共收录 6 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 combines multiple errno values using bitwise OR, resulting in incorrect error codes when multiple error conditions occur simultaneously, which may allow a remote attacker to cause a minor service disruption via conditions that trigger incorrect error-handling paths.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
An incorrect calculation in the hextoint macro in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 due to improper uppercase character handling allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause limited data modification via crafted hexadecimal input.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Ledger Bitcoin app versions 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 contain an address derivation vulnerability that allows attackers to cause incorrect Bitcoin addresses to be displayed by exploiting improper handling of miniscript policies containing the a: fragment. Attackers can craft malicious miniscript policies that cause the device to derive and display incorrect receiving addresses, potentially leading to funds
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Ledger Bitcoin app versions 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 contain an address derivation vulnerability that allows attackers to cause incorrect Bitcoin addresses to be displayed by exploiting improper handling of miniscript policies containing the a: fragment. Attackers can craft malicious miniscript policies that cause the device to derive and display incorrect receiving addresses, potentially leading to funds
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to version 4.4.0, Zebra's block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS), allowing it to accept blocks that zcashd rejects with bad-blk-sigops. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while zcashd nodes do not. This issue
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Zebra's block validator undercounts transparent signature operations against the 20000-sigop block limit (`MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS`), allowing it to accept blocks that `zcashd` rejects with `bad-blk-sigops`. A miner who produces such a block can split the network: Zebra nodes follow the offending chain while `zcashd` nodes do not. Two distinct undercounts: #### A: Coinbase Hidden Legacy Sigops `zcashd
💡 风险点: 原文内容（由于配额限制，未进行深度 LLM 分析）
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估