A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
共收录 27 条相关安全情报。
← 返回所有主题A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass.
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 does not validate or improperly validates TLS certificate validation, which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Netezza Software 11.3.0.3 through Interim Fix 002 does not validate or improperly validates TLS certificate validation, which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Any application shipping logs to RabbitMQ over TLS via the Log4j2 appender, relying on the documented default, is exposed to man-in-the-middle interception of every log event. Spring AMQP 4.1.0 Spring AMQP 4.0.0 - 4.0.4 Spring AMQP 3.2.0 - 3.2.12 Spring AMQP 2.4.18 and earlier
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Netty (io.netty:netty-handler) versions from 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.16.Final and versions through 4.1.136.Final disable TLS hostname verification on the SslProvider.OPENSSL client path when a plain (non-extended) X509TrustManager is used and Unsafe-based trust-manager wrapping is unavailable (Java 25+). In this configuration the OpenSSL client does not perform hostname verification, allowing a ma
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
libgit2 is a portable C implementation of the Git core methods provided as a linkable library with a solid API, allowing to build Git functionality into your application. Prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.5, verify_server_cert in src/libgit2/streams/openssl.c uses an inverted !!memcmp result in the GEN_IPADD branch when comparing an IP-literal host with a certificate IP SubjectAltName. OpenSSL builds reject
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
erlang_quic is a pure Erlang QUIC implementation. Prior to version 1.4.4, the QUIC client did not authenticate the server during the TLS 1.3 handshake. The CertificateVerify signature was not checked, the certificate chain was not validated, and the hostname was not compared against the certificate, so `verify` was effectively a no-op on the client. A man-in-the-middle on the network path could pr
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
TLS hostname verification issue in Apache Ranger Client Code in versions <= 2.8.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
IBM Business Automation Workflow containers and traditional 26.0.0, 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 005, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 007, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 009 IBM Business Automation Workflow fails to properly verify that the hostname matches the server certificate potentially allowing connections to an attacker-controlled server.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, JSSE hostname verifier CN-fallback enabled by default despite documented opt-in. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bctls-fips 1.0.24 (1.0.X series), 2.0.24 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.24 (2.1.X series).
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, JSSE hostname verifier CN-fallback enabled by default despite documented opt-in. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bctls-fips 1.0.24 (1.0.X series), 2.0.24 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.24 (2.1.X series).
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, JSSE hostname verifier CN-fallback enabled by default despite documented opt-in. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bctls-fips 1.0.24 (1.0.X series), 2.0.24 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.24 (2.1.X series).
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift Python bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.24.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.24.0, which fixes the issue. This replaces CVE-2026-41603
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++ bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.24.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.24.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift c_glib bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.24.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.24.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper TLS hostname verification in Snowflake Connector for Python versions prior to 4.7.1 and 3.18.1 may have allowed a network-positioned attacker to bypass certificate hostname validation on HTTPS connections made by the connector. An attacker with on-path network access could exploit this by intercepting or redirecting network traffic and presenting a certificate signed by any trusted CA for
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
### Impact The QUIC client did not authenticate the server during the TLS 1.3 handshake. The CertificateVerify signature was not checked, the certificate chain was not validated, and the hostname was not compared against the certificate, so `verify` was effectively a no-op on the client. A man-in-the-middle on the network path could present any certificate and impersonate any server, defeating th
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.1, the server_hostname TLS SNI check can be bypassed when an existing connection is reused. If an application makes multiple requests to the same domain, but with different per-request server_hostname parameters, then the later calls may succeed by reusing the existing connection when they should have bee
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper host validation in the social login autofill feature in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.8 allows an attacker to disclose stored social login credentials via a crafted web entry pointing to a provider lookalike domain.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
It was identified that the LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP hostname. While the underlying code validates the certificate chain against a trusted authority, the absence of endpoint identification allows a valid certificate issued for an entirely unrelated host to be improperly accepted. This oversight leaves the con
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_cert and public_key modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification. Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a val
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
The Claude Desktop app gives you Claude Code with a graphical interface built for running multiple sessions side by side. From 1.2581.0 to before 1.4304.0, Claude Desktop's SSH remote development feature verified only whether a hostname existed in ~/.ssh/known_hosts without comparing the server's presented host key against the stored key. This allowed a network-positioned attacker to present an ar
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 风险点: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
💡 影响/原因: 原文内容(由于配额限制,未进行深度 LLM 分析)
🎯 建议动作: 建议根据原文自行评估