#cwe-277

共收录 4 条相关安全情报。

← 返回所有主题
推荐 7.4
Conf: 50%
view_component

### Summary The preview route derives an example name from the URL and calls it with `public_send`. The code does not verify that the requested method is one of the preview examples explicitly defined by the preview class. As a result, inherited public methods on `ViewComponent::Preview` are route-reachable. The most important one is `render_with_template`, which accepts `template:` and `locals:

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)

The VerySecureApp made by DIVD using Mendix Studio Pro 11.8.0 Beta allows unintended data exposure due to authorization misconfiguration. The VerySecureApp allows anonymous users of the MyFirstModule with the anonymous user role to gain access to all stored records, even though no access rights are explicitly configured on that role. Anonymous users are required to make a Mendix Entity available p

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | 包含 CVE (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
CVE-2026-7891

The VerySecureApp made by DIVD using Mendix Studio Pro 11.8.0 Beta allows unintended data exposure due to authorization misconfiguration. The VerySecureApp allows anonymous users of the MyFirstModule with the anonymous user role to gain access to all stored records, even though no access rights are explicitly configured on that role. Anonymous users are required to make a Mendix Entity available p

💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: Primary 数据源 (+3) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)
openclaw

## Summary ACP child sessions inherit subagent security envelope constraints. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: openclaw (npm) - Affected versions: <= 2026.4.21 - Fixed version: 2026.4.22 ## Impact A restricted subagent spawning an ACP child session could fail to carry forward subagent-only constraints such as depth, child-count limits, control scope, or target-agent restrictions. ## F

💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)

🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估

排序因子: 有可用补丁/修复方案 (+3) | Secondary 数据源 (+2) | LLM 评分加成 (+0.4)