共收录 40 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
### Impact The output of `cilium-bugtool` can contain sensitive data when the tool is run against Cilium deployments with WireGuard encryption enabled. Users of [WireGuard Transparent Encryption](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/) are affected. The sensitive data is the WireGuard private key (`cilium_wg0.key`) used for node-to-node encrypted communication `
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary After a note-mark owner soft-deletes a public book, its notes and uploaded assets stay readable at `/api/notes/{id}`, `/api/notes/{id}/content`, the slug URL, and the asset endpoints. Unauthenticated callers who hold the note ID or the slug path retain access. GORM's soft-delete scope does not reach the raw `JOIN books ...` clauses used by the note and asset queries. ## Details `DELE
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary `IsPasswordMatch` in `backend/db/models.go` falls back to a hard-coded `bcrypt("null")` placeholder whenever a user has no stored password. OIDC-registered users are created with an empty password, so anyone who submits `password: "null"` to the internal login endpoint receives a valid session for that user. The bypass is unauthenticated and requires no user interaction. ## Details `
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
**Summary** The zrok WebDAV drive backend (davServer.Dir) restricts path traversal through lexical normalization but does not prevent symlink following. When a symbolic link inside the shared DriveRoot points to a location outside that root, remote WebDAV consumers can read files and—on shares without OS-level permission restrictions—write or overwrite files anywhere on the host filesystem accessi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Heimdall performs rule matching on the raw (non-normalized) request path, while downstream components may normalize dot-segments according to [RFC 3986, Section 6.2.2.3](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-6.2.2.3). This discrepancy can result in heimdall authorizing a request for one path (e.g., `/user/../admin`, or URL-encoded variants such as `/user/%2e%2e/admin` or `/us
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary `_clone()` validates `multi_options` as the original list, then executes `shlex.split(" ".join(multi_options))`. A string like `"--branch main --config core.hooksPath=/x"` passes validation (starts with `--branch`), but after split becomes `["--branch", "main", "--config", "core.hooksPath=/x"]`. Git applies the config and executes attacker hooks during clone. ### Details The vulnera
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact Workspace MCP stdio configuration could pass dangerous process-startup environment variables such as `NODE_OPTIONS`, `LD_PRELOAD`, or `BASH_ENV` to the spawned MCP server process. In a malicious workspace, this could make the MCP child load attacker-controlled
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact Workspace `.env` loading did not reserve the `OPENCLAW_` runtime-control namespace broadly enough. A malicious workspace could set variables such as `OPENCLAW_GIT_DIR` before source-update or installer flows, potentially steering trusted OpenClaw runtime behavi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact Feishu card-action callbacks could synthesize a message event with DM conversations classified as group conversations. That skipped `dmPolicy` enforcement for card actions, so a sender in a Feishu DM could trigger card-action flows that should have been blocked
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact Templated hook mapping `sessionKey` values were treated differently from request-supplied session keys. A hook mapping could render an externally influenced session key even when `hooks.allowRequestSessionKey` was disabled, bypassing the intended routing opt-in
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary GitPython blocks dangerous Git options such as `--upload-pack` and `--receive-pack` by default, but the equivalent Python kwargs `upload_pack` and `receive_pack` bypass that check. If an application passes attacker-controlled kwargs into `Repo.clone_from()`, `Remote.fetch()`, `Remote.pull()`, or `Remote.push()`, this leads to arbitrary command execution even when `allow_unsafe_options`
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact Browser profile creation normalized `cdpUrl` values before persisting them, but did not apply the configured browser SSRF policy at creation time. In deployments that explicitly disabled private-network CDP targets, a stored profile could still point at a priva
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The application fails to validate the ```nick``` parameter during a ```POST``` request to the ```EditUser``` controller. Although the UI prevents editing this field, a user can bypass this restriction using a proxy to rename any account (including the Administrator). This leads to Broken Access Control and potential Audit Log Corruption. ### Details The vulnerability exists in the use
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary CoreDNS' DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) server can be driven into large goroutine and memory growth by a remote client that opens many QUIC streams and stalls after sending only 1 byte. Even with a small configured quic { worker_pool_size ... }, CoreDNS still spawns a goroutine per accepted stream (workers + waiters) and active workers can block indefinitely in io.ReadFull() with no per-stream re
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `>= 2026.4.5, < 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact A malicious workspace `.env` could set `MINIMAX_API_HOST` and redirect credentialed MiniMax requests to an attacker-controlled origin, exposing the MiniMax API key in the outbound `Authorization` header. This requires running OpenClaw from an atta
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `< 2026.4.20` - Patched version: `2026.4.20` ## Impact The QQBot direct-upload media path could forward attacker-controlled image URLs without applying the SSRF validation used by the local download path. This could make configured QQBot media delivery request or relay URLs the operator did not intend to allow. Th
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Fiber cache middleware's default key generator uses only `c.Path()` and does not include the query string. As a result, requests like `/?id=1` and `/?id=2` can map to the same cache key and share the same cached response. This can cause response mix-up (cache poisoning-like behavior) for endpoints where response content depends on query parameters. ### Details Default configuration i
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary CoreDNS' tsig plugin can be bypassed on non-plain-DNS transports because it trusts the transport writer's TsigStatus() instead of performing verification itself. In the attached PoC, plain DNS/TCP correctly rejects an invalid TSIG (NOTAUTH), while the same invalid-TSIG request is accepted over DoT (tls://) and DoH (https://), allowing a client without the shared secret to satisfy requi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary CoreDNS' transfer plugin can select the wrong ACL stanza when both a parent zone and a more-specific subzone are configured. A permissive parent-zone transfer rule can override a restrictive subzone rule (name-dependent), allowing an unauthorized client to perform AXFR/IXFR for the subzone and retrieve its zone contents. ### Details In plugin/transfer/transfer.go, stanza selection is
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary CoreDNS's DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized `dns=` query values and performs substantial request parsing, query unescaping, base64 decoding, and message unpacking work before returning `400 Bad Request`. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to `/dns-query?dns=...` and force high CPU usage, large transient allocations, elevate
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The gRPC, QUIC, DoH, and DoH3 transports in CoreDNS incorrectly handle TSIG authentication. For gRPC and QUIC, CoreDNS checks whether the TSIG key name exists in the config, but does not actually verify the TSIG HMAC. If the key name matches, `tsigStatus` remains nil and the tsig plugin treats the request as "verified". For DoH and DoH3, the issue is worse: TSIG is not verified at a
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The HTML Writer in PhpSpreadsheet bypasses `htmlspecialchars()` output escaping when a cell uses a custom number format containing the `@` text placeholder with additional literal text (e.g., `@ "items"` or `"Total: "@`). This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into the generated HTML output by crafting a malicious XLSX file. ### Details #### 1. Conditional e
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary The Zipkin exporter remote endpoint cache accepted unbounded key growth derived from span attributes. In high-cardinality scenarios, this could increase process memory usage over time and degrade availability. ### Details - Introduce a bounded, thread-safe LRU cache for remote endpoints. - Enforce fixed maximum size to prevent unbounded growth. ### Impact - A process using Zipkin
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
It was discovered that there is a way to bypass HTML escaping in the HTML writer using custom number format codes. ## The Problem In `Writer/Html.php` around line 1592, the code checks if the formatted cell data equals the original data to decide whether to apply `htmlspecialchars()`: ```php if ($cellData === $origData) { $cellData = htmlspecialchars($cellData, ...); } ``` When a cell has
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
[MOCK] 这是一个厂商公告的伪摘要: No Title
💡 风险点: 涉及相关组件配置
🎯 建议动作: 建议排查资产和配置
### Impact The HTML output format in wlc embeds API response data into HTML without escaping, allowing cross-site scripting when the output is rendered in a browser. ### Patches * https://github.com/WeblateOrg/wlc/pull/1327 ### Workarounds The only vulnerable code path is HTML output which is opt-in. ### References Weblate thanks @fg0x0 for reporting this on GitHub.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact `@excalidraw/excalidraw@0.18.0` depends on a Mermaid conversion package version that resolves to a Mermaid release affected by CVE-2025-54881 / GHSA-7rqq-prvp-x9jh. User-supplied Mermaid sequence diagram labels could trigger XSS through Mermaid’s KaTeX label rendering path. This is patched in `@excalidraw/excalidraw@0.18.1` by updating `@excalidraw/mermaid-to-excalidraw` to `2.2.2`, w
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
## Summary There is a timing side-channel vulnerability in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware that allows an attacker to enumerate valid usernames through response-time differences. The variable intended to hold a constant-time fallback secret always resolves to an empty string, causing the constant-time comparison to short-circuit in microseconds rather than performing a full bcrypt evaluation. Thi
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ **Command Injection vulnerabilities in electerm:** A command injection vulnerability exists in `github.com/elcterm/electerm/npm/install.js:130`. The `runLinux()` function appends attacker-controlled remote version strings directly into an `exec("rm -rf ...")` command without validation. **Who is impacted:** Users who run `npm insta
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
gitverify is still a prototype. ### Impact The bug is related to `requireSignedTags` which is on by default: an unsigned annotated tag would pass the verification. The commit pointed to by the tag would still have to be signed by a maintainer or a contributor. ### Patches Since the initial commit, fixed in c2c60da05d5c73621d0ce7ea02770bacd79ec8b1 (no semantic versions yet). ### Workarounds No
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary An unchecked type assertion in the `forEach` mutation handler allows any user with permission to create a `Policy` or `ClusterPolicy` to crash the cluster-wide background controller into a persistent CrashLoopBackOff. The same bug also causes the admission controller to drop connections and block all matching resource operations. The crash loop persists until the policy is deleted. Th
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### TL;DR This vulnerability affects all Kirby sites where users of a particular role have no permission to create pages, files or users (`pages.create`, `files.create` or `users.create` permission is disabled). This can be due to configuration in the user blueprint(s), via `options` in the model blueprint(s) or via a combination of both settings. **This vulnerability is of high severity for aff
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Heimdall performs host matching in a case-sensitive manner, while HTTP hostnames are case-insensitive. This discrepancy can result in heimdall failing to match a rule for a request host that differs only in letter casing, potentially causing the request to be classified differently than intended. **Note:** The issue can only lead to unintended access if heimdall is configured with an
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Summary Heimdall handles URL-encoded slashes (`%2F`) in a case-sensitive manner, while percent-encoding is defined to be case-insensitive. As a result, the lowercase equivalent (`%2f`) is not recognized and therefore not processed as expected when `allow_encoded_slashes` is set to `off` (the default setting). This discrepancy can lead to differences in how request paths are interpreted by he
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估