2.12.5.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75035

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. When a non-administrative caller supplied a label selector naming a different user, the ext.cattle.io/v1 Token store dropped its internal owner filter instead of returning an empty result. Any authenticated user could therefore list and watch every other user's tokens, disclosing token metadata and the stored salted hash of the bearer token. This issue affec

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85214

vhr fails to validate user authorization in the PUT /hr/info endpoint, allowing authenticated users to modify arbitrary HR profiles by supplying any profile ID in the request body. Attackers can overwrite other users' names, addresses, and disable accounts including administrators to cause denial of service.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85211

Label Studio fails to apply organization filters when resolving storage URIs for tasks and projects in proxy_api.py endpoints. Attackers can access other tenants' cloud storage objects by creating a separate organization and supplying arbitrary file URIs to presign or stream bucket contents.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85182

vhr through commit 03abbd3 fails to verify that the account ID in PUT /hr/pass requests belongs to the authenticated caller. Authenticated attackers can change arbitrary account passwords by supplying a target account ID and that account's current password in the request body.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85178

Helicone's VaultManager.getDecryptedProviderKeyById() function in the GET /v1/vault/key/{providerKeyId} endpoint fails to validate the requester's organization against the vault key's organization identifier. Attackers with admin or owner privileges in any organization can retrieve decrypted upstream provider credentials for other tenants, including plaintext OpenAI, Anthropic, and Bedrock API key

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85177

CRMEB through 6.0.0 fails to validate message ownership in the edit_message handler of MessageSystemController.php, allowing authenticated users to modify arbitrary system inbox messages. Attackers can update any message's columns including is_del, look, and uid to delete, mark read, or reassign victim notifications without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75033

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. Project Secrets were propagated into a namespace based only on its `field.cattle.io/projectId` annotation, without verifying that the referenced project belonged to the same downstream cluster. A user able to create namespaces on one cluster could set the annotation to a project ID from another cluster and have that project's secrets copied into a namespace und

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71404

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. The GlobalRole controller derived the target ClusterRole name from the user-settable `authz.management.cattle.io/cr-name` annotation and overwrote that object's rules without verifying ownership. A user with delegated GlobalRole create or update permission could point the annotation at any existing ClusterRole, such as `cluster-admin`, and revoke the permission

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71403

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. The /v3/users update path did not enforce immutability of a User resource's `username` and `principalIds` fields. A user holding the `update` verb on `users.management.cattle.io` could inject a foreign identity provider principal into any account, so that the next login by the owner of that principal was bound to the victim's account and inherited its role bind

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. When a non-administrative caller supplied a label selector naming a different user, the ext.cattle.io/v1 Token store dropped its internal owner filter instead of returning an empty result. Any authenticated user could therefore list and watch every other user's tokens, disclosing token metadata and the stored salted hash of the bearer token. This issue affec

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. Project Secrets were propagated into a namespace based only on its `field.cattle.io/projectId` annotation, without verifying that the referenced project belonged to the same downstream cluster. A user able to create namespaces on one cluster could set the annotation to a project ID from another cluster and have that project's secrets copied into a namespace und

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. The GlobalRole controller derived the target ClusterRole name from the user-settable `authz.management.cattle.io/cr-name` annotation and overwrote that object's rules without verifying ownership. A user with delegated GlobalRole create or update permission could point the annotation at any existing ClusterRole, such as `cluster-admin`, and revoke the permission

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. The /v3/users update path did not enforce immutability of a User resource's `username` and `principalIds` fields. A user holding the `update` verb on `users.management.cattle.io` could inject a foreign identity provider principal into any account, so that the next login by the owner of that principal was bound to the victim's account and inherited its role bind

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Label Studio fails to apply organization filters when resolving storage URIs for tasks and projects in proxy_api.py endpoints. Attackers can access other tenants' cloud storage objects by creating a separate organization and supplying arbitrary file URIs to presign or stream bucket contents.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

CRMEB through 6.0.0 fails to validate message ownership in the edit_message handler of MessageSystemController.php, allowing authenticated users to modify arbitrary system inbox messages. Attackers can update any message's columns including is_del, look, and uid to delete, mark read, or reassign victim notifications without authorization.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85173

n8n versions before 2.36.2 contain a missing per-project authorization vulnerability in the Insights API routes that allows authenticated users with insights scopes to access workflow names and execution statistics across projects. Attackers can supply arbitrary projectId parameters to retrieve sensitive project and workflow information from projects they have no membership in.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85105

A flaw has been found in NousResearch hermes-agent 0.18.0. Affected by this issue is the function _sess_nowait of the file s71.py of the component Session Management. This manipulation of the argument session_id causes authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80254

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key issue exists in ShizenBox2 (edge-app). If exploited, an attacker who can log in to the product may change the other user's password.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78065

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Guest checkout address disclosure to any authenticated user (IDOR) in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - `editAddress()` redirected non-owners away only when the loaded address row had a **non-empty** `user_id` belonging to someone else. Guest-checkout address rows have an empty `user_id`, so that check never triggered for them — any logged-in acc

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78064

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Anonymous cart-record tampering via inherited FOF `save` task in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.21, 4.0.0-4.0.21, 4.1.0-4.1.6 - `fof.xml` grants the `carts` view's tasks a wildcard `true` ACL, and FOF only enforces CSRF tokens on back-end HTML requests, not on front-end `format=raw` requests. `J2StoreControllerCarts` already scoped `remove()` to the caller's own session, but

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

n8n versions before 2.36.2 contain a missing per-project authorization vulnerability in the Insights API routes that allows authenticated users with insights scopes to access workflow names and execution statistics across projects. Attackers can supply arbitrary projectId parameters to retrieve sensitive project and workflow information from projects they have no membership in.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/openchoreo/openchoreo

### Summary The OpenChoreo API server (`openchoreo-api`) authorized requests to its exec and wirelogs endpoints against the project supplied by the caller in the request, rather than against the project that actually owns the target component. The target component was resolved by name only, and the authorization engine decided purely from the caller-supplied resource hierarchy — the component's r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Jenkins Microsoft Entra ID (previously Azure AD) Plugin 710.v0b_ff8e9cc2d2 and earlier grants Entra group permissions using both the group's unique object ID and its display name, allowing attackers who can create an Entra group with a colliding display name to gain the permissions configured for a privileged group.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-84672

Jenkins Microsoft Entra ID (previously Azure AD) Plugin 710.v0b_ff8e9cc2d2 and earlier grants Entra group permissions using both the group's unique object ID and its display name, allowing attackers who can create an Entra group with a colliding display name to gain the permissions configured for a privileged group.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79990

Craft CMS GraphQL entry mutation resolvers (saveEntry, deleteEntry) read siteIddirectly from$argumentswithout passing throughArgumentManagerprepareArguments(), which is the function that enforces site-scope filtering via array_intersect against the GraphQL schema’s allowed sites. The query path (ElementResolverprepareElementQuery) correctly calls prepareArguments()`, so queries to unauthorized sit

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14326

The Timetics WordPress plugin through 1.0.61 does not enforce per-object ownership when updating appointments through its REST API, allowing users with its custom staff role to modify, disable, or take over appointments belonging to other staff members.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Craft CMS GraphQL entry mutation resolvers (saveEntry, deleteEntry) read siteIddirectly from$argumentswithout passing throughArgumentManagerprepareArguments(), which is the function that enforces site-scope filtering via array_intersect against the GraphQL schema’s allowed sites. The query path (ElementResolverprepareElementQuery) correctly calls prepareArguments()`, so queries to unauthorized sit

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-84796

Craft CMS versions before 5.10.11 contain a site scope bypass vulnerability in GraphQL entry mutation resolvers that fail to validate siteId through ArgumentManager::prepareArguments(). Attackers with tokens scoped to one site can read, modify, or delete entries across unauthorized sites by passing siteId directly in mutation arguments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Craft CMS versions before 5.10.11 contain a site scope bypass vulnerability in GraphQL entry mutation resolvers that fail to validate siteId through ArgumentManager::prepareArguments(). Attackers with tokens scoped to one site can read, modify, or delete entries across unauthorized sites by passing siteId directly in mutation arguments.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81428

The WC Vendors WordPress plugin before 2.7.2.1 does not verify ownership or the object type of user-supplied IDs when saving product variations, allowing authenticated users with the vendor role to modify product variations belonging to other vendors, and to change the status and title of arbitrary posts, via IDOR.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81198

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.46 does not properly verify ownership of a curriculum object before acting on it, allowing authenticated users with the instructor role to delete or modify curriculum sections and materials belonging to courses owned by other instructors.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81196

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.46 does not properly verify ownership of quiz question identifiers, allowing users with instructor access to read other instructors' quiz questions, including the correct answers and explanations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81194

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.46 does not properly verify authorization when retrieving order line-item data, allowing any authenticated user including Subscribers to read other instructors' course sales records by supplying another user's identifier.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77788

The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that the metadata row being updated belongs to the object the user was authorised against, allowing users with the Author role and above to overwrite arbitrary post and user metadata, including that belonging to higher-privileged users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77785

The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that the requesting user is permitted to read the specific post referenced in a request before returning its content and SEO metadata, allowing users with the Author role and above to read the title, body and metadata of other users' non-public posts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77784

The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that a user is allowed to edit the object being modified before updating its SEO indexing metadata, allowing users with the Author role and above to alter that metadata on content, taxonomy terms and user profiles they do not own, and to remove other users' content from the site's sitemap and search engine index.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77783

The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that the post whose schema it renders on the front end is publicly viewable, allowing unauthenticated visitors to disclose the schema and associated content of draft, pending, private, scheduled and password-protected posts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77764

The GamiPress WordPress plugin before 7.9.9.6 does not properly restrict its video watch-tracking functionality, allowing users with a role as low as Subscriber to award the configured gamification points, achievements and ranks to arbitrary users including administrators, and to accrue them without limit.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15232

The MotoPress Appointment Booking WordPress plugin before 2.4.8 does not perform an authorization or ownership check when handling a user-supplied booking identifier on an unauthenticated endpoint, allowing unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete other users' reservations. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-9180: the deletion remains reachable on sites using payment confirmation, confir

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in the first-broker-login flow of the Keycloak identity management service. When a user links a social identity provider account to their local account, the verification proof generated is not strictly bound to the specific upstream identity being verified. This allows an attacker with a different account on the same social provider to intercept the process and link their own acco

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82968

A flaw was found in the first-broker-login flow of the Keycloak identity management service. When a user links a social identity provider account to their local account, the verification proof generated is not strictly bound to the specific upstream identity being verified. This allows an attacker with a different account on the same social provider to intercept the process and link their own acco

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81846

An authorization bypass in the runZero Platform MCP service has been resolved in version 5.1.260826.0. This issue is an instance of CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N (3.5 Low).

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-84205

GROWI contains an access control vulnerability in the GET /_api/v3/revisions/:id endpoint that validates access against a query parameter but returns the revision identified by the path parameter without confirming they reference the same page. Authenticated attackers can pair a page identifier they can access with an arbitrary revision identifier to read revision content from pages they lack perm

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

GROWI contains an access control vulnerability in the GET /_api/v3/revisions/:id endpoint that validates access against a query parameter but returns the revision identified by the path parameter without confirming they reference the same page. Authenticated attackers can pair a page identifier they can access with an arbitrary revision identifier to read revision content from pages they lack perm

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-84148

This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper authentication and authorization controls in the API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter which could lead to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users on the targeted system.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-83743

A weakness has been identified in invoiceninja Invoice Ninja up to 5.13.26. This affects an unknown part of the file /vedor/profile/ of the component Vendor Portal Profile Update. Executing a manipulation of the argument vendor_contact can lead to authorization bypass. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgradin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

A weakness has been identified in invoiceninja Invoice Ninja up to 5.13.26. This affects an unknown part of the file /vedor/profile/ of the component Vendor Portal Profile Update. Executing a manipulation of the argument vendor_contact can lead to authorization bypass. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgradin

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82395

Sulu is an open-source PHP content management system based on the Symfony framework. Prior to versions 2.6.25 and 3.0.8, the media move endpoint derives its permission check from the client-supplied collection value instead of the media item's actual source collection, and src/Sulu/Bundle/MediaBundle/Media/Manager/MediaManager.php allows MediaManager::move() to reassign the item without checking t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Pangolin before 1.22.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access any protected resource by supplying an attacker-controlled URL parameter to the share-link authentication endpoint that omits the expected resource identifier from the token verification call. Attackers holding a single valid share link for any resource can authenticate against ar

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Kimai before 2.57.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the favorite timesheet add and remove endpoints that allows authenticated users to manipulate other users' bookmarks. Attackers can add or remove timesheet entries from another user's favorite list by referencing their timesheet identifier, enabling cross-user business-state tampering without administrative privileges.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81892

EasyAdmin is a fast and modern admin generator for Symfony applications. From 4.0.0 until 4.29.16 and 5.5.1, EasyAdmin serves all backend requests through a single dashboard route and, for custom actions (Action::linkToRoute() and MenuItem::linkToRoute()), swaps the executed controller based on the routeName query parameter on the kernel.controller event. The swap happens after Symfony's security

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75460

XueZhiSi Open Source Exam System <= 3.9.0 has a privilege escalation vulnerability in the teacher-end interface POST /api/teacher/user/page/list. The role parameter in UserPageRequestVM is fully controllable by the requester.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75458

The teacher-end interface POST /api/teacher/user/delete/{id} in XueZhiSi Open Source Exam System <= 3.9.0 contains a vertical privilege escalatio vulnerability. This interface accepts a user ID and then executes getUserById(id), setDeleted(true), updateByIdFilter() in sequence, without any validation of whether the current user has the authority to delete the target user. An authenticated teacher

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50198

Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Prior to version 4.9.1, an authenticated user can edit their own inactive subscription and set replacement_subscription_id to a subscription ID belonging to another user. The write is accepted, and later the stats logic dereferences that foreign subscription ID without user_id scoping. This lets the attacker infer the victim su

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72001

Pangolin before 1.22.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access any protected resource by supplying an attacker-controlled URL parameter to the share-link authentication endpoint that omits the expected resource identifier from the token verification call. Attackers holding a single valid share link for any resource can authenticate against ar

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53552

Goploy is an open-source automation deployment system. In versions 1.17.5 and prior, Project.AddFile, Project.EditFile, Project.RemoveFile, and Project.Edit in cmd/server/api/project/handler.go accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding model.ProjectFile.GetData and model.Project.Ge

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Goploy is an open-source automation deployment system. In versions 1.17.5 and prior, Project.AddFile, Project.EditFile, Project.RemoveFile, and Project.Edit in cmd/server/api/project/handler.go accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding model.ProjectFile.GetData and model.Project.Ge

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82816

A vulnerability has been found in dibo-software diboot 3.8.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /api/ai-session/ of the component AI Session Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79750

MCPHub is a unified hub for centrally managing and dynamically orchestrating multiple MCP servers/APIs into separate endpoints with flexible routing strategies. Prior to version 1.0.30, MCPHub scopes non-admin users to servers they own (list views and config edits enforce ownership), but the tool-execution API does not. Any authenticated non-admin user can invoke tools on MCP servers owned by othe

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

MCPHub is a unified hub for centrally managing and dynamically orchestrating multiple MCP servers/APIs into separate endpoints with flexible routing strategies. Prior to version 1.0.30, MCPHub scopes non-admin users to servers they own (list views and config edits enforce ownership), but the tool-execution API does not. Any authenticated non-admin user can invoke tools on MCP servers owned by othe

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78075

Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Broken Object-Level Authorization in Blog Image Deletion in Helix Ultimate < 2.2.10 - `Blog::remove_image()` checked whether the user was authorized to edit the article ID passed in the request, but did not verify whether the specified image path (src) belonged to that article. On Joomla 3 builds where physical file deletion was triggered, an author could supply

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82874

ToolJet before v3.16.208 fails to validate that authenticated users belong to the organization specified in the organizationId path parameter of tooljet-db endpoints, allowing any Builder user to read, modify, and delete tables across tenant boundaries. Attackers can extract victim organization IDs from public app endpoints, then exploit schema operation endpoints to disclose table schemas, plant

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82873

ToolJet through 3.0.0-ee-beta.2 contains authorization bypass vulnerabilities in the POST /api/v2/resources/export endpoint that allow authenticated users to disclose TooljetDB table schemas across workspace boundaries and export app definitions across granular permission boundaries. Attackers can supply a body-provided organization_id parameter to access schemas from other workspaces, or bypass p

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82872

ToolJet before v3.16.208 fails to validate that the path organizationId matches the authenticated user's workspace before performing ToolJet DB table operations. A workspace admin can create, view, and delete database tables in another workspace by replacing the organizationId parameter in table-management API requests.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82870

ToolJet before v3.16.208 fails to validate organizationId ownership in database write and destroy routes, allowing any builder-role user to create, alter, or drop tables in other organizations' databases. Attackers can exploit missing organization-resolving guards to permanently delete tables, insert arbitrary data, and modify schemas across tenant boundaries on shared instances.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82869

ToolJet Database versions before v3.16.44 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the join_tables endpoint that grants JOIN_TABLES ability to all authenticated users without role or workspace membership validation. Attackers can read arbitrary ToolJet Database tables from any workspace by supplying victim workspace identifiers in the request path while authenticating with their own workspa

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53620

GROWI contains a vulnerability with an authorization bypass through user-controlled key in the bookmark folder APIs. If this vulnerability is exploited, an authenticated attacker could retrieve, tamper with, and/or delete the other user's bookmark data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82621

A weakness has been identified in Soarkey StudentManagement and 学生信息管理系统 up to e08f7f1d5015af407aa4cca0ada3dea189b4937e. This impacts the function AdminDao.doGet of the file code/src/service/AdminDao.java of the component Administrative Servlet. Executing a manipulation of the argument action can lead to authorization bypass. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82725

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix lets an attacker who controls filter form parameters filter across relationships the resource author marked non-public, turning the returned rows into a boolean oracle over private related data. AshPhoenix.FilterForm resolved every relationship hop in the user-supplied path with Ash.Resource.Info.related/2,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81853

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_admin turns a record-lookup URL into an equality oracle over sensitive attributes. AshAdmin.Helpers.decode_primary_key/2 decodes the composite-primary-key form (Base64 plus ETF) and returns the decoded map verbatim as the lookup filter, without checking that its keys are the resource's primary-key fields. The deseri

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix lets an attacker who controls filter form parameters filter across relationships the resource author marked non-public, turning the returned rows into a boolean oracle over private related data. AshPhoenix.FilterForm resolved every relationship hop in the user-supplied path with Ash.Resource.Info.related/2,

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_admin turns a record-lookup URL into an equality oracle over sensitive attributes. AshAdmin.Helpers.decode_primary_key/2 decodes the composite-primary-key form (Base64 plus ETF) and returns the decoded map verbatim as the lookup filter, without checking that its keys are the resource's primary-key fields. The deseri

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82602

A security vulnerability has been detected in SeaCMS up to 13.6. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /ass.php. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82564

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a caller of an identity-configured tool to update or destroy records it never identified, including every row in the table. In AshAi.Tool.Execution, identity_filter/3 built the update/destroy filter directly from the raw tool arguments as [{key, Map.get(arguments, to_string(key))}] and passed it to Ash.Que

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a caller of an identity-configured tool to update or destroy records it never identified, including every row in the table. In AshAi.Tool.Execution, identity_filter/3 built the update/destroy filter directly from the raw tool arguments as [{key, Map.get(arguments, to_string(key))}] and passed it to Ash.Que

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.42 does not correctly restrict access to order information, allowing any user with the instructor role to read other users' order billing details, including name, email address, phone number and postal address, by enumerating order IDs.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Stripe Payment Forms by WP Full Pay WordPress plugin before 8.5.5 does not verify that a subscription belongs to the customer bound to the requesting customer-portal session before cancelling it, allowing a user with a confirmed portal session to cancel subscriptions belonging to other customers. Exploitation requires the attacker to know the target subscription's identifier, which is high-e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81200

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.42 does not correctly restrict access to order information, allowing any user with the instructor role to read other users' order billing details, including name, email address, phone number and postal address, by enumerating order IDs.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80311

The Stripe Payment Forms by WP Full Pay WordPress plugin before 8.5.5 does not verify that a subscription belongs to the customer bound to the requesting customer-portal session before cancelling it, allowing a user with a confirmed portal session to cancel subscriptions belonging to other customers. Exploitation requires the attacker to know the target subscription's identifier, which is high-e

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject unauthorized messages due to a namespace collision between user identifiers.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute and read any user's private flow due to improper authorization.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55867

Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.2.0 until 6.3.12, 7.0.7, and 7.1.2, the DELETE /users/{userId}/tokens/{idOrToken} endpoint implemented by UsersResource.revokeToken() in graylog2-server/src/main/java/org/graylog2/rest/resources/users/UsersResource.java checks USERS_TOKENREMOVE permission against the attacker-controlled userId path parameter before resolving the token sele

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19294

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute and read any user's private flow due to improper authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18904

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject unauthorized messages due to a namespace collision between user identifiers.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
org.graylog2:graylog2-server

### Impact Graylog contains an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the token revocation endpoint. An authenticated user can delete access tokens belonging to other users, including service account tokens and administrator tokens, if they know or can guess a valid token identifier. The issue does not expose token contents, but it allows unauthorized token deletion, leading to

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Quivr versions through 0.0.322 fail to validate chat ownership in the GET /chat/{chat_id}/history, DELETE /chat/{chat_id}, and POST /chat/{chat_id}/question/answer endpoints. Authenticated attackers can read other users' conversation histories including private knowledge base content, delete arbitrary chats, and inject fabricated messages into other users' conversations.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

VoltAgent through 2.1.20 fails to validate conversation ownership in memory API handlers, allowing authenticated users to access other users' conversations. Attackers can read, modify, and delete arbitrary conversations and messages by supplying caller-controlled identifiers to memory endpoints.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82290

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82284

Quivr versions through 0.0.322 fail to validate chat ownership in the GET /chat/{chat_id}/history, DELETE /chat/{chat_id}, and POST /chat/{chat_id}/question/answer endpoints. Authenticated attackers can read other users' conversation histories including private knowledge base content, delete arbitrary chats, and inject fabricated messages into other users' conversations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82283

VoltAgent through 2.1.20 fails to validate conversation ownership in memory API handlers, allowing authenticated users to access other users' conversations. Attackers can read, modify, and delete arbitrary conversations and messages by supplying caller-controlled identifiers to memory endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82281

Kotaemon through 0.12.0 fails to properly validate conversation ownership in select_conv, delete_conv, rename_conv, and on_set_public_conversation functions in control.py. Attackers can read other users' chat histories, delete conversations, or rename conversations by supplying arbitrary conversation identifiers without proper authorization checks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82280

Quivr through 0.0.322 fails to validate ownership in prompt endpoints, allowing authenticated users to modify any prompt by identifier. Attackers with read-only access to shared brains can read exposed prompt identifiers and overwrite system prompts affecting all brain users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82271

R2R through 3.6.5 fails to properly validate user ownership in conversation update and message handlers, allowing authenticated users to modify other users' conversations. Attackers can supply arbitrary conversation identifiers to rename conversations and append messages to other users' conversation histories, corrupting state and injecting malicious content.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55067

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.4.0, POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/buckets/{bucket} allows the request body project_view_id value to be mass assigned by Bucket.Update in pkg/models/kanban.go. The permission check validates that the bucket currently belongs to the URL project and view but does not validate the body selected destination view,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55066

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.4.0, POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/buckets/{bucket}/tasks accepts a body supplied task_id but TaskBucket.CanUpdate in pkg/models/kanban_task_bucket.go authorizes only the project, view, and bucket from the URL. updateTaskBucket then calls Task.ReadOne without a separate task permission check, returns the vict

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55065

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. From 0.24.6 until 2.4.0, DELETE /api/v1/projects/:project/views/:view permits an authenticated user to supply a view identifier from another project while authorizing only against an attacker-controlled project identifier. ProjectView.CanDelete in pkg/models/project_view_permissions.go does not establish that the view belongs to the p

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54746

Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. From 0.40.0 until 0.91.1, the Dispatcher gRPC service does not verify that a request's worker ID belongs to the tenant identified by the bearer-token context in Dispatcher/UpsertWorkerLabels and Dispatcher/Unsubscribe. An authenticated owner of any tenant who guesses another tenant's worker UUID ca

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81299

Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WP Job Portal <= 2.5.9 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79995

The User Registration & Membership WordPress plugin before 5.2.5 does not verify that the account whose pending email change is being cancelled belongs to the user making the request, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber-level access and above to cancel any other user's in-progress email change, including an administrator's.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-79615

The Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) WordPress plugin before 11.2.4 does not check authorisation when returning question bank entries through one of its REST API routes, allowing users with a role as low as Contributor to read the questions, hints and correct answer keys of quizzes belonging to other users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81817

Affected versions of Flowintel contain an insecure direct object reference / broken object-level authorization issue across numerous task endpoints. The routes generally received both a case identifier and a task identifier, but previously they did not enforce that the task actually belonged to the supplied case. As a result, an authenticated user with editor-level access to one case could poten

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81668

A flaw was found in Katello where the Content View Filter Rules API does not properly enforce authorization on the parent Content View Filter. An authenticated, low-privileged user with Content View permissions in one organization may be able to access and modify filter rules belonging to a Content View Filter in another organization by supplying that filter's identifier. This can result in unauth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81658

A flaw was found in Foreman. The template revision endpoint does not enforce object-level authorization when retrieving an audited template revision. An authenticated, low privileged user with a template-related permission, such as view_ptables, can obtain historical template contents belonging to another organization or location by supplying the corresponding audit ID. This can result in unauthor

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17562

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Summit Security Systems AdisyonPro allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects AdisyonPro: before v5.21.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Affected versions of Flowintel contain an insecure direct object reference / broken object-level authorization issue across numerous task endpoints. The routes generally received both a case identifier and a task identifier, but previously they did not enforce that the task actually belonged to the supplied case. As a result, an authenticated user with editor-level access to one case could poten

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-81576

If configured as a server, CodeMeter Runtime before versions 8.41a and 9.10 issues handles per connection and relies on a cryptographically weak SID as sole authenticator. An attacker can brute-force the SID, recover another session's handle number, and read license information belonging to another handle.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user with edit-own rights (the eventowner=1 setting or core.edit.own) can POST another user's record id together with their own id as created_by and take over that record.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Attendee lists readable by any logged-in user in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A non-manager can therefore read attendee names, usernames, registration dates and statuses for events they do not manage, including lists belonging to unpublished events.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78139

The Notifima WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not verify that the caller owns the subscription being modified on one of its REST endpoints in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.3, allowing authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access to unsubscribe arbitrary customers from product stock-alert notifications.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77990

Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Attendee lists readable by any logged-in user in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A non-manager can therefore read attendee names, usernames, registration dates and statuses for events they do not manage, including lists belonging to unpublished events.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77035

Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user with edit-own rights (the eventowner=1 setting or core.edit.own) can POST another user's record id together with their own id as created_by and take over that record.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16568

The Mobile App for WooCommerce: ShopApper Mobile App Builder Service for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 0.4.62 does not verify that the requesting user owns the customer profile being queried through one of its REST endpoints, allowing any authenticated user (e.g. a customer/subscriber) to retrieve other users' personal data, including their email address, name, and roles.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16567

The Document Embedder WordPress plugin before 2.3.1 does not check a document's status before issuing a download token and streaming the file, allowing unauthenticated attackers to download arbitrary Document Embedder WordPress plugin before 2.3.1 documents, including private and draft ones, by enumerating IDs.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
asyncssh

**Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h).** The 2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before `%u` substitution in `AuthorizedKeysFile` blocks `/`, `\` and `..`, but does not block a leading `~` (or `${ENV}`), both of which are re-introduced by later expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard. **Affected:** asyncssh 2.23.0 and current `develop` (commi

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
starlette-admin

## Summary Affected versions of Starlette-Admin prior to 0.16.1 do not properly validate user-supplied sort and search parameters against the configured field allowlists. While the administrative UI restricts available fields based on field configuration, the backend accepts arbitrary field names supplied through API requests. An authenticated user can submit crafted requests to sort or filter r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77789

CVE-2026-77789 是 WordPress 插件“Stripe Payment Forms by WP Full Pay”中存在的一个逻辑缺陷漏洞,影响 8.5.1 之前的版本。该插件用于在 WordPress 站点上集成 Stripe 支付与订阅管理功能。漏洞的根源在于:当用户通过已确认的客户门户会话(customer-portal session)对订阅执行操作(如取消、重新激活或修改)时,插件未验证该订阅是否确实归属于当前会话所绑定的客户。由于缺少这种归属校验,任何能够建立有效门户会话的已认证用户,都可以越权操作其他客户的订阅数据。攻击者需要具备低权限账号(PR:L),无需用户交互(UI:N),攻击路径为网络(AV:N),且该漏洞不影响机密性和可用性,但会对完整性造成低影响(C:N/I:L/A:N),CVSS 评分为 4.3,属于中等严重程度。该漏洞本质上是一种不安全的直接对象引用(IDOR)/ 越权访问问题,常见于未对资源所有者进行严格校验的 Web 应用。目前该漏洞尚未被列入已知被利用漏洞目录(KEV),也没有明确标记为在野利用。建议受影响站点的管理员尽快将插件升级到 8.5.1 或更高版本,以修复此缺陷;同时,可审查现有用户及订阅的日志记录,排查是否存在异常操作,并考虑限制管理后台或客户门户的暴露面,降低被利用的风险。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限用户越权操作其他客户的 Stripe 订阅,可能导致付费服务被异常取消或篡改,破坏业务完整性和客户信任。WordPress 插件部署广泛,即便 CVSS 不高也应尽快修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-74930

The Project Manager WordPress 插件在 4.0.7 版本之前存在一处越权访问漏洞。该插件的一个 REST API 路由在获取用户活动历史时,未校验请求者是否为被查询用户本人,导致任何已认证用户(例如订阅者)都可以读取其他任意用户的活动记录、电子邮件地址,以及他们本无权限访问的项目详情。攻击者只需一个低权限账户即可利用此漏洞,通过构造 API 请求获取敏感信息,造成隐私泄露。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 4.3,属于中危,攻击复杂度低,无需用户交互,攻击路径为网络,且仅影响机密性,不影响完整性和可用性。由于该插件常用于项目管理场景,泄露的数据可能包含商业敏感信息,建议受影响站点尽快升级至 4.0.7 或更高版本,同时限制 REST API 的暴露范围,并监控异常请求。目前没有证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用或被列入 KEV 目录。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞使低权限用户即可横向读取他人敏感数据,破坏多租户隔离。项目管理插件通常存有协作信息,信息泄露可能引发商业机密外泄与隐私合规风险。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14212

The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 9.8 does not verify that an authenticated employee (provider) owns the provider account being updated, allowing any employee with an Employee Panel login to overwrite another employee's cabinet password and take over their account.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13404

The Royal Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.7.1066 does not perform any capability or ownership check (relying only on a publicly-scrapeable nonce) before writing like-count and visitor-tracking post meta keyed on an arbitrary post ID, allowing unauthenticated users to modify that metadata on any post, including private and draft posts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80197

Kimai before 2.57.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the favorite timesheet add and remove endpoints that allows authenticated users to manipulate other users' bookmarks. Attackers can add or remove timesheet entries from another user's favorite list by referencing their timesheet identifier, enabling cross-user business-state tampering without administrative privileges.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Kimai before 2.57.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the favorite timesheet add and remove endpoints that allows authenticated users to manipulate other users' bookmarks. Attackers can add or remove timesheet entries from another user's favorite list by referencing their timesheet identifier, enabling cross-user business-state tampering without administrative privileges.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62861

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Prior to 3.18.0, any authenticated non-guest workspace member can remove another workspace's public custom domain and make typebots on that domain unavailable. The custom-domain delete handler in handleDeleteCustomDomain.ts authorizes a caller against a client-supplied workspaceId but sends the client-supplied domain name to the shared Vercel project before verif

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-80049

Airbyte Platform resolves the workspace used for its authorization decision from a field the caller supplies. AuthorizationServerHandler copies recognised identifiers out of the raw JSON request body into X-Airbyte-* headers, and AuthenticationHeaderResolver.resolveWorkspace consults X-Airbyte-Workspace-Id ahead of every resource-derived header, including those for connection, source and destinati

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
@arikusi/deepseek-mcp-server

# Cross-Session Data Exposure via Caller-Controlled `session_id` Project / Repository: `arikusi/deepseek-mcp-server` Affected version / commit tested: `1.6.0` / `04f28be2c6e99d3d4e443a6ae37cc35f0a71554a` Vulnerability type: Authorization bypass / cross-session data exposure Authentication required: No ## Summary The process-global `SessionStore` accepts caller-supplied `session_id` values w

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
grpc

### Summary In the HTTP-to-gRPC transcoding layer of the `grpc` Hex package, query-string and request-body parameters can silently overwrite path-bound fields when building the decoded protobuf request struct. An authenticated attacker who can reach a transcoded endpoint can substitute any path-bound identifier (e.g. `user_id` from `/users/{user_id}/profile`) with an arbitrary value, bypassing au

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78581

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized data modification via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, an authenticated user could reference another user's AI Assistant conversation identifier to access or modify a conversation they do not own. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77998

Joomla Extension - miniorange.com - Unauthenticated Authentication Bypass via SAMLResponse Parameter in miniOrange SAML SSO < 11.0.2, SAML SP Single Sign On – Login with ADFS < 6.4, SAML SP Single Sign On – SAML SSO login with Google Apps < 6.4 - This is due to the mo_saml_validate_signature() function performing a loose boolean check on the raw tri-state integer returned by PHP's openssl_verify(

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77145

The permission check for the frontend management update flow verified a different event than the one the request went on to modify. A user with frontend event management access could therefore modify events belonging to other organizers.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77143

The frontend topic editing flow does not verify on the server side that the requesting visitor owns the topic being modified. As a result, a visitor who knows the identifier of a topic from the public forum can submit a modified update request for that topic directly and overwrite its content, without the application confirming ownership. Topic identifiers are visible in the public forum listing,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77142

The frontend company self-service editing feature relies on a template-level visibility flag to hide the edit form for company records a visitor does not own, but the corresponding write operation does not repeat this ownership check on the server side. As a result, a visitor who knows the identifier of a company record from the public directory can submit a modified update request for that record

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77141

The extension resolves the targeted club record from a user-supplied request argument in its frontend edit, update, and activate actions, but performs no ownership check in any of them. An unauthenticated visitor who knows the UID of a club record can send a direct request to the update or activate action and overwrite that record, or publish one still awaiting approval, without owning it.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77140

The extension validates the HMAC of a frontend employee edit link only in the action that renders the edit form, not in the action that persists the change. An unauthenticated visitor who knows the UID of a visible employee record can send a direct POST request to the update action and overwrite that record without a valid edit link or any ownership check.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77135

The extension's user detail view fails to verify that a requested user record matches the configured or logged-in target, allowing any visitor with access to the Detail or List plugin to retrieve another frontend user's profile data, including name, email, date of birth and address, by supplying an arbitrary user ID.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77127

The extension fails to restrict a backend AJAX endpoint for inline editing to fields the current user is permitted to see or edit. An authenticated, low-privileged backend user can supply arbitrary table, field and record parameters, and trigger an error response that discloses the current database value of the requested field, leading to disclosure of sensitive information such as backend and fro

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56093

The extension's frontend detail-view document lookup does not apply the current site's siteHash filter or frontend user access filter, unlike the regular search path. A visitor who can obtain or guess a valid Solr document id can retrieve documents through this lookup without the same access restrictions enforced elsewhere.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78466

The Fluent Boards Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.11 due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to perform an unauthorized action.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10630

The WP Courses LMS – Online Courses Builder, eLearning Courses, Courses Solution, Education Courses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.29 via the 'resultID' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with custom-level access and above, to read any oth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A vulnerability was identified in HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) such that an authenticated attacker may manipulate an identity value referenced by a templated policy path to gain unintended access to Vault paths. An attacker who can control the referenced identity value may include slash ({{/}}) characters that Vault interprets as additional path segments when rendering the polic

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API company bank account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to create, replace, or delete bank account details of any company without requiring read access to that company. Attackers can inject attacker-controlled IBANs as creditor accounts, which are then wr

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API third-party site account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to overwrite the WebPortal password of any company by bypassing per-object access checks that are only enforced on read routes. Attackers can replace the victim company's WebPortal password throu

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5006

A vulnerability was identified in HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) such that an authenticated attacker may manipulate an identity value referenced by a templated policy path to gain unintended access to Vault paths. An attacker who can control the referenced identity value may include slash ({{/}}) characters that Vault interprets as additional path segments when rendering the polic

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 11.4
Conf: 50%
org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-api, org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-impl

### Summary The Sakai REST API endpoint `DELETE /api/users/{userId}/profile/image` does not verify that the requesting user is authorized to modify the target user's profile. Any authenticated user can delete the profile image of any other user, including administrators, by supplying a different `userId` in the path. The service layer has no authorization check, and the delete cascades through Co

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71507

Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API company bank account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to create, replace, or delete bank account details of any company without requiring read access to that company. Attackers can inject attacker-controlled IBANs as creditor accounts, which are then wr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71505

Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API third-party site account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to overwrite the WebPortal password of any company by bypassing per-object access checks that are only enforced on read routes. Attackers can replace the victim company's WebPortal password throu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Label Studio does not scope the annotation detail endpoint to the requesting user's organization. AnnotationAPI in label_studio/tasks/api.py declares queryset = Annotation.objects.all() and provides no get_queryset override, so the default lookup retrieves any annotation by primary key. The view's permission_required entries name annotations.view, annotations.change and annotations.delete, and lab

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76073

Label Studio does not scope the annotation detail endpoint to the requesting user's organization. AnnotationAPI in label_studio/tasks/api.py declares queryset = Annotation.objects.all() and provides no get_queryset override, so the default lookup retrieves any annotation by primary key. The view's permission_required entries name annotations.view, annotations.change and annotations.delete, and lab

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77995

Joomla Extension - miniorange.com - Arbitrary account takeover in miniOrange OAuth Client < 3.2.0 - The manipulation of a cookie value allows actors to login as arbitrary accounts, including admins.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78365

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the supplier API in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 4.0.0 through 5.3.1 allows any authenticated user to read and modify another company's supplier record, and to reassign it to their own company, via a PUT request to /api/supplier/{id} setting company_id in the body.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78203

CVE-2026-78203 是 Ghostwriter 报告协作平台中一个已修复的访问控制缺陷,影响 7.1.2 之前的版本。该漏洞位于报告模板替换(swap)端点,服务端未能校验模板归属权,导致低权限攻击者能够将其他客户端(客户)作用域下的模板附加到自己的报告中。由于模板主键是顺序递增的,攻击者可以枚举这些主键,从而遍历并绑定任意外部模板。在成功绑定后,攻击者通过生成报告可泄露模板内容,包括信头、样板文字和方法论文本等敏感信息。CVSS 评分为 7.1(高),攻击向量为网络,攻击复杂度低,需要低权限前置条件,无需用户交互,影响范围不变,机密性影响高、完整性影响低。目前该漏洞未被列入 CISA KEV 目录,也无在野利用证据,但因其可导致跨客户敏感信息泄露,且利用条件简单,受影响组织应优先升级到 Ghostwriter 7.1.2 或更高版本,同时审查并限制报告模板相关 API 的网络暴露,并关注官方公告。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限用户跨客户窃取敏感报告模板内容,破坏多租户隔离,且利用简单(仅需枚举主键),在渗透测试或红队场景中可能泄露客户机密。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78160

A vulnerability has been found in Dolibarr ERP up to 18.0.10/22.0.5/23.0.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /user/note.php of the component User Notes Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 23.0.4 and 24.0.0 is capable of addressing this issue. The identifier of the patch is 9b522

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
INFO EPSS 0%
ADVISORY 2026-08-24

Dolibarr ERP User Notes note.php authorization

推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

A vulnerability has been found in Dolibarr ERP up to 18.0.10/22.0.5/23.0.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /user/note.php of the component User Notes Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 23.0.4 and 24.0.0 is capable of addressing this issue. The identifier of the patch is 9b522

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78144

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /boarders.php of the component Boarder Management Module. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-78142

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /archived_records.php of the component Restore/Delete. The manipulation of the argument resident_id results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Brave Popup Builder (slug: brave-popup-builder) has a broken access control issue in versions through 0.8.5. Any logged-in user - Subscriber or WooCommerce Customer is enough — can read popup content they shouldn't have access to by passing a post ID in the URL.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77116

Brave Popup Builder (slug: brave-popup-builder) has a broken access control issue in versions through 0.8.5. Any logged-in user - Subscriber or WooCommerce Customer is enough — can read popup content they shouldn't have access to by passing a post ID in the URL.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Cross-customer order replication in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user could supply another customer's order_id to copy their cart contents and address data into the attacker's session. The CSRF token was validated but ownership was not checked.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Order content disclosure J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An unauthenticated visitor could supply any order_id as a query parameter to render the full checkout confirmation page for that order, including line items, prices, and totals.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62283

Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. Nezha versions 1.14.13 through 1.14.14 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 do not bind stream identifiers created by CreateStream in service/rpc/io_stream.go to their creating user, and `GET /ws/terminal/:id` and `GET /ws/file/:id` only check whether the supplied UUID exists. An authenticated RoleMember who obtains

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67360

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Cross-customer order replication in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user could supply another customer's order_id to copy their cart contents and address data into the attacker's session. The CSRF token was validated but ownership was not checked.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67359

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Order content disclosure J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An unauthenticated visitor could supply any order_id as a query parameter to render the full checkout confirmation page for that order, including line items, prices, and totals.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67358

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Download quota manipulation in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user with a valid order token could increment the download limit counter on a download record belonging to a different order. The endpoint also lacked a CSRF token.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77780

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the transaction save endpoint in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 4.9.1 through 5.14.0 allows a user with transaction and accounting creation permissions to disclose another company's bank account name, bank name and card last four digits via a bank_account_id or bank_card_id belonging to that company in POST /transaction/save, which is persisted and ren

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77776

Headroom's LLM proxy derives the memory owner from the x-headroom-user-id request header. The header is read directly at several points in headroom/proxy/handlers/openai.py, including the chat completion and websocket paths, and nothing binds the value to the caller. A client can therefore name another user's identifier and read or write that user's stored LLM memory. The fix introduces a single r

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77759

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the transaction API in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 5.0.0 through 5.3.5 allows an authenticated user to read the transactions of other companies on the same instance via an incremented identifier in GET /api/transaction/{id}, which is resolved without company scoping and without any permission check.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77769

The report.list procedure in packages/trpc/src/routers/report.ts accepted a projectId and a dashboardId and returned getReportsByDashboardId(dashboardId). The enforceAccess middleware in packages/trpc/src/trpc.ts verified membership for the supplied projectId, but nothing verified that the supplied dashboardId belonged to that project, and getReportsByDashboardId in packages/db/src/services/report

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77768

The report.get procedure in packages/trpc/src/routers/report.ts accepted only a reportId and returned getReportById(reportId) directly. The enforceAccess middleware in packages/trpc/src/trpc.ts evaluates membership only when the input carries a projectId or organizationId key, so an input consisting of a reportId alone passed through unchecked, and getReportById in packages/db/src/services/reports

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19085

The Duplicate Post WordPress plugin before 1.5.6 does not check that a user may read the content of a post before duplicating it, allowing users with a delegated role to republish another user's password-protected post as publicly readable.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69558

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62945

TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.1.3, TREK file upload, update, and link actions accept attacker-controlled reservation_id, place_id, and assignment_id values without using findForeignLinkTarget() to verify that the referenced object belongs to the file's trip. An authenticated user with file-edit permission on any accessible trip can submit a foreign reservation identifier throu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55489

BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom. Prior to 3.0.29, BigBlueButton presenters could submit a presentationId through /api/graphql that identified a presentation belonging to another meeting. akka-bbb-apps/src/main/scala/org/bigbluebutton/core/apps/presentationpod/RemovePresentationPubMsgHdlr.scala did not verify the presentation's meeting identifier before deletion, allowing a presen

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.1.3, TREK file upload, update, and link actions accept attacker-controlled reservation_id, place_id, and assignment_id values without using findForeignLinkTarget() to verify that the referenced object belongs to the file's trip. An authenticated user with file-edit permission on any accessible trip can submit a foreign reservation identifier throu

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom. Prior to 3.0.29, BigBlueButton presenters could submit a presentationId through /api/graphql that identified a presentation belonging to another meeting. akka-bbb-apps/src/main/scala/org/bigbluebutton/core/apps/presentationpod/RemovePresentationPubMsgHdlr.scala did not verify the presentation's meeting identifier before deletion, allowing a presen

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63003

django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, page duplication lacks an object-level authorization check on the source page. In cms/admin/forms.py, DuplicatePageForm.source accepts any Page, the AddPageForm constructor does not narrow a hidden source field, AddPageForm.clean does not validate the source against the user,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61663

django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, render_object_structure fails to authorize non-PageContent objects that use PlaceholderRelationField. An active staff user without cms.use_structure or model-level view or change permission can request the //admin/cms/placeholder/object//structure// endpoint with guessed cont

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54622

django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.8, the copy_plugins endpoint in cms/admin/placeholderadmin.py authorizes only the destination clipboard. The _copy_plugin_to_clipboard and _copy_placeholder_to_clipboard paths accept source_placeholder_id and source_plugin_id values but use has_copy_plugins_permission and check_

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
winter/wn-backend-module

### Impact `Backend\Controllers\MyAccount`, introduced in v1.2.13, declares an empty `$requiredPermissions` array so that any authenticated backend user can manage their own account. It implements the `FormController` behavior, which exposes three routable actions — `create`, `update` and `preview` — that each take a record id from the URL. `index()` passes the authenticated user's own id to the

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
django-cms

## Summary The django-cms frontend-editing structure endpoint ``` GET //admin/cms/placeholder/object//structure// ``` did not perform an object-level authorization check for **non-`PageContent`** objects. Any authenticated, active staff user could request the structure endpoint for a frontend-editable object (a model using `PlaceholderRelationField`) and read its placeholder/plugin structure, e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
django-cms

## Impact The only authorization gate on the duplicate flow is `PageAdmin.has_add_permission`, which checks `user_can_add_page(user, site)` / `user_can_add_subpage(...)` — i.e. *“may this user create a page at all”*. Nothing checks the user’s relationship to the page being copied: - `cms/admin/forms.py` — `DuplicatePageForm.source = ModelChoiceField(queryset=Page.objects.all(), widget=HiddenInpu

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, page duplication lacks an object-level authorization check on the source page. In cms/admin/forms.py, DuplicatePageForm.source accepts any Page, the AddPageForm constructor does not narrow a hidden source field, AddPageForm.clean does not validate the source against the user,

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76634

WeGIA before 3.9.2 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the employee profile page that allows authenticated attackers to access arbitrary employee records by injecting an id_pessoa parameter through a request extraction function that overwrites the session-derived identifier. Attackers can enumerate all user identifiers to retrieve full profile data for any employee accoun

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64969

ATutor is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attack in profile picture related endpoints. Any authenticated user, including a student, can supply another user's member_id in a POST request to the profile album endpoint and permanently delete that user's profile picture, including those of instructors and administrators. Product is no longer actively supported and the vulnerabi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64961

ATutor is vulnerable to authentication bypass . Although a token validation check is present in the auto-login functionality, the values required for token validation remain uninitialized in certain code paths. An unauthenticated attacker who can determine a user's identifier and registration timestamp can generate a valid token and authenticate as an existing user, including administrator, withou

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77081

n8n before 1.123.69, 2.x before 2.33.4, and 2.x before 2.34.1 contain an allowed-domains bypass in the GraphQL node. When the node's Authentication parameter is set to expression mode, every authentication-gated credential selector is treated as active; if two credentials of different types are attached, the node enforces the allowed-domains policy of only the first credential while still attachin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77079

n8n before 2.34.1 and 2.33.4 contains an authorization bypass in the custom project role deletion (reassignment) path. When deleting a custom project role with a reassignment target, the code validated only that the target role existed and was project-scoped, performing no project-level authorization check. A user holding only the narrow role:manageProject global scope could delete any custom proj

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-77073

n8n versions before 2.34.1 contain a credential validation bypass in the MCP create_workflow_from_code tool when authentication type is set to an expression. Attackers with a valid MCP Bearer API key and knowledge of a target credential ID can persist unauthorized cross-project credential references on workflows in different projects.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could access and delete all relevant data in experiment history, including data associated with other users. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk AI Toolkit does not preserve the trusted experiment scope when it processes caller-controlled query values before accessing restricted history data. For more info

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76397

In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could access and delete all relevant data in experiment history, including data associated with other users. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk AI Toolkit does not preserve the trusted experiment scope when it processes caller-controlled query values before accessing restricted history data. For more info

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76263

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2 and 10.2.6, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could delete Splunk Processing Language version 2 (SPL2) modules belonging to other users through the data management orchestrator interface. The vulnerability does not affect Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2. The broken object level authorization is possible because the data ma

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59992

Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to next-tinacms-s3 23.0.4, next-tinacms-dos 23.0.4, next-tinacms-azure 14.0.4, and next-tinacms-cloudinary 26.0.4, the first-party production media adapters pass attacker-controlled object keys to storage SDK upload and delete operations without enforcing the operator's configured mediaRoot. In packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts, createMedi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
next-tinacms-s3, next-tinacms-dos, next-tinacms-azure, next-tinacms-cloudinary

## Summary The production media handler shipped by `next-tinacms-s3` (`createMediaHandler` in `packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts`) accepts an attacker-chosen `?key=` query parameter and returns an AWS-signed `PutObject` URL whose `Key` is that value, with no check that the key falls under the operator's configured `mediaRoot`. The same handler's `DELETE` branch reads `objectKey = (req.quer

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53548

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. Prior to 2.6.1, the GET /host/db/host/:id/password endpoint in src/backend/database/routes/host.ts accepts an authenticated user's numeric host ID and the field=password or field=sudoPassword query without enforcing host ownership during credential resolution. A failed requester-scoped loo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53546

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. Prior to 2.3.2, the terminal WebSocket accepts a user-controlled hostConfig.id and src/backend/ssh/host-resolver.ts resolves that host without requiring ownership or explicit access. When no credential is shared with the requester, resolveHostById performs an owner credential fallback, and

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68559

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. From 9.57 until 9.74, the /api/boards/:boardId/exportExcel route in models/exportExcel.js called the asynchronous exporterExcel.canExport(user) authorization guard from models/server/ExporterExcel.js without awaiting it. The returned Promise was always truthy, so exporterExcel.build(res) ran even when board.isVisibleBy(user) would deny access, allowin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
snipe/snipe-it

### Impact An attacker can completely bypass file-name randomization security and without authorization download confidential, signed EULA files belonging to any other user across the application. ### Steps to Reproduce: 1. Log in as a restricted user. 2. Send a GET request to /api/v1/users/{target_id}/eulas (where target_id belongs to a restricted/denied user). 3. Observe the response leaks the

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55694

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.3, a restricted user can request /api/v1/users/{target_id}/eulas to obtain another user's randomized EULA filename and then download the signed file through /account/stored-eula-file/{filename}. The primary /stored-eula-file/{filename} route correctly denies access, but app/Http/Controllers/ProfileController.php and app/Http/Controlle

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55482

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.4.1, a non-superadmin can use app/Http/Controllers/Assets/BulkAssetsController.php update() to submit company_id directly without Company::getIdForCurrentUser(), allowing assets to be moved across company boundaries and breaking multi-tenant isolation. This issue is fixed in version 8.4.1.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18315

The TrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key leading to Account Takeover in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to the admin_user_create_cus AJAX handler lacking any authentication or capability check before passing the attacker-supplied truebooker_wp_user_id parameter directly to

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62666

Grav API Plugin is a RESTful API for Grav CMS that provides full headless access to your site's content. Prior to 1.0.6, Grav API plugin UsersController::createApiKey(), generate2fa(), and disable2fa() omit the accessGrantsSuper() target check used by sibling user mutation endpoints. A non-super account with api.users.write can mint an API key bound to an access.api.super target through requireApi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75951

Joomla Extension - cmsjunkie.com - Insecure Direct Object Reference (multiple frontend/API actions) in J-BusinessDirectory < 6.2.3

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75950

Joomla Extension - cmsjunkie.com - Unauthenticated listing ownership takeover in J-BusinessDirectory < 6.2.3 - Ownership could be changed using attacker-supplied company and user IDs, including for listings that already had an owner. 6.2.3 binds the action to the authenticated user and only allows unowned listings.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76237

stigmem-node before 0.9.0a12 contains a broken object level authorization (cross-tenant BOLA) vulnerability in the quarantine review endpoints. On multi-tenant deployments running the opt-in stigmem-plugin-multi-tenant, the list/count queries and _get_quarantined_fact in routes/quarantine.py lacked a tenant_id predicate and the garden lookup was not tenant-scoped, allowing a tenant administrator w

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76236

stigmem-node before 0.9.0a12 contains a cross-tenant broken object level authorization (BOLA) flaw in the RTBF (right-to-be-forgotten) tombstone mechanism. issue_tombstone defaulted the tenant to "default" instead of the caller's tenant, allowing deletion records to be written to the wrong tenant, and the read-suppression path (_get_tombstone_filter and the tombstone scope cache) lacked a tenant_i

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-76216

Vikunja through 2.4.0 contains a principal-type confusion vulnerability where LinkSharing principals with id N are treated as user principals with users.id == N at three permission checks lacking type guards. Attackers with a link-share JWT can remove victims from teams, enumerate and delete victim bot users, or read team rosters by exploiting id collisions in the autoincrement space.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19417

The KiviCare WordPress plugin before 4.5.4 does not verify that the requesting user is entitled to the media file being served, allowing authenticated patient-level users to download any file in the media library, including other patients' uploaded medical reports.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19416

The KiviCare WordPress plugin before 4.5.4 does not verify that the requesting user owns the appointment being modified, allowing authenticated patient-level users to cancel and reschedule other patients' appointments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16979

The SmartCrawl SEO checker, analyzer & optimizer WordPress plugin before 3.16.3 does not perform capability checks on two of its AJAX actions, allowing users with at least the Subscriber role to read the titles of private and draft posts by ID and to enumerate stored post-meta key names.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16058

The YayCurrency WordPress plugin before 3.3.5 does not perform any capability or ownership check on several of its multi-vendor integration handlers that are reachable by unauthenticated users, allowing anyone to read the store's order totals and its vendors' earnings, balance ledgers, and withdrawal histories by iterating identifiers.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14861

The User Verification by PickPlugins WordPress plugin through 2.0.47 does not verify that a request to resend a verification email is authorized to act on the supplied user, nor bind the protecting token to that user, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reset arbitrary users' email-verification status and lock them, including administrators, out of their accounts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14826

The Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) WordPress plugin before 11.2.4 does not perform a per-object ownership check on the REST routes that return a quiz's email-notification and results-page configuration, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to read the configuration, including notification recipient addresses, of quizzes created by other users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14825

The Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) WordPress plugin before 11.2.4 does not perform a per-object ownership check before saving a quiz's front-end text settings, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to modify the text settings of quizzes created by other users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14196

The WCFM Marketplace WordPress plugin before 3.8.1 does not verify that a marketplace vendor owns a review before allowing it to be unapproved or deleted, allowing any vendor to modify or permanently delete reviews belonging to other vendors' stores.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13175

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.21 does not verify ownership before allowing schedule records to be modified or deleted, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to alter or delete schedule entries created by other users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13169

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.21 does not properly verify ownership of events before allowing them to be modified, deleted, or reassigned to a different author, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to alter, delete, or take over events created by other users including administrators.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
lemur

## Summary Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur `PUT /api/1/certificates//revoke` authorizes the caller against the *Lemur database row* (creator == current user, or `CertificatePermission` over the row's roles) rather than the underlying CA-side certificate identity. Separately, `POST /api/1/certificates/upload` lets any user passing `StrictRolePermission` create a new `Certificate

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
lemur

## Summary Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur The certificate create and upload endpoints accept a `replaces[]` (alias `replacements`) array that is resolved to live `Certificate` ORM objects with no ownership or `CertificatePermission` check on the referenced certificates. The SQLAlchemy `Certificate.replaces` append listener then immediately sets `victim.notify = False` and popu

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71417

Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.3, POST /api/1/certificates/upload allowed a non-read-only user to create a duplicate row using another certificate body, authority_id, serial, or external_id without requiring permission on the underlying authority. PUT /api/1/certificates//revoke authorized the caller against only the selected Lemur row, so the creator of the duplicate bypasse

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-71308

Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. From 0.5.0 until 1.9.3, certificate create, upload, and edit requests accepted replaces[] or replacements identifiers that AssociatedCertificateSchema resolved with fetch_objects without a CertificatePermission check. Assigning those objects to Certificate.replaces invoked an append listener that disabled the victim certificate notifications and marked it as

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55166

Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.2, authenticated users could influence an ACME authority acme_url without an effective server-side destination restriction and trigger AcmeHandler.setup_acme_client to make backend requests. An attacker could target cloud instance metadata or internal services from Lemur network context, potentially obtaining credentials available to the host. T

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69160

OpenList a file list program that supports multiple storage. Prior to 4.2.4, the share creation and update checks in server/handles/sharing.go use strings.HasPrefix(requested_path, user.BasePath) without enforcing a directory separator boundary. An authenticated user with CanShare permission and a BasePath such as /base can submit a sibling path such as /base2/secret.txt, create a share for the ou

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50167

Kurrier is a modern, self-hosted workspace for email, calendar, contacts, and storage. Prior to 1.2.4, Kurrier API endpoints for listing and retrieving webhook and identity resources did not enforce ownership checks for authenticated API requests. An attacker with a valid API key could use another account's identifiers to read and enumerate webhook and identity resources belonging to that account

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61574

authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, the Remote Access Control endpoint list returns every configured endpoint to any authenticated user regardless of which applications the user may access, and the response includes connection settings that can contain stored credentials. The endpoint listing does not apply the access controls governing the endpoints, and

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49228

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to access products owned by another Vendor. The admin/controller/product/products.php controller accepts a caller-controlled product_id for duplicate and delete actions, and admin/sql/sqlite/product.sql loads and mu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49225

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product revision operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to access revisions for products owned by another Vendor. The admin/controller/product/revisions.php route reuses admin/controller/content/revisions.php, while admin/sql/sqlite/product_content_revision.sql

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49224

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend post revision operations allow a low-privileged Author to access revisions for posts owned by another Author. The admin/controller/content/revisions.php controller and admin/sql/sqlite/post_content_revision.sql queries trust caller-controlled post_id, language_id,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49223

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product review operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage reviews under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_review.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_review_id and do not verify product_review.product_id against product.admi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49222

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product question operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage questions under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_question.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_question_id and do not verify product_question.product_id against pr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19869

@neo4j/graphql from 5.2.0 until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level @authentication rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level @authentication rule is also present on the same operation type. When both a type-level @authentication (on Query/Mutation) and a field-level @authentication (on a root custom-resolver field within that type) are declared, only the type-level rule

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49227

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend comment operations allow a low-privileged Author to manage comments under another Author's posts. The admin/controller/content/comment.php and admin/controller/content/comments.php controllers and the admin/sql/sqlite/comment.sql queries accept a caller-controlled

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49226

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend post operations allow a low-privileged Author to access posts owned by another Author. The admin/controller/content/posts.php controller permits filter[admin_id] to replace the server-selected admin_id restriction and accepts a caller-controlled post_id for duplic

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49221

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend digital asset operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to access digital assets linked to another Vendor's products. The admin/controller/product/digital-asset.php and admin/controller/product/digital-assets.php controllers and the admin/sql/sqlite/digital_asset.s

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45120

MyBB is free and open source forum software. Prior to 1.8.40, the calendar module does not verify private event status consistently, allowing users with viewing and moderation permissions to access and moderate private events. The private-event check used by get_events() in inc/functions_calendar.php and the event action is missing from the remaining calendar.php actions, despite the limited-acces

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73395

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System <= 3.2.36 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73189

Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WP Crowdfunding < 2.2.1 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69189

Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem. Prior to 2026.6.0, the team, teamMembers.user, RESTHistory, GQLHistory, currentRESTSession, currentGQLSession, environments, globalEnvironments, and settings GraphQL paths expose another workspace member's private User data, while toggleHistoryStarStatus and removeRequestFromHistory in the UserHistory service accept another user's history ide

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16309

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Netiket Information Technologies EdoWEB allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects EdoWEB: before 780-g7.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63178

Onyx is an open-source AI platform. Prior to 4.3.0, Onyx Enterprise Edition's PATCH /manage/admin/user-group/{user_group_id} and POST /manage/admin/user-group/{user_group_id}/add-users endpoints in ee/onyx/server/user_group/api.py call update_user_group and add_users_to_user_group in ee/onyx/db/user_group.py without enforcing _validate_curator_can_modify_group, allowing a curator to add accounts t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

phpIPAM through 1.8.1 fails to verify that a requested IP address belongs to the subnet a temporary share token was issued for. In app/temp_share/index.php and app/temp_share/address.php, when the share type is 'subnets', the subnetId parameter is used directly as a database primary key to fetch an address without confirming the address belongs to the authorized subnet. An unauthenticated party ho

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Crawlab fails to verify user ownership or administrative role on the password-change endpoint, allowing any authenticated user to reset any account's password. Attackers can enumerate user accounts through the user listing endpoint and change administrator credentials to achieve full account takeover and arbitrary code execution.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-75103

Crawlab fails to verify user ownership or administrative role on the password-change endpoint, allowing any authenticated user to reset any account's password. Attackers can enumerate user accounts through the user listing endpoint and change administrator credentials to achieve full account takeover and arbitrary code execution.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14832

CVE-2026-14832 影响 ShopSmart Loyalty for WooCommerce WordPress 插件(版本至 1.0.0)。该插件存在一个严重的访问控制缺失问题:其电话号查询接口暴露给未认证用户,且没有执行任何授权或所有权检查。攻击者只需知道某个客户的电话号码,即可通过该接口检索该客户的忠诚度档案,其中包含姓名、电子邮件地址和账户余额等敏感个人数据。由于该漏洞可通过网络远程利用,且无需任何权限或用户交互,攻击门槛极低,因此可能被用于批量收集客户隐私信息,造成数据泄露和隐私侵犯。CVSS 评分为 5.3(中等),攻击向量为网络,攻击复杂度低,影响保密性(低)但不对完整性和可用性造成影响。目前该漏洞尚未被列入 KEV 目录,也没有明确证据表明已被在野利用。修复建议包括:立即升级插件到已修复的版本(如有);若暂无补丁,应暂时禁用或限制该电话号查询功能的网络暴露,例如通过 Web 应用防火墙规则或服务器配置阻止未授权访问;同时审查插件源码,确保所有敏感接口都实施适当的授权和所有权验证。

💡 影响/原因: 未认证接口泄露客户姓名、邮箱、余额等隐私,攻击者仅凭电话号即可窃取数据,风险直接且利用门槛极低,需尽快处置。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19979

CVE-2026-19979 是 GL.iNet 多款路由器/网关产品中 WebDAV 服务组件存在的一个授权绕过漏洞。受影响设备包括 A1300、AX1800、AXT1800、BE1400、BE3600、BE6500、BE9300、BE10000、E5800、MT2500、MT3000、MT3600BE、MT5000、MT6000、X2000、X3000、XE3000 等,固件版本直至 4.8.x。漏洞位于 WebDAV 服务的 COPY/MOVE 功能中,攻击者可通过远程发送特制请求,在无需任何身份认证的情况下绕过授权机制,从而对目标设备执行未授权的文件操作。CVSS 评分为 8.3(高危),攻击向量为网络,攻击复杂度低,无需特权,且影响范围可波及相邻系统。厂商 GL.iNet 已确认漏洞存在,但尚未提供完整修复版本信息。此漏洞可能导致攻击者非法读取、修改或删除设备上的文件,破坏设备正常功能,甚至为进一步入侵内网创造条件。建议用户立即关注官方固件更新,在补丁发布前,应限制 WebDAV 服务的网络暴露,避免将其直接暴露于公网,并采取防火墙规则仅允许可信 IP 访问。由于该漏洞可被远程利用且利用难度低,应视为高危风险,及时采取缓解措施。

💡 影响/原因: 影响 GL.iNet 全线多款路由器直至 4.8.x,WebDAV 授权绕过可被远程无认证利用,CVSS 8.3 高危。设备常承载家庭/办公网络边界,易被攻击者控制文件系统并横向渗透,需立即关注补丁并收敛暴露面。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19966

A vulnerability was identified in CodeCanyon TimeCamp Integration for CRM up to 2.8. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /clients/save_contact of the component Contact Information Update. Such manipulation of the argument contact_id leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.55.0.2 via the 'draft' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enumerate sequential integer entry IDs via the 'draft' parameter and read ot

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12998

The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.55.0.2 via the 'draft' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enumerate sequential integer entry IDs via the 'draft' parameter and read ot

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 27.7 via the appointment() method of the Mobile Staff Cabinet API (resource=appointment, action=bookly_mobile_staff_cabinet) in frontend/modules/mobile_staff_cabinet/api/handlers/Handler1_0.php. This is due to the handler loading an Appointment by the attacker-supplied params[id] wit

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Appointment Booking Calendar — Simply Schedule Appointments Booking Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.12.10 via the ssa_past_appointments due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to access appointment recor

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The PPWP – Password Protect WordPress | #1 Most-Reviewed Password Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.20 via the ppw_free_set_password AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update the password o

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13358

The Appointment Booking Calendar — Simply Schedule Appointments Booking Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.12.10 via the ssa_past_appointments due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to access appointment recor

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12905

The Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 27.7 via the appointment() method of the Mobile Staff Cabinet API (resource=appointment, action=bookly_mobile_staff_cabinet) in frontend/modules/mobile_staff_cabinet/api/handlers/Handler1_0.php. This is due to the handler loading an Appointment by the attacker-supplied params[id] wit

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-10005

The PPWP – Password Protect WordPress | #1 Most-Reviewed Password Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.20 via the ppw_free_set_password AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update the password o

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16142

The TrueBooker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Account Takeover in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to the add_front_user_update() AJAX handler being registered for unauthenticated users and accepting an arbitrary truebooker_wp_user_id value, which is passed directly to wp_update_user() without verifying authentication or ownership. This makes it possible for unauthentic

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. An administrator of any repository, by knowing or guessing a target notification's Universally Unique Identifier (UUID), can read the notification configuration, including sensitive details like webhook URLs, Slack tokens, and email addresses. This vulnerability also allows them to trigger test notifications for another repository. This could lead to unauthorized

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-74242

CVE-2026-74242 是 Red Hat Quay 中存在的一个信息泄露漏洞。该漏洞源于对通知 UUID 的访问控制不当:任何仓库的管理员只要知道或猜到目标通知的 UUID,就可以读取该通知的配置信息,包括 webhook URL、Slack 令牌和电子邮件地址等敏感数据。此外,攻击者还能触发其他仓库的测试通知,可能导致未授权的信息泄露以及通知服务的滥用。由于攻击成功需要较高的攻击复杂度(AC:H)且需要低权限(PR:L),CVSS 评分为 5.3,属于中危漏洞。该漏洞影响网络攻击面,且无需用户交互。目前没有证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用,也未列入 KEV 目录。建议受影响的 Red Hat Quay 用户尽快升级到修复版本,同时限制管理接口的网络暴露,并审计仓库管理员权限,避免不必要的敏感信息泄露。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞可致仓库管理员越权读取其他仓库的敏感通知配置,造成凭据泄露并可能利用通知服务进行钓鱼或干扰,需及时修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19838

A security vulnerability has been detected in Webkul Bagisto up to 2.4.4. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/reporting/sales/ of the component Backend Reporting Endpoint. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor confirms: "The reported issues were alread

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19836

A security flaw has been discovered in Webkul Bagisto up to 2.4.4. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin/customers/view of the component Backend Customer Detail Feature. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The ven

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19834

A vulnerability was determined in Webkul Bagisto up to 2.4.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/customers/login-as-customer/ of the component Admin Customer Impersonation Feature. This manipulation of the argument ID causes authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor confirms: "The reported iss

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19870

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the payroll module in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.10 allows authenticated users holding the read payroll permission to view the salary and banking details of employees of any other company in the instance, and users holding the create payroll permission to create payroll records attributed to another company's employees, because the list

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19784

A flaw has been found in francoisjacquet RosarioSIS up to 12.8. This affects the function DBUpdate of the file Discipline/Referrals.php. This manipulation causes authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 12.9 is able to mitigate this issue. Patch name: 04dd1a368ddf80ad7082baefa3c656e4e1825c76. It is suggested to

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 12.4
Conf: 50%

A flaw has been found in francoisjacquet RosarioSIS up to 12.8. This affects the function DBUpdate of the file Discipline/Referrals.php. This manipulation causes authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 12.9 is able to mitigate this issue. Patch name: 04dd1a368ddf80ad7082baefa3c656e4e1825c76. It is suggested to

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

streama contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in ViewingStatusController that allows authenticated users to read and delete other users' viewing status records. Attackers can enumerate all users' watch progress, delete arbitrary viewing history, and manipulate other users' Continue Watching dashboards by supplying arbitrary primary keys without ownership verification.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73841

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73657

Trigger.dev is a platform for building and deploying fully managed AI agents and workflows. From 4.4.2 until 4.5.0-rc.4, `POST /api/v1/runs/:runParam/replay` in apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.runs.$runParam.replay.ts uses `prisma.taskRun.findUnique({ where: { friendlyId: runParam } })` without a runtimeEnvironmentId filter, then ReplayTaskRunService in apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.serv

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73039

streama contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in ViewingStatusController that allows authenticated users to read and delete other users' viewing status records. Attackers can enumerate all users' watch progress, delete arbitrary viewing history, and manipulate other users' Continue Watching dashboards by supplying arbitrary primary keys without ownership verification.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Kibana Agent Builder A2A JSON-RPC API endpoint derives the identifier of a stored conversation from a user-supplied input, and the ownership check on that identifier does not distinguish between a conversation that does not exist and one that exists but belongs to another user. As a result, an authenticated user holding only the Agent Builder read privilege can supply an identifier already in use

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized query execution against Elastic Agents that are assigned to a Kibana space the requesting user has no access to, via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A user who is authorized to run Osquery live queries in one space can have a query carried out on hosts belonging to anot

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Fleet Server can lead to information disclosure via Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (CAPEC-77). The authorization decision for artifact downloads relied on a client-supplied value that was persisted without being validated against the server-side record of the requesting agent's assignment. An authenticated party in possession of

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73656

Trigger.dev is a platform for building and deploying fully managed AI agents and workflows. Prior to 4.5.6, POST /api/v1/deployments/:deploymentId/background-workers calls CreateDeploymentBackgroundWorkerServiceV4.call() in apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorkerV4.server.ts, where workerDeployment.findFirst() selects a deployment by friendlyId without an environmentId predica

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72680

Kibana Agent Builder A2A JSON-RPC API endpoint derives the identifier of a stored conversation from a user-supplied input, and the ownership check on that identifier does not distinguish between a conversation that does not exist and one that exists but belongs to another user. As a result, an authenticated user holding only the Agent Builder read privilege can supply an identifier already in use

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72666

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized query execution against Elastic Agents that are assigned to a Kibana space the requesting user has no access to, via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A user who is authorized to run Osquery live queries in one space can have a query carried out on hosts belonging to anot

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72657

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Fleet Server can lead to information disclosure via Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (CAPEC-77). The authorization decision for artifact downloads relied on a client-supplied value that was persisted without being validated against the server-side record of the requesting agent's assignment. An authenticated party in possession of

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72650

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user who is authorized to read alerting rules in a single Kibana space could retrieve alerting rule execution telemetry that belongs to spaces the user is not authorized to access. The disclosed telemetry in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72629

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). The result is disclosure of inference output from a trained model in a different space that the user is not authorized to list, read, or use, which exposes the behavior of a model. The same pattern also reached the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Trigger.dev is a platform for building and deploying fully managed AI agents and workflows. Prior to 4.5.6, POST /api/v1/deployments/:deploymentId/background-workers calls CreateDeploymentBackgroundWorkerServiceV4.call() in apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorkerV4.server.ts, where workerDeployment.findFirst() selects a deployment by friendlyId without an environmentId predica

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73644

OpenDJ is an LDAPv3 compliant directory service. Prior to 5.1.2, the SASL PLAIN authorization identity path in opendj-server-legacy/src/main/java/org/opends/server/extensions/PlainSASLMechanismHandler.java checked the PROXIED_AUTH privilege but did not evaluate the mayProxy proxy ACI scope when an authzid resolved to a different user. Both dn: and u: or bare authzid forms could therefore let an au

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72741

Rainbond through 6.9.7 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the CheckToken function that allows authenticated attackers to access unauthorized enterprise resources by substituting another enterprise's tenant name in URL paths. Attackers can use any valid API token to bypass enterprise ID verification and access or modify another enterprise's services, plugins, environment variables, a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 3.4
Conf: 50%
CVE-2026-58445

Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
INFO EPSS 0%
VULNERABILITY 2026-08-13

Gitea LFS Deploy-Key Privilege Escalation

推荐 3.4
Conf: 50%
CVE-2026-58435

Gitea LFS Deploy-Key Privilege Escalation

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58432

Missing Authorization and Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in code.gitea.io/gitea

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57886

Cross-repository issue/comment attachment re-linking can expose private attachment content

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
INFO EPSS 0%
ADVISORY 2026-08-13

Gitea LFS Deploy-Key Privilege Escalation

推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Gitea LFS Deploy-Key Privilege Escalation

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Missing Authorization and Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in code.gitea.io/gitea

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Cross-repository issue/comment attachment re-linking can expose private attachment content

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19734

Missing Authorization and Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the product management component in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.4.7 allows authenticated users of any company to read the full sensitive data (price, cost, stock, SKU, and barcode) of another company's product and to hijack that product by reassigning its company_id, via the product's numeric identifier, because `P

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28155

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Do Lasso <= 358 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73616

OpenRemote notification deletion endpoints fail to enforce realm boundaries, allowing any realm administrator to delete notifications belonging to other realms. Attackers with write:admin role in one realm can send DELETE requests to remove notifications from the master realm or other tenants without authorization checks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73612

File Browser before v2.63.22 fails to validate access rules for descendants during recursive copy, rename, and delete operations, allowing authenticated users to bypass path-based access controls. Attackers can copy, rename, or delete denied files by operating on their allowed parent directory, defeating rule-based isolation for confidentiality and integrity.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73610

SiYuan before v3.7.4 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the local storage filter that returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized. Unauthenticated attackers or publish readers can retrieve closed-tab history, search keywords, private document identifiers, and expanded folder paths by calling the getLocalStorage endpoint.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73606

SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/block/getRefIDs endpoint that fails to check password-protected document tiers. Unauthenticated readers can discover that password-protected documents reference specific blocks and obtain block identifiers without entering the document password.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73488

Flowise versions before 3.1.3 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the GET /api/v1/organization/customer-default-source endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to access other customers' payment and profile data by manipulating the customerId parameter. Attackers can enumerate predictable customer IDs to retrieve sensitive information including email addresses, account

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18945

The WP Helper Premium WordPress plugin before 4.7.6 does not verify the order key when rendering its custom order confirmation page or when handling the related AJAX actions, allowing unauthenticated users to view other customers' order details, including personal information, as well as change the state of arbitrary orders. Exploitation requires WooCommerce to be active and the WP Helper Premium

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14213

The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.6 does not verify that an authenticated employee (provider) is assigned to the appointment being accessed, allowing any employee to read any appointment by its identifier and disclose the booked customer's personal data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18750

vinny/views.py: (ModifyEmailNotifications) IDOR: view fetches VinceCommEmail by raw pk from URL and toggles email_function/name without checking the record's contact belongs to the requesting group-admin. Lets a vendor admin flip notification routing (or read email/name) for another vendor's contact.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18749

The type=track branch authorises on _is_my_case(t_attach.case) only and never checks VinceTrackAttachment.shared. A coordinator-uploaded case artefact that has NOT been marked shared is still retrievable by any case member who has (or is sent) its uuid — leaks not-yet-released coordinator material to vendors on the case.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18744

Any authenticated case participant can fetch any OTHER vendor's CaseStatement + per-vul CaseMemberStatus by supplying that member's id — test_func only checks _is_my_case, not ownership of kwargs['member']. Bypasses share_status; leaks embargoed vendor affected/not-affected + statement text cross-tenant.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in the provider-credential-controller component of multicluster-engine (MCE). An attacker with specific permissions on the hub cluster, and knowledge of a prior credential value, could exploit an authorization bypass vulnerability. By manipulating `copiedFrom` labels, the attacker could intercept newly rotated provider credentials, leading to unauthorized information disclosure. T

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the resolveAssetPath endpoint that returns absolute filesystem paths unmodified to CheckAuth-only requests. Attackers can harvest relative asset paths from published documents and submit them to resolveAssetPath to obtain the server's absolute workspace path, disclosing the operating-system username and installation l

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.1.4 and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to cause AI usage to be attributed to another namespace, due to improper authorization of identity information supplied in requests.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19130

A flaw was found in the provider-credential-controller component of multicluster-engine (MCE). An attacker with specific permissions on the hub cluster, and knowledge of a prior credential value, could exploit an authorization bypass vulnerability. By manipulating `copiedFrom` labels, the attacker could intercept newly rotated provider credentials, leading to unauthorized information disclosure. T

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73303

Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.40.0, POST /api/v2/email on account.budibase.app accepted a client-controlled accountId without binding it to the authenticated session, while checking only currentEmail. An authenticated attacker who obtains a victim account identifier can start the email-change workflow for the victim, receive and submit the verification code through POST

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72802

SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the resolveAssetPath endpoint that returns absolute filesystem paths unmodified to CheckAuth-only requests. Attackers can harvest relative asset paths from published documents and submit them to resolveAssetPath to obtain the server's absolute workspace path, disclosing the operating-system username and installation l

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19228

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.1.4 and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to cause AI usage to be attributed to another namespace, due to improper authorization of identity information supplied in requests.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73298

The Microsoft Container Migration Solution Accelerator is a multi-service application that provides a multi-agent, AI-driven migration solution for moving container service configurations to Azure Kubernetes Service. In version 2.1.2 and earlier, a security vulnerability was identified in the Container Migration Solution Accelerator, specifically an authenticated IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Refer

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73239

Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) due to missing permission checks for multiple Artifact types in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68076

Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern could not match a team name containing an underscore, which team names are allowed to contain. When the guard did not apply, the lookup fell through to an unconditional global read

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
winter/wn-backend-module

### Impact Affected versions of Winter CMS did not validate the handler name submitted through the form postback mechanism (`_handler` POST field) in the same way as AJAX requests (`X_WINTER_REQUEST_HANDLER` header). The AJAX path validates that handler names match the `on[A-Z][\w+]*` pattern, but the postback path passed the handler name directly to the handler dispatcher with no validation. Th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47231

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/documents-files.php` gates state-changing modes by checking that the actor has `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`. The `move_save` handler then operates on a *separate* URL parameter `file_uuid` and calls `File::moveToFolder($destFolderUUID)`. `File::moveToFolder()` checks the upload right on t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47230

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/documents-files.php` mode `file_rename_save` shares the same root-cause shape as the cross-folder move bug (`05-documents-cross-folder-move-idor.md`): the top-level rights check at lines 79-89 validates `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`, but the rename operation acts on `file_uuid` — a separat

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47227

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. `modules/categories.php` checks that the supplied `type` parameter (`ANN`, `EVT`, `ROL`, `USF`, …) corresponds to a module the actor administers. The follow-up "is this specific category editable by me" check at lines 56-61 is dead code because it compares `$getType` (a category-type code) against mode names (`edit`/`save`/`delete`); the conditio

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47226

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, an authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on any one folder can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the top of `modules/documents-files.php` evaluates upload rights against the attacker-supplied `folder_uuid` URL parameter — not the file's actual pare

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18962

The WP Photo Album Plus WordPress plugin before 9.2.09.002 does not check that the current user is allowed to upload into the album they target when it processes a front-end upload, allowing any authenticated user, such as a Subscriber, to upload files into albums owned by other users or by the administrator. Exploitation requires the WP Photo Album Plus WordPress plugin before 9.2.09.002's front-

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16737

The WP Travel Engine WordPress plugin before 6.8.5 does not perform authorization or ownership checks when loading a caller-supplied booking identifier in one of its unauthenticated cart actions, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose any customer's booking order details and their stored billing information, and to overwrite that customer's booking record with their own data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14858

The WP Crowdfunding WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not verify order ownership before returning order details, allowing any authenticated users such as Subscribers to read the personal data of any WooCommerce order and enumerate every order in the store.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66878

CVE-2026-66878 是 multicloud-operators-subscription 组件中的一个信息泄露漏洞。该组件通常用于 OpenShift 或 Kubernetes 环境中的多集群订阅管理。漏洞的核心在于:具备命名空间管理员权限的用户(能够创建 Channel 和 Subscription 资源)可以通过操纵 Channel.Spec.SecretRef.Namespace 字段,将原本位于其他命名空间中的敏感 Secret 内容复制到自己的命名空间中,从而实现跨命名空间的敏感信息读取。此漏洞属于访问控制缺陷,攻击者无需拥有集群管理员权限,仅需较低权限即可利用,且可利用网络远程触发(CVSS 向量中 AV:N)。CVSS 评分为 7.7(高危),影响机密性(C:H),但不影响完整性和可用性(I:N/A:N)。由于涉及 Kubernetes/OpenShift 环境中的 Secret 管理,可能导致凭据、令牌或其他机密数据泄露,进而可能被用于进一步横向移动或特权提升。目前该漏洞尚未被列入 KEV,也没有明确证据表明已在野外被利用,因此暂不确认其实际武器化程度。建议相关用户优先升级到已修复的版本,并在升级前严格限制 Channel 和 Subscription 资源的创建权限,同时监控日志中异常的 SecretRef 字段修改行为。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限命名空间管理员窃取其他命名空间的敏感 Secret,直接破坏多租户隔离,可能导致集群凭据和业务机密泄露,需尽快修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64927

A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-channel component. This vulnerability allows a user with specific permissions to manipulate how the system handles sensitive information, known as Secrets, across different parts of the system (namespaces). By exploiting this, an attacker can modify these Secrets in unauthorized areas. This could lead to unauthorized access to information or elevated pr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Snipe-IT before 8.6.0 contains an authorization bypass (insecure direct object reference) in the asset checkout-request cancellation endpoint. The cancel_by_admin and requestingUser values are read from user-controlled URL path segments and used without a server-side authorization check, so any authenticated, low-privileged user can supply a non-empty cancel_by_admin value to bypass the request-ow

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Taubyte Tau v1.1.10 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the services/auth HTTP service that allows any authenticated user to read or permanently delete another tenant's project by supplying an arbitrary project ID to the GET and DELETE /projects/{id} endpoints. The GitHubTokenHTTPAuth middleware only validates that a caller presents a valid GitHub OAuth token without verifying owners

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

NetBox 4.5.8 contains an ORM injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers, including those with read-only API tokens, to inject arbitrary Django ORM lookup expressions into nested object references by supplying crafted JSON dictionary keys in POST, PUT, or PATCH requests to any REST API endpoint. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted queryset used by WritableNestedSerializer to per

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48765

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Versions prior to 3.17.0 allow a low-privilege read collaborator to extract a workspace OAuth `credentialsId` from a readable bot configuration and then overwrite that credential through `handleUpdateOAuthCredentials()` by supplying an attacker-controlled writable `workspaceId`. The update path validates only the attacker-supplied workspace and then updates the c

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19579

Snipe-IT before 8.6.0 contains an authorization bypass (insecure direct object reference) in the asset checkout-request cancellation endpoint. The cancel_by_admin and requestingUser values are read from user-controlled URL path segments and used without a server-side authorization check, so any authenticated, low-privileged user can supply a non-empty cancel_by_admin value to bypass the request-ow

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Versions prior to 3.17.0 allow a low-privilege read collaborator to extract a workspace OAuth `credentialsId` from a readable bot configuration and then overwrite that credential through `handleUpdateOAuthCredentials()` by supplying an attacker-controlled writable `workspaceId`. The update path validates only the attacker-supplied workspace and then updates the c

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69119

Taubyte Tau v1.1.10 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the services/auth HTTP service that allows any authenticated user to read or permanently delete another tenant's project by supplying an arbitrary project ID to the GET and DELETE /projects/{id} endpoints. The GitHubTokenHTTPAuth middleware only validates that a caller presents a valid GitHub OAuth token without verifying owners

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69117

NetBox 4.5.8 contains an ORM injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers, including those with read-only API tokens, to inject arbitrary Django ORM lookup expressions into nested object references by supplying crafted JSON dictionary keys in POST, PUT, or PATCH requests to any REST API endpoint. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted queryset used by WritableNestedSerializer to per

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48494

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. In version 3.16.1, an authenticated user who has read access to any typebot can resume a WhatsApp preview webhook session that belongs to a different typebot by mixing an authorized `typebotId` and `blockId` and a foreign preview phone number tied to another preview session. The WhatsApp test-webhook handler authorizes the parent typebot first, but then resolves

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58650

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47704

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Prior to version 3.17.0, an authenticated user who has read access to any typebot can resume a waiting webhook session that belongs to a different typebot by mixing an authorized `typebotId` and `blockId` and a foreign live `resultId`. The webhook resume handler authorizes the parent typebot first, but then resolves the descendant `result` only by `resultId`. As

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-73068

ToolJet is the open-source foundation am AI-native platform for building and deploying internal tools, workflows and AI agents. Prior to 3.20.207, the ToolJet Database HTTP API in server/src/modules/tooljet-db/controller.ts authorizes operations against the :organizationId URL path value without verifying that the caller belongs to that organization. JwtAuthGuard validates the tj-workspace-id head

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56721

CamaleonCMS version 2.9.2 and earlier contains a privilege escalation vulnerability via insecure direct object reference (IDOR) that allows authenticated low-privileged attackers to overwrite any user's credentials by exploiting a parameter confusion flaw between the authorization filter and action body in the UsersController. Attackers can send a PATCH request to the updated_ajax endpoint setting

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72774

n8n before 1.123.67, 2.31.5, and 2.32.1 contains a credential authorization bypass in the HTTP Request node. An authenticated member with edit access to a shared workflow can reference another user's credential while specifying the credential type via an expression. Because the pre-execution permission check compares the unresolved expression instead of the resolved credential type, the ownership

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72763

n8n before 1.123.67, 2.31.5, and 2.32.1 validates credential-access only for a node's top-level credentials and not for credentials referenced inside an Execute Sub-workflow node's inline workflow JSON. A member with Editor access to a shared workflow (when workflow sharing is enabled) who knows a target credential's ID can reference that credential in the inline JSON; it passes save-time and runt

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72547

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in Attendize through commit 9289acb allows any authenticated event organiser to bulk import attendees into events belonging to other accounts via the postImportAttendee endpoint. The endpoint loads the target event by ID without verifying ownership against the requesting organiser account. An attacker can inject bulk attendee data into any event in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72546

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in Attendize through commit 9289acb allows any authenticated event organiser to inject attendees and orders into events belonging to other accounts via the postInviteAttendee endpoint. The endpoint loads the target event by ID without scoping the query to the authenticated organiser account. An attacker can modify event data and financial records a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72545

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in OpenSignLabs OpenSign through 2.37.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to write to any contact record via the updatecontacttour Parse cloud function. The function performs no authentication or authorization before updating the target contact record. An attacker can corrupt or overwrite contact data for any user in the system without creden

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72543

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in OpenSignLabs OpenSign through 2.37.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve any contact record via the getcontact Parse cloud function. The function executes with useMasterKey and performs no authentication or authorization checks before returning the requested contact object. An attacker can enumerate and read all contact records i

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72540

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in PhotoPrism through commit bb0b933 allows any user with a valid preview token to retrieve the original-resolution cover photo of any album. The AlbumCover handler does not verify that the requesting user is authorized to access the specified album before serving the cover image. An attacker with any valid preview token can enumerate and download

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19424

Chiline Cloud developed by Inventec Appliances has a Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can modify a specific parameter to read other users' sensitive data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66764

Reprocess Bank Statement Items in SAP S/4HANA does not perform the necessary authorization checks for authenticated users, allowing them to use rules that have not been shared with them, resulting in privilege escalation.This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability of the application

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Data Science Pipelines. A restricted user, or tenant, can exploit an improper authorization vulnerability in the setDefaultServiceAccount function. By specifying a more privileged ServiceAccount (SA) during a CreateRun request, an attacker can bypass authorization checks. This allows the tenant to run their containers with elevated privileges, potentially leading to the disclos

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and Secrets Manager backends in Apache Airflow's Amazon provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with either backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Azure Key Vault secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Microsoft Azure provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Yandex Lockbox secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Yandex provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its credential

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18620

A flaw was found in Data Science Pipelines. A restricted user, or tenant, can exploit an improper authorization vulnerability in the setDefaultServiceAccount function. By specifying a more privileged ServiceAccount (SA) during a CreateRun request, an attacker can bypass authorization checks. This allows the tenant to run their containers with elevated privileges, potentially leading to the disclos

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72876

Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, swarm.getNodes, swarm.getNodeInfo, swarm.getNodeApps, and swarm.getAppInfos in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/swarm.ts accept another organization’s serverId without an activeOrganizationId ownership check, and getNodeInfo in packages/server/src/services/docker.ts interpolates nodeId into execAsyncRemote, allowing a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69114

Spacebar Server before commit 8d126f4 contains a cross-channel message deletion vulnerability in the single-delete and bulk-delete message handlers that fail to scope message queries to the requested channel. Authenticated users with MANAGE_MESSAGES permission in any controlled channel can delete arbitrary messages in other channels by routing delete requests through their own channel.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72863

Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, Dokploy's WebSocket handlers (in-app terminals and log streamers) authenticate the session but never authorize it. They establish who the user is via validateRequest() and then proceed without consulting the role/permission model that every tRPC procedure enforces. Any authenticated member, can therefore open an inter

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68872

The AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and Secrets Manager backends in Apache Airflow's Amazon provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with either backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68871

The Yandex Lockbox secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Yandex provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its credential

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68870

The Azure Key Vault secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Microsoft Azure provider resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable id through the team-agnostic lookup when the team-scoped lookup missed. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a caller in one team could resolve a secret belonging to another team by supplying an id that spells out that team's namespace, obtaining its

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72737

Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). In 0.29.8 and earlier, backup.create, backup.update, and backup.restoreBackupWithLogs in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/backup.ts accept a client-controlled destinationId and use the referenced destination without verifying that destination.organizationId equals ctx.session.activeOrganizationId. An authenticated member with backup per

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72734

Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). From 0.28.7 until 0.29.13, the server.remove tRPC mutation in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/server.ts accepts a caller-controlled serverId and calls haveActiveServices, findServerById, removeDeploymentsByServerId, and deleteServer without verifying that currentServer.organizationId equals ctx.session.activeOrganizationId. An authenti

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72724

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to 2026.1.6, 2026.5.2, 2026.6.1, and 2026.7.0, plugins/chat/lib/chat/onebox_handler.rb resolves Chat::Thread by route thread_id independently of the route channel_id before checking whether the user can preview the selected chat channel. An authenticated user can pair a public channel ID with a private thread ID in a /onebox.json request and o

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19433

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the contact management component in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.4.8 allows authenticated users of any company to blindly overwrite the contact data of another company and to download that contact's personal data as a vCard via the contact's numeric identifier, because the save and export operations retrieve the record without constraining t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72690

An improper authorization vulnerability in Attendize through commit 9289acb allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject persistent mandatory survey questions into another organizer's events via the POST /event/{event_id}/question/create endpoint. The postCreateEventQuestion method loads the target event without the tenant-isolation scope, enabling cross-tenant writes; the injected question c

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72689

A broken object-level authorization vulnerability in OpenSignLabs opensignserver through 2.37.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read complete contract records via the getDocument Parse cloud function. The function fetches documents using useMasterKey, bypassing the object ACL, and returns full records including sender and signer PII and a pre-signed document download URL whenever the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59233

Missing Authorization in the permission management component in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.2.1 allows any authenticated user to grant any role, including their own, the complete set of application permissions via a crafted POST request to the permission save endpoint, which performs no authorization check before synchronizing the submitted permissions to the specified role.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-72564

An improper authorization vulnerability in fosrl/pangolin through v1.20.0 allows an authenticated remote attacker to authenticate to any resource in any organization by reusing an access token issued for a different resource.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48169

PraisonAI 是一个多智能体团队系统,其 Platform API 在 0.1.4 版本之前存在两个授权缺陷,二者叠加会彻底破坏工作区隔离。第一个缺陷位于 issues 和 projects 的服务层:该层执行全局主键查询时未校验工作区所有权,任何已认证用户只需在 API 请求中替换目标资源的 UUID,即可读取、修改或删除任意工作区中的资源。第二个缺陷涉及成员管理端点(添加成员、更新角色、移除成员),这些端点仅要求调用者具备 min_role="member",意味着任何工作区成员都能将自己提升为所有者,并可以踢出原所有者。因此,一个低权限成员不仅能窃取所有其他工作区的数据,还能完全接管其所属的任意工作区。两个问题的根源相同:路由层从 URL 中提取 workspace_id 并验证成员资格,但服务层在进行资源查询时忽略了工作区作用域,在成员操作时也忽略了调用者的角色级别。require_workspace_member() 依赖本身工作正常,问题在于服务层没有使用其提供的信息。版本 0.1.4 已修复该问题。此漏洞风险高,攻击者只需普通用户权限即可利用,建议立即升级到 0.1.4 或更高版本,同时限制 API 的网络暴露范围,并审查现有工作区中的成员角色配置,确保没有异常提权操作。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许任意低权限用户跨工作区窃取数据并完全接管工作区,破坏多租户隔离,属于严重的水平越权问题,可能导致敏感数据泄露与未授权操作,应紧急修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

TestLink 1.9.20 and prior contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows any authenticated user, including low-privilege guest accounts, to read arbitrary attachments by supplying an integer attachment ID to the attachmentdownload.php handler without any project or role authorization check. Attackers can enumerate sequential integer IDs through the attachment download endpo

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-70561

TestLink 1.9.20 and prior contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows any authenticated user, including low-privilege guest accounts, to read arbitrary attachments by supplying an integer attachment ID to the attachmentdownload.php handler without any project or role authorization check. Attackers can enumerate sequential integer IDs through the attachment download endpo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66058

Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.20.0 and 15.112.0, unrestricted access to a Document Follow API (update_follow) is possible for an authenticated user. This issue is fixed in versions 16.20.0 and 15.112.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16039

The MStore API WordPress plugin before 4.21.0 does not restrict its vendor-orders endpoint to the caller's own orders, allowing any authenticated user, including Subscribers, to read every WooCommerce order in the store together with each customer's personal information.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15214

The Subscriptions for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 does not verify that the requester owns the subscription being viewed before rendering its details, allowing any authenticated customer to read another customer's subscription information (the subscribed product, status, and dates) by supplying that subscription's ID.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

diboot-core's POST /common/load-related-data endpoint resolves caller-supplied field names to any @TableField column of any entity and returns those values for all rows, with no field or entity allowlist. The only guard, relatedDataSecurityCheck(), returns true unconditionally, so any authenticated user (including a zero-role account) can read @JsonIgnore-annotated secret fields such as IamAccount

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Flowise through 3.1.4 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the OpenAI Assistants integration that allows authenticated attackers to access credentials belonging to other workspaces by supplying an arbitrary credential UUID to Assistants endpoints without workspace ownership verification. Attackers can enumerate cross-workspace assistant metadata, retrieve file and vector s

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-70557

diboot-core's POST /common/load-related-data endpoint resolves caller-supplied field names to any @TableField column of any entity and returns those values for all rows, with no field or entity allowlist. The only guard, relatedDataSecurityCheck(), returns true unconditionally, so any authenticated user (including a zero-role account) can read @JsonIgnore-annotated secret fields such as IamAccount

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67622

Flowise through 3.1.4 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the OpenAI Assistants integration that allows authenticated attackers to access credentials belonging to other workspaces by supplying an arbitrary credential UUID to Assistants endpoints without workspace ownership verification. Attackers can enumerate cross-workspace assistant metadata, retrieve file and vector s

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64662

Statamic is a Laravel and Git powered content management system (CMS). Prior to 5.74.1 and 6.24.0, an authenticated Control Panel user could view content from entries they did not have permission to view, including entry content and custom field values, from any collection and including unpublished entries, through the navigation endpoint, though no data could be modified. This issue is fixed in v

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45414

Decidim is a participatory democracy framework. Prior to 0.31.5 and in 0.32.0.rc1 before 0.32.0.rc2, JWT-backed API authentication is not bound to the organization selected by the current host, allowing a JWT issued for one tenant to be replayed against another tenant’s API to read participantDetails data and reach the proposal.answer mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 0.31.5 and 0.32.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19111

Insecure direct object reference in the mongodb_memory, elasticsearch_memory, and mem0_memory tools in Amazon Strands Agents Tools before 0.8.3 might allow remote authenticated users to access, modify, or delete memories belonging to other tenants by influencing the LLM to emit tool calls with a forged namespace parameter. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.8.3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19066

A vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file view_students.php. Such manipulation of the argument class_group leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19064

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /view.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15147

The Five Star Restaurant Reservations WordPress plugin before 2.7.23 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, failing to validate the payment recipient, amount, and status or to bind the notification to the intended booking, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary pending reservations as paid and confirmed.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14842

The Events Made Easy WordPress plugin before 3.1.2 does not bind the payment authorization token to the payment record being charged, allowing unauthenticated attackers to pay a low amount for a cheap booking and have a separate, higher-priced booking marked as fully paid.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14306

The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 3.9.14 does not properly verify enrollment when restricting access to protected course content, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access and above who are enrolled in at least one course to view paid lesson, quiz, and assignment content belonging to other courses.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13399

The Payment Plugins for PayPal WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.20 does not have proper authorization checks on a REST endpoint, allowing unauthenticated users to bypass payments

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10599

The Integrate PhonePe with WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not validate that a verified payment transaction belongs to the order being marked as paid, nor does it verify the authenticity of its payment-completion request, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single valid transaction to mark arbitrary orders as paid and bypass payment.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Flowise through 3.1.4 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the OpenAI Assistants integration that allows authenticated attackers to access credentials belonging to other workspaces by supplying an arbitrary credential UUID to Assistants endpoints without workspace ownership verification. Attackers can enumerate cross-workspace assistant metadata, retrieve file and vector s

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Decidim is a participatory democracy framework. Prior to 0.31.5 and in 0.32.0.rc1 before 0.32.0.rc2, JWT-backed API authentication is not bound to the organization selected by the current host, allowing a JWT issued for one tenant to be replayed against another tenant’s API to read participantDetails data and reach the proposal.answer mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 0.31.5 and 0.32.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

diboot-core's POST /common/load-related-data endpoint resolves caller-supplied field names to any @TableField column of any entity and returns those values for all rows, with no field or entity allowlist. The only guard, relatedDataSecurityCheck(), returns true unconditionally, so any authenticated user (including a zero-role account) can read @JsonIgnore-annotated secret fields such as IamAccount

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Insecure direct object reference in the mongodb_memory, elasticsearch_memory, and mem0_memory tools in Amazon Strands Agents Tools before 0.8.3 might allow remote authenticated users to access, modify, or delete memories belonging to other tenants by influencing the LLM to emit tool calls with a forged namespace parameter. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.8.3.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18275

Authorization bypass in the process and annotation taxonomy serializers in Scripta eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to run segmentation and transcription against other users' document parts, overwriting their content, via part primary keys supplied to a many=True related field whose queryset restriction was applied to the ManyRelatedField instead of its child_relatio

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18258

Authorization bypass in the Line, LineTranscription, VirtualCollection, tag and process API endpoints in Scripta/eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to read, modify and delete other users' transcription content via primary keys supplied in the request body, which are queried against the global model manager instead of the request-scoped queryset

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66692

Customer Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Colissimo Officiel : Méthodes de livraison pour WooCommerce <= 2.10.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-65523

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Formidable Forms Signature Online Contract Automation <= 2.0.1 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28180

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Mercado Pago payments for WooCommerce <= 8.9.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-11850

When secondary user stores are configured, the implicit-association resolver incorrectly initializes from a secondary user store and bypasses the primary user store during search and uniqueness checks. This allows a subject to be associated with an unintended local account if the same lookup claim (e.g., username or email) exists in both the primary and a secondary store. If duplicate claim value

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14313

PeproDev WooCommerce Receipt Uploader (PeproDev WooCommerce Receipt Uploader WordPress plugin through 2.8.0 slug: pepro-bacs-receipt-upload-for-woocommerce), all versions up to and including 2.8.0 (latest on wordpress.org; no fixed version available at the time of writing), is vulnerable to unauthenticated missing-authorization / IDOR write. Requires WooCommerce.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48912

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. A missing ownership check in the avatar-cleanup logic allows any authenticated user to delete other users' uploaded files by supplying their file URLs. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
ghost

### Impact A vulnerability in Ghost's public donation checkout flow allowed an unauthenticated attacker to obtain full paid gift memberships for a minimal payment. No customer or member data was exposed, and the issue could not be used to steal money from a site or its members. ### Vulnerable versions This vulnerability is present in Ghost from [v6.27.0](https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/releas

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
open-webui

## Summary A user with write access to one knowledge base could delete directories, and drop file embeddings, belonging to knowledge bases they do not control. The sync cleanup endpoint verified write access on the knowledge base named in the URL and then acted on the directory and file ids supplied in the request body without checking that those objects belonged to that knowledge base. ## Precon

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
flowise

### Summary Several organization billing endpoints accept attacker-controlled Stripe identifiers (subscriptionId) without verifying that the identifier belongs to the authenticated user's organization. This allows an authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized Stripe subscription operations on other tenants. As a result, an authenticated user can manipulate the Stripe subscription of another or

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46712

Misskey is an open source, federated social media platform. Versions 2025.3.2 and later, but prior to 2026.5.4, contain a vulnerability where a lack of proper permission checks allows access to certain data points from the Direct Messages (formerly Chat) feature, regardless of account permissions. This vulnerability occurs whether or not federation is enabled. Notes created with "specified" visibi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18631

A vulnerability was identified in jeequan jeepay up to 3.2.9. This vulnerability affects the function WebSecurityConfig of the file jeepay-manager/src/main/java/com/jeequan/jeepay/mgr/ctrl/sysuser/SysLogController.java of the component PreAuthorize Handler. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-69094

Admidio before 5.0.11 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the save_temporary mode of mylist_function.php that allows authenticated users to hijack list configurations. Attackers can enumerate global list UUIDs and overwrite admin-curated global lists or other users' private lists by supplying a list_uuid parameter, transferring ownership and demoting global lists to perso

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2346

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Menulux Software Inc. Mobile App allows Software Integrity Attack. This issue affects Mobile App: through 12.05.2026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16565

The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution WordPress plugin before 5.0.9 does not verify product ownership on its product-attribute REST write endpoints, allowing users with a Dokan vendor account to modify the product attributes and default attributes of any other vendor's products on the marketplace.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16564

The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution WordPress plugin before 5.0.9 does not verify order ownership on a REST endpoint that performs bulk order-status changes, allowing users with a Dokan vendor account to modify the status of any WooCommerce order on the marketplace, including orders belonging to other vendors and the store's own customers.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15260

The GEO my WP WordPress plugin before 4.5.5.3 does not perform any ownership or capability check on two of its logged-in AJAX actions, allowing users with subscriber-level access or above to modify or permanently delete other users' and posts' geolocation records by supplying arbitrary record IDs.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Vikunja versions >= 0.24.0 and <= 2.3.0 contain a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the task-collection endpoint (GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks). The endpoint loads the requested project view from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a link-share token holder, the task scope is pinned to the share's own project, but the vie

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

better-auth passkey versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the passkey deletion endpoint that allows authenticated users to delete arbitrary passkeys by ID. Attackers with valid sessions can submit crafted requests to the delete-passkey endpoint with enumerated passkey IDs to remove other users' passkeys.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68582

Vikunja versions >= 0.24.0 and <= 2.3.0 contain a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the task-collection endpoint (GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks). The endpoint loads the requested project view from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a link-share token holder, the task scope is pinned to the share's own project, but the vie

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-71400

better-auth passkey versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the passkey deletion endpoint that allows authenticated users to delete arbitrary passkeys by ID. Attackers with valid sessions can submit crafted requests to the delete-passkey endpoint with enumerated passkey IDs to remove other users' passkeys.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Vikunja versions >= 0.24.0 and <= 2.3.0 contain a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the task-collection endpoint (GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks). The endpoint loads the requested project view from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a link-share token holder, the task scope is pinned to the share's own project, but the vie

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

better-auth passkey versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the passkey deletion endpoint that allows authenticated users to delete arbitrary passkeys by ID. Attackers with valid sessions can submit crafted requests to the delete-passkey endpoint with enumerated passkey IDs to remove other users' passkeys.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in HTTP handlers for time series, batch, Prometheus, and Grafana endpoints that fail to validate database access permissions. Attackers can access and modify databases they are not authorized to use by directly calling affected endpoints with arbitrary database parameters.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

@better-auth/stripe versions >= 1.4.11 and = 1.7.0-beta.0 and < 1.7.0-beta.10, contain an authorization bypass in organization subscription actions. The middleware validates the organization ID taken from the request query string against the authorizeReference callback, but the handler reads the organization ID only from the request body and falls back to the caller's active organization from thei

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67342

ArcadeDB 是 ArcadeDB 团队开发的多模型数据库。该漏洞位于时间序列、批量、Prometheus 和 Grafana 等 HTTP 端点,由于这些处理程序未验证数据库访问权限,远程未认证攻击者可以在请求中指定任意数据库名称,直接访问或修改本无权访问的数据。攻击向量为网络,无需身份验证和用户交互,影响范围广泛,可导致数据泄露、数据篡改或服务中断。CVSS 3.1 基础评分为 9.8,属于严重漏洞。目前没有证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用(该条信息仅基于本次输入元数据,未标记 KEV 或在野利用)。受影响版本为 26.7.2 之前。建议用户尽快升级至 26.7.2 或更高版本,以修复授权验证缺失问题。同时,应限制这些 HTTP 端点的网络暴露,仅允许受信任主机访问,并在部署环境中启用数据库级访问控制。如无法立即升级,可通过反向代理或防火墙规则对相关端点进行访问限制,并持续监控相关日志是否有异常访问行为。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许未认证远程攻击者绕过授权直接读写任意数据库,CVSS 9.8,危害严重。大型部署中可能导致批量数据泄露或破坏,需优先处置。

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67331

better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-67329

@better-auth/stripe versions >= 1.4.11 and = 1.7.0-beta.0 and < 1.7.0-beta.10, contain an authorization bypass in organization subscription actions. The middleware validates the organization ID taken from the request query string against the authorizeReference callback, but the handler reads the organization ID only from the request body and falls back to the caller's active organization from thei

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

@better-auth/stripe versions >= 1.4.11 and = 1.7.0-beta.0 and < 1.7.0-beta.10, contain an authorization bypass in organization subscription actions. The middleware validates the organization ID taken from the request query string against the authorizeReference callback, but the handler reads the organization ID only from the request body and falls back to the caller's active organization from thei

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in HTTP handlers for time series, batch, Prometheus, and Grafana endpoints that fail to validate database access permissions. Attackers can access and modify databases they are not authorized to use by directly calling affected endpoints with arbitrary database parameters.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-14073

The WooCommerce PayPal Payments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Disclosure due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2 via the `enqueue_paypal_insights_script_on_order_received()` function due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to obtain sensitive order informati

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45330

Decidim是一个开源的参与式民主框架,用于城市参与预算、公民咨询等场景。近期,该框架被披露存在一个跨租户权限绕过漏洞(CVE-2026-45330)。在设计上,Decidim支持多租户(多个组织/社区)隔离运行,每个租户的数据和用户相互独立。然而,在身份文档(identity document)验证功能中,管理控制器在加载待审批的Authorization记录时,仅根据记录的原始ID进行查询,未校验该记录是否隶属于当前管理员所在的租户组织。由于Authorization记录在数据库中全局存储,且与组织(organization)关联,攻击者只要获得任一租户的管理员权限,就可以通过构造请求,查看甚至审批/拒绝其他租户提交的身份证件验证申请。受影响版本包括0.30.9之前的0.30.x系列、0.31.0至0.31.5之前的0.31.x系列,以及0.32.0.rc1至0.32.0.rc2前的候选版本。官方已在0.30.9、0.31.5和0.32.0.rc2版本中修复此问题,修复方式是确保在加载记录时强制校验当前租户上下文。该漏洞的CVSS评分为4.9,属于中危,其攻击复杂度低,需要管理员权限,但网络攻击即可触发,影响机密性。由于涉及多租户数据隔离,实际危害可能高于评分。建议使用Decidim的组织尽快升级到修复版本,并检查是否有异常跨租户访问行为。

💡 影响/原因: 多租户隔离失效属于高影响安全问题。即使CVSS评分不高,但任意租户管理员可越权操作他人敏感证件数据,违背平台信任承诺,可能导致个人隐私泄露和治理流程被破坏,需优先对待。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-65981

Coturn is a free open source implementation of TURN and STUN Server. Prior to 4.15.0, a server using --mobility authenticates a resumed REFRESH request with the resuming user's credentials but does not verify that identity against the original allocation owner, allowing an authenticated attacker who obtains a victim MOBILITY-TICKET to receive and inject relayed traffic and consume the victim's quo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
sylius/mollie-plugin

### Impact Two unauthenticated Mollie shop endpoints look up orders by a sequential integer `orderId` with no ownership or session check. Chained, they expose customer PII. `GET /{_locale}/thank-you` (`PageRedirectController::thankYouAction`, route `sylius_mollie_shop_thank_you_page_redirect`) loads the order with `findOneBy(['id' => $orderId])` and returns a `302` whose `Location` header carries

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
sylius/mollie-plugin

### Impact The shop payment webhook `POST /{_locale}/update-payment` (route `sylius_mollie_shop_payment_webhook`) accepts two independent, attacker-controlled parameters: `id` (the Mollie payment ID, verified against Mollie's API) and `orderId` (the Sylius order ID, read directly from the database). The handler never verifies that the Mollie payment belongs to the referenced order. An

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17349

/misc/workspace/adhoc_connect_server, part of the Workspaces feature introduced in pgAdmin 4 9.0, when passed the id of an existing server, clones that server via Server.clone(), which copies every column from the source row, including user_id, shared, shared_username, and the stored credential fields password, save_password, and tunnel_password. When a non-owner triggered an adhoc connect against

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17567

The Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.8 via the 'transaction' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to brute-force valid transaction hashes and view sensitiv

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8155

The BuddyPress WordPress plugin before 14.5.0 does not properly enforce authorization on its private messaging endpoints, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber+) to read, modify, or delete other users' private messages.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15209

The JS Help Desk WordPress plugin before 3.1.5 does not verify that the requesting user owns the ticket being loaded: a low-privileged authenticated user can supply another user's ticket ID and read that ticket's contents, including the reporter's PII and message body.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14927

The FluentCart A New Era of eCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.5.3 does not perform any authorization or ownership check before rendering customer order documents keyed on a sequential numeric identifier, allowing unauthenticated visitors to enumerate and disclose customer personal data (names, email addresses, billing and shipping postal addresses, and order details) across the store.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14847

The Paid Membership Subscriptions WordPress plugin before 3.0.7 does not perform capability or nonce checks on one of its payment-related AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access and above to disclose the payment details of any member by enumerating the payment identifier.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14843

The Events Made Easy WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not verify that the requester is authorized to modify the targeted record when handling an unauthenticated data-change request, relying only on a public nonce with no per-record token or ownership check, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the personal data of any person record.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12697

The wpForo Forum WordPress plugin before 3.1.2 does not verify that an AI chat conversation belongs to the requesting user before deleting its messages, allowing users with a subscriber-level account to permanently delete the stored AI chat message history of any other user.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12376

The Academy LMS WordPress plugin through 3.8.2 does not restrict access to quiz attempt records to their owner, allowing any authenticated user with subscriber-level access and above (enrolled in any single course) to read every user's quiz attempts across the whole site, including personal data such as IP addresses, names, registration dates and quiz results.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68501

Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's GET /{_locale}/thank-you PageRedirectController::thankYouAction and GET /{_locale}/get-code QrCodeAction::fetchQrCodeFromOrder endpoints look up sequential orderId values without ownership or session checks, exposing order tokenValue values that can be used wit

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-68500

Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's POST /{_locale}/update-payment payment webhook accepts attacker-controlled id and orderId parameters but does not verify that the Mollie payment belongs to the referenced Sylius order, allowing an unauthenticated attacker with any valid paid Mollie payment ID t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's GET /{_locale}/thank-you PageRedirectController::thankYouAction and GET /{_locale}/get-code QrCodeAction::fetchQrCodeFromOrder endpoints look up sequential orderId values without ownership or session checks, exposing order tokenValue values that can be used wit

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's POST /{_locale}/update-payment payment webhook accepts attacker-controlled id and orderId parameters but does not verify that the Mollie payment belongs to the referenced Sylius order, allowing an unauthenticated attacker with any valid paid Mollie payment ID t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10700

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 contains multiple broken access control vulnerabilities in its file handling API that allow unauthorized access to user files.The /api/v1/files/images/{flow_id}/{file_name} endpoint does not enforce authentication or authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve image files associated with any flow by specifying a valid flow_id and

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12945

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows authenticated users to access and manipulate other users' build jobs through improper access control on log retrieval and unauthenticated build endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-60931

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the Employee Compensation View function of Infor Global HR v11.24.10.01.33 allows unauthorized attackers to arbitrarily view the compensation information of other employees via a crafted GET request.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
alextselegidis/easyappointments

### Summary `Google::oauth` at `application/controllers/Google.php:278` stores its URL-supplied `provider_id` in the session, and `oauth_callback` saves the issued Google OAuth token against that row without checking the caller owns the provider. Any logged-in backend user (admin, provider, or secretary) rebinds a peer provider's Google sync to a Google account they control. The peer's appointmen

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
alextselegidis/easyappointments

## Summary The booking reschedule view at `/index.php/booking/reschedule/{appointment_hash}` (handled by `Booking::index()`) embeds the **entire customer record** as inline JavaScript (`const vars = {... "customer_data": {...}, ...}`) without authentication and without field whitelisting. Anyone in possession of the 12-character `appointment_hash` — which appears in plain text in reschedule email

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
alextselegidis/easyappointments

## Summary Easy!Appointments correctly filters provider-scoped appointments in the `appointments/search` response, proving that provider isolation is an intended security boundary. However, the direct mutation endpoints `appointments/store` and `appointments/update` only check generic appointment privileges and never verify that the submitted `id_users_provider` belongs to the current session.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5060

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin – for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.7.14. This is due to the `stm_lms_delete_cover()` function lacking ownership validation on the `file_id` parameter before passing it to `wp_delete_attachment()`. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, wit

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63242

A business logic vulnerability in Koollab LMS allowed an authenticated learner to set their lesson completion status to completed via the SCORM commit endpoint without viewing the lesson material, compromising training and completion records.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63241

An insecure direct object reference vulnerability in Koollab LMS allowed an authenticated user to query the course completion progress of any other user without authorisation, disclosing private learning progress information.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14224

The Easy Appointments WordPress plugin through 3.12.26 does not verify that the appointment targeted by its customer-data update action belongs to the current user; the action only checks a shared nonce that any authenticated user can obtain from their own appointment's edit form. A subscriber-level user with an appointment of their own can therefore reuse that nonce to overwrite the customer meta

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SuperPlane before 0.27.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the CanvasService gRPC handlers that allows authenticated users with viewer-level access to one organization to access resources belonging to other organizations by supplying arbitrary canvas or queue UUIDs without organization scoping. Attackers can read cross-tenant execution history and event payloads contain

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57510

SuperPlane before 0.27.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the CanvasService gRPC handlers that allows authenticated users with viewer-level access to one organization to access resources belonging to other organizations by supplying arbitrary canvas or queue UUIDs without organization scoping. Attackers can read cross-tenant execution history and event payloads contain

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49258

Nebula Mesh is a self-hosted control plane for the Slack Nebula mesh VPN. In versions 0.3.5 and below, the web UI (/ui/*) does not apply the per-operator CA scoping employed by the JSON API. This was partially addressed by GHSA-598g-h2vc-h5vg, but the changes were not implemented in the web read/mutation surface. Any authenticated non-admin operator (for example, one created via self-registration

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SuperPlane before 0.27.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the CanvasService gRPC handlers that allows authenticated users with viewer-level access to one organization to access resources belonging to other organizations by supplying arbitrary canvas or queue UUIDs without organization scoping. Attackers can read cross-tenant execution history and event payloads contain

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Nebula Mesh is a self-hosted control plane for the Slack Nebula mesh VPN. In versions 0.3.5 and below, the web UI (/ui/*) does not apply the per-operator CA scoping employed by the JSON API. This was partially addressed by GHSA-598g-h2vc-h5vg, but the changes were not implemented in the web read/mutation surface. Any authenticated non-admin operator (for example, one created via self-registration

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18028

The "quick setup" view presented to users after they first create an event allows to set up the most critical parts of an event in just a few clicks. This view did not properly check that the user has permission to change configuration for the given event. An attacker could use a well-timed request to create products, quotas, set bank transfer configuration, or connect a stripe account to an

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16797

The ShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.5 via the 'optionSection' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to read arbitrary wp_options row

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The vulnerability involves an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the `DeleteNotificationController::delete()` method at endpoint `GET /notification/delete/{id}`. The flaw allows any authenticated user, regardless of company or permissions, to delete notifications belonging to any other user in the system. The controller retrieves the target record with `Notification::findOrFail($id)` and d

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59240

The vulnerability involves an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the `DeleteNotificationController::delete()` method at endpoint `GET /notification/delete/{id}`. The flaw allows any authenticated user, regardless of company or permissions, to delete notifications belonging to any other user in the system. The controller retrieves the target record with `Notification::findOrFail($id)` and d

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

The vulnerability involves an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the `DeleteNotificationController::delete()` method at endpoint `GET /notification/delete/{id}`. The flaw allows any authenticated user, regardless of company or permissions, to delete notifications belonging to any other user in the system. The controller retrieves the target record with `Notification::findOrFail($id)` and d

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48052

Papra is a minimalistic document management and archiving platform. Prior to version 26.5.0, an authenticated user who is a member of any organization can delete or rename tags belonging to a different organization, given the target tag's ID. The route handler verifies the caller's membership of the ":organizationId" in the URL, but the repository write filters on tag.id alone, so the URL-level or

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17570

Improper access control in the PAM password history endpoints in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated low-privileged user to disclose plaintext credential secrets via crafted API requests. This issue affects : * Devolutions Server 2026.2.4.0 through 2026.2.12.0 * Devolutions Server 2026.1.23.0 and earlier

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17531

A weakness has been identified in unitedbyai droidclaw up to 0.5.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file server/src/routes/goals.ts of the component Unsigned Scheduled Callback. This manipulation causes authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exp

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

A weakness has been identified in unitedbyai droidclaw up to 0.5.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file server/src/routes/goals.ts of the component Unsigned Scheduled Callback. This manipulation causes authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exp

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 3.4
Conf: 50%
CVE-2026-59546

Subscriber Broken Authentication in Hide My WP Ghost <= 7.0.06 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-17527

In containerized-data-importer (CDI), the aggregated cdi.kubevirt.io:view ClusterRole, intended to provide read-only access to CDI resources, includes a rule granting create on the datavolumes/source subresource. CDI's DataVolume clone authorization accepts this permission as sufficient to authorize cloning the contents of any PVC the caller can name, without requiring write access to the source n

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66412

Leantime 3.6.2 and prior contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read milestone data from projects they are not assigned to by supplying arbitrary integer milestone IDs to the tickets.getMilestone JSON-RPC endpoint. Attackers can enumerate integer milestone IDs through the JSON-RPC API to access project planning information, milestone titles, descriptions,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OpenRemote before 1.26.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the console registration API that allows unauthenticated attackers to update existing console assets by supplying a known asset identifier. Attackers can overwrite push notification tokens and console metadata without authentication or ownership validation, redirecting notifications or denying delivery to legitimate consol

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66013

OpenRemote 1.26.2之前的版本存在一个认证绕过漏洞。漏洞位于控制台注册API中,未经过身份验证的攻击者可以通过提供已知的资产标识符来更新现有的控制台资产。攻击者能够覆盖推送通知令牌和控制台元数据,从而将通知重定向到其他设备或完全阻止合法控制台接收通知。该漏洞无需任何认证或所有权验证,攻击者只需知道目标控制台的资产ID即可实施攻击。由于控制台资产通常具有可预测的ID或可以通过其他方式泄露,因此漏洞的影响范围较广。建议立即升级到OpenRemote 1.26.2或更高版本,以修复该漏洞。作为临时缓解措施,可以限制对控制台注册API的网络访问,仅允许可信IP段或内部网络访问,并启用额外的身份验证机制。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许未认证攻击者劫持或阻断推送通知,严重影响终端用户的服务可用性及消息传递的完整性。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v4

### Summary An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the file sharing mechanism of `Openlist`. Due to a flawed, non-separator-aware path validation check, an authenticated user can create share links for files outside their restricted base directory. This allows an attacker to bypass tenant/user isolation and gain unauthorized read access to arbitrary files within the system. ### Details W

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v4

### Summary An authorization bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the search API of `Openlist`. Due to a non-separator-aware path check and unfiltered backend counting, a low-privileged user can bypass their assigned `BasePath` restrictions to discover and access metadata of files residing in unauthorized sibling directories. ### Details This vulnerability stems from two comb

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
poweradmin/poweradmin

## Affected software - Product: Poweradmin (web front-end for PowerDNS) - Version tested: master, commit 7f28c3a97 (also reachable in the 4.x release line — the record-edit code is the same) - Component: record editing (web UI) - Vulnerability type: Broken Access Control / Insecure Direct Object Reference ## Severity Any authenticated user who owns at least one zone can tamper with records in e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 13.4
Conf: 50%
org.openidentityplatform.opendj:opendj-server-legacy

### Summary When a SASL PLAIN bind supplies an authorization identity (authzid) that resolves to a **different** user, PlainSASLMechanismHandler verified only the PROXIED_AUTH privilege and never evaluated the "proxy" access-control right (the mayProxy ACI scope check). As a result, any account holding the proxied-auth privilege could assume **any resolvable non-root identity** without being grant

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
@budibase/server

## Summary `POST /api/v2/email` on the account portal (`account.budibase.app`) starts an email-change workflow using a client-supplied `accountId` that is **not validated against the authenticated session**. A logged-in attacker supplies a victim's `accountId` and an email address they control; the verification code is delivered to the attacker's address, and completing the workflow changes the *

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

AgentGPT through 1.0.0 contains an authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability that allows authenticated users to attach tasks to another user's agent run by supplying a target run_id in the request body without ownership verification. The AgentCRUD.create_task and validate_task_count functions look up the target AgentRun using the client-supplied run_id without confirming the r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Overseerr through 1.35.0 contains an authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in the push subscription API that allows authenticated users to list, read, and delete any other user's push subscriptions by supplying an arbitrary userId in the path parameters. Attackers can exploit the missing ownership check in the affected handlers to access target user records without the fil

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

CyberPanel through 1.9.1, fixed in commit b198460, contains an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the IncBackups application's incremental-backup handlers (deleteBackup, fetchRestorePoints, and restorePoint) that allows authenticated panel users to access or manipulate other tenants' backup resources by supplying an attacker-controlled globally sequential IncJob integer ID th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n

## Impact An authenticated user with permission to create workflows in one project could bypass project/folder authorization boundaries during workflow creation. By supplying a crafted request payload, the user could associate a newly created workflow with a folder belonging to a different project they do not have access to. The workflow itself remains in the attacker's project and is not visible

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n

## Impact External secrets were incorrectly resolved in workflow node expressions, where they are not intended to be available. An authenticated user with project editor access could read the plaintext value of external secrets by referencing them in a node expression, without needing explicit secrets access permissions. This issue only affects instances with the external secrets feature configur

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n

## Impact Due to a mismatch between the static validation check and the runtime expression engine, an authenticated user with credential create or update permissions, but without the `externalSecret:list` scope, could embed external secret references into credentials in forms the validation did not detect. These references would resolve at workflow execution time, exposing secret values the user w

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n

## Impact n8n's Enterprise SSO instance-role provisioning maps a role claim asserted by the configured Identity Provider (IdP) to an n8n global role and applies it during authentication. The provisioning path did not prevent assignment of the `global:owner` role, unlike the token-exchange identity path, which explicitly rejects it. As a result, an SSO-authenticated user whose instance-role claim r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-3482

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2,  6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and  6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 could allow an unauthenticated user to read sensitive information by bypassing authentication through a specially crafted HTTP request.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-65013

Onlook through 0.2.32, fixed in commit 423e2e9, contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to access and manipulate other users' resources by supplying arbitrary UUID values to tRPC API procedures including project.get, member.remove, and chat.conversation.delete. Attackers can provide arbitrary projectId or conversationId values without authoriz

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Onlook through 0.2.32, fixed in commit 423e2e9, contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to access and manipulate other users' resources by supplying arbitrary UUID values to tRPC API procedures including project.get, member.remove, and chat.conversation.delete. Attackers can provide arbitrary projectId or conversationId values without authoriz

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-65016

n8n versions before 1.123.64, 2.29.8, and 2.30.1 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in Enterprise SSO instance-role provisioning. The provisioning path maps an IdP-asserted role claim to an n8n global role but does not prevent assignment of the global:owner role (unlike the token-exchange identity path, which rejects it). An SSO-authenticated user whose instance-role claim resolves to gl

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 17.4
Conf: 50%

n8n versions before 1.123.64, 2.29.8, and 2.30.1 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in Enterprise SSO instance-role provisioning. The provisioning path maps an IdP-asserted role claim to an n8n global role but does not prevent assignment of the global:owner role (unlike the token-exchange identity path, which rejects it). An SSO-authenticated user whose instance-role claim resolves to gl

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2406

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Universe Software Computer Marketing Trade and Industry Inc. Online Registration and Workflow Management System allows Exploiting Trust in Client. This issue affects Online Registration and Workflow Management System: through 12022026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

XXL-Job version 2.4.2 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read execution log content from job groups they are not authorized to access by supplying arbitrary sequential log IDs to the logDetailCat endpoint. Attackers can enumerate log records across all job groups by calling the logDetailCat endpoint with incremented logId parameter values,

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63259

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56147

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized information disclosure and case attachment integrity compromise via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). An inconsistency in Kibana's file access authorization logic allows a low-privileged authenticated user to retrieve, modify, and delete case attachments that belong to feature areas they are not authorized to

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47419

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an* Insecure Direct Object Reference. The agent CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/agents/{agent_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `agent_id` through `AgentService.get(agent_id)` which is a primary-key lookup

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47418

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. The project CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/projects/{project_id}` and `GET .../{project_id}/stats`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `project_id` through `ProjectService.get

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47417

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. The comment endpoints (`POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/comments` and `GET .../comments`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then call `CommentService.create(issue_id=issue_id, ...)` and `CommentService.l

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47415

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. The issue CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `issue_id` through `IssueService.get(issue_id)` which is a primary-key lookup w

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47414

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. Five label endpoints — `PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `DELETE .../labels/{label_id}`, `POST .../issues/{issue_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `DELETE .../issues/{issue_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `GET .../issues/{issue_id}/labels` — gate

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47408

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. The `GET /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/activity` endpoint is gated by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` and dispatches to `ActivityService.list_for_issue(issue_id)`, which executes `SELECT * FROM activity WHERE issue_id = :issu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47407

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then loo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47406

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an Insecure Direct Object Reference. The dependency endpoints (`POST/GET /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/dependencies` and `DELETE .../dependencies/{dep_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then dispatch to `DependencyService` calls that take

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47399

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the workspace-scoped REST routes contain a systemic object-level authorization flaw that allows an authenticated user from one workspace to access, modify, and delete objects belonging to another workspace by supplying the victim object's global UUID. The affected pattern appears in workspa

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15342

Plane contains a multi‑tenant authorization flaw in its asset‑management API that allows authenticated users from one workspace to access, delete, or duplicate assets belonging to another workspace by providing only the victim workspace slug and asset ID. The affected endpoints return presigned file URLs and enable destructive or duplicative actions without verifying that the requester is a member

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28317

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to privilege escalation. This issue requires domain administrator access. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28316

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to privilege escalation to a system administrator with the ability to execute commands as the root user. This issue requires a domain account with administrator access. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28314

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that leads to an account takeover. User authentication is required. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28313

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to SMTP hijacking leading to arbitrary account takeover. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28308

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. Domain administrator access is required. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28305

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution as root. A domain account with admin privileges and read and write access to the home directory is required. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28302

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to privilege escalation and remote code execution as root. This issue requires group administrator access. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16450

A vulnerability was identified in zsadmin2025 ZS-Admin up to b52e14536d59fda11e56e2536a1c32e82a38cead. This affects the function getTenantId of the file /api/system/sys/dept/page of the component MyBatis-Plus Tenant Plugin. Such manipulation of the argument X-Tenant-Id leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14184

The Academy LMS WordPress plugin before 3.8.1 does not verify ownership of a user-supplied user identifier in several of its lesson AJAX handlers, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access to read and modify other users' lesson notes and mark other users' lesson content as completed.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14183

The Classified Listing WordPress plugin before 5.3.9 does not verify that the order targeted by its payment-receipt handler belongs to the requesting user, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access to read the payment receipt details of any other user's order.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57494

AgenticMail gives AI agents real email addresses and phone numbers. In @agenticmail/api prior to version 0.9.64, a low-privileged authenticated AgenticMail agent can enumerate another agent's pending/claimed tasks by supplying the target agent name to `GET /api/agenticmail/tasks/pending?assignee=`. The returned task objects include the task IDs and payloads. The same task IDs can then be used with

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55544

NextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. In version 0.12.1, the MCP campaign tools expose campaign read and write operations over the network using user-generated Bearer API tokens (`nxtc__...`). The application has an authorization model that restricts normal users to campaigns they created, but multiple MCP campaign handlers ignore the authenticated user ID and que

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
directus

## Summary When response caching is enabled (`CACHE_ENABLED=true`), the cache-key derivation in `api/src/utils/get-cache-key.ts` includes only `version`, `path`, `query`, and `accountability.user` (plus a conditional `ip`). Authorization context beyond `user` (`share`, `role`, `roles`, `admin`, `app`, `policies`) is not part of the key. For share tokens this is load-bearing. Directus's share-aut

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

VSee Clinic 7.1.26 and API 1.3.0 contain an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the /v1.3.0/api/files endpoint. An authenticated attacker can manipulate the 'remark' request parameter to enumerate, retrieve, and delete files belonging to other users on the application server.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47198

Paymenter is a free and open-source webshop solution for management of hosting services. In versions prior to 1.5.1, the checkout component improperly filters URL-writable properties, allowing authenticated users to inject arbitrary key-value pairs into server provisioning parameters. Because bundled server extensions prioritize these user-supplied properties over administrator-defined configurati

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47130

NextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. Versions prior to 0.12.0 have a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerability exists in the CRM contact and target update endpoints. The application fails to verify if the authenticated user has ownership of the specific resource being modified. This allows any authenticated user (even with a standard `member` ro

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44585

Paymenter is a free and open-source webshop solution for management of hosting services. In versions prior to 1.5.0, the ticket creation endpoint accepts a user-supplied service identifier without enforcing ownership validation, allowing authenticated users to create support tickets referencing services belonging to other accounts by modifying the service ID in the request. An attacker could modif

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13381

VSee Clinic 7.1.26 and API 1.3.0 contain an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the /v1.3.0/api/files endpoint. An authenticated attacker can manipulate the 'remark' request parameter to enumerate, retrieve, and delete files belonging to other users on the application server.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45295

FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to version 1.8.219, the open tracking endpoint `GET /thread/read/{conversation_id}/{thread_id}` allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid conversation and thread IDs, and modify thread state (`opened_at` timestamp) without any authentication. Version 1.8.219 patches the issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to version 1.8.219, the open tracking endpoint `GET /thread/read/{conversation_id}/{thread_id}` allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid conversation and thread IDs, and modify thread state (`opened_at` timestamp) without any authentication. Version 1.8.219 patches the issue.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63763

SurrealDB before 2.5.0 and before 3.0.0-beta.3 contains a confused deputy privilege escalation vulnerability. Unprivileged users (e.g., those with the database editor role) can create or modify fields containing futures, functions, or closures. Because these are executed in the context of the invoking/querying user rather than their creator, an attacker can plant malicious logic that executes with

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63745

SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where authenticated users can spoof composite record-id field values by writing to editable body fields. Attackers can bypass permission rules that gate access on id components like tenant isolation by setting same-named body fields to spoofed values that permission checks incorrectly read instead of the immutable id key

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63735

SurrealDB versions before 3.2.0 fail to validate namespace and database scope in custom API routes, allowing authenticated users to invoke endpoints in different namespaces/databases. Attackers with valid credentials for any namespace/database can access custom API endpoints in other tenants by specifying the target scope in the URL path, reading sensitive data or triggering unintended operations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

SurrealDB before 2.5.0 and before 3.0.0-beta.3 contains a confused deputy privilege escalation vulnerability. Unprivileged users (e.g., those with the database editor role) can create or modify fields containing futures, functions, or closures. Because these are executed in the context of the invoking/querying user rather than their creator, an attacker can plant malicious logic that executes with

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16217

A security vulnerability has been detected in guohongze adminset up to 0.61. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file delivery/deli.py of the component Delivery Deployment Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument project_id leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The proj

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

A security vulnerability has been detected in guohongze adminset up to 0.61. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file delivery/deli.py of the component Delivery Deployment Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument project_id leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The proj

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16214

A vulnerability was identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. This affects an unknown function of the file jet/dashboard/views.py of the component Dashboard Module. Such manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responde

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

A vulnerability was identified in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. This affects an unknown function of the file jet/dashboard/views.py of the component Dashboard Module. Such manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responde

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (c

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55518

Avo 是一个用于 Ruby on Rails 应用创建管理后台的框架。在版本 3.32.1 和 4.0.0.beta.51 之前,Avo 的关联附加工作流在 UI 和 GET /resources/:resource/:id/:related/new 路径中会检查 attach_<association>? 权限,但实际的写入端点 POST /resources/:resource/:id/:related 在通过 Avo::AssociationsController#create 修改关联之前未执行相同的授权检查。因此,经过身份验证的低权限 Avo 用户可以通过发送精心构造的 POST 请求,绕过隐藏或禁用的附加控件,直接将相关记录附加到父记录上。这可能导致权限提升和跨租户数据暴露,尤其是当关联代表授权相关关系时。该漏洞已在版本 3.32.1 和 4.0.0.beta.51 中修复。建议所有用户尽快升级至修复版本,并检查应用配置中是否存在不必要的网络暴露。

💡 影响/原因: 漏洞 CVSS 评分 9.6(严重),允许低权限用户绕过 UI 授权检查直接附加关联记录,可导致权限提升和多租户环境下的数据泄露,影响面广且利用难度低。

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13445

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (c

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Chat2DB before 5.3.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the GET /api/connection/datasource/{id} endpoint. The handler calls dataSourceService.queryExistent(id, ...) without an ownership check and returns the decrypted password field, allowing any authenticated non-admin user to enumerate datasource IDs and read the plaintext database credentials of datasources owned by o

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Vimesoft Inc. Enterprise Video Platform allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Enterprise Video Platform: from 3.11.0.0 before 3.25.0.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.4) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Gis Informatics Engineering Consulting Laboratory R&D and Software Services Inc. GisLab Laboratory Management System allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects GisLab Laboratory Management System: from 1.4.03 through 08072026.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

TheHive through 4.1.24 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the attachment download endpoints that allows any authenticated user to access attachments belonging to other organizations by supplying a content-hash identifier. Attackers can exploit the missing organization-scoped authorization check in AttachmentSrv.visible, which is implemented as a pass-through traversal, t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48016

Shopware is an open commerce platform. Prior to 6.6.10.18 and 6.7.10.1, the Store API endpoint /store-api/handle-payment in src/Core/Checkout/Payment/SalesChannel/HandlePaymentMethodRoute.php accepts a user-controlled orderId and forwards it to src/Core/Checkout/Payment/PaymentProcessor.php without verifying order ownership or guest-order authentication, allowing a normal customer or guest context

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Shopware is an open commerce platform. Prior to 6.6.10.18 and 6.7.10.1, the Store API endpoint /store-api/handle-payment in src/Core/Checkout/Payment/SalesChannel/HandlePaymentMethodRoute.php accepts a user-controlled orderId and forwards it to src/Core/Checkout/Payment/PaymentProcessor.php without verifying order ownership or guest-order authentication, allowing a normal customer or guest context

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63307

Chat2DB before 5.3.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the GET /api/connection/datasource/{id} endpoint. The handler calls dataSourceService.queryExistent(id, ...) without an ownership check and returns the decrypted password field, allowing any authenticated non-admin user to enumerate datasource IDs and read the plaintext database credentials of datasources owned by o

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12693

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Vimesoft Inc. Enterprise Video Platform allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Enterprise Video Platform: from 3.11.0.0 before 3.25.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.4) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11763

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Gis Informatics Engineering Consulting Laboratory R&D and Software Services Inc. GisLab Laboratory Management System allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects GisLab Laboratory Management System: from 1.4.03 through 08072026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63099

TheHive through 4.1.24 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the attachment download endpoints that allows any authenticated user to access attachments belonging to other organizations by supplying a content-hash identifier. Attackers can exploit the missing organization-scoped authorization check in AttachmentSrv.visible, which is implemented as a pass-through traversal, t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-63095

Dendrite through 0.13.8 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the Matrix Client-Server API that allows any authenticated local user to delete third-party identifier bindings belonging to other users by submitting an arbitrary address and medium to the account deletion endpoint without ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the unverified Forget3PID handler to remove a victim's

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Chat2DB before 5.3.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the GET /api/connection/datasource/{id} endpoint. The handler calls dataSourceService.queryExistent(id, ...) without an ownership check and returns the decrypted password field, allowing any authenticated non-admin user to enumerate datasource IDs and read the plaintext database credentials of datasources owned by o

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

TheHive through 4.1.24 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the attachment download endpoints that allows any authenticated user to access attachments belonging to other organizations by supplying a content-hash identifier. Attackers can exploit the missing organization-scoped authorization check in AttachmentSrv.visible, which is implemented as a pass-through traversal, t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Dendrite through 0.13.8 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the Matrix Client-Server API that allows any authenticated local user to delete third-party identifier bindings belonging to other users by submitting an arbitrary address and medium to the account deletion endpoint without ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the unverified Forget3PID handler to remove a victim's

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-22104

Improper access control in Hashtopolis server web-interface chunk activity component for versions prior to 0.14.8 allows any created account to read all cracked hashes of a Hashtopolis server instance.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Improper access control in Hashtopolis server web-interface chunk activity component for versions prior to 0.14.8 allows any created account to read all cracked hashes of a Hashtopolis server instance.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12393

The WPS Bookings for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.11.7 does not verify that a booking order belongs to the requesting user before cancelling it, allowing any authenticated user, such as a Subscriber or Customer, to cancel and void other customers' booking orders.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11966

The User Registration & Membership WordPress plugin before 5.2.3 does not perform a capability check for unauthenticated callers on one of its membership payment actions and acts on a caller-supplied user identifier, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete recently-registered, payment-pending user accounts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15159

The Ninja Forms - Excel Export plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.6 via the 'spreadsheet_export_form_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to enumerate any Ninja Forms form ID and download all stored su

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

grav-plugin-api before 1.0.6 fails to validate super-admin status in createApiKey, generate2fa, and disable2fa endpoints, allowing non-super api.users.write managers to escalate to super-admin. Attackers can mint API keys bound to super-admin accounts or strip 2FA from super-admin users to achieve full instance takeover.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-62233

grav-plugin-api before 1.0.6 fails to validate super-admin status in createApiKey, generate2fa, and disable2fa endpoints, allowing non-super api.users.write managers to escalate to super-admin. Attackers can mint API keys bound to super-admin accounts or strip 2FA from super-admin users to achieve full instance takeover.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

grav-plugin-api before 1.0.6 fails to validate super-admin status in createApiKey, generate2fa, and disable2fa endpoints, allowing non-super api.users.write managers to escalate to super-admin. Attackers can mint API keys bound to super-admin accounts or strip 2FA from super-admin users to achieve full instance takeover.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43977

wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions prior to 2.6, any authenticated user can read another user's private workout session notes, exercise history, and training statistics by calling the /logs/ and /stats/ actions on a routine they do not own. The vulnerability exists in RoutineViewSet (wger/manager/api/views.py). The view defines two custom actions /logs/ and /stats

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions prior to 2.6, any authenticated user can read another user's private workout session notes, exercise history, and training statistics by calling the /logs/ and /stats/ actions on a routine they do not own. The vulnerability exists in RoutineViewSet (wger/manager/api/views.py). The view defines two custom actions /logs/ and /stats

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SALTO ProAccess Space software using the tenancy feature / logical partition is vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack that could allow an authorized attacker to access any space managed by the affected product.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11889

SALTO ProAccess Space software using the tenancy feature / logical partition is vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack that could allow an authorized attacker to access any space managed by the affected product.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
mcp

### Summary In affected versions, the SSE and Streamable HTTP server transports routed incoming requests to an existing session based only on the session identifier, without verifying that the request was authenticated as the same principal that created the session. Anyone who learned or guessed a session ID could send JSON-RPC messages on that session, regardless of which bearer token the request

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53536

Activepieces is an open source AI workflow automation platform. Prior to 0.83.0, the /v1/step-files/signed download endpoint verified the supplied JWT against the shared signing secret but did not check the token's audience, and combined with a missing null-check on the decoded fileId, this allowed any caller holding any valid Activepieces JWT (including a freshly created user's own access token)

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Activepieces is an open source AI workflow automation platform. Prior to 0.83.0, the /v1/step-files/signed download endpoint verified the supplied JWT against the shared signing secret but did not check the token's audience, and combined with a missing null-check on the decoded fileId, this allowed any caller holding any valid Activepieces JWT (including a freshly created user's own access token)

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15945

A flaw was found in the group search functionality of the Keycloak server's administrative API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled, a delegated administrator can bypass access restrictions to view parent groups they are not authorized to see. By searching for a child group they have permission to view, the system incorrectly returns the full details of the parent group in the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57205

SimpleChat is a secure AI conversation application with personal and group workspaces for document-grounded interactions. Prior to 0.241.203, the authenticated GET /api/user/info/ and GET /api/user/profile-image/ endpoints in application/single_app/route_backend_users.py accepted a caller-supplied user_id and read the matching Cosmos DB user-settings document without object-level authorization, al

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54568

Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. From 3.0.0 until 3.0.6, a client connected to the UFO WebSocket server as a DEVICE could call DEVICE_INFO_REQUEST with another device's target_id and receive that device's server-side system_info through ufo/server/ws/handler.py, because handle_device_info_request and get_device_info did not enforce the co

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. From 3.0.0 until 3.0.6, a client connected to the UFO WebSocket server as a DEVICE could call DEVICE_INFO_REQUEST with another device's target_id and receive that device's server-side system_info through ufo/server/ws/handler.py, because handle_device_info_request and get_device_info did not enforce the co

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59237

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in the Order and OrderItem REST API controllers in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated user to read, modify, and delete orders and order items belonging to any other company (tenant) via a sequential numeric {id} supplied to GET /api/order/{id}, PUT /api/order/{id}, GET /api/order-item/{id}, PUT /api/order-

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in the Order and OrderItem REST API controllers in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated user to read, modify, and delete orders and order items belonging to any other company (tenant) via a sequential numeric {id} supplied to GET /api/order/{id}, PUT /api/order/{id}, GET /api/order-item/{id}, PUT /api/order-

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-71388

stoatchat (delta/Revolt) versions from 20241213-1 before 20250210-1 allow users with only ViewChannel (read) permission on a channel to fetch that channel's webhooks, including their tokens, because the webhook fetch endpoint checked for ViewChannel instead of ManageWebhooks. Using a retrieved token, an attacker can send arbitrary messages to the channel, bypassing channel permissions and imperson

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

stoatchat (delta/Revolt) versions from 20241213-1 before 20250210-1 allow users with only ViewChannel (read) permission on a channel to fetch that channel's webhooks, including their tokens, because the webhook fetch endpoint checked for ViewChannel instead of ManageWebhooks. Using a retrieved token, an attacker can send arbitrary messages to the channel, bypassing channel permissions and imperson

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-35147

HCL DFXServer is affected by a Broken Authentication vulnerability via direct API access. The application fails to verify the user's authentication status when accessing specific API endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to interact with the APIs and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12906

The RTMKit WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 does not perform a capability check in one of its AJAX actions and resolves a request-supplied post identifier directly, allowing users with at least the Contributor role to read the titles of other users' private, draft, pending, scheduled and trashed posts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12510

The AI Engine WordPress plugin before 3.5.5 does not verify that a user owns the chatbot conversation referenced by a client-supplied identifier, allowing users with subscriber-level access to read other users' private conversations and take over their conversation records when the discussions feature is enabled.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15909

A vulnerability has been found in RafyMrX TOKO-ONLINE-ROTI up to ddfe1cd587be0a0b5135d8b6e85cce2ec3aece99. Affected is an unknown function of the file proses/add.php. The manipulation of the argument kd_cs leads to authorization bypass. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55234

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.37, Wekan DDP update allow rules in server/permissions/cards.js, server/permissions/lists.js, and server/permissions/swimlanes.js authorize against the stored source boardId and do not validate a new boardId in the update modifier. Any authenticated user with write access to their own board can call /cards/update, /lists/update, or /swimlan

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53447

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.35, the Wekan cloneBoard Meteor method in models/import.js uses caller-supplied sourceBoardId to build a board export through models/exporter.js without invoking canExport() or checking source-board membership. Any authenticated user who knows a private board ID can clone the board into their own account and read its cards, comments, attach

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54052

n8n-MCP is an MCP server that provides AI assistants access to n8n node documentation, properties, and operations. Prior to 2.56.1, in HTTP mode with multi-tenancy enabled through ENABLE_MULTI_TENANT=true, n8n-mcp's local workflow version history backups were not isolated per tenant, allowing an authenticated tenant to read workflow version snapshots belonging to other tenants and delete or destro

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.37, Wekan DDP update allow rules in server/permissions/cards.js, server/permissions/lists.js, and server/permissions/swimlanes.js authorize against the stored source boardId and do not validate a new boardId in the update modifier. Any authenticated user with write access to their own board can call /cards/update, /lists/update, or /swimlan

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.35, the Wekan cloneBoard Meteor method in models/import.js uses caller-supplied sourceBoardId to build a board export through models/exporter.js without invoking canExport() or checking source-board membership. Any authenticated user who knows a private board ID can clone the board into their own account and read its cards, comments, attach

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

n8n-MCP is an MCP server that provides AI assistants access to n8n node documentation, properties, and operations. Prior to 2.56.1, in HTTP mode with multi-tenancy enabled through ENABLE_MULTI_TENANT=true, n8n-mcp's local workflow version history backups were not isolated per tenant, allowing an authenticated tenant to read workflow version snapshots belonging to other tenants and delete or destro

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52869

The MCP Python SDK, called mcp on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to 1.27.2, the SSE and stateful Streamable HTTP transports mcp.server.sse.SseServerTransport and mcp.server.streamable_http_manager.StreamableHTTPSessionManager route requests to existing sessions using only the session_id query parameter or Mcp-Session-Id header without verifying the auth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The MCP Python SDK, called mcp on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to 1.27.2, the SSE and stateful Streamable HTTP transports mcp.server.sse.SseServerTransport and mcp.server.streamable_http_manager.StreamableHTTPSessionManager route requests to existing sessions using only the session_id query parameter or Mcp-Session-Id header without verifying the auth

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
mantisbt/mantisbt

### Impact Users below _report_issues_for_unreleased_versions_threshold_ can assign unreleased product versions. ### Patches - https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/17072d4c322c85f7135ebec3417a6d90b525d12f ### Workarounds None ### Resources - https://mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=37065 ### Credits MantisBT thanks Vishal Shukla for discovering and responsibly reporting the issue.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58660

Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48799

Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to 2.21.8, Postiz fails to verify Nowpayments IPN callback authenticity against the payment provider shared secret and reads the target subscription identifier from the untrusted request body, allowing a low-privileged account to grant arbitrary organizations lifetime PRO subscriptions without payment. This issue is fixed in version 2.21.8.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-32781

Apollo is a reliable configuration management system suitable for microservice configuration management scenarios. Prior to 2.5.0, Apollo Portal does not verify application and namespace permissions when an authenticated user requests a release by ID through GET /envs/{env}/releases/{releaseId} while configView.memberOnly.envs is enabled, allowing a low-privileged Portal user who obtains or guesse

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 564cc30, BoardAjaxController save() method (used by the kanban board drag-and-drop endpoint) validates the caller's role on the attacker-supplied project_id but never verifies that the supplied task_id actually belongs to that project. Because task identifiers are sequential integers shared across the entire instance, any authenticated user who is a member

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Apollo is a reliable configuration management system suitable for microservice configuration management scenarios. Prior to 2.5.0, Apollo Portal does not verify application and namespace permissions when an authenticated user requests a release by ID through GET /envs/{env}/releases/{releaseId} while configView.memberOnly.envs is enabled, allowing a low-privileged Portal user who obtains or guesse

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44986

Penpot is an open-source design tool for design and code collaboration. Prior to 2.14.5, Penpot exposed teams_invitations.clj invitation tokens from create-team-invitations, embedded an existing profile id in auth.clj prepare-register-profile, and had auth.clj register-profile issue a session based on the invitation email match without password verification, allowing a registered user to take over

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to 2.21.8, Postiz fails to verify Nowpayments IPN callback authenticity against the payment provider shared secret and reads the target subscription identifier from the untrusted request body, allowing a low-privileged account to grant arbitrary organizations lifetime PRO subscriptions without payment. This issue is fixed in version 2.21.8.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61836

Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Prior to 12.0.0, when response caching is enabled, the cache-key derivation in api/src/utils/get-cache-key.ts includes version, path, query, and accountability.user but omits authorization context such as share, role, roles, admin, app, and policies. Directus share tokens and anonymous requests can both reduce to user

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Penpot is an open-source design tool for design and code collaboration. Prior to 2.14.5, Penpot exposed teams_invitations.clj invitation tokens from create-team-invitations, embedded an existing profile id in auth.clj prepare-register-profile, and had auth.clj register-profile issue a session based on the invitation email match without password verification, allowing a registered user to take over

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Prior to 12.0.0, when response caching is enabled, the cache-key derivation in api/src/utils/get-cache-key.ts includes version, path, query, and accountability.user but omits authorization context such as share, role, roles, admin, app, and policies. Directus share tokens and anonymous requests can both reduce to user

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59259

n8n before versions 1.123.61, 2.27.4, and 2.28.1 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in external secrets handling caused by a mismatch between the static validation check and the runtime expression engine. An authenticated user with credential create or update permissions but without the externalSecret:list scope can embed external secret references into credentials in forms the static vali

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59254

n8n before 2.28.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where external secrets are incorrectly resolved in workflow node expressions outside credentials scope. Authenticated project editors can read plaintext external secret values by referencing them in node expressions without requiring explicit secrets access permissions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59236

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in the Excel import handlers (CustomerImport, LeadImport, ProductImport) in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.14.0 allows a remote, authenticated user of any role or company to create customer, lead, and product records inside another company's tenant via a spreadsheet whose company_id column points to the victim tenant, uploaded to POST /

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

n8n before versions 1.123.61, 2.27.4, and 2.28.1 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in external secrets handling caused by a mismatch between the static validation check and the runtime expression engine. An authenticated user with credential create or update permissions but without the externalSecret:list scope can embed external secret references into credentials in forms the static vali

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

n8n before 2.28.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where external secrets are incorrectly resolved in workflow node expressions outside credentials scope. Authenticated project editors can read plaintext external secret values by referencing them in node expressions without requiring explicit secrets access permissions.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59235

Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in BankAccountListController (app/Http/Controllers/Api/BankAccount/BankAccountListController.php), exposed at GET /api/bank-account, in Prospero Flow CRM company_id)->get(), performing only company scoping and no role or permission check before returning the data. This results in the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive banking information (e.g. IBAN, SWIFT/BIC, acc

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in BankAccountListController (app/Http/Controllers/Api/BankAccount/BankAccountListController.php), exposed at GET /api/bank-account, in Prospero Flow CRM company_id)->get(), performing only company scoping and no role or permission check before returning the data. This results in the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive banking information (e.g. IBAN, SWIFT/BIC, acc

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11580

The Kali Forms — Contact Form & Drag-and-Drop Builder WordPress plugin before 2.4.17 does not perform a per-object capability check in its post-duplication AJAX action, allowing users with Contributor-level access or above to duplicate any post (regardless of owner, post type, or status) into a published post they own and read its private post metadata, including secrets stored by other Kali Forms

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59733

Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.74.4, rclone serve restic --private-repos enforces authorization using the routed user path segment while building the backend object key from the raw uncleaned URL path, allowing an authenticated user to include .. in a request such as //..//config and read, overwrite, or delet

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.74.4, rclone serve restic --private-repos enforces authorization using the routed user path segment while building the backend object key from the raw uncleaned URL path, allowing an authenticated user to include .. in a request such as //..//config and read, overwrite, or delet

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15637

Improper authorization in the PAM SSH key and certificate retrieval endpoints in Devolutions Server 2026.2.11, 2026.1.22 allows an authenticated low-privileged user to disclose the private key of an SSH key or certificate PAM credential via a direct object reference to the credential identifier.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15058

Improper authorization in the secure messages deletion endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.2.11, 2026.1.22 allows an authenticated user to delete another user's messages via a direct object reference to the message identifier.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n-mcp

## Impact In multi-tenant HTTP deployments — where a single n8n-mcp server serves several tenants — the locally stored workflow version history (the automatic backups taken before workflow updates) was not isolated per tenant. An authenticated tenant could read workflow version snapshots belonging to other tenants, and could delete or destroy other tenants' stored backups. A stored snapshot incl

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
go.woodpecker-ci.org/woodpecker/v3

### Impact A vulnerability in Woodpecker CI's gRPC layer allowed any authenticated agent to impersonate any other agent on the same server by injecting a forged `agent_id` value into outgoing gRPC metadata. The server correctly verified the JWT token but then discarded the verified agent identity in favor of the client-supplied value. ### Patches Direct patch: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woo

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52839

Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. Versions prior to 1.6.0 correctly filter provider-scoped appointments in the `appointments/search` response, proving that provider isolation is an intended security boundary. However, the direct mutation endpoints `appointments/store` and `appointments/update` only check generic appointment privileges and never verify that the submitted `id

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15622

该漏洞存在于 poco-ai poco-claw 0.5.4 及之前版本的 Workspace API 组件中,具体位于 executor_manager/app/api/v1/workspace.py 文件的 get_workspace_file 函数。攻击者可以通过操纵 user_id 参数实现授权绕过,从而访问其他用户的文件或资源。该漏洞可远程利用,无需身份验证,CVSS 3.1 评分为 5.3(中等),影响机密性(低),对完整性和可用性无影响。目前已有公开的利用代码,但尚未被列入已知被利用漏洞目录(KEV)或在野利用标记为 false。厂商已发布补丁(commit 67fcc88505c57f77d3fcf04eb5b89425b10cbf48),建议受影响用户立即升级至修复版本。缓解措施包括限制对 API 的网络访问、实施额外的访问控制等。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许远程未认证攻击者绕过授权,可能泄露其他用户的文件,尽管影响范围有限,但公开的利用代码增加了风险。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
kimai/kimai

### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains an authenticated improper authorization vulnerability in the Web rate editing flows for projects, customers, and activities. A user who can edit one authorized parent object can combine that authorized parent ID with the rate ID of a different, unauthorized parent object and thereby modify the unauthorized rate record. This affects `ProjectRate`, `CustomerRate`,

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
kimai/kimai

### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains an authenticated improper authorization vulnerability in the preset-project activity creation flow. A user with the generic `create_activity` permission, but without access to a target project, can still create a new `Activity` under that unauthorized project by visiting the preset project creation route directly. This is a persistent cross-project business-obje

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
kimai/kimai

## Summary The Timesheet API `PATCH /api/timesheets/{id}` and `POST /api/timesheets` endpoints accept a user-supplied `project` ID and resolve it through a Symfony `EntityType` whose `query_builder` allows the submitted ID to satisfy the access predicate via an unconditional OR branch. As a result, any authenticated user can re-assign their own timesheet to any project in the database — including

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58410

ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to version 7.4.0, there was an authorization flaw in the family-scoped endpoints which allowed low-privileged users to read and modify other families’ records. An authenticated non-admin user with EditSelf access can supply another family’s `familyId` and access records outside their own family scope. The backend trusts the attacker-contr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to version 7.4.0, there was an authorization flaw in the family-scoped endpoints which allowed low-privileged users to read and modify other families’ records. An authenticated non-admin user with EditSelf access can supply another family’s `familyId` and access records outside their own family scope. The backend trusts the attacker-contr

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6541

Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.1, 11.6.x <= 11.6.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.19 fail to restrict metric configuration changes to the playbook being saved, which allows an authenticated user with team access to alter another user’s playbook metric settings via a crafted import or update request with a foreign metric ID. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00653

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61971

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Cozmoslabs User Profile Picture metronet-profile-picture allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects User Profile Picture: from n/a through <= 2.6.3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57694

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Themeum Tutor LMS tutor allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Tutor LMS: from n/a through <= 3.9.13.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9708

Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.2, 11.6.x <= 11.6.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.19 fail to validate that an assigned incoming webhook user has access to the target team or channel, which allows a requester with webhook management permissions to create posts or direct messages attributed to another user via crafted incoming webhook configuration and payloads.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00683

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10103

Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.2, 11.6.x <= 11.6.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.19 fail to verify post ownership in the shared channel inbound sync handler, which allows an authenticated remote cluster to modify or delete posts authored by local users or other remotes via crafted sync messages referencing arbitrary post IDs in channels shared with that remote.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00689

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14165

An Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability affecting Tuleap Enterprise Edition from 17.0 through 17.5 could allow an attacker to access data of other users without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15516

A vulnerability was detected in MacCMS Pro up to 2022.1000.3005. Impacted is the function step5 of the file application/install/controller/Index.php of the component Installation Module. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is now public and may

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The WCFM – Frontend Manager for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.27 via the wcfm_product_archive due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to archive arbitrary vendors' products, toggle the featured status

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10041

The WCFM – Frontend Manager for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.27 via the wcfm_product_archive due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to archive arbitrary vendors' products, toggle the featured status

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.14.0 via the generate_document_shortcode due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to mint publicly accessible, session-free download lin

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13116

The PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.14.0 via the generate_document_shortcode due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to mint publicly accessible, session-free download lin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Teracity Software Technologies Inc. TeraMIS allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects TeraMIS: from V03.26.01.14 through 30.04.2026.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Krayin CRM through 2.2.3 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in LeadController, PersonController, OrganizationController, QuoteController, and ActivityController that allows authenticated users to edit, update, or delete records owned by other users. Attackers can modify CRM records and reassign ownership by exploiting missing record-level ownership validation in edit, updat

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55881

OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. From 1.22.0 before 1.27.0, getFirstMob returned 15-second presigned S3 download URLs for a session's DOM-replay recording based solely on the session path parameter, while validateProjectAccess checked only that the project belonged to the requester's tenant and did not verify that the session belonged to that project, allowing any authenticated lo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55880

OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. In 1.27.0 and earlier, three dashboard and note mutation functions ran their SQL without the ownership predicate that their sibling read and edit functions use: notes.delete filtered only on note id and project id, while dashboards.update_widget and dashboards.remove_widget filtered only on dashboard id and widget id, allowing any authenticated mem

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55515

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, the unaccepted-assets report delete endpoint authorizes only reports.view and deletes CheckoutAcceptance::pending()->find($acceptanceId) by global ID without checking access to the related checkoutable asset, allowing a reports user in one company to delete pending checkout acceptance records for another company. This issue is fixe

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6212

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Teracity Software Technologies Inc. TeraMIS allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects TeraMIS: from V03.26.01.14 through 30.04.2026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-61460

Krayin CRM through 2.2.3 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in LeadController, PersonController, OrganizationController, QuoteController, and ActivityController that allows authenticated users to edit, update, or delete records owned by other users. Attackers can modify CRM records and reassign ownership by exploiting missing record-level ownership validation in edit, updat

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55516

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, PATCH or PUT /api/v1/maintenances/{maintenance_id} checks access to the current maintenance record and asset but then fills attacker-controlled fields including asset_id without re-authorizing the newly supplied asset, allowing an authorized user to move a maintenance record onto an asset outside their company scope. This issue is

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55478

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, POST /api/v1/kits/{kit_id}/licenses checks whether the caller can edit kits but does not authorize access to the referenced license object, allowing a low-privilege user with predefined-kit permissions to bind a license they should not be able to access or manage into a kit. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55670

ZITADEL is an open source identity management platform. Prior to 4.15.1, ZITADEL's event store validation can retain the original resource owner for a deleted user identifier, causing a later user recreated with the same identifier in another organization to be provisioned under the original organization and exposed to that organization's administrator. This issue is fixed in version 4.15.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59190

grav-plugin-admin is an HTML user interface that provides a way to configure Grav and create and modify pages. In 1.10.52 and earlier, an authenticated attacker with admin.users permission can change the password of any user account, including the super administrator, by sending a direct POST request to /admin/user/{username}?task=save with data[password] because saveUser authorizes the caller's u

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2398

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Adam Retail Automation Ltd. MobilMen 20T allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects MobilMen 20T: from v3 through 10072026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56765

Vikunja before 2.2.1 contains an authorization flaw where the LinkSharing.ReadAll endpoint exposes share hashes to users with read access, enabling permission escalation to admin-level shares. The GetTaskAttachment endpoint performs permission checks against user-supplied task IDs but fetches attachments by sequential ID without verifying ownership, allowing attackers to download and delete all fi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41878

R-SOFT DMS is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attack in multiple file download endpoints. The application fetches files from the database by ID and serves them to whoever requests them, relying only on session authentication, meaning any valid user can access any file. This issue was fixed in version v3.19-2862 and v3.17-2580.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6802

The Easy Upload Files During Checkout plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing authorization checks in the ufdc_custom_init() function, which processes the 'eufdc-delete' parameter without any nonce verification, capability check, or attachment ownership validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attac

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12400

The FlowForms – Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1 via the update_form due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to modify the content, design, and settings of, as well as publish or revert

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55604

DeepSeek MCP Server is an MCP server for DeepSeek V4. Starting in version 1.4.2 and prior to version 1.7.0, the process-global `SessionStore` accepts caller-supplied `session_id` values without binding them to any authenticated principal or transport session. An attacker can enumerate active session IDs via `deepseek_sessions`, then reuse a victim-controlled `session_id` in `deepseek_chat` to retr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-51925

A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in docuForm GmbH Client v.11.11c that allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the dfm-menu_report.php component. Attackers can exploit this flaw to read arbitrary files on the server, including sensitive configuration files, source code or system files.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-51924

An issue in docuForm GmbH Client v.11.11c allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the file upload and report.php component

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-51923

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability exists in docuForm GmbH Client v.11.11c allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the user settings component, and modify or retrieve sensitive data associated with other users’ accounts.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 16.4
Conf: 50%
sylius/sylius

### Impact The `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can: - read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, rec

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59817

Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.27.0 before 6.44.0, Ghost's public donation checkout flow allowed an unauthenticated attacker to control donation checkout metadata and obtain full paid gift memberships for a minimal payment without exposing customer or member data or stealing money from a site or its members. This issue is fixed in version 6.44.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.27.0 before 6.44.0, Ghost's public donation checkout flow allowed an unauthenticated attacker to control donation checkout metadata and obtain full paid gift memberships for a minimal payment without exposing customer or member data or stealing money from a site or its members. This issue is fixed in version 6.44.0.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59216

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, get_event_call delivered execute:python and execute:tool Socket.IO events to a client-supplied session_id after checking only that the session was connected, allowing authenticated users who learned another socket ID through ydoc:document:join to run code interpreter Python or tools in that user

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59215

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, channel thread parent and reply handling did not bind parent_id to the channel in the URL, allowing an authenticated user to reference a message from another private or DM channel and disclose thread context across channels. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15191

A flaw has been found in mettle sendportal up to 3.0.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file vendor/mettle/sendportal-core/src/Http/Requests/CampaignStoreRequest.php of the component Campaign Creation Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, channel thread parent and reply handling did not bind parent_id to the channel in the URL, allowing an authenticated user to reference a message from another private or DM channel and disclose thread context across channels. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, get_event_call delivered execute:python and execute:tool Socket.IO events to a client-supplied session_id after checking only that the session was connected, allowing authenticated users who learned another socket ID through ydoc:document:join to run code interpreter Python or tools in that user

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw has been found in mettle sendportal up to 3.0.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file vendor/mettle/sendportal-core/src/Http/Requests/CampaignStoreRequest.php of the component Campaign Creation Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-1989

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in PAVO Financial Technology Solutions Inc. PAVO Pay allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects PAVO Pay: through 09072026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12433

The Hydra Booking – Appointment Scheduling & Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 1.2.1 via the /wp-json/hydra-booking/v1/booking/details/{id} REST endpoint. This is due to the getBookingDetails() callback only enforcing the tfhb_manage_options capability via tfhb_manage_options_permission(), without verifying tha

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13450

The GamiPress – Gamification plugin to reward points, achievements, badges & ranks in WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.9.4 via the 'access' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view private GamiPress activity log entries belonging

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12418

The User Frontend: AI Powered Frontend Posting, User Directory, Profile, Membership & User Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.7 via the 'wpuf_files_data' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the post_title, post_conten

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5523

The Divi Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in versions up to, and including, 5.1.8. This is due to the update_user() function accepting a user ID parameter from form submissions without verifying that the authenticated user has permission to edit that specific user account, and the handle_register_submission() function only checking if any user is logged in r

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 does not verify that the email in a POST /auth-requests/admin-request body belongs to the authenticated caller, allowing a low-privileged organization member to obtain another user's vault key and a victim-scoped access token by creating a Trusted Device Encryption authentication request, bound to an attacker-controlled public key, that is readable from an unauthen

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54590

AsyncSSH is a Python package which provides an asynchronous client and server implementation of the SSHv2 protocol on top of the Python asyncio framework. Version 2.23.0 contains an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 in SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that blocks /, , and .. before %u substitution in AuthorizedKeysFile but does not block a leading ~ or ${ENV}, allowing later expansion in _expand_val an

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-35210

OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to 7.260326.0, an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenCTI allows any authenticated user with KNOWLEDGE_KNUPDATE permission to bypass Confidence Level validation and Object Marking restrictions by injecting the synchronized-upsert: true HTTP header, enabling attackers to downgrade confid

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
nl.nl-portal:taak

## Impact In versions from 1.5.0 up to and including 3.0.0, any authenticated portal user could complete and tamper with another user's open task by submitting it on their behalf. The task submission endpoint accepted a task ID and a payload, but it never checked whether the task actually belonged to the user making the call. An attacker who held a valid login (a normal `burger` OAuth token) and

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 13.4
Conf: 50%

OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to 7.260326.0, an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenCTI allows any authenticated user with KNOWLEDGE_KNUPDATE permission to bypass Confidence Level validation and Object Marking restrictions by injecting the synchronized-upsert: true HTTP header, enabling attackers to downgrade confid

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-60104

Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 does not verify that the email in a POST /auth-requests/admin-request body belongs to the authenticated caller, allowing a low-privileged organization member to obtain another user's vault key and a victim-scoped access token by creating a Trusted Device Encryption authentication request, bound to an attacker-controlled public key, that is readable from an unauthen

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 does not verify that the email in a POST /auth-requests/admin-request body belongs to the authenticated caller, allowing a low-privileged organization member to obtain another user's vault key and a victim-scoped access token by creating a Trusted Device Encryption authentication request, bound to an attacker-controlled public key, that is readable from an unauthen

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-15036

A vulnerability was determined in Harness up to 2.28.2. This vulnerability affects the function getAuthorizedSpaces of the file app/api/controller/gitspace/list_all.go of the component gitspaces Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the proble

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A vulnerability was determined in Harness up to 2.28.2. This vulnerability affects the function getAuthorizedSpaces of the file app/api/controller/gitspace/list_all.go of the component gitspaces Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the proble

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59253

n8n before 2.28.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability allowing authenticated users to assign workflows to folders in other projects. Attackers can bypass project and folder authorization boundaries by supplying crafted request payloads during workflow creation, causing logical integrity violations in target project folder structures.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

n8n before 2.28.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability allowing authenticated users to assign workflows to folders in other projects. Attackers can bypass project and folder authorization boundaries by supplying crafted request payloads during workflow creation, causing logical integrity violations in target project folder structures.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5459

The User Frontend: AI Powered Frontend Posting, User Directory, Profile, Membership & User Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.1 via the payment_page() function due to missing validation on the 'user_id' user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate a free subscription

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-3688

The WCFM Membership – WooCommerce Memberships for Multivendor Marketplace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.10. This is due to the 'wcfmvm_membership_change' AJAX action not validating user permission to modify other users. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with vendor level access and above, to chang

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55429

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `UpsertWorkspaceApp` overwrites an existing app's `agent_id` on a primary-key conflict and `insertAgentApp` accepts the app ID from the provisioner's `CompleteJob` payload without verifying it belongs to the workspace being built. `CompleteJob` runs under `db

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `UpsertWorkspaceApp` overwrites an existing app's `agent_id` on a primary-key conflict and `insertAgentApp` accepts the app ID from the provisioner's `CompleteJob` payload without verifying it belongs to the workspace being built. `CompleteJob` runs under `db

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/zhenorzz/goploy

### Summary `Project.AddFile`, `Project.EditFile`, `Project.RemoveFile`, and `Project.Edit` in `cmd/server/api/project/handler.go` accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding `model.ProjectFile.GetData` and `model.Project.GetData` queries filter only by row id. A user holding the `m

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55418

FastGPT is an open source AI knowledge base platform. Prior to v4.15.0-beta5, two FastGPT file handlers authorize an unrelated resource and then sign or read an S3 object using a key taken directly from the request, without checking that the key belongs to the caller's team. Because S3 object keys are global within the bucket and carry the tenant id only as a path segment, an attacker can supply a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54602

FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. Prior to 4.15.0, GET /api/core/ai/record/getRecord authenticates the caller but loads LLM request and response traces only by requestId without team scoping, allowing any authenticated user to read another team's prompts, retrieved RAG chunks, and completions if the requestId is known. This issue is fixed in version 4.15.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. Prior to 4.15.0, GET /api/core/ai/record/getRecord authenticates the caller but loads LLM request and response traces only by requestId without team scoping, allowing any authenticated user to read another team's prompts, retrieved RAG chunks, and completions if the requestId is known. This issue is fixed in version 4.15.0.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

FastGPT is an open source AI knowledge base platform. Prior to v4.15.0-beta5, two FastGPT file handlers authorize an unrelated resource and then sign or read an S3 object using a key taken directly from the request, without checking that the key belongs to the caller's team. Because S3 object keys are global within the bucket and carry the tenant id only as a path segment, an attacker can supply a

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53729

DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, any authenticated user can download (/exportCenter/download/{id}), delete (/exportCenter/delete), retry (/exportCenter/retry/{id}), or generate download links (/exportCenter/generateDownloadUri/{id}) for export tasks belonging to other users by manipulating the task ID parameter, and the /exportCenter/download/{id}

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50530

DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, a share mode chart data interface only validates that sceneId matches the resourceId in the link token and fails to validate whether tableId and field IDs in the request body belong to the shared resource, allowing an attacker with a valid share link token to replace dataset identifiers and retrieve unauthorized dat

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
@better-auth/scim

### Am I affected? Users are affected if all of these hold: - They install and register the `@better-auth/scim` plugin (`plugins: [scim()]`). - They create SCIM providers without an `organizationId`, that is, non-organization ("personal") providers. Organization-scoped providers are not affected because they enforce organization membership and role. - Their application's deployment has more than

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, a share mode chart data interface only validates that sceneId matches the resourceId in the link token and fails to validate whether tableId and field IDs in the request body belong to the shared resource, allowing an attacker with a valid share link token to replace dataset identifiers and retrieve unauthorized dat

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 8.4
Conf: 50%

DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, any authenticated user can download (/exportCenter/download/{id}), delete (/exportCenter/delete), retry (/exportCenter/retry/{id}), or generate download links (/exportCenter/generateDownloadUri/{id}) for export tasks belonging to other users by manipulating the task ID parameter, and the /exportCenter/download/{id}

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49296

Before apache-airflow 3.3.0, a user authorized to read one Dag could disclose the source of other Dags co-located in the same source file. `GET /api/v2/dagSources/{dag_id}` — and the equivalent Dag-source view in the UI — returned the entire source file without redacting Dags the caller was not authorized to read, bypassing per-DAG read authorization. Deployments that co-locate multiple Dags in a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5799

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Idvlabs Software and Consulting Services Inc. Ontime allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects Ontime: through 04052026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5730

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Idvlabs Software and Consulting Services Inc. Ontime allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects Ontime: through 04052026.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57870

Broken object-level access control on the Template API in MicroRealEstate allows attackers to retrieve document templates used by other organizations without authorization. This issue affects MicroRealEstate: through 1.0.0-alpha3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57869

Broken object-level access controls and the use of a deterministic pattern during random ID generation in MicroRealEstate allows attackers to access documents uploaded by landlords or tenants without authorization. This issue affects MicroRealEstate: through 1.0.0-alpha3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57868

MicroRealEstate is affected by broken object-level access controls in PDF generator functionality. This issue affects MicroRealEstate: through 1.0.0-alpha3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-34044

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.466, the Logs::mount() component looks up resources by UUID without scoping the lookup to the current team, allowing an authenticated user to access logs for applications owned by other teams by supplying a victim resource UUID. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.466.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-34037

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.464, the cloneTo() Livewire action in ResourceOperations.php authorizes the source resource but resolves destination resources with unscoped Eloquent lookups, allowing an authenticated user to clone resources into destinations owned by other teams and access cross-tenant resource

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53644

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions 0.5.3 through 0.7.2 allow authenticated clients to both read and reset API key service secrets for orders that are no longer in an `active` state (e.g., `suspended`, `canceled`). The root cause is missing order-state validation in two client API endpoints, despite an `isActive()` helper already existing in the `Servi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53643

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 allow low-privileged staff accounts to perform unauthorized actions via admin API endpoints. The root cause is a combination of the `can_always_access` module flag (which grants all staff access to certain modules) and insufficient permission checks or unsafe parameter handling on individual endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-34167

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, the ActivityMonitor Livewire component exposes a public $activityId property without Livewire's #[Locked] attribute. It loads activities via Activity::find($this->activityId) with no authorization or team scoping. Activity IDs are auto-incrementing integers. Any authenticate

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Leantime's Users::getUser method in the JSON-RPC API lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to retrieve full user credential rows including password hashes, TOTP secrets, and session tokens. Attackers can exploit this by calling users.getUser with arbitrary user IDs to enumerate all accounts and obtain credentials for offline password cracking, 2FA bypass, and session hija

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59712

Leantime's Users::getUser method in the JSON-RPC API lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to retrieve full user credential rows including password hashes, TOTP secrets, and session tokens. Attackers can exploit this by calling users.getUser with arbitrary user IDs to enumerate all accounts and obtain credentials for offline password cracking, 2FA bypass, and session hija

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/coder/coder/v2

### Summary `UpsertWorkspaceApp` overwrites an existing app's `agent_id` on a primary-key conflict and `insertAgentApp` accepts the app ID from the provisioner's `CompleteJob` payload without verifying it belongs to the workspace being built. `CompleteJob` runs under `dbauthz.AsProvisionerd` so the authorization layer does not block the cross-workspace upsert. > **Note:** Exploitation requires e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
io.openremote:openremote-manager

### Summary A realm admin of tenant B can read the profile, client roles, and realm roles of any user in any other realm (including the master realm) by supplying the target user's UUID in the REST API path. Three read endpoints in UserResourceImpl check whether the caller holds the read:admin role but omit a check that the target user belongs to the caller's own realm. The vulnerability enables

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12686

An authenticated user could manipulate a company ID parameter in a POST request to the backend to gain unauthorised access to other companies hosted within the same subdomain environment. The application does not adequately verify whether the requested company ID belongs to the authenticated user’s session, resulting in a cross-tenant authorisation bypass. If this vulnerability is successfully exp

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49099

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component. The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search, the target SObject name and id, the Apex REST URL and method, and the Apex query parameters - from

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48206

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel JIRA component. The camel-jira producers read their operation parameters - the issue key, project key, transition id, summary, type, assignee, components, watchers, link type, work-log minutes and others - from Exchange message headers. The header constants defined in JiraConstants (for examp

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46585

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Lucene Component. The camel-lucene producer reads the search phrase from an Exchange header (LuceneConstants.HEADER_QUERY) whose value was the plain string QUERY (and RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS for HEADER_RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS). Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderF

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46453

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel ElasticSearch Rest Client. The camel-elasticsearch-rest-client component reads several Exchange headers to control its behaviour - SEARCH_QUERY (an advanced query body), OPERATION (which Elasticsearch operation to run), INDEX_NAME, INDEX_SETTINGS and ID. The string values of these header cons

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14793

A vulnerability was detected in Craft CMS up to 4.18.0.1. Affected is the function actionReorderSets of the file src/controllers/GlobalsController.php of the component reorder-sets Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. Upgrading to version 4.18.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 9bd05c91e6a7e6da5e949ec41a31c220c059

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14753

A vulnerability was detected in mjperpinosa stumasy up to 327d1b0f2915ba79d7ef8ebb74553e987609d9be. This impacts an unknown function of the file /PHP/objects/notes of the component Note Handler/Assignment Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument assignment_item_id results in authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Continious

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Gitea versions before 1.25.5 look up tracked-time entries by time ID without scoping the lookup to the issue in the request URL, allowing deletion attempts to target entries from another issue.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Gitea versions before 1.25.5 allow a user to change another user's primary email address.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28740

Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 allow Git LFS object reuse to authorize private source objects for users who have repository access but lack Code-unit access.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27657

Gitea versions before 1.25.5 allow a user to change another user's primary email address.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-25782

Gitea versions before 1.25.5 look up tracked-time entries by time ID without scoping the lookup to the issue in the request URL, allowing deletion attempts to target entries from another issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14608

A security vulnerability has been detected in SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /index.php?action=view_student of the component POST Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-59234

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in CalendarDeleteEventController (app/Http/Controllers/Calendar/CalendarDeleteEventController.php), exposed at GET /calendar/event/delete/{id}, in Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary calendar events belonging to other users by manipulating the {id} path parameter, because the delete ha

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11900

The Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & AdSense Ads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to and including 2.8.16 via the 'data' attribute of the [adinserter] shortcode. This is due to the replace_ai_tags() function processing a {reusable-block-N} tag pattern that calls get_post_field('post_content', N) without verifying the requesting user's capability with

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9180

The MotoPress Appointment Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.4. This is due to the `POST /motopress/appointment/v1/bookings` REST endpoint being registered with `'permission_callback' => '__return_true'`, allowing unauthenticated access, while the `createBooking` handler in `BookingsRestController

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
kimai/kimai

### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains an authenticated improper authorization / IDOR vulnerability in the favorite timesheet add and remove endpoints. A low-privileged user who knows another user's `timesheet.id` can add that record to, or remove it from, the victim's `favorite/recent` bookmark list. This allows cross-user manipulation of per-user favorite state without administrative privileges. ##

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
Steeltoe.Management.Endpoint, Steeltoe.Management.EndpointCore

### Summary When Steeltoe management endpoints are configured to listen on an alternate port (`Management:Endpoints:Port` is configured), the middleware responsible for restricting access to the endpoints uses the `Host` HTTP header rather than the actual network socket port. ### Impact An unauthenticated remote attacker can reach every actuator endpoint using a specially crafted HTTP request.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50283

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asse

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49858

API Platform Core is a system to create hypermedia-driven REST and GraphQL APIs. In versions from 2.6.0 prior to 4.1.29, 4.2.26, and 4.3.12, a missing isCacheKeySafe gate in the JSON:API and HAL item normalizers causes a cross-user attribute leak. #[ApiProperty(security: ...)] is evaluated per request to decide whether a property is exposed. The componentsCache arrays in ApiPlatform\JsonApi\Seria

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5142

A flaw was found in foreman. Authenticated users with 'view_keypairs' permission can bypass taxonomy scoping, allowing them to download private SSH (Secure Shell) keys from other organizations by directly querying key pair IDs. This vulnerability leads to cross-tenant data exposure in multi-tenant deployments, potentially compromising sensitive information.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5138

A flaw was found in Foreman. An authenticated user with host-edit permissions could exploit a cross-tenant information disclosure vulnerability. This flaw occurs because the taxonomy_scope controller method does not properly validate organization and location IDs from nested request parameters, bypassing existing authorization checks. This allows the user to leak sensitive infrastructure metadata,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5135

A flaw was found in Foreman. This broken access control vulnerability allows an authenticated user with host-edit permissions to retarget an existing lookup value override to a different host. This is achieved by modifying the match field through nested host attributes, effectively bypassing authorisation checks. The consequence is the potential for unauthorised modification of managed host config

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53903

MCO is vulnerable to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/trading-document/fetchPdfStatement endpoint. The application does not properly validate whether an authenticated user is authorized to access a requested document, allowing direct retrieval based on a user-supplied identifier. An attacker can access trading documents belonging to other

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10096

The Qi Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the 'page_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to modify the stored Qi Blocks styles of arbitrary posts, templates, or widgets they do not own — inclu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12904

The Kadence Blocks – Gutenberg Blocks for Page Builder Features plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to and including 3.7.7. This is due to a mismatch between the object used for authorization and the object actually accessed in the Optimize_Rest_Controller's create_item(), get_item(), delete_item(), and bulk_delete_items() endpoints — authorization

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11988

The LearnPress – WordPress LMS Plugin for Create and Sell Online Courses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.9.1 via the 'userId' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to view the course enrollment progress

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in middlewareKey() that accepts the client-controlled x-limited-key-id header without validating ownership, allowing authenticated users to adopt cross-tenant limited keys. Attackers can supply another tenant's limited key ID to bypass authorization checks and access unauthorized cross-tenant resources across multiple

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56230

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in middlewareKey() that accepts the client-controlled x-limited-key-id header without validating ownership, allowing authenticated users to adopt cross-tenant limited keys. Attackers can supply another tenant's limited key ID to bypass authorization checks and access unauthorized cross-tenant resources across multiple

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58447

Invidious through 2.20260626.0, fixed in commit 77ad416, contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to delete videos from other users' playlists by supplying an arbitrary global video index in the remove_video action of the playlist endpoint. Attackers can obtain per-video index values from the public playlist JSON API and submit them to the play

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10140

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 voice mode contains improper shared-state handling that allows reuse of API clients across tenant boundaries. An authenticated attacker can manipulate cache state to cause requests from other users to be processed using incorrect upstream API credentials, leading to cross-tenant billing and accountability misattribution.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27956

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.464, `GET /api/v1/servers/{server_uuid}/domains?uuid={app_uuid}` bypasses team scoping when the optional uuid query parameter is provided. Any authenticated API user can enumerate domain names (FQDNs) of applications belonging to other teams. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.0.0-

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27883

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.464, the `GET /api/v1/deployments/{uuid}` endpoint allows any authenticated user to access deployment details belonging to any team, bypassing team-based authorization. The $teamId is extracted from the authentication token but never used to scope the database query. This vulnera

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27881

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.464, `GET /api/v1/deployments/{uuid}` in DeployController.php retrieves deployment details without validating that the deployment belongs to the authenticated user's team. Any authenticated API user can read deployment records from other teams by providing a valid deployment UUID

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-14209

A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's Admin UI extension that allows certain administrative users to bypass security restrictions. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) are enabled, an administrator who should only be able to search for users (but not view their full details) can use a specific "brute-force-user" endpoint to access a user's full profile. This includes sensitive infor

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12073

The ProfileGrid – User Profiles, Groups and Communities plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in all versions up to, and including, 5.9.9.5. This is due to the plugin not validating a `user_login` on registration forms that don't contain this parameter, and not properly handling the error messages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to ch

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-34592

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, Coolify server and project lookups are not scoped to the current team, allowing any authenticated user to access servers and projects belonging to other teams by specifying their IDs directly. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.0.0-beta.471.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57498

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.474, Coolify's API controllers consistently validate server ownership with Server::whereTeamId($teamId) before any operation. However, multiple Livewire web UI components accept server_id and destination_uuid from URL query parameters without any team ownership validation, allowi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SigNoz through 0.130.1 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other organizations' alert rules by supplying a target rule UUID, as the alert rule store predicates fail to filter by organization ID. Attackers can read, edit, and delete alert rules belonging to other organizations by exploiting the missing tenant isolation check, bypassing multi-tena

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Modoboa before 2.9.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the PUT /api/v1/accounts/{pk}/password/ endpoint that allows domain administrators to change any user's password. Attackers with domain admin privileges can bypass object-level access controls to reset superadmin passwords and achieve full account takeover.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

LibrePhotos before 1.0.0 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in the SetPhotosShared endpoint that allows authenticated users to grant themselves access to other users' private photos by bypassing ownership validation. Attackers can manipulate shared_to relations without proper owner checks to read arbitrary private photos belonging to other users.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Teable before 2026-06-15T04-43-24Z.1912 contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows anonymous attackers to access hidden field data by supplying arbitrary field IDs in the projection parameter of the share view records endpoint. Attackers can enumerate hidden field IDs from share metadata and specify them in projection parameters to read field values that are intended to be restr

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

PhotoPrism before 260601-a7d098548 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to modify other users' profile information by sending requests to arbitrary user endpoints. Attackers can exploit the missing session-to-user identifier validation in the PUT users API endpoint to overwrite another user's profile details without authorization.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57956

SigNoz through 0.130.1 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other organizations' alert rules by supplying a target rule UUID, as the alert rule store predicates fail to filter by organization ID. Attackers can read, edit, and delete alert rules belonging to other organizations by exploiting the missing tenant isolation check, bypassing multi-tena

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57945

PhotoPrism before 260601-a7d098548 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to modify other users' profile information by sending requests to arbitrary user endpoints. Attackers can exploit the missing session-to-user identifier validation in the PUT users API endpoint to overwrite another user's profile details without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57943

LibrePhotos before 1.0.0 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in the SetPhotosShared endpoint that allows authenticated users to grant themselves access to other users' private photos by bypassing ownership validation. Attackers can manipulate shared_to relations without proper owner checks to read arbitrary private photos belonging to other users.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56781

Teable before 2026-06-15T04-43-24Z.1912 contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows anonymous attackers to access hidden field data by supplying arbitrary field IDs in the projection parameter of the share view records endpoint. Attackers can enumerate hidden field IDs from share metadata and specify them in projection parameters to read field values that are intended to be restr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56780

Modoboa before 2.9.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the PUT /api/v1/accounts/{pk}/password/ endpoint that allows domain administrators to change any user's password. Attackers with domain admin privileges can bypass object-level access controls to reset superadmin passwords and achieve full account takeover.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57341

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Colissimo Officiel : Méthodes de livraison pour WooCommerce <= 2.9.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57676

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Matteo Manna Simple User Avatar allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Simple User Avatar: from n/a through 4.9.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13549

A security flaw has been discovered in CodeAstro Complaint Management System 1.0. The affected element is the function deletereport of the file application/controllers/Report.php of the component Report Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13534

A vulnerability was detected in CherryHQ cherry-studio up to 1.9.7. This affects the function sha256 of the file src/main/services/memory/MemoryService.ts of the component CherryIN Preload API. Performing a manipulation of the argument state results in authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. It is indicated that the exploitability is di

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13512

A vulnerability was identified in Databend up to 1.2.881 on HTTP. This affects the function ClientSessionManager::state_key of the file src/query/service/src/servers/http/v1/session/client_session_manager.rs of the component Tenant Handler. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The pull r

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13490

A security vulnerability has been detected in glpi-project glpi 11.0.5/11.0.6/11.0.7. This affects the function Document::canViewFile of the file front/document.send.php of the component Document Handler. Such manipulation of the argument docid leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is indicated that the exploitabilit

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution – Build Your Own Amazon, eBay, Etsy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.4 via the 'id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to read any oth

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11987

The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution – Build Your Own Amazon, eBay, Etsy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.4 via the 'id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to read any oth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
go.senan.xyz/gonic

## Summary In gonic, the Subsonic API endpoints `/rest/deletePlaylist.view` and `/rest/getPlaylist.view` perform no per-resource authorization. Once authenticated as *any* user (admin or not), an attacker can: 1. **Delete any playlist owned by any other user** (including admin) by passing its `id`. 2. **Read the full contents** (name, comment, song list) of any other user's **private** (non-publ

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
go.senan.xyz/gonic

## Summary The maintainer's recent fix in [`6dd71e6a3c966867ef8c900d359a7df75789f410`](https://github.com/sentriz/gonic/commit/6dd71e6) (`fix(subsonic): enforce playlist ownership on getPlaylist/deletePlaylist`) added an ownership check based on `playlist.UserID`. However, `playlist.UserID` is derived from the *first path segment* of the attacker-controlled playlist ID, with no path containment o

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/nezhahq/nezha

### Summary In nezha **v1.14.13–v1.14.14** and **v2.0.0–v2.0.9**, the WebSocket endpoints `GET /ws/terminal/:id` and `GET /ws/file/:id` authenticate the caller only by the presence of a valid stream UUID, with no ownership check tying that UUID to the user who created the stream. Any authenticated dashboard user (including a `RoleMember`) who learns a live stream UUID can attach to the session an

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
solidinvoice/solidinvoice

## Summary Four authorization bypass vulnerabilities in Symfony LiveComponent actions allow any authenticated user within a company to access, modify, or delete other users' API tokens and notification transport settings. The root cause is that LiveComponent actions accept entity IDs without verifying ownership, while the listing methods correctly filter by user. ## Findings ### 1. Cross-User A

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52782

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, there is an IDOR through /projects//settings/project_storages/ via PATCH parameter "storages_project_storage[project_folder_id]" leads to Access to Unauthorized Resources. A project-admin in one project can hijack the managed Nextcloud or OneDrive folder of another project on the same storage by writing

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52779

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, a cross-project IDOR / authorization context confusion in the Calendar and Team Planner modules allows a user with management permissions in one project to delete public Calendar or Team Planner Queries from another project where they do not have the corresponding management permissions. Both modules aut

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49355

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.4.0, `GET /api/v3/meetings/:meeting_id/agenda_items/:agenda_item_id` discloses private work package data from a linked work package that belongs to a private/inaccessible project. This vulnerability is fixed in 17.4.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44736

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.4.0, the GET /api/v3/relations endpoint allows any authenticated user to retrieve relations — and the subject (title) of work packages they have no permission to view — by supplying an arbitrary work package ID in the involved, fromId, or toId filter. This bypasses the Relation.visible scope due to a flawed performance

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44732

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.2 and 17.4.0, OpenProject exposes a document update endpoint used to modify existing documents. The target document is loaded with visibility checks and then updated. During update, attacker-controlled attributes are applied to the persisted record before authorization is enforced. As a result, a user without :manage_

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44731

OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.2 and 17.4.0, the web application's meetings filter feature leaks whether a given user ID corresponds to a valid account and discloses the user's full name, allowing an attacker to enumerate all existing user accounts by probing user IDs and observing differences in the server response. This vulnerability is fixed in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56823

AutoGPT is a workflow automation platform for creating, deploying, and managing continuous artificial intelligence agents. Prior to , the `POST /api/integrations/webhooks/{webhook_id}/ping` endpoint fetches the target webhook by primary key alone without verifying that the webhook belongs to the authenticated user. Any authenticated user can supply an arbitrary webhook_id to confirm webhook existe

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12411

Broken Access Control in the devLXDInstancePatchHandler component of Canonical LXD allows an untrusted guest to mount, read, and overwrite another guest's custom storage volume via a crafted device PATCH request over /dev/lxd when security.devlxd.management.volumes is enabled.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-57634

Contributor Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in PPWP <= 1.9.19 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56048

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Payment Gateway Based Fees and Discounts for WooCommerce <= 3.0.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54839

Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Trinity Backup &#8211; Backup, Migrate, Restore, Clone &amp; Schedule Backups <= 2.0.9 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54826

Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in SupportCandy <= 3.4.6 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-66123

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in BookPro <= 1.1.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
lemur

Lemur 1.9.0: any SSO-authenticated user achieves AWS IAM compromise and permanent PKI key access via ACME acme_url SSRF and creator-equality IDOR Vulnerability Summary Field | Value -- | -- Title | Lemur 1.9.0: any SSO-authenticated user achieves AWS IAM compromise and permanent PKI key access via ACME acme_url SSRF and creator-equality IDOR Component | lemur/lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handler

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56774

Kanboard through 1.2.52, fixed in commit 928c68a, UserViewController::removeSession fails to validate the session id parameter before passing it to RememberMeSessionModel::remove, allowing authenticated users to delete other users' Remember Me sessions. Attackers can enumerate sequential session IDs and mass-invalidate persistent login sessions of any user, including administrators, forcing re-aut

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56772

NewsBlur before 14.5.0 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read private notification feeds by supplying arbitrary user_id values to the GET /social/interactions endpoint without ownership verification. Attackers can enumerate user_id values to access another user's follows, replies, and social activity without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54097

File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.6, a low-privileged authenticated user of filebrowser (with create + delete permissions in their own isolated scope) can silently destroy share-link records belonging to any other user — including the administrator — by performing a legitimate DELET

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9799

A flaw was found in org.keycloak.authorization. An authenticated user with a granted User-Managed Access (UMA) permission ticket for one resource can exploit this by using a specific permission request prefix to bypass per-resource access control. This allows the user to gain unauthorized access to all resources of that type within the same resource server, even if they do not have a ticket for th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9099

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A missing authorization check in the GroupResource.addChild() endpoint within the Admin REST API allows an authenticated user with limited administrative privileges to reparent any existing group. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions v2 (FGAPv2) is enabled, an attacker with management rights over a single low-privilege group can reparent a highly privileged group (such

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55411

ToolJet is the open-source foundation am AI-native platform for building and deploying internal tools, workflows and AI agents. Prior to 3.20.1780-lts, the authenticated endpoint POST /api/data-sources/decrypt returns the decrypted plaintext for any credential whose credential_id is supplied in the request body. Unlike every neighbouring data-source route, this handler is not protected by Validate

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13350

Permissions where checked incorrectly during room creation, allowing attackers to create rooms of types they shouldn't be allowed to create.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56013

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in License Manager for WooCommerce <= 3.0.15 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5309

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.6 before 18.11.6, 19.0 before 19.0.3, and 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to read or modify another group's virtual registry cleanup policy settings without authorization.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52812

Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, Git LFS storage is content-addressed by OID alone (///) but per-repo authorization lives in the lfs_object table keyed (repo_id, oid). serveUpload skips re-uploading when the OID file already exists on disk and inserts a new (repo_id, oid) row pointing at it without verifying the request body hashes to the OID being claimed. Any user

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52799

Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, GET /attachments/:uuid returns the raw attachment file without verifying whether the requester has view permission for the associated Issue/Comment/Release or the repository. In a test environment with REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false, we confirmed that an unauthenticated user can download attachments belonging to a private repository. Th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55583

Twenty is an open-source CRM (customer relationship management) platform. Prior to 2.9.0, Twenty was vulnerable to a cross-workspace insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the AI agent monitor's AgentTurnResolver, in packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/ai/ai-agent-monitor/reso lvers/agent-turn.resolver.ts. The agentTurns(agentId) query and the evaluateAgentTurn(turnId) mutation

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27708

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.7.2 and prior, the Servicecustom Client API's __call method accepts an order_id parameter and fetches the associated order without verifying the authenticated client owns it, potentially exposing cross-client data through IDOR. An authenticated client can access any other client's custom service by guessing sequ

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55611

AnythingLLM is an application that turns pieces of content into context that any LLM can use as references during chatting. From 1.11.1 until 1.14.1, userId/workspaceId scoping to the parsed-files read/delete paths was added. However, the POST /api/workspace/:slug/embed-parsed-file/:fileId flow still deletes the target file by primary key only, with no ownership check, inside two finally{} blocks

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
snipe/snipe-it

### Impact The `BulkAssetsController::update()` method accepts `company_id` directly from user input without calling `Company::getIdForCurrentUser()`, the standard company-scoping function used by every other controller in the codebase. A non-superadmin user can move assets across company boundaries, breaking multi-tenancy isolation. ### Patches Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47388

NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a low-privilege MCP token holder with knowledge of an attachment path could read any file in shared storage, including attachments belonging to other bases and workspaces, because the MCP readAttachment tool did not verify the file's ownership. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-64105

FOSSBilling is a billing and client management system that automates invoicing, payments, and communication for online service businesses. Versions 0.6.21 through 0.7.2 are vulnerable to IDOR through the support ticket creation workflow. By manipulating rel_id when rel_type=order, an authenticated client can create a support ticket that references another client's order they do not own. The ticket

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54015

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, Open WebUI's prompt version-history endpoints authorize the prompt_id in the URL but then act on caller-supplied history IDs without verifying that the history row belongs to that prompt (history_entry.prompt_id == prompt.id). This affects /api/v1/prompts/id/{prompt_id}/history/diff,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54010

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, Open WebUI lets an authenticated user attach arbitrary file_id values to their own chat message without checking whether they own or can read those files. If the attacker then shares that chat and grants themselves read access, has_access_to_file() treats the victim file as accessible

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54009

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.6, POST /api/chat/completions accepts an image_url.url value that, when it does NOT start with http://, https://, or data:image/, is interpreted as a file id and resolved against the global file table with no ownership check. an authenticated user can therefore set image_url.url to anoth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-55255

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.2, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

⚠ 公开 PoC 线索:
排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45732

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 1.123.43, 2.22.1, and 2.20.7, the OAuth1 and OAuth2 credential reconnect endpoints authorized access using credential:read rather than credential:update. An authenticated user with read-only access to a shared credential could initiate an OAuth reconnect flow and overwrite the stored token material for that credential with tokens bound t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-33760

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.0, Langflow's /api/v1/monitor router exposes 7 endpoints that perform read, write, and delete operations on user-owned resources — messages, sessions, build artifacts, and LLM transaction logs — without verifying that the authenticated requester owns the targeted resource. Any authenticated user can read, m

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 11.4
Conf: 50%
gogs.io/gogs

## Summary In Gogs 0.14.1, `GET /attachments/:uuid` returns the raw attachment file **without verifying whether the requester has view permission for the associated Issue/Comment/Release or the repository**. In a test environment with `REQUIRE_SIGNIN_VIEW = false`, we confirmed that **an unauthenticated user can download attachments belonging to a private repository**. ## Description `/attachme

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48067

Filament is a collection of full-stack components for accelerated Laravel development. From filament/actions 4.0.0 until 4.11.4 and 5.6.4 and from filament/tables 3.0.0 until 3.3.51, the recordSelectOptionsQuery() method may be used to scope the options available in the Select field for AttachAction and AssociateAction. However, the built-in validation rule for these fields did not apply the same

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6062

Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 11.6.x <= 11.6.2, 11.5.x <= 11.5.5, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 Fail to validate channel ownership of an existing subscription before applying edits which allows an authenticated attacker to hijack subscriptions from channels they have no access to via a crafted PUT request to the subscription edit endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00650

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56424

MISP core contained multiple broken access-control flaws where authorization checks were performed against the wrong entity, or where ownership/editability checks were missing on write paths. In affected subsystems, a lower-privileged authenticated user with the relevant feature permission could cause the application to authorize one object but mutate another, or could modify objects that were mer

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56422

Multiple MISP core controllers and model capture paths accepted client-controlled request fields such as primary keys (id) and ownership/scope foreign keys (event_id, org_id, user_id, sharing_group_id, galaxy_cluster_uuid, organisation_uuid, and related nested object identifiers) without consistently stripping, pinning, or revalidating them against the server-authorized object. In affected paths,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1, = 4.0.0-RC1, <= 4.17.7 contain an authorization bypass in the assets/preview-file endpoint. The action does not enforce per-asset view authorization before returning preview content, allowing an authenticated low-privileged user to supply a controlled assetId for an asset they are not permitted to view and still receive preview response data (previewHtml), includin

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /build/status and /build/logs endpoints that allows attackers to access build jobs belonging to different applications by supplying a mismatched app_id and job_id combination. Limited API keys restricted to a single app can retrieve build status and logs from other apps by providing an authorized app_id while using a job_i

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56385

Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1, = 4.0.0-RC1, <= 4.17.7 contain an authorization bypass in the assets/preview-file endpoint. The action does not enforce per-asset view authorization before returning preview content, allowing an authenticated low-privileged user to supply a controlled assetId for an asset they are not permitted to view and still receive preview response data (previewHtml), includin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56229

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /build/status and /build/logs endpoints that allows attackers to access build jobs belonging to different applications by supplying a mismatched app_id and job_id combination. Limited API keys restricted to a single app can retrieve build status and logs from other apps by providing an authorized app_id while using a job_i

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Capgo before 12.128.12 allows authenticated users to modify their mutable public.users.email to arbitrary addresses, which the SSO provisioning endpoint trusts as an account-merge key. Attackers can pre-position their account with a victim's corporate SSO email, causing the provision-user endpoint to merge the victim's SSO identity into the attacker-controlled account.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-56215

该漏洞存在于 Capgo 版本 12.128.12 之前。经过身份验证的用户可以修改自己账户的 public.users.email 字段为任意电子邮件地址。Capgo 的 SSO 配置端点信任该字段作为账户合并的密钥,当用户通过 SSO 登录时,系统会根据该字段查找现有账户并合并身份。攻击者可以提前将自己的账户的 email 字段设置为受害者企业 SSO 的邮箱地址,然后诱导受害者通过 SSO 登录;登录时,SSO 配置端点会认为受害者应合并到攻击者控制的账户中,从而将受害者的 SSO 身份绑定到攻击者账户。此后,攻击者即可利用该账户访问受害者的企业资源。CVSS 8.3 分,攻击复杂度低,只需低权限,无需用户交互,影响机密性和完整性。该漏洞目前未被列入 KEV,也未见在野利用报道。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限用户通过篡改 email 字段劫持高权限 SSO 用户的账户,导致身份冒充和数据泄露,威胁企业级 SSO 系统的信任基础。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 9.4
Conf: 50%
io.openremote:openremote-manager

### Summary OpenRemote Manager is vulnerable to a cross-tenant Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the bulk alarm deletion endpoint. An authenticated user in any realm can delete alarms belonging to other realms (tenants) by supplying arbitrary alarm IDs. The vulnerability exists because the bulk removeAlarms() method only verifies that the caller's own realm is active and accessible, but n

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
stigmem-node

### Summary On a multi-tenant stigmem node, a tenant administrator could list, read, and **admit or reject** quarantined facts belonging to **other** tenants. The list/count queries and `_get_quarantined_fact` in `routes/quarantine.py` lacked an `f.tenant_id = identity.tenant_id` predicate, and the garden lookup was not tenant-scoped — reached via the `/v1/quarantine` list and admit/reject endpoin

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
stigmem-node

### Summary On a multi-tenant stigmem node, RTBF (right-to-be-forgotten) tombstones were mis-scoped two ways. (1) `issue_tombstone` defaulted the tenant to `"default"` instead of the caller's tenant, so tombstones could be written to the wrong tenant. (2) The read-suppression path — `_get_tombstone_filter` (`routes/facts/common.py`) and the `_tombstone_scope_cache` (`lifecycle/tombstones.py`) — ha

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
langflow

## Summary Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request. ## Details The vulnerability exists in the `get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name` helper function in [`src/backend/base/langflow/helpers/flow.py` (lines 399-414)](https://gith

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.9) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49339

gonic is a music streaming server / free-software subsonic server API implementation. The maintainer's fix in commit `6dd71e6a3c966867ef8c900d359a7df75789f410` added an ownership check based on `playlist.UserID`. However, `playlist.UserID` is derived from the first path segment of the attacker-controlled playlist ID, with no path containment on the resolved file path. Any authenticated Subsonic u

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49338

gonic is a music streaming server / free-software subsonic server API implementation. Prior to version 0.21.0, the Subsonic API endpoints `/rest/deletePlaylist.view` and `/rest/getPlaylist.view` perform no per-resource authorization. Once authenticated as any user (admin or not), an attacker can delete any playlist owned by any other user (including admin) by passing its `id` and read the full con

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Electronic Protest Docketing System (EPDS) and Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) Electronic Docketing System (EDS) expose sensitive account information through the 'update-profile/' API endpoint. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can submit a request containing an arbitrary 'user_id' parameter and receive a JSON response containing account-s

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
@agenticmail/api

## Summary A low-privileged authenticated AgenticMail agent can enumerate another agent's pending/claimed tasks by supplying the target agent name to `GET /api/agenticmail/tasks/pending?assignee=`. The returned task objects include the task IDs and payloads. The same task IDs can then be used with the capability-style task mutation endpoints (`/tasks/:id/claim`, `/tasks/:id/result`, `/tasks/:id/c

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
nl.nl-portal:documenten-api

## Summary A previous advisory (CVE-2026-49463 / GHSA-qpm9-h556-mwxm) reported that any logged-in user could download any document by its identifier, and stated this was fixed in 3.0.1. For the document-content part that fix was **incomplete**: documents remained downloadable by any authenticated user in 3.0.1 and 3.0.2, and the issue was only fully resolved in **3.0.3**. ## Relationship to CVE-

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54105

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Electronic Protest Docketing System (EPDS) and Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) Electronic Docketing System (EDS) expose sensitive account information through the 'update-profile/' API endpoint. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can submit a request containing an arbitrary 'user_id' parameter and receive a JSON response containing account-s

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50141

Woodpecker is a CI/CD engine. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.14.1, a vulnerability in Woodpecker CI's gRPC layer allowed any authenticated agent to impersonate any other agent on the same server by injecting a forged `agent_id` value into outgoing gRPC metadata. The server correctly verified the JWT token but then discarded the verified agent identity in favor of the client-suppl

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12102

The UsersWP – Front-end login form, User Registration, User Profile & Members Directory plugin for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.63 via the 'user_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level access and above, to reset and p

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10623

The PressPrimer Quiz – AI Quiz Maker, Exam Builder & LMS Assessment Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.0 via the 'rule_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with custom-level access and above, to modify or delete quiz rules belonging t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10023

The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution – Build Your Own Amazon, eBay, Etsy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.3 via the change_order_status, add_order_note, delete_order_note, add_shipping_tracking_info, grant_access_to_download, and revoke_access_to_download AJAX handlers due to missing owner

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48759

TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Versions 3.15.2 and below have an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability through cross-workspace Theme Template modification and deletion. The handleSaveThemeTemplate and handleDeleteThemeTemplate handlers validate that the authenticated user is a non-guest member of the provided workspaceId, but then operate on themeTemplateId via Prisma queries that do

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-50194

Steeltoe is an open source project that provides a collection of libraries that helps users build cloud-native applications. When Steeltoe management endpoints versions 3.2.2 through 3.3.0 and 4.1.0 are configured to listen on an alternate port (`Management:Endpoints:Port` is configured), the middleware responsible for restricting access to the endpoints uses the `Host` HTTP header rather than the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Hermes WebUI before 0.51.443 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the /api/session endpoint that allows authenticated users to disclose cross-profile session transcripts. Attackers can bypass profile boundary checks by directly querying session IDs belonging to other profiles via GET /api/session?session_id=&messages=1 to retrieve unauthorized conversation transcripts and metadata.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Hermes WebUI before 0.51.443 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the session export endpoint that allows authenticated users to access sessions from other profiles. The _handle_session_export handler in api/routes.py fails to verify active-profile ownership before serializing session data, enabling attackers to exfiltrate foreign session transcripts by guessing or knowing session ide

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
avo

## Summary A critical missing authorization flaw exists in Avo's association attach workflow. The UI and `GET /resources/:resource/:id/:related/new` path can check `attach_?`, but the actual write endpoint, `POST /resources/:resource/:id/:related`, does not run the same authorization check before mutating the association. As a result, an authenticated low-privileged Avo user can bypass hidden/di

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/daytonaio/daytona

### Summary A cross-tenant authorization flaw in Daytona's notification WebSocket gateway allowed any authenticated user to subscribe to another organization's realtime notification channel and passively receive that organization's events. ### Impact The notification gateway's JWT handshake joined a client-supplied organization identifier to the corresponding notification room without verifying t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
open-webui

## Summary Open WebUI's prompt version-history endpoints authorize the `prompt_id` in the URL but then act on caller-supplied history IDs without verifying that the history row belongs to that prompt (`history_entry.prompt_id == prompt.id`). Three operations are affected: - `GET /api/v1/prompts/id/{prompt_id}/history/diff` — returns another prompt's history snapshots (read). - `POST /api/v1/prom

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains an input validation vulnerability in tool group policy callers that accept unvalidated group IDs. Attackers who can supply a group ID to the policy resolver could trigger incorrect group-policy decisions for tool invocations, potentially bypassing intended access controls.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/daytonaio/daytona

### Summary Daytona's organization role update and delete endpoints authorized the caller as an owner of the organization named in the request path, but resolved and mutated the target role by its identifier alone, without verifying the role belonged to that organization. An authenticated user who owns any organization (organizations are self-service) could therefore modify the permissions of, or

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53863

OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains an input validation vulnerability in tool group policy callers that accept unvalidated group IDs. Attackers who can supply a group ID to the policy resolver could trigger incorrect group-policy decisions for tool invocations, potentially bypassing intended access controls.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10780

The Static Block plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.2. This is due to the static_block_content() shortcode handler retrieving a post via get_post() using an attacker-supplied 'id' attribute and outputting its post_content without verifying the post's status (private, draft, pending) or the requesting user's capability to v

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48599

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body. In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in VikRentCar <= 1.4.5 versions.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in EmbedPress <= 4.5.2 versions.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Simple Shopping Cart <= 5.2.9 versions.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-52699

Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in VikRentCar <= 1.4.5 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 3.4
Conf: 50%
CVE-2026-48872

Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in EmbedPress <= 4.5.2 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-40792

Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in KiviCare <= 4.2.1 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-39518

Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in EventPrime <= 4.3.0.0 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-59133

Custom role Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Projectopia <= 5.1.25.2 versions.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12204

A vulnerability was determined in ShopXO up to 6.7.1. This vulnerability affects the function OrderClose/OrderSuccess/PayLogOrderClose/GoodsGiveIntegral of the file app/api/controller/Crontab.php of the component Scheduled Task Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The v

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

MISP contained multiple mass assignment vulnerabilities in the handling of collections, tag collections, event delegations, and shadow attributes. Several controller actions accepted user-supplied fields that should have remained server-controlled, including record identifiers and ownership-related fields such as id, org_id, orgc_id, and user_id. An authenticated attacker with access to the affec

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

An improper authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed an authenticated organization administrator to access or modify user settings belonging to site administrator accounts within the same organization. The affected access-control checks scoped administrative actions by organization membership but did not exclude higher-privileged site administrator users. As a result, an organization administra

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A mass assignment vulnerability exists in MISP’s sharing group creation endpoint. When creating a new sharing group, the controller did not remove a user-supplied id field before saving the submitted data. In CakePHP, supplying a primary key in the save data can cause a create() followed by save() operation to update an existing record instead of creating a new one. An authenticated user with per

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw in Naxclow's platform’s onboarding workflow allows an attacker to replay a confirm-then-bind sequence to silently reassign a device to an arbitrary account. Because the affected endpoints validate request signatures but do not confirm legitimate ownership, an attacker with any account can take over a device without user interaction while the device remains online and unaware.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser, github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2

### Summary A low-privileged authenticated user of filebrowser (with `create` + `delete` permissions in their own isolated scope) can silently destroy share-link records belonging to any other user — including the administrator — by performing a legitimate DELETE on a file in their own directory whose logical path happens to be a byte-prefix of another user's stored `share.Link.Path`. The file con

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54361

MISP contained multiple mass assignment vulnerabilities in the handling of collections, tag collections, event delegations, and shadow attributes. Several controller actions accepted user-supplied fields that should have remained server-controlled, including record identifiers and ownership-related fields such as id, org_id, orgc_id, and user_id. An authenticated attacker with access to the affec

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54360

A mass assignment vulnerability exists in MISP’s sharing group creation endpoint. When creating a new sharing group, the controller did not remove a user-supplied id field before saving the submitted data. In CakePHP, supplying a primary key in the save data can cause a create() followed by save() operation to update an existing record instead of creating a new one. An authenticated user with per

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54357

An improper authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed an authenticated organization administrator to access or modify user settings belonging to site administrator accounts within the same organization. The affected access-control checks scoped administrative actions by organization membership but did not exclude higher-privileged site administrator users. As a result, an organization administra

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53726

Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.80 and 9.9.1-alpha.6, a relation query using the $relatedTo operator could read the membership of a Relation field even when that field was hidden from the requesting client by protectedFields, and even when the object owning the relation was not readable by the client unde

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42947

A flaw in Naxclow's platform’s onboarding workflow allows an attacker to replay a confirm-then-bind sequence to silently reassign a device to an arbitrary account. Because the affected endpoints validate request signatures but do not confirm legitimate ownership, an attacker with any account can take over a device without user interaction while the device remains online and unaware.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8828

A lack of authorization validation in version 1.0.0 or later of the ChromaDB Rust project allows any authenticated users to arbitrarily read, write, update, or delete data in any tenant's collection regardless of which tenant they belong to.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45832

All V1 collection-level endpoints in ChromaDB's Python project pass None for the tenant and database to the authorization layer, allowing attackers to bypass authorization controls by using the V1 endpoints.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45830

A lack of authorization validation in version 0.4.17 or later of the ChromaDB Python project allows any authenticated users to arbitrarily read, write, update, or delete data in any tenant's collection regardless of which tenant they belong to.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44207

Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to versions 15.107.0 and 16.17.0, an IDOR vulnerability allows authenticated users to access other users' email configuration details. This issue has been patched in versions 15.107.0 and 16.17.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47238

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
filament/tables, filament/actions

The `recordSelectOptionsQuery()` method may be used to scope the options available in the `Select` field for `AttachAction` and `AssociateAction`. However, the built-in validation rule for these fields did not apply the same scope. As a result, a user who can trigger these actions could tamper with the Livewire component's state and submit an out-of-scope value.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47189

Quest Bot is an opensource modern Discord Bot built for moderation, utilities and support. Prior to version 1.0.5, the AutoMod remove flow looks up and deletes rules by global database ID without verifying that the rule belongs to the guild where the command is executed. A user can learn a victim guild’s AutoMod rule ID through autocomplete, then remove that rule from another guild where they have

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow an authenticated user to read or modify sensitive information by bypassing authentication using insecure direct object references.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7787

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow an authenticated user to read or modify sensitive information by bypassing authentication using insecure direct object references.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

openSIS Classic 9.3 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messaging module. Any authenticated user with access to the messaging module can request sent-message details from modules/messaging/SentMail.php by supplying an arbitrary mail_id value.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8406

openSIS Classic 9.3 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messaging module. Any authenticated user with access to the messaging module can request sent-message details from modules/messaging/SentMail.php by supplying an arbitrary mail_id value.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6976

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.9 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to hide changes from merge request diff views due to improper input handling of file names.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6552

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 15.5 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with group Owner role to take over another group member's GitLab account due to improper authorization in the Group SAML identity management functionality.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53911

Cerebrate before version 1.37 allowed the id primary key field to be supplied through request input during CRUD edit operations and certain custom entity patching flows. In affected entities that did not explicitly mark id as inaccessible, an authenticated attacker could submit a crafted edit request containing the id of another record, causing the save operation to update that unrelated record in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2023-40200

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Essential Plugin WP Logo Showcase Responsive Slider and Carousel allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Logo Showcase Responsive Slider and Carousel: from n/a through 3.6.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44692

Sharp is a content management framework built for Laravel as a package. Prior to version 9.22.0, Sharp exposes a generic download endpoint that authorizes access only to the supplied Sharp entity instance, but then reads the target storage disk and path from request parameters. Because the requested storage object is not bound to the authorized entity instance, an authenticated Sharp user who can

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the friends REST API that allows any authenticated attacker to enumerate another user's complete friend list. Attackers can query the friends endpoint with an arbitrary user_id because the get_items_permissions_check method only verifies that the requester is logged in and never checks ownership of the requested list,

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messages REST API that allows authenticated attackers to access arbitrary private message threads by supplying a user_id parameter in the request. Attackers can pass another user's identifier to the get_item_permissions_check method, which validates the supplied user_id instead of the logged-in user and is reused b

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53675

BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the friends REST API that allows any authenticated attacker to enumerate another user's complete friend list. Attackers can query the friends endpoint with an arbitrary user_id because the get_items_permissions_check method only verifies that the requester is logged in and never checks ownership of the requested list,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53673

BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messages REST API that allows authenticated attackers to access arbitrary private message threads by supplying a user_id parameter in the request. Attackers can pass another user's identifier to the get_item_permissions_check method, which validates the supplied user_id instead of the logged-in user and is reused b

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
phoenix_storybook

### Summary The storybook iframe LiveView accepts a PubSub topic from the URL query string and broadcasts its own pid onto that topic with no check that the topic belongs to the current session. Any unauthenticated visitor who knows or guesses another user's playground topic can hijack the playground↔iframe handshake, causing the victim's playground to send its control messages to an attacker-cont

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw exists in the FlashArray Purity management interface where an authenticated low-privileged user may, under specific conditions, access functionality beyond their assigned privileges.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6444

A flaw exists in the FlashArray Purity management interface where an authenticated low-privileged user may, under specific conditions, access functionality beyond their assigned privileges.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44083

An authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability has been reported to affect QuMagie. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain unintended privileges. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuMagie 2.9.1 and later

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9185

The 6Storage Rentals plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to and including 2.22.0 via the `userId` parameter of the `six_storage_get_user_info` and `six_storage_update_profile` AJAX actions. This is due to the `six_storage_getUserInfo()` and `six_storage_updateProfile()` functions being registered on `wp_ajax_nopriv_*` hooks and

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49141

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modif

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46441

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, a mass assignment vulnerability exists in the assistant update endpoint of FlowiseAI. The endpoint allows authenticated users to modify server-controlled properties such as workspaceId, createdDate, and updatedDate when updating an assistant resource. Due to missing server-side validati

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42863

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, a mass assignment vulnerability exists in the chatflow update endpoint of FlowiseAI. The endpoint allows clients to modify server-controlled properties such as deployed, isPublic, workspaceId, createdDate, and updatedDate when updating a chatflow object. Due to missing server-side valid

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42862

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, a mass assignment vulnerability exists in the tool update endpoint of FlowiseAI. The endpoint allows authenticated users to modify server-controlled properties such as workspaceId, createdDate, and updatedDate when updating a tool resource. Due to missing server-side validation and auth

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42861

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, a mass assignment vulnerability exists in the variable update endpoint of FlowiseAI. The endpoint allows authenticated users to modify server-controlled properties such as workspaceId, createdDate, and updatedDate when updating a variable resource. Due to missing server-side validation

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11500

A vulnerability was identified in Weaviate up to 1.37.7. This vulnerability affects the function validateConfig of the file usecases/auth/authentication/apikey/client.go of the component Static API Key Handler. The manipulation of the argument StaticApiKey leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. It is stated that th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11461

A vulnerability has been found in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 0.12.0. This affects the function resolve_session_by_title of the file hermes_state.py of the component resume Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument Title leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early abo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Akinsoft OctoCloud allows Resource Leak Exposure. This issue affects OctoCloud: from s1.09.02 before v1.11.01.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Essential Addons for Elementor – Popular Elementor Templates & Widgets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 6.6.4 via the ajax_load_more function due to insufficient restrictions on which posts can be included. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract data from password protected, private, or draft posts that th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Klamra Paycal for Aspaclaria plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4 via the 'invoice_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to download arbitrary customer invoices by enumerating sequential post IDs, e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Booking Package plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Account Takeover in versions up to, and including, 1.7.16. This is due to a missing capability check on the 'updateUser' branch of the package_app_action AJAX endpoint, where the handler only validates a nonce and the dispatcher invokes Schedule::updateUser() with the $administrator argument hard-coded to 1, bypassi

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The MapPress Maps for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 2.96.6. This is due to missing ownership verification in the REST API routes registered via `Mappress_Api::rest_api_init()`, where the GET `/wp-json/mapp/v1/maps/{mapid}` endpoint uses `'permission_callback' => '__return_true'` and the write e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9851

The Booking Package plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Account Takeover in versions up to, and including, 1.7.16. This is due to a missing capability check on the 'updateUser' branch of the package_app_action AJAX endpoint, where the handler only validates a nonce and the dispatcher invokes Schedule::updateUser() with the $administrator argument hard-coded to 1, bypassi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8839

The MapPress Maps for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 2.96.6. This is due to missing ownership verification in the REST API routes registered via `Mappress_Api::rest_api_init()`, where the GET `/wp-json/mapp/v1/maps/{mapid}` endpoint uses `'permission_callback' => '__return_true'` and the write e

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8611

The Klamra Paycal for Aspaclaria plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4 via the 'invoice_id' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to download arbitrary customer invoices by enumerating sequential post IDs, e

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7665

该漏洞存在于WordPress插件Essential Addons for Elementor(流行模板与小部件)所有版本至6.6.4(含)中。通过ajax_load_more函数,由于对可包含的文章限制不足,未认证攻击者能够利用信息泄露漏洞提取本应受保护的密码保护、私有或草稿文章的数据。该漏洞影响范围广泛,攻击者无需任何权限即可利用,但仅能获取受限文章的内容,无法修改或删除。CVSS评分为5.3(中等),属于信息泄露类型。建议用户立即将插件更新至最新版本,同时考虑在网络层面(如Web应用防火墙)添加针对ajax_load_more功能的访问控制规则,以缓解潜在风险。目前未发现该漏洞已被在野利用的证据。

💡 影响/原因: WordPress广泛使用该插件,漏洞使未认证攻击者可绕过访问控制读取密码保护或私有文章,可能泄露敏感内容。虽然CVSS仅5.3,但利用简单且影响多个版本。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Charitable – Donation Plugin for WordPress – Fundraising with Recurring Donations & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference / Authorization Bypass leading to Arbitrary Attachment Deletion in versions up to, and including, 1.8.11.1 via the profile avatar update flow. This is due to the save_avatar() function in Charitable_Profile_Form calling wp_delete_attach

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10038

The Charitable – Donation Plugin for WordPress – Fundraising with Recurring Donations & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference / Authorization Bypass leading to Arbitrary Attachment Deletion in versions up to, and including, 1.8.11.1 via the profile avatar update flow. This is due to the save_avatar() function in Charitable_Profile_Form calling wp_delete_attach

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
bugsink

### Description Bugsink’s issue list supports bulk actions such as resolving or muting selected issues. In affected versions, the issue list view authorizes access through the project in the URL, but applies the requested bulk action to the submitted issue IDs without also requiring those issues to belong to that project. This is a project-boundary authorization issue: a logged-in user with acces

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
bugsink

### Description Bugsink issue event pages accept a direct event identifier from the URL and, in affected versions, look up that event without also requiring it to belong to the issue in the URL. This is a project-boundary authorization issue: a logged-in user with access to one project can view another project’s event data through an issue they are allowed to access. However, the issue is mitiga

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
shopper/framework

## Impact Three related defects on admin Livewire components allowed data tampering, sensitive data disclosure, and stored XSS: - **IDOR via unlocked properties.** Several Livewire components in the admin panel exposed Eloquent model identifiers as public properties without the `#[Locked]` attribute. An authenticated user could rewrite the wire payload from the browser to target any record id, b

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46390

HAX CMS helps manage microsite universe with PHP or NodeJs backends. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 26.0.0, the gitlist plugin is exposed to unauthenticated users, allowing unauthenticated browsing of git repositories and git history. Version 26.0.0 patches the issue.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45750

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. Prior to version 2.3.2, the GET /ssh/file_manager/ssh/resolvePath endpoint in the Termix File Manager component unsafely processes the path parameter and embeds it into a shell command executed over the active SSH session. Because the user-controlled value is placed inside double quotes an

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.0) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45746

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. Prior to version 2.3.2, the File Manager functionality in Termix contains a critical Broken Access Control vulnerability due to improper validation of the sessionId parameter. The backend trusts a client-controlled identifier without verifying that it belongs to the authenticated user. Thi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.0) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45743

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. 16 file-manager endpoints in Termix prior to version 2.3.2 do not verify that the requesting user owns the SSH session identified by `sessionId`. An authenticated attacker who knows or guesses another user's active `sessionId` can read, write, delete, download, and execute files on the vic

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The agent CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/agents/{agent_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `agent_id` through `AgentService.get(agent_id)` which is a primary-key lookup with no workspace constraint. A user who is a member of any workspace `W1` can read, modify, or

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 12.4
Conf: 50%
nocodb

### Summary A low-privilege MCP token holder with knowledge of an attachment path could read any file in shared storage, including attachments belonging to other bases and workspaces, because the MCP `readAttachment` tool did not verify the file's ownership. ### Details The MCP `readAttachment` tool accepts caller-supplied `path`/`url` values and streams the file via the storage adapter. The hand

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-11369

The Comment API (GET /api/Comment and POST /api/Comment) in the affected application fails to perform authorization checks to verify that the requesting user has access to the object identified by the relatedObjectId. This Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability allows any authenticated user to read and write comments on any process across all business units by supplying an arbitrary

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OMICARD EDM developed by ITPison has a Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify a specific parameter to obtain user's email address.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10597

ITPison 开发的 OMICARD EDM 系统存在不安全的直接对象引用(IDOR)漏洞。未经身份验证的远程攻击者可以通过修改特定参数,获取任意用户的电子邮件地址。该漏洞影响机密性(低),无需用户交互或特权。CVSS 评分为 5.3(中等),攻击向量为网络,攻击复杂度低,无需认证。目前无证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用或列入已知被利用漏洞目录。受影响产品和厂商信息未提供,但建议立即检查是否使用此系统。缓解措施包括:升级到最新版本(如果官方有补丁),实施严格的访问控制,限制敏感参数的直接引用,并对敏感数据进行服务器端校验。由于可导致用户邮箱泄露,可能引发后续钓鱼攻击,建议优先处理。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许攻击者未认证即可窃取用户邮箱,可被用于精准钓鱼或社会工程攻击,直接危害用户隐私。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-14772

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in ABB T-MAC Plus. This issue affects T-MAC Plus: 4.0-24.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account compromise. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of values that are not generally exposed to low-privile

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7201

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account compromise. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of values that are not generally exposed to low-privile

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-24761

Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.3.0, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms allows an authenticated user to access metadata of resources belonging to other users due to insufficient authorization checks on resource ownership. Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.3.0 or later to receive a patch.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-24756

Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.3.0, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms allows an authenticated user to modify resources belonging to other users due to insufficient authorization checks on resource ownership. Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.3.0 or later to receive a patch.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-24755

Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.3.0, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms allows an authenticated user to modify permissions on resources belonging to other users due to insufficient authorization checks on resource ownership. Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.3.0 or later to receive a patch.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-24753

Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.3.0, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms allows an authenticated user to modify resources belonging to other users due to insufficient authorization checks on resource ownership. Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.3.0 or later to receive a patch.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45810

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 31.0.0 to before 31.0.12, and 32.0.0 to before 32.0.3, a missing check of a relation allowed authenticated users with access to any file comment, to read the content of all comments. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 31.0.12 or 32.0.3. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterpri

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45281

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, with the knowledge of other users’ principal URL an attacker could possibly send a request to gain full access to their calendar. Therefore, the attacker must be an authenticated user. This is because of improper authorization controls in the backend o

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-23638

Kiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.3.0, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms allows an authenticated attacker to tamper with the internal approval flow configurations of forms belonging to other users due to insufficient authorization checks on resource ownership. Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.3.0 or later to receive a

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45159

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 1.15.0 to before 1.15.4, 1.16.0 to before 1.16.3, 1.17.0 to before 1.17.1, and 1.18.0 to before 1.18.1, a malicious user with access to an end-to-end encrypted files drop link was able to also drop files into other end-to-end encrypted folders of the share owner. Reading and modifying of other files was not possible. This is

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45155

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.7 and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.1, a missing access check on API level allowed to add unknown circles by their ID directly to other circles. Since circle IDs have 62^15 complexity by default this is still unlikely to be executable at will, but if access to an ID was available via another

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The issue CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `issue_id` through `IssueService.get(issue_id)` which is a primary-key lookup with no workspace constraint. A user who is a member of any workspace `W1` can read, modify, or

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The comment endpoints (`POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/comments` and `GET .../comments`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then call `CommentService.create(issue_id=issue_id, ...)` and `CommentService.list_for_issue(issue_id)` without verifying that `issue_id` belongs to `workspace_id`. A user wh

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The project CRUD endpoints (`GET / PATCH / DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id}/projects/{project_id}` and `GET .../{project_id}/stats`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then resolve `project_id` through `ProjectService.get(project_id)` / `update(project_id, ...)` / `delete(project_id)` / `get_stats(project_id)`. Non

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46764

The Event Log detail endpoint `GET /api/v2/eventLogs/{event_log_id}` in Apache Airflow fetched audit-log rows directly by numeric ID after only the generic Audit Log permission check, while the collection endpoint `GET /api/v2/eventLogs` applied per-Dag scoping. An authenticated UI/API user with audit-log read permission for one Dag could retrieve audit-log entries for any other Dag by guessing or

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41084

A bug in Apache Airflow's bulk Task Instances API (`PATCH/DELETE /api/v2/dags/{dag_id}/dagRuns/{dag_run_id}/taskInstances`) evaluated authorization against the `dag_id` resolved from the URL path while operating on the `dag_id` / `dag_run_id` extracted from request-body entity fields. An authenticated UI/API user with edit permission on one Dag could mutate Task Instance state in any other Dag by

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10212

A vulnerability was identified in AstrBotDevs AstrBot 4.24.2. This affects the function astr_main_agent of the file astrbot/core/astr_main_agent.py. Such manipulation of the argument session_id leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-10154

Dolibarr ERP CRM 是一个开源的企业资源规划与客户关系管理系统。该漏洞存在于 23.0.0、23.0.1 和 23.0.2 版本中,位于文件 htdocs/user/messaging.php 的某个未知函数中。攻击者可以通过操纵参数 ID 实现授权绕过,从而可能访问本应受限的资源。由于攻击可以通过远程进行,且无需用户交互,但需要低权限(攻击者需先拥有合法账号),因此 CVSS v3.1 评分为 4.3(中等)。官方已在 23.0.3 版本中修复该问题,对应的补丁提交是 119b3606c7a701747a57a1f18b1a9e7666f678e2。建议所有受影响版本的用户尽快升级至 23.0.3 或更高版本,以消除安全风险。目前没有证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限攻击者绕过授权检查,可能导致敏感信息泄露。虽然 CVSS 评分不高,但利用门槛低,建议优先升级。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. Five label endpoints — `PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `DELETE .../labels/{label_id}`, `POST .../issues/{issue_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `DELETE .../issues/{issue_id}/labels/{label_id}`, `GET .../issues/{issue_id}/labels` — gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only and pass URL-supplied `label_id` and `i

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The dependency endpoints (`POST/GET /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/dependencies` and `DELETE .../dependencies/{dep_id}`) gate access on `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` only, then dispatch to `DependencyService` calls that take URL/body-supplied issue and dependency IDs without verifying any of them belong to the members

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

### Summary PraisonAI Platform's workspace-scoped REST routes contain a systemic object-level authorization flaw that allows an authenticated user from one workspace to access, modify, and delete objects belonging to another workspace by supplying the victim object's global UUID. The affected pattern appears in workspace-scoped routes such as agents, projects, issues, and comments. The route lay

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary The Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `depende

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

## Summary **Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference. The `GET /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/activity` endpoint is gated by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` and dispatches to `ActivityService.list_for_issue(issue_id)`, which executes `SELECT * FROM activity WHERE issue_id = :issue_id` with no workspace constraint. A user who is a member of any workspace can read the full a

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
praisonai-platform

### Summary The PraisonAI Platform API has two authorization failures that together break workspace isolation. The service layer for issues and projects performs global primary-key lookups without checking workspace ownership, so any authenticated user can read, modify, and delete resources in any workspace just by swapping UUIDs in their API requests. On top of that, every member management endp

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
verbb/formie

### Impact Unauthenticated users could modify existing submissions by posting a known or guessed submission ID to `formie/submissions/save-submission`. ### Patches [2.2.21](https://github.com/verbb/formie/releases/tag/2.2.21), [3.1.26](https://github.com/verbb/formie/releases/tag/3.1.26) ### Workarounds Block unauthenticated access to `actions/formie/submissions/save-submission`, or disable/cust

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
admidio/admidio

## Summary `modules/documents-files.php` gates state-changing modes by checking that the actor has `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`. The `move_save` handler then operates on a *separate* URL parameter `file_uuid` and calls `File::moveToFolder($destFolderUUID)`. `File::moveToFolder()` checks the upload right on the **destination** folder but never on the **source** folder cont

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
admidio/admidio

## Summary `modules/documents-files.php` mode `file_rename_save` shares the same root-cause shape as the cross-folder move bug (`05-documents-cross-folder-move-idor.md`): the top-level rights check at lines 79-89 validates `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`, but the rename operation acts on `file_uuid` — a separate URL parameter — without re-checking the folder that actually co

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
admidio/admidio

## Summary `modules/categories.php` checks that the supplied `type` parameter (`ANN`, `EVT`, `ROL`, `USF`, …) corresponds to a module the actor administers. The follow-up "is this specific category editable by me" check at lines 56-61 is dead code because it compares `$getType` (a category-type code) against mode names (`edit`/`save`/`delete`); the condition is permanently false, so `$category->i

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
admidio/admidio

### Summary An authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on **any one folder** can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the top of `modules/documents-files.php` evaluates upload rights against the attacker-supplied `folder_uuid` URL parameter — not the file's actual parent folder. The `file_delete` handler then only verifies view

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.1.13570 improper access control allowed enumeration of restricted issues and articles on Planning Canvas

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47266

Formie 是一个 Craft CMS 的插件,用于创建表单。在 2.2.21 和 3.1.26 之前的版本中,存在一个严重漏洞:未经身份验证的攻击者可以通过向 formie/submissions/save-submission 端点发送 POST 请求,并携带已知或猜测的提交 ID,从而修改已有的表单提交数据。这意味着任何能够访问该端点的人都可以篡改他人提交的表单内容,而无需任何身份验证。该漏洞源于插件未能充分验证修改请求的权限,仅依赖提交 ID 的不可预测性作为防护,但提交 ID 往往可被枚举或猜测。攻击者利用此漏洞可以破坏表单数据的完整性,可能导致业务逻辑被绕过、虚假数据提交或信息泄露。修复版本已在 2.2.21 和 3.1.26 中发布,建议所有用户立即升级。此外,作为临时缓解措施,可以限制该端点的外部访问,或启用额外的身份验证检查。由于 CVE 来源仅提供元数据,未提及在野利用证据,因此 confidence_label 设为 metadata_only。

💡 影响/原因: 此漏洞允许未认证攻击者绕过权限控制,任意修改已有表单提交,严重威胁数据完整性和业务安全。无需认证即可操作,攻击门槛低,需尽快修补。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-49386

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.1.13570 improper access control allowed enumeration of restricted issues and articles on Planning Canvas

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43917

Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). In 0.19.0 and earlier, the protectedProcedure middleware only verifies the user is authenticated - it does NOT enforce organization scoping. Each endpoint must individually verify the resource's org matches the session's activeOrganizationId. This affects the following endpoints: allByType, killProcess, and removeDeployment in deployme

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45551

Group-Office is an enterprise customer relationship management and groupware tool. Prior to 26.0.25, 25.0.100, and 6.8.165, GroupOffice allows authenticated users to persist arbitrary legacy settings for any user_id via index.php?r=core/saveSetting. A separate client-side sink in the email module injects the email_font_size setting directly into JavaScript without escaping. By combining these two

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9493

Service Center developed by BankPro E-Service Technology has an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to modify the parameter of a specific query function to access other users' EC order details.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47713

AnythingLLM is an application that turns pieces of content into context that any LLM can use as references during chatting. Prior to 1.13.0, an approved mobile device token created in single-user mode can survive single-user -> multi-user migration even when the device record has userId = null. In multi-user mode, that stale token is still accepted by the mobile authentication middleware. Because

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45342

LinkAce is a self-hosted archive to collect website links. Prior to 2.5.6, LinkAce contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability in the authorization policy layer that allows any authenticated user to modify resources owned by other users. The affected resource types are links, lists, tags, and notes. Both the web UI and the REST API are vulnerable. The root cause is in the update() m

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9241

该漏洞存在于WordPress插件FOX – Currency Switcher Professional for WooCommerce的所有版本直至1.4.6中。问题出在`classes/fixed/fixed_user_role.php`文件中的`get_value()`函数,该函数直接信任用户可控的`$_REQUEST['wooc_order_user_roles']`参数来确定用户角色上下文,用于基于角色的价格解析,而无需任何验证。这允许已认证的攻击者(至少订阅者权限)覆盖从经过身份验证的用户会话对象`$user->roles`中获取的合法角色数据,从而能够冒充更高权限的角色(如批发客户或管理员),获取本不应由其实际角色享受的折扣或限制性定价。该漏洞仅在启用固定用户角色定价功能且至少有一个产品配置了特权角色价格时才有实际影响。攻击者可以通过修改请求参数来利用此漏洞,实现授权绕过,仅影响价格数据完整性(CVSS 4.3)。建议用户立即更新插件至已修复版本,或禁用固定用户角色定价功能直到补丁可用。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限用户以高级别角色获取折扣价格,可能导致电商收入损失和权限混乱。虽然CVSS评分不高,但在启用特定定价功能时危害明显,且利用简单,应尽快修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9228

The Timetable and Event Schedule by MotoPress 插件(WordPress)在所有版本(包括 2.4.16)中,通过 action_get_event_data 存在不安全的直接对象引用(IDOR)漏洞。该漏洞源于对用户控制的键(key)缺乏验证,使得拥有 contributor 及以上权限的认证攻击者能够枚举 timeslot ID 并读取其他用户的草稿、待审、私有 mp-event 文章的完整 WP_Post 对象,包括 post_content、post_excerpt、post_status、post_author 以及关联的原始 timeslot 描述。攻击者可利用此漏洞获取敏感信息,但无法修改数据。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 4.3(中等),攻击复杂度低,需要低权限,且无需用户交互。目前无证据表明该漏洞已在野利用。受影响的用户应尽快将插件更新到 2.4.16 以上的版本。建议同时限制对 WordPress 后台的不必要访问,并监控日志中的异常 action_get_event_data 请求。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许认证用户(如贡献者)越权查看其他用户的草稿、待审文章等敏感内容,可能泄露活动安排、私人信息等,需及时修复。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46544

Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. In 3.0.1-4-ge2626659, Microsoft UFO accepts client-supplied session_id values in WebSocket task messages and reuses an existing in-memory session object if that session_id already exists. If a prior session has completed and remains in memory with populated results, a different authenticated client can sen

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46414

Microsoft UFO open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. In 3.0.1-4-ge2626659, Microsoft UFO's WebSocket control plane trusts client-supplied identity and role fields in task messages. A client connection can register as a normal device, but later send a TASK message claiming client_type="constellation" and target_id=. The server trusts the role and target value

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.8 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to cause specific Duo AI workflows to run under another user's identity due to improper user identity resolution when triggering Duo AI workflow runners.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-4868

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.8 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to cause specific Duo AI workflows to run under another user's identity due to improper user identity resolution when triggering Duo AI workflow runners.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

When creating an export through the pretix API, API clients are returned an UUID value for their export job (a long, random string like 35742818-c375-4d15-839f-d49aecce94d6). Using this UUID, the API client can then request the actual file for download. The same kind of UUID is used in other places in pretix when temporary files are generated for internal use or download. One remaining AP

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9712

When creating an export through the pretix API, API clients are returned an UUID value for their export job (a long, random string like 35742818-c375-4d15-839f-d49aecce94d6). Using this UUID, the API client can then request the actual file for download. The same kind of UUID is used in other places in pretix when temporary files are generated for internal use or download. One remaining AP

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42736

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in wordplus BP Better Messages bp-better-messages allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects BP Better Messages: from n/a through <= 2.14.16.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42725

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in WP Wham Checkout Files Upload for WooCommerce checkout-files-upload-woocommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Checkout Files Upload for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 2.2.5.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

code100x contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Mobile API that allows unauthenticated attackers to impersonate arbitrary users by supplying a crafted JSON payload in the 'g' HTTP header. The middleware in middleware.ts skips identity header generation when an Auth-Key header is present without validating its value, allowing attackers to inject a spoofed user identity header that t

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8890

code100x contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Mobile API that allows unauthenticated attackers to impersonate arbitrary users by supplying a crafted JSON payload in the 'g' HTTP header. The middleware in middleware.ts skips identity header generation when an Auth-Key header is present without validating its value, allowing attackers to inject a spoofed user identity header that t

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44776

Kavita is a cross platform reading server. Prior to 0.9.0, the download, size-check, and chapter metadata endpoints do not enforce library-level authorization. A low-privileged user who knows or guesses a chapterId, volumeId, or seriesId belonging to a library they are not assigned to can download the full file contents, query file sizes, and read metadata for that content. This affects /api/Downl

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47716

Bugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. Prior to 2.2.0, In affected versions, the issue list view authorizes access through the project in the URL, but applies the requested bulk action to the submitted issue IDs without also requiring those issues to belong to that project. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47715

Bugsink is a self-hosted error tracking tool. Prior to 2.2.0, Bugsink issue event pages accept a direct event identifier from the URL and, in affected versions, look up that event without also requiring it to belong to the issue in the URL. This is a project-boundary authorization issue: a logged-in user with access to one project can view another project’s event data through an issue they are all

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43934

e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.4, a Broken Access Control vulnerability exists in the application, allowing an unauthorized authenticated user to edit comments posted by others. This stems from inadequate server-side access control validation, where the application depends only on a predictable identifier in the request to determine which comment to edit, without confirmin

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-38587

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability was discovered in ONLYOFFICE DocSpace before 3.2.1. The flaw exists in multiple REST API endpoints. This allows authenticated users with low-level permissions (User or Guest) to retrieve sensitive information, such as the Owner's unique identifier (ID) and profile information, which should only be accessible to administrators.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The AudioIgniter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to the handle_playlist_endpoint() function (hooked to template_redirect) accepting a user-controlled playlist ID via the audioigniter_playlist_id query var or the /audioigniter/playlist/{id}/ rewrite rule and returning playlist track data without performing a

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8679

该漏洞存在于WordPress的AudioIgniter插件(版本<=2.0.2)中,属于不安全的直接对象引用(IDOR)。插件的handle_playlist_endpoint()函数(挂载于template_redirect钩子)在处理播放列表请求时,接受用户可控的playlist ID参数(通过查询参数audioigniter_playlist_id或URL重写规则/audioigniter/playlist/{id}/),并直接返回该播放列表的曲目数据,而未执行任何身份验证、权限检查或文章状态校验——仅验证了post_type。因此,未认证的攻击者可以枚举任意播放列表ID(包括草稿、私密、待审或回收站状态的播放列表),获取其曲目元数据,如标题、艺术家、音频URL、购买链接、下载链接和封面图片。CVSS评分为7.5(高),攻击向量为网络远程,无需认证,攻击复杂度低,仅影响机密性。该漏洞可能导致敏感信息泄露(如私有播客内容、未发布曲目等)。建议用户立即升级至插件最新版本(已修复版本>2.0.2),并考虑限制对/wp-content/plugins/audioigniter/等目录的网络访问作为缓解措施。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许未认证攻击者窃取网站中所有播放列表的曲目元数据,包括本应保密的草稿或私有内容,导致敏感信息泄露。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR in AddMessage/UpdateMessage via attachments[] parameter which can lead to file permission bypass. The `AddMessage` and `UpdateMessage` conversation controllers accept user-supplied file attachment IDs and load files directly via `$em->find(File::class, $attachmentID)` without checking per-file permissions (`canViewFile()`). A user who can post in

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is subject to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the Express Entry Detail block via the exEntryID parameter. This IDOR leads to unauthorized access to all Express form submissions. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Tristan Madani fo

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8337

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR in surveys. To be vulnerable, a site would have to be configured in such a way that both public and private surveys are present on the site. An unauthenticated attacker can vote in the restricted survey by submitting the restricted optionID through the public survey’s endpoint. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 sc

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7886

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR in AddMessage/UpdateMessage via attachments[] parameter which can lead to file permission bypass. The `AddMessage` and `UpdateMessage` conversation controllers accept user-supplied file attachment IDs and load files directly via `$em->find(File::class, $attachmentID)` without checking per-file permissions (`canViewFile()`). A user who can post in

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7881

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is subject to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the Express Entry Detail block via the exEntryID parameter. This IDOR leads to unauthorized access to all Express form submissions. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Tristan Madani fo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to authorization Bypass in the Calendar Event Frontend Dialog which can allow cross-calendar data disclosure. A public calendar block can be used as a pivot point to access private calendar data. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Tha

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8204

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to authorization Bypass in the Calendar Event Frontend Dialog which can allow cross-calendar data disclosure. A public calendar block can be used as a pivot point to access private calendar data. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Tha

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-13479

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in PosCube Hardware Software and Consulting Ltd. QR Menu allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects QR Menu: through 21052026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45760

(Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere), (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) vulnerability in Apache Camel K. Authorized users in a Kubernetes namespace can create a Build resource, controlling the Pod generation in a namespace of their choice, including the operator namespace. This issue affects Apache Camel K: from 2.0.0 before 2.8.1, from 2.9.0 before 2

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Broadstreet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.52.2 via the get_sponsored_meta AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to disclose any private post metadata.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9152

A missing authentication vulnerability exists in the Altium 365 SearchService. A legacy SOAP endpoint exposes search index operations without requiring authentication, session tokens, or any form of identity verification. An unauthenticated network attacker who can reference a target workspace's identifier can interact with that workspace's search index, crossing tenant boundaries. Successful

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-1881

The Broadstreet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 1.52.2 via the get_sponsored_meta AJAX action due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to disclose any private post metadata.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A vulnerability was identified in the ShadowAttribute proposal creation workflow. The add action accepted user-controlled ShadowAttribute request data without removing the id field before saving the record. Because the underlying framework treats a supplied primary key as an instruction to update an existing record, an authenticated user able to submit shadow attribute proposals could provide the

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9136

A vulnerability was identified in the ShadowAttribute proposal creation workflow. The add action accepted user-controlled ShadowAttribute request data without removing the id field before saving the record. Because the underlying framework treats a supplied primary key as an instruction to update an existing record, an authenticated user able to submit shadow attribute proposals could provide the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

A flaw was found in Keycloak. The cross-session verification proof is keyed only by (local userId, idpAlias) and is not bound to the upstream identity that was actually verified, so a second upstream account on the same IdP can consume it and get linked to the victim's local account.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9087

A flaw was found in Keycloak. The cross-session verification proof is keyed only by (local userId, idpAlias) and is not bound to the upstream identity that was actually verified, so a second upstream account on the same IdP can consume it and get linked to the victim's local account.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
INFO
ADVISORY 2026-05-20

phpMyFAQ: IDOR Account Takeover

推荐 5.4
Conf: 50%
thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq

### Summary An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in phpMyFAQ's Admin API allows any authenticated administrator to change the password of any user account, including SuperAdmin accounts (userId=1), without authorization verification. An attacker with a low-privilege admin account can escalate privileges to full SuperAdmin control by simply changing the target user's ID in the A

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-47068

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in phenixdigital phoenix_storybook allows cross-session PubSub topic injection via a URL query parameter. 'Elixir.PhoenixStorybook.Story.ComponentIframeLive':handle_params/3 in lib/phoenix_storybook/live/story/component_iframe_live.ex reads a PubSub topic directly from params["topic"] and broadcasts {:component_iframe_pid, self()} on

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6566

The Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and Themes – NextGEN Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to and including 4.2.0. This is due to insufficient object-level authorization in the image deletion REST flow where the permission callback for DELETE /imagely/v1/images/{id} only checks 'NextGEN Manage gallery' permissions and does not enforce ga

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Oliver POS – A WooCommerce Point of Sale (POS) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to and including 2.4.2.6. The plugin protects its entire /wp-json/pos-bridge/* REST API namespace through the oliver_pos_rest_authentication() permission callback, which uses a loose PHP comparison (==) to compare the attacker-supplied 'Oliver

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6072

The Oliver POS – A WooCommerce Point of Sale (POS) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to and including 2.4.2.6. The plugin protects its entire /wp-json/pos-bridge/* REST API namespace through the oliver_pos_rest_authentication() permission callback, which uses a loose PHP comparison (==) to compare the attacker-supplied 'Oliver

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/Kuadrant/mcp-gateway

## Summary The MCP router (ext_proc) exposes an `initialize`-method code path that, when a request carries an `mcp-init-host` header, bypasses the gateway JWT session validator and rewrites the upstream `:authority` header to whatever the caller chooses, gated only by a single shared header value (`router-key`). The shared value is * a literal string (`secret-api-key`) baked into `cmd/mcp-broke

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42097

Sparx Pro Cloud Server requires authentication based on requested URL. An attacker can omit the "model" query parameter and send the model name only in the binary blob in POST request allowing SQL query execution without authentication. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.1 (build

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-4630

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated client could exploit an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Authorization Services Protection API endpoint. By knowing or obtaining a resource's unique identifier (UUID) belonging to another Resource Server within the same realm, the client could bypass authorization checks. This allows the client to perform unauthorized GET,

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-37978

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A low-privilege administrator with the 'view-clients' role can exploit this by invoking the 'evaluate-scopes' Admin API endpoints with an arbitrary user ID (userId) parameter. This vulnerability allows for cross-role personally identifiable information (PII) leakage, enabling unauthorized visibility into user identities and authorizations across the realm. Exploitatio

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46721

The create and edit flows do not restrict which user properties may be submitted and do not enforce access control on the frontend user group assignment. As a result, an attacker can assign an arbitrary frontend user group to a newly registered or edited account, gaining unauthorized access to content and functionality restricted to privileged frontend user groups.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-33052

Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. Versions 2.28.0 and 2.28.1 allow a low-privileged authenticated user assigned the "add_profile_threshold" permission to create a global profile despite not having manage_global_profile_threshold, by tampering with the user_id parameter in a valid profile creation request. This issue has been fixed in version 2.28.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41949

Dify version 1.14.1 and prior contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the file preview endpoint that allows any authenticated user to read up to 3,000 characters of any uploaded document across all tenants and workspaces using only the file's UUID. Attackers can access the /console/api/files/{file_id}/preview endpoint with an intercepted file UUID to extract sensitive content from documen

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41947

Dify version 1.14.1 and prior contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated editor users to set and enable trace configurations for any application regardless of tenant ownership. Attackers can exploit missing tenant ownership checks in the trace configuration endpoints to redirect all messages and responses from victim applications to attacker-controlled LLM trace provi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8786

A vulnerability has been found in Tencent WeKnora up to 0.3.6. Affected by this issue is the function getKnowledgeBaseForInitialization of the file internal/handler/initialization.go of the component Config API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument kbId leads to authorization bypass. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45666

Open WebUI 是一个自托管的离线人工智能平台。在 0.8.11 之前版本中,API /api/v1/notes/{note_id} 端点缺少适当的授权检查,允许已通过身份验证的用户通过猜测或枚举 UUID 来检索其他用户的笔记。这导致潜在的敏感私人数据被未授权泄露。该漏洞在 0.8.11 版本中已修复。受影响的用户应尽快升级至 0.8.11 或更高版本。临时缓解措施包括限制 API 的网络暴露或实施额外的访问控制列表。CVSS 评分为 6.5(中等),攻击复杂度低,需要低权限,且不涉及用户交互。

💡 影响/原因: 此漏洞允许低权限用户横向窃取其他用户的笔记,可能暴露敏感信息。无需交互,攻击面广,应优先升级修复。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44570

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.6.19, authorization controls surrounding the memories API were inconsistent, resulting in the ability of a standard user to delete, restore, and view the contents of other users' memories. Using a newly created non-admin user with no existing memories, it is possible to view existing memor

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45402

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, multiple endpoints accept a user-supplied file_id and attach the referenced file to a resource the caller controls (folder knowledge, knowledge-base contents) without verifying that the caller owns or has been granted access to the file. The file's content then becomes reachable throu

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45398

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, _validate_collection_access() checks the user-memory-* and file-* collection name prefixes but does not check knowledge base collections, which use raw UUIDs as collection names. Any authenticated user who knows a private knowledge base UUID can read its content through the retrieval

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45386

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, Pin/Unpin is a write operation (modifies the message's is_pinned , pinned_by, pinned_at fields), but in standard channels it only checks read permission, allowing users with read-only access to pin/unpin any message. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.5.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45385

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, an IDOR vulnerability exists in the Channels feature of Open WebUI, allowing any channel member to modify messages sent by other members (including administrators) within the same channel. In the update_message_by_id function, for group or dm type channels, only the caller's membershi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45671

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, any authenticated user can permanently delete files owned by other users via DELETE /api/v1/files/{id} when the target file is referenced in any shared chat. The has_access_to_file() authorization gate unconditionally grants access through its shared-chat branch. It checks neither the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-45349

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, a user just needs to use the API endpoint: /api/chat/completions with their own API key (generated in OWUI) and the Chat ID of another user to continue the conversation of the other user. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46408

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.3, the checkout endpoint accepts a user-controlled cart_id and uses it to enter the payment flow without verifying cart ownership. A logged-in attacker can therefore reuse another user's cart data in their own checkout session. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.8.3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-46407

Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.3, the backend admin/auth-token endpoint allows an authenticated administrator to load another administrator's REST API token list by supplying that user's admin_id. This can disclose sensitive API tokens belonging to other administrators. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.8.3.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44718

Mathesar is a web application that makes working with PostgreSQL databases both simple and powerful. From 0.2.0 to before 0.10.0, explorations.get, explorations.replace, and explorations.delete operate on an exploration_id without verifying that the requesting user was a collaborator on the exploration’s database. An authenticated user on the same Mathesar installation who knew or guessed an explo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
WWBN/AVideo

## Summary **Type:** Authorization-bypass via user-controlled identifier. The Meet plugin's recorded-video upload endpoint (`plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php`) authenticates the caller using a single shared `Authorization: Bearer ` against `$objM->secret`. Once that check passes, the endpoint reads the *target user identifier* from the uploaded file's `name` field, instantiates a `User` o

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
code16/sharp

Sharp exposes a generic download endpoint that authorizes access only to the supplied Sharp entity instance, but then reads the target storage `disk` and `path` from request parameters. Because the requested storage object is not bound to the authorized entity instance, an authenticated Sharp user who can view one valid record may use that record as an authorization anchor to download unrelated d

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Crabbox prior to v0.12.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows users with shared visibility-only access to obtain Code, WebVNC, and Egress agent tickets by sending POST requests to ticket endpoints. Attackers can exploit insufficient access control checks on the /v1/leases/:id/code/ticket, /v1/leases/:id/webvnc/ticket, and /v1/leases/:id/egress/ticket endpoints to obtain bridge

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44678

Tuist is a virtual platform team for Swift app devs. In 1.180.8 and earlier, the DELETE /api/projects/{account_handle}/{project_handle}/previews/{preview_id} endpoint loads the preview by its UUID without verifying that the preview belongs to the project resolved from the URL path. The route's project-level authorization plug (AuthorizationPlug, :preview) authorizes the caller against the project

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
open-webui

### Summary Any authenticated user can permanently delete files owned by other users via `DELETE /api/v1/files/{id}` when the target file is referenced in any shared chat. The `has_access_to_file()` authorization gate unconditionally grants access through its shared-chat branch. It checks neither the requesting user's identity nor the type of operation being performed. File UUIDs (which would oth

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 11.4
Conf: 50%
open-webui

### Summary The API /api/v1/notes/{note_id} endpoint lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to retrieve notes belonging to other users by guessing or enumerating UUIDs. This results in unauthorized disclosure of potentially sensitive or private user data. ### Details - if notes is enabled from UI (Settings >> General >> Features >> Notes (Beta)) - From API, attacker c

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
open-webui

# Cross-User File Access via Unchecked file_id in Folder Knowledge and Knowledge-Base Attach Endpoints ## Summary Multiple endpoints accept a user-supplied `file_id` and attach the referenced file to a resource the caller controls (folder knowledge, knowledge-base contents) without verifying that the caller owns or has been granted access to the file. The file's content then becomes reachable th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
open-webui

# IDOR: Retrieval API Bypasses Knowledge Base Access Controls **Author:** Andrew Orr ## Summary `_validate_collection_access()` ([PR #22109](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/22109)) checks the `user-memory-*` and `file-*` collection name prefixes but does not check knowledge base collections, which use raw UUIDs as collection names. Any authenticated user who knows a private knowl

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8629

Crabbox prior to v0.12.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows users with shared visibility-only access to obtain Code, WebVNC, and Egress agent tickets by sending POST requests to ticket endpoints. Attackers can exploit insufficient access control checks on the /v1/leases/:id/code/ticket, /v1/leases/:id/webvnc/ticket, and /v1/leases/:id/egress/ticket endpoints to obtain bridge

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44544

gittuf is a platform-agnostic Git security system. Prior to 0.14.0, an attacker with push access to gittuf's Reference State Log (RSL) can roll back the current policy to any previous policy trusted by the current set of root keys. gittuf determines the policy to load by inspecting the RSL. Except for the very first policy (which is automatically trusted given gittuf's TOFU model, or verified agai

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42572

Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.83.39, a missing authorization directive on the GET /api/v1/stable/dags/tasks endpoint caused Hatchet's tenant-membership check to be skipped for this route. A user authenticated to any tenant on the same Hatchet instance could query the endpoint with another tenant's UUID and a DAG UUID

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44504

Aegra is a drop-in replacement for LangSmith Deployments. Prior to 0.9.7, with multiple authenticated users on a shared instance are vulnerable to a cross-tenant IDOR. Any authenticated attacker, given another user's thread_id, can execute graph runs against the user's thread, read the user's full checkpoint state, and inject arbitrary messages into the user's conversation history. This vulnerabil

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-15025

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Yordam Information Technology Consulting, Training and Electronic Systems Industry and Trade Inc. Library Automation System allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects Library Automation System: from v.21.6 before v.22.1.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6008

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Im Park Information Technology, Electronics, Press, Publishing and Advertising, Education Ltd. Co. DijiDemi allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects DijiDemi: from v4.5.12.1 before v4.5.13.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5798

Unsafe object reference (IDOR) in Stel Order v3.25.1 and earlier versions, specifically in the ‘/app/FrontController’ endpoint, through manipulation of the ‘employeeID’ parameter. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access information about any employee (first names, last names, roles, job titles, and vacation records, among others) by modifying that identifier in request

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-12008

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in APPYAP Technology and Information Inc. Yaay Social Media App allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Yaay Social Media App: from 3.8.0 through 24102025.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2347

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Akilli Commerce Software Technologies Ltd. Co. E-Commerce Website allows Session Hijacking. This issue affects E-Commerce Website: before 4.5.001.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6206

The MW WP Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.2 via the _get_post_property_from_querystring() function due to insufficient restrictions on which posts can be included. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract data from password protected, private, or draft posts that they should not have access to.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5395

The Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0 via the exportEntries function due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Fluent Forms manager-level access and above, to bypass

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6063

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.10 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to remove code owner approval rules from merge requests due to improper access control.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-5396

The Fluent Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.21. This is due to the SubmissionPolicy class authorizing submission-level actions (read, modify, delete, add notes) based on a user-supplied `form_id` query parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Fluent Forms Manager access

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-3074

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.7 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to download private debugging symbols from inaccessible projects due to improper access control.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-3073

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.6 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to bypass PyPI package protection rules and upload restricted packages due to improper authorization checks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-1338

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.10 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to delete protected container registry tags due to improper authorization checks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-13874

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.1 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an authenticated user with Guest permissions to view issues in projects they were not authorized to access.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7648

The LearnPress – WordPress LMS Plugin for Create and Sell Online Courses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to payment bypass through user-controlled key in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.5. This is due to improper handling of user-supplied request parameters in the REST API endpoint, which passes the unsanitized parameter array to the add_to_cart() function where array_merge() allows atta

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44426

ShellHub is a centralized SSH gateway. Prior to 0.24.2, GET /api/namespaces/:tenant returns the full namespace object — including the members list (user IDs, e-mails, roles), settings, and device counts — to any caller authenticated by an API Key, for any tenant, regardless of the API Key's own tenant scope. The handler conditionally skips the membership check when the user ID (X-ID) is absent, wh

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

⚠ 公开 PoC 线索:
排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44424

ShellHub is a centralized SSH gateway. Prior to 0.24.2, GET /api/devices/:uid returns the full device object whenever the caller is authenticated, without verifying that the device belongs to the caller's namespace (tenant). Any authenticated user (JWT or API Key) who knows or can guess a device UID can read device metadata from any other namespace. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.24.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44423

ShellHub is a centralized SSH gateway. Prior to 0.24.2, GET /api/sessions/:uid returns the full session object for any authenticated caller, without scoping by the caller's tenant. An authenticated user can read session records (SSH username, device UID, remote IP, terminal type, authenticated flag, timestamps) belonging to any other namespace. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.24.2.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42463

SQLBot is an intelligent Text-to-SQL system based on large language models and RAG. Prior to 1.8.0, SQLBot contains a Cross-Workspace IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) and Authorization Bypass vulnerability in the /api/v1/datasource/exportDsSchema and /api/v1/datasource/uploadDsSchema endpoints. An attacker can access and modify database schemas and data sources belonging to other tenants/wo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6965

The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to and including 3.9.9. This is due to the `get_course_id_by()` function unconditionally trusting the user-supplied `course` GET parameter as the authoritative course ID for content ownership lookups, which is then consumed by `can_user_manage()`, the plugin's

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-14033

The ilGhera Support System for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the 'get_ticket_content_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view any support ticket content, including sensitive customer information and private communications, by provi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44341

GoJobs is a REST API for a Job Board platform. The application exposes a job retrieval endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to access job details by directly manipulating object identifiers. The endpoint lacks proper authentication and authorization checks, resulting in unauthorized access to job data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42889

Relay adds real-time collaboration to Obsidian. Relay Server versions 0.9.0 through 0.9.6 contain an authentication bypass in the multi-document WebSocket endpoints. When authentication is configured, WebSocket connections without a token query parameter were incorrectly treated as having full server permissions. An unauthenticated network attacker who knows or guesses a document ID could connect

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-29204

Insufficient ownership check in `clientarea.php` allows an authenticated client area user to submit requests using another user’s `addonId` without any ownership validation leading to unauthorized access to the victim's account.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.1) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43890

Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. From 0.84.0 to 1.7.0, the subscriptions.create API endpoint in server/routes/api/subscriptions/subscriptions.ts exhibits a broken authorization pattern. When both collectionId and documentId are supplied in the request, the route handler authorizes ONLY the collection branch (line 125 if (collectionId)), while the downstream subscri

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43883

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, plugin/PayPalYPT/agreementCancel.json.php cancels a PayPal billing agreement using an attacker-supplied agreement parameter without verifying that the authenticated user owns the agreement. A low-privilege authenticated user who learns or obtains another user's PayPal billing agreement ID can silently suspend the v

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-38568

HireFlow v1.2 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The application does not enforce object-level authorization on the /candidate/ and /interview/ endpoints. The route handlers retrieve records by the user-supplied ID without verifying that the requesting user is the owner or has an authorized role. Any authenticated user can access any other user's candidate profiles and interview notes by i

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
mantisbt/mantisbt

MantisBT allows a low-privileged authenticated user having *add_profile_threshold* to create a global profile despite not having *manage_global_profile_threshold*, by tampering with the user_id parameter in a valid profile creation request. ### Impact Authentication bypass ### Patches - 3f952e68fa864e0e60abc3e84adecf3cfa84c75e ### Workarounds None ### Credits Thanks to Vishal Shukla for discov

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-33356

In Meari IoT Cloud MQTT Broker deployments running EMQX 4.x, any authenticated low-privilege account can subscribe to global wildcard topics and receive telemetry from devices the user does not own. The broker enforces publish restrictions but does not enforce equivalent subscribe authorization at per-device scope.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42609

Grav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to 2.0.0-beta.2, a business logic vulnerability in the Grav Admin Panel allows a low-privileged user (with only user creation permissions) to overwrite existing accounts, including the primary administrator. By creating a new user with a username that already exists, the system updates the existing account's metadata and permissions instead of rejecting the

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-8196

CVE-2026-8196 是影响 JeecgBoot 3.9.1 版本的一个授权绕过漏洞。该漏洞存在于 mLogin 端点的 LoginController.java 文件中,具体位于 jeecg-module-system/jeecg-system-biz/src/main/java/org/jeecg/modules/system/controller/LoginController.java。攻击者可以通过未知函数利用此漏洞,实现授权绕过。攻击复杂度较高,利用难度较大,CVSS 评分为 3.7(低危),攻击向量为网络远程攻击,无需认证但需高复杂度。尽管 CVSS 分数较低,但漏洞利用代码已被公开,可能被攻击者用于实际攻击。厂商在收到通知后未做出回应,目前暂无官方补丁。受影响用户应加强网络访问控制,限制对 mLogin 端点的暴露,并关注官方更新。由于漏洞利用代码已公开,建议安全团队监控相关告警并采取缓解措施。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞利用代码已公开,攻击者可能远程绕过认证,虽复杂度高但无需权限。JeecgBoot 用户应警惕潜在攻击,尤其是暴露于公网的实例。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42456

AnythingLLM 是一个将内容片段转化为 LLM 聊天参考上下文的应用程序。在 1.12.1 版本之前,GET /api/workspace/:slug/tts/:chatId 接口存在不安全的直接对象引用(IDOR)漏洞。该路由仅验证用户是否为工作区成员,但未检查所请求的聊天记录是否属于当前用户。因此,已认证的攻击者如果知道或能猜测到其他用户在同一工作区内的聊天ID(chatId),就可以通过 TTS 端点获取其他用户与助手对话的音频回复,导致私密对话内容泄露。该漏洞影响聊天记录中助手生成的文本转语音音频。攻击者需具备工作区成员身份且需知道目标聊天ID,利用条件有限。官方已在 1.12.1 版本中修复此问题,建议用户立即升级至最新版本。临时缓解措施可限制对 TTS 端点的网络访问权限,或禁用 TTS 功能。CVSS 评分为 4.3(中等),暂无在野利用证据。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许工作区内的低权限用户窃取其他用户的私密助手对话音频,破坏了多租户场景下的数据隔离,可能泄露敏感信息。虽利用需知聊天ID,但ID可枚举,风险切实存在。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42291

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. From version 2026.4 to before version 2026.27, the endpoints for reading and creating sharing links for personal notes is not properly authorized. This allows authenticated attackers who obtain the note ID of victim users to list and create sharing links to those users' personal notes. This gives attackers read and write access to notes

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42205

Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. Prior to version 3.31.2, a broken access control vulnerability was identified in the ActionsController of the Avo framework. Due to insecure action lookup logic, an authenticated user can execute any Action class (descendants of Avo::BaseAction) on any resource, even if the action is not registered for that specific resource. This l

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

MailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.55 and earlier contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the WebAdmin mobile portal that allows attackers to bypass authentication checks by reusing AuthenticationToken cookies generated for low-privileged users. Attackers can obtain a token from the WebMail login endpoint using the PersistentLogin parameter and replay it against the WebAdmin portal to pe

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44400

MailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.55 and earlier contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the WebAdmin mobile portal that allows attackers to bypass authentication checks by reusing AuthenticationToken cookies generated for low-privileged users. Attackers can obtain a token from the WebMail login endpoint using the PersistentLogin parameter and replay it against the WebAdmin portal to pe

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42279

solidtime is an open-source time-tracking app. In version 0.12.0, the PUT /api/v1/organizations/{organization}/time-entries/{timeEntry} API accepts a route-bound timeEntry from another organization when the caller has time-entries:update:all in the URL organization, allowing a known foreign time-entry UUID to be modified and rebound to objects in the caller's organization. This issue has been patc

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

⚠ 公开 PoC 线索:
排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42278

UltraDAG is a minimal DAG-BFT blockchain in Rust. Prior to commit fb6ef59, the UltraDAG StateEngine implementation of SmartTransferTx contains a critical logic flaw in its policy enforcement pipeline. When a transaction originates from a "Pocket" (a derived sub-address documented in the protocol as a way to organize funds), the engine fails to resolve the pocket's parent account before checking th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42277

Onyx is an open-source AI platform. Prior to versions 3.0.9, 3.1.6, and 3.2.6, the GET /chat/file/{file_id} endpoint allows any authenticated user to download any other user's uploaded files by providing the file UUID. The endpoint verifies the caller is authenticated but never checks that the file belongs to them. An attacker who knows or obtains a file UUID can access confidential documents, cha

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42276

Onyx is an open-source AI platform. Prior to versions 3.0.9, 3.1.6, and 3.2.6, the POST /chat/stop-chat-session/{chat_session_id} endpoint lets any authenticated user stop any other user's active chat session. The endpoint checks authentication but never verifies the session belongs to the caller. An attacker who knows a chat session UUID can kill another user's LLM generation mid-stream. This iss

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41906

FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to version 1.8.214, the Change Customer modal correctly hides out-of-scope customers through the mailbox-filtered search endpoint, but the backend conversation_change_customer action accepts any supplied customer_email. A low-privileged agent can forge a request and bind a visible conversation to a hidden cust

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-27329

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in YITH YITH WooCommerce Wishlist allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects YITH WooCommerce Wishlist: from n/a through 4.12.0.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-40981

When using Google Secrets Manager as a backend for the Spring Cloud Config server a client can craft a request to the config server potentially exposing secrets from unintended GCP projects. Spring Cloud Config 3.1.x: affected from 3.1.0 through 3.1.13 (inclusive); upgrade to 3.1.14 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.1.x: affected from 4.1.0 through 4.1.9 (inclusive); upgr

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
github.com/gittuf/gittuf

## Summary An attacker with push access to gittuf's Reference State Log (RSL) can roll back the current policy to any previous policy trusted by the current set of root keys. ## Impact gittuf determines the policy to load by inspecting the RSL. Except for the very first policy (which is automatically trusted given gittuf's TOFU model, or verified against manually specified keys), whenever an RS

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub

## Summary `GET /api/namespaces/:tenant` returns the full namespace object — including the members list (user IDs, e-mails, roles), settings, and device counts — to any caller authenticated by an **API Key**, for any tenant, regardless of the API Key's own tenant scope. The handler conditionally skips the membership check when the user ID (`X-ID`) is absent, which is exactly the case for API Key

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
aegra-api

## Impact Aegra deployments running 0.9.0 through 0.9.6 with multiple authenticated users on a shared instance are vulnerable to a cross-tenant IDOR. Any authenticated user (User A), given another user's `thread_id` (User B), can: - Execute graph runs against User B's thread via `POST /threads/{thread_id}/runs`, `POST /threads/{thread_id}/runs/stream`, or `POST /threads/{thread_id}/runs/wait` -

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub

## Summary `GET /api/sessions/:uid` returns the full session object for any authenticated caller, without scoping by the caller's tenant. An authenticated user can read session records (SSH username, device UID, remote IP, terminal type, authenticated flag, timestamps) belonging to any other namespace. ## Severity **CVSS 3.1: 7.5 (High)** CWE-639 ## Affected versions ShellHub Community v0.24.1

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub

## Summary `GET /api/devices/:uid` returns the full device object whenever the caller is authenticated, without verifying that the device belongs to the caller's namespace (tenant). Any authenticated user (JWT or API Key) who knows or can guess a device UID can read device metadata from any other namespace. ## Severity **CVSS 3.1: 7.5 (High)** CWE-639 — Authorization Bypass Through User-Controll

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

An authorization bypass (CWE-639) in the GetUserRoles gRPC API endpoint in Velocidex Velociraptor below version 0.76.5 allows any authenticated low-privilege user to retrieve the complete ACL policy (roles and permissions) for any user across all organizations by supplying targeted Name and Org parameters via a network request.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7573

CVE-2026-7573 是一个影响 Velociraptor(Velocidex 开发的数字取证与事件响应工具)的授权绕过漏洞。该漏洞存在于 GetUserRoles gRPC API 端点中,属于 CWE-639(授权绕过)。在版本 0.76.5 之前的 Velociraptor 中,任何拥有低权限的已认证用户,通过向该端点发送网络请求并精心构造 Name 和 Org 参数,即可检索任意用户在全部组织下的完整 ACL 策略(包括角色和权限)。这意味着攻击者可以枚举并获取系统内所有用户的权限配置,从而了解哪些用户拥有高权限,为后续的横向移动或提权攻击铺平道路。CVSS 评分为 5.0(中等),攻击复杂度低,无需特殊权限即可发起,且影响范围可能跨组织。尽管该漏洞目前未被列入已知利用目录(KEV)或标记为在野利用,但鉴于其利用难度低且可能暴露敏感权限信息,建议用户立即升级至 Velociraptor 0.76.5 或更高版本以修复该问题。作为临时缓解措施,可限制对 gRPC API 端点的网络访问,仅允许可信 IP 或使用防火墙规则进行隔离。

💡 影响/原因: 低权限用户可越权获取所有用户的完整 ACL 策略,导致权限配置泄露,为攻击者提供内部人员权限映射,增加横向移动和权限提升风险。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
wwbn/avideo

## Summary `plugin/PayPalYPT/agreementCancel.json.php` cancels a PayPal billing agreement using an attacker-supplied `agreement` parameter without verifying that the authenticated user owns the agreement. A low-privilege authenticated user who learns or obtains another user's PayPal billing agreement ID can silently suspend the victim's recurring subscription, causing revenue loss to the platform

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Dify before version 1.14.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read the full contents of files uploaded by other users within the same tenant by supplying an arbitrary file UUID in the files array of a chat-messages request. Attackers can exploit insufficient permission verification in the chat-messages endpoints to access files without ownership valid

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
getgrav/grav

### Summary A business logic vulnerability in the Grav Admin Panel allows a low-privileged user (with only user creation permissions) to overwrite existing accounts, including the primary administrator. By creating a new user with a username that already exists, the system updates the existing account's metadata and permissions instead of rejecting the request. This leads to a Denial of Service (D

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41950

Dify 1.14.0 之前版本存在授权绕过漏洞,漏洞位于聊天消息端点。认证用户可通过在请求的 files 数组中提供任意文件 UUID,读取同一租户内其他用户上传的文件完整内容。漏洞根源在于这些端点缺乏对所有权的验证,仅依赖文件 UUID 进行访问,且未正确实施工作空间隔离和签名 URL 保护。攻击者利用工作流处理机制,能够绕过权限检查获取敏感文件。CVSS 3.1 评分为 6.5(中等),攻击复杂度低,需要低权限,无需用户交互,对机密性影响高,但对完整性和可用性无影响。该漏洞已在 Dify 1.14.0 中修复,建议用户立即升级。由于受限于同租户且需要认证,外部利用门槛较高,但内部恶意用户或横向移动攻击者可能利用此漏洞窃取敏感配置、凭据等文件,造成数据泄露。没有证据表明该漏洞已在野外被利用。

💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞绕过文件权限检查,导致同租户内用户可越权读取他人敏感文件,影响数据隔离。虽需认证,但内部威胁风险增加,可能导致凭据或配置泄露。

🎯 建议动作: 立即升级到 Dify 1.14.0 或更高版本;同时检查访问控制策略,限制不必要的网络暴露。

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-3454

The GenerateBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing object-level authorization checks in the /wp-json/generateblocks/v1/dynamic-tag-replacements REST endpoint. The endpoint only verifies that the user has the edit_posts capability but does not verify the user has permission to access the speci

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2729

The Forminator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.52.0. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action when processing attacker-supplied Stripe PaymentIntent identifiers in the public payment flow. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to submit high-value paid forms as c

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7782

A vulnerability was detected in CodeCanyon Perfex CRM up to 3.4.1. This affects the function Clients::project of the file application/controllers/Clients.php of the component Tenant Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42227

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 1.123.32, 2.17.4, and 2.18.1, an authenticated user with a valid API key scoped to variable:list could read variables from projects they are not a member of by supplying an arbitrary projectId query parameter to the public API variables endpoint. The handler queried the variables repository directly without enforcing project mem

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41471

Easy PayPal Events & Tickets plugin for WordPress versions 1.3 and earlier contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the QR code scanning endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate and retrieve all customer order records. Attackers can iterate over sequential WordPress post IDs through the scan_qr.php endpoint to harvest the complete set of orders stored in the database w

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-29200

A critical IDOR vulnerability has been discovered in Comet Backup affecting all versions from 20.11.0 to 26.1.1 and 26.2.1. The vulnerability allows a tenant administrator to impersonate any end-user account of other tenants on the same server via a vulnerable API call.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7702

A vulnerability was detected in toeverything AFFiNE up to 0.26.3. This issue affects the function allowDocPreview of the file /workspace/:workspaceId/:docId of the component Public Markdown Preview Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7681

A security vulnerability has been detected in jsbroks COCO Annotator up to 0.11.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file backend/webserver/api/datasets.py of the component Dataset API. The manipulation of the argument DatasetId leads to authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor wa

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The WCFM – Frontend Manager for WooCommerce along with Bookings Subscription Listings Compatible plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.25 via the 'wcfm_delete_wcfm_customer' due to missing validation on the 'customerid' user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Vendor-level access and abo

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-2554

The WCFM – Frontend Manager for WooCommerce along with Bookings Subscription Listings Compatible plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.25 via the 'wcfm_delete_wcfm_customer' due to missing validation on the 'customerid' user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Vendor-level access and abo

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

School App developed by Zyosoft has an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to modify a specific parameter to read and modify other users' data.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7491

School App developed by Zyosoft has an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to modify a specific parameter to read and modify other users' data.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The App Builder – Create Native Android & iOS Apps On The Flight plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to and including 5.6.0. This is due to missing authorization validation in the `upload_avatar()` function, which accepts an attacker-controlled `user_id` parameter from the POST request body and uses it to update user meta without verifying tha

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 could allow any user to supply a flow_id to read transaction logs and vertex build data belonging to other users, and to delete persisted vertex build data for another user's flow.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7510

A vulnerability was determined in OWAP DefectDojo up to 2.55.4. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Benchmark/Engagement/Product/Survey. Executing a manipulation can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.56.0 addresses this issue. This patch is ca

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7502

A security vulnerability has been detected in LinkStackOrg LinkStack up to 4.8.6. The affected element is the function saveLink of the file app/Http/Controllers/UserController.php of the component Management Endpoint. The manipulation leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awai

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6542

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 could allow any user to supply a flow_id to read transaction logs and vertex build data belonging to other users, and to delete persisted vertex build data for another user's flow.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an unauthenticated user to view other users' images due to an indirect object reference through a user-controlled key.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-4503

IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an unauthenticated user to view other users' images due to an indirect object reference through a user-controlled key.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-40600

Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. In version 4.9.0, Chartbrew allows authenticated users with access to one project to update or delete a SharePolicy record that belongs to a different project. The affected routes authorize the caller against the project in the URL path, but they never verify that policy_i

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7399

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in MeWare Software Development Inc. PDKS allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects PDKS: from V16.20200313 before VMYR_3.5.2025117.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
n8n

## Impact An authenticated user with a valid API key scoped to `variable:list` could read variables from projects they are not a member of by supplying an arbitrary `projectId` query parameter to the public API variables endpoint. The handler queried the variables repository directly without enforcing project membership checks, bypassing the authorization-aware service layer used by the internal e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to improper access control in resource access validation. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter in the API request URL to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information of patients on the targeted system.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to the use of reversible Base64 encoding for protecting sensitive data. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by decoding and manipulating Base64-encoded parameters in the request URL to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information on the targeted system.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to improper authorization checks during resource access. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating encoded parameters in the request URL to gain unauthorized access to patient accounts on the targeted system.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42517

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to the use of reversible Base64 encoding for protecting sensitive data. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by decoding and manipulating Base64-encoded parameters in the request URL to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information on the targeted system.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42516

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to improper authorization checks during resource access. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating encoded parameters in the request URL to gain unauthorized access to patient accounts on the targeted system.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-42515

This vulnerability exists in e-Sushrut due to improper access control in resource access validation. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter in the API request URL to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information of patients on the targeted system.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41649

Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. The `shares.create` API endpoint starting in version 0.86.0 and prior to version 1.7.0 has an insecure direct object reference.. When both `collectionId` and `documentId` are provided in the request, the authorization logic only checks access to the collection, completely ignoring the document. This allows an authenticated attacker

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 fails to normalize trailing-dot localhost hosts in remote CDP discovery responses, allowing bypass of loopback protections. Attackers can craft hostile discovery responses returning localhost. to retarget authenticated browser control toward localhost endpoints and expose browser state.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-41372

OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 fails to normalize trailing-dot localhost hosts in remote CDP discovery responses, allowing bypass of loopback protections. Attackers can craft hostile discovery responses returning localhost. to retarget authenticated browser control toward localhost endpoints and expose browser state.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-28747

A weak key generation vulnerability exists in specific firmware versions of Milesight AIOT cameras allows authorization to be bypassed.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7145

A weakness has been identified in mettle sendportal up to 3.0.1. Affected is the function destroy of the file app/Http/Controllers/Workspaces/WorkspaceInvitationsController.php of the component Invitation Handler. This manipulation of the argument invitation causes authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7144

A security flaw has been discovered in 1000 Projects Portfolio Management System MCA 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file update_passwd_process.php. The manipulation of the argument temp_user results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2025-15626

Authenticated user can bypass authorization in Ribblr - Crochet & Knitting iOS application

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)