#cwe-807

共收录 33 条相关安全情报。

← 返回所有主题
CVE-2026-59157

webhookd is a minimalist webhook server that triggers shell scripts and external processes through HTTP requests. Prior to 1.22.0, webhookd deployments without htpasswd authentication forwarded all incoming HTTP headers through HTTPParamsToShellVars in pkg/api/index.go into the hook script environment without an allowlist. When an upstream reverse proxy did not strip a client-supplied X-WebAuthn-U

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3

## Summary Traefik's entrypoint defenses against spoofed trusted header names — `aliasHeadersStrategy` / `underscoreHeadersStrategy` in `delete` or `reject` mode, and the default `forwardedHeaders` stripping of client-supplied `X-Forwarded-*` — scan `req.Header` only and never `req.Trailer`. An unauthenticated client can therefore smuggle a sanitized name (an aliasing spelling such as `X_Auth_Use

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-88004

Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.2.0 until 3.7.13, Traefik entrypoint defenses aliasHeadersStrategy, underscoreHeadersStrategy, and forwardedHeaders inspect req.Header but not req.Trailer, allowing an unauthenticated client to submit an aliasing or trusted header name in an HTTP/1.1 chunked trailer or an HTTP/2 trailer. When the retry or buffering middleware r

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.2.0 until 3.7.13, Traefik entrypoint defenses aliasHeadersStrategy, underscoreHeadersStrategy, and forwardedHeaders inspect req.Header but not req.Trailer, allowing an unauthenticated client to submit an aliasing or trusted header name in an HTTP/1.1 chunked trailer or an HTTP/2 trailer. When the retry or buffering middleware r

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-82533

DeepSeek Harness before 0.1.2-alpha.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its local HTTP control-plane API that allows attackers to gain full agent control by supplying a spoofed Host header, as the server validates only the client-supplied Host header value rather than the actual TCP connection origin. Attackers can exploit this flaw to invoke privileged commands such as commands/e

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.6) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

DeepSeek Harness before 0.1.2-alpha.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its local HTTP control-plane API that allows attackers to gain full agent control by supplying a spoofed Host header, as the server validates only the client-supplied Host header value rather than the actual TCP connection origin. Attackers can exploit this flaw to invoke privileged commands such as commands/e

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

SAP GUI for Java does not correctly enforce the trust level policy for certain functions invoked from a connected backend system. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this weakness by manipulating a connected backend system to trigger affected functionality. This could allow arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and avai

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.0) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-66768

SAP GUI for Java does not correctly enforce the trust level policy for certain functions invoked from a connected backend system. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this weakness by manipulating a connected backend system to trigger affected functionality. This could allow arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine, leading to a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and avai

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.0) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-85602

The Grav Form plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-form) versions 8.0.6 through 9.1.19 select the reCAPTCHA version to validate based solely on which response field key is present in the submitted payload. On a site configured for reCAPTCHA v3, an anonymous attacker can place their v3 token under the v2 field name (g-recaptcha-response instead of token), causing validation to use the v2 branch, which never

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-54730

authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, the enterprise Google Chrome device-trust stages advance the flow without confirming that the out-of-band device attestation actually ran. Affected enterprise deployments place either a Google Chrome Endpoint stage with mode set to REQUIRED or the deprecated Google Chrome Device Trust Connector stage in an authenticatio

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53789

rsync before 3.5.0 contains an improper path handling vulnerability that allows a malicious sender to expand the scope of --delete operations beyond the intended destination subtree by sending a crafted file list that causes rsync to reclassify implied parent directory entries or treat synthetic paths as the transfer root. Attackers can exploit multiple variants including implied parent reclassifi

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The Mira cloud API accepts the firmware version reported by the companion app as authoritative for a given device, without independently attesting the version from the device itself. An authenticated attacker could submit arbitrary firmware version strings for their own device, allowing them to evade vendor-side vulnerable-fleet analytics, suppress security update prompts to the user, and misrepre

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64934

The Mira cloud API accepts the firmware version reported by the companion app as authoritative for a given device, without independently attesting the version from the device itself. An authenticated attacker could submit arbitrary firmware version strings for their own device, allowing them to evade vendor-side vulnerable-fleet analytics, suppress security update prompts to the user, and misrepre

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

An issue in MongoDB Server's Atlas Vector Search feature could allow an authenticated user with read access to one view to retrieve documents from a different, protected view over the same underlying collection. This is due to insufficient handling of certain user-supplied fields when constructing an internal request forwarded to the search process.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-19579

Snipe-IT before 8.6.0 contains an authorization bypass (insecure direct object reference) in the asset checkout-request cancellation endpoint. The cancel_by_admin and requestingUser values are read from user-controlled URL path segments and used without a server-side authorization check, so any authenticated, low-privileged user can supply a non-empty cancel_by_admin value to bypass the request-ow

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-18705

An issue in MongoDB Server's Atlas Vector Search feature could allow an authenticated user with read access to one view to retrieve documents from a different, protected view over the same underlying collection. This is due to insufficient handling of certain user-supplied fields when constructing an internal request forwarded to the search process.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-58239

SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate tenant context in inbound requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to spoof the tenant context under conditions not fully within their control. Successful exploitation could allow limited access to another tenant's information, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availabili

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-9077

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 Langflow allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass localhost-only restrictions and write arbitrary MCP server configurations to IDE configuration files on the host system.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-64827

Telenia Software TVox 26.5.3 and prior 26.x versions, and 24.9.21 and prior 24.x versions, contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in set_env.php where the redirectToLoginAdminIRequestHaveAccessToken() function derives the current page name from PHP_SELF and skips authentication when the value matches 'login_admin.php'. Attackers can append '/login_admin.php' to the path of any target PHP s

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-13059

An authenticated user with low privileges may be able to perform unauthorized reads and writes on data protected by role-based query-level access controls, due to insufficient validation of certain client-supplied command parameters. The issue affects find, update, delete, and aggregate commands in non-apiStrict configurations.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

Keycloak provides a mechanism called Client Policies to enforce security requirements on clients, such as requiring them to use signed JWTs for authentication. A flaw was discovered where this enforcement can be bypassed. An attacker with valid client credentials can provide a fake, unsigned assertion header that tricks the system into thinking the policy requirements have been met. This allows th

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-16093

Keycloak provides a mechanism called Client Policies to enforce security requirements on clients, such as requiring them to use signed JWTs for authentication. A flaw was discovered where this enforcement can be bypassed. An attacker with valid client credentials can provide a fake, unsigned assertion header that tricks the system into thinking the policy requirements have been met. This allows th

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
github.com/0xERR0R/blocky

## Summary Blocky accepts and caches forged DNS answers while `dnssec.validate: true` is enabled. The issue has two related exploit paths: 1. **Basic DNSSEC validation bypass.** If an untrusted upstream returns an unsigned positive answer for a DNSSEC-signed public domain, Blocky classifies the response as `Insecure` solely because the response contains no RRSIG records. It does not first check

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-48980

pam_usb provides hardware authentication for Linux using removable media. In versions prior to 0.9.2, getenv() environment variables XRDP_SESSION, DISPLAY and TMUX allow environment variable injection into local-check logic. These environment variables influence whether a current session is local or remote, and a PAM module that runs in the context of setuid binaries (sudo, su), getenv() returns

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

OpenClaw before 2026.5.7 contains a sender policy bypass vulnerability in BlueBubbles that allows participants to match allowlist entries through conversation metadata rather than stable sender identity. Attackers can influence conversation-level identifiers to receive agent responses intended for configured senders, potentially bypassing access controls.

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-53860

OpenClaw before 2026.5.7 contains a sender policy bypass vulnerability in BlueBubbles that allows participants to match allowlist entries through conversation metadata rather than stable sender identity. Attackers can influence conversation-level identifiers to receive agent responses intended for configured senders, potentially bypassing access controls.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-12058

The connection confirmation pop-up of a specific feature in the PcSuite can be bypassed.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-44649

SillyTavern is a locally installed user interface that allows users to interact with text generation large language models, image generation engines, and text-to-speech voice models. Prior to 1.18.0, SillyTavern accepts Remote-User (Authelia) and X-Authentik-Username (Authentik) HTTP headers to automatically log in users when SSO is configured. There is no validation that these headers originate f

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-43935

e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.4, a Host Header Injection vulnerability in the password reset page allows attackers to manipulate the Host header to generate password reset links pointing to attacker-controlled domains. This can lead to phishing attacks, account takeover, or other security risks. The severity is high, as the vulnerability affects a critical function relate

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 20.4
Conf: 50%
sillytavern

## Resolution SillyTavern 1.18.0 now includes a configuration option to limit which IP addresses can authorize using SSO headers, limiting to just loopback addresses by default. A setting can be customized according to user's needs. Documentation: https://docs.sillytavern.app/administration/sso/ ## Summary SillyTavern accepts `Remote-User` (Authelia) and `X-Authentik-Username` (Authentik) HTTP

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: CVSS 严重风险 (9.8) (+4) | 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | 影响边界/网络设备 (+5) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | 影响关键基础设施/核心组件 (+4) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-6213

A vulnerability in Remote Spark SparkView before build 1122 allows an attacker to bypasses the local connection check and achieve arbitrary code execution as root on the server side. Depending on implementation the vulnerability can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker.

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
bandit

### Summary Bandit reflects the client-supplied URI scheme into `conn.scheme` without verifying the actual transport. Over a plaintext HTTP/1.1 connection (or h2c), an unauthenticated attacker can send an absolute-form request target like `GET https://victim/path HTTP/1.1` and the application observes `conn.scheme = :https` even though no TLS was negotiated. Any downstream Plug logic that trusts `

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-39807

Bandit是一个Elixir HTTP服务器。在1.0.0至1.11.0之前版本中,存在一个安全决策依赖于不可信输入的漏洞。具体而言,函数`Elixir.Bandit.Pipeline.determine_scheme/2`在处理HTTP/1.1 absolute-form请求目标(例如`GET https://victim/path HTTP/1.1`)以及HTTP/2 `:scheme`伪头部时,直接使用客户端提供的URI scheme字符串,而未验证传输层是否实际启用了TLS(即忽略`transport.secure?`标志)。攻击者可通过明文TCP连接,在请求中声明`https` scheme,导致Bandit将连接标记为`conn.scheme = :https`,即使未进行任何TLS握手。下游Plug中间件(如`Plug.SSL`)会依据`conn.scheme`做出安全决策:`Plug.SSL`的`already-secure`分支会跳过HTTP到HTTPS的重定向,使得本应强制使用HTTPS的请求继续以明文传输;设置了`secure: true`属性的Cookies也会通过明文连接发送;审计日志错误地将请求记录为HTTPS;此外,CSRF保护和SameSite机制也可能基于错误的scheme做出不安全的判断。攻击者利用这一漏洞可以实施中间人攻击,劫持会话、窃取敏感数据或绕过安全策略。受影响的版本为bandit 1.0.0至1.10.x。建议用户立即升级至bandit 1.11.0或更高版本;对于无法立即升级的环境,应限制服务器的网络暴露,仅允许可信网络访问,并在反向代理层终止TLS后再将请求转发至Bandit。

💡 影响/原因: 此漏洞允许攻击者通过明文连接冒充HTTPS,绕过HTTPS强制跳转、发送安全Cookie,误导审计日志和CSRF保护,可能导致会话劫持或敏感信息泄露。无需认证即可利用,影响严重。

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)