共收录 10 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.0 before 18.10.8, 18.11 before 18.11.5, and 19.0 before 19.0.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause denial of service on the CI/CD Catalog page due to improper sanitization.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
None of the response paths in `internal/web/` or `internal/api/` set the standard browser-security headers. `grep` for `Content-Security-Policy`, `X-Frame-Options`, `Strict-Transport-Security`, `X-Content-Type-Options`, `Referrer-Policy` returns zero matches across the codebase. ## Impact The admin UI signs CA certificates, mints API keys (returned inline once per page), displays TOTP QR codes, a
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In multiple functions of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In startAnimation of StageCoordinator.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A misconfigured Content Security Policy (CSP) in HCL BigFix Remote Control Server WebUI (versions 10.1.0.0442 and earlier) fails to define directives without fallbacks, allowing attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and load unauthorized resources.
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
A misconfigured Content Security Policy (CSP) in HCL BigFix Remote Control Server WebUI (versions 10.1.0.0442 and earlier) fails to define directives without fallbacks, allowing attackers to bypass intended security restrictions and load unauthorized resources.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain security-related HTTP response headers are not properly configured. Absence of these headers may reduce the effectiveness of browser-based security controls and could expose the application to limited security risks under specific conditions.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估